Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Cristian Delgado]

Hi, everyone

I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.

I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find the
spec file

SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
my FAS username is crisdel
I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.

Thanks for your time.
Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"


On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 06:32, Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> affected
> packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected
> package or
> retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
> package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets
> retired.
>
> Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-11-06.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
>
> For human readable dependency chains,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
> For all orphaned packages,
> see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan
>
>  Package  (co)maintainers   Status
> Change
>
> 
> belle-sip orphan, sdgathman4 weeks
> ago
> clang11   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> clang13   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> darkhttpd cicku, orphan0 weeks
> ago
> golang-gioui  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks
> ago
> golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term   go-sig, orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> golang-storj-common   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks
> ago
> lld13 orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks
> ago
> llvm12orphan, petersen,4 weeks
> ago
>sergesanspaille
> llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen,   4 weeks
> ago
>sergesanspaille
> mygnuhealth   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> onboard   orphan   0 weeks
> ago
> ortp  orphan, sdgathman4 weeks
> ago
> perl-Fennec   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> perl-Twiggy   orphan   5 weeks
> ago
> php-kolab-net-ldap3   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Date-Holidaysorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Date-Holidays-USAorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-HTTP-OAuth   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-HTTP-Request2orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-DNS2 orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-LDAP2orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Net-URL2 orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-Text-Passwordorphan   1 weeks
> ago
> php-pear-XML-Serializer   orphan   1 weeks
> ago
> python-gpiozero   orphan, python-packagers-sig 5 weeks
> ago
> python-pyvhacdneuro-sig, orphan1 weeks
> ago
> python-ratelimiterankursinha, neuro-sig, orphan2 weeks
> ago
> rubygem-byebugorphan   0 weeks
> ago
> rubygem-transaction-simpleorphan   5 weeks
> ago
> scalacheckorphan   4 weeks
> ago
> sqljetfiliperosset, orphan 2 weeks
> ago
>
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: clang13 (2), status change: 2023-10-03 (4 weeks ago)
> zig 

[Bug 2246528] perl-Log-Report-1.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc38



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-d57939414d has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246528%23c10
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2246565] perl-Log-Report-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc38



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-d57939414d has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246565%23c10
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

[Kate Hsuan]

Hi Jelle,

Thank you for the suggestion.

Upower is one of my backup plans and I plan to start to move all the
ppd API and features to Upower.
But considering the comment from Mark Pearson, tuned allows the vendor
to implement their profile in a much more flexible manner.
Also, tuned provides a set of dbus APIs to use so I think it is not
difficult to integrate with GNOME applications.

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 AM Jelle van der Waa  wrote:
>
> On 06/11/2023 17:30, Allan Day wrote:
> > Hi Kate,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan  wrote:
> >> ... By
> >> integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra
> >> features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd
> >> can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the
> >> efforts of the maintainer.
> > ...
> >> Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here.
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon
> >
> > I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line:
> >
> > "We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided
> > through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user,
> > the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the
> > power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can
> > switch to the advanced mode themselves."
> >
> > It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more
> > of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that
> > from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings
> > mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined
> > profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult
> > to overcome.
> >
> > If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd
> > suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them.
>
> Wouldn't it also be logical for UPower to replace power-profiles-daemon?
> UPower is already integrated into GNOME Settings while tuned is not, not
> having an additional dependency might be nicer and beneficial for other
> distributions which might not have a tuned package at all.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Jelle van der Waa
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
BR,
Kate
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:58 PM Kate Hsuan  wrote:
>
> Hi Allan,
>
> Thank you for the comments.
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:31 AM Allan Day  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kate,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan  wrote:
> > >... By
> > > integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra
> > > features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd
> > > can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the
> > > efforts of the maintainer.
> > ...
> > > Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here.
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon
> >
> > I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line:
> >
> > "We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided
> > through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user,
> > the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the
> > power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can
> > switch to the advanced mode themselves."
> >
> > It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more
> > of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that
> > from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings
> > mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined
> > profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult
> > to overcome.
> >
> - Simple (Basic) mode is the original UX design of the power panel so
> we don't need to change or redesign it.
> - The advanced mode only shows the profile that tuned provides and the
> profile can be filtered based on the system architecture or platform
> model (Dell, Lenovo...etc). It is my thought and any kinds of ideas
> are welcome.
>
> Since there are many kinds of profiles provided by tuned, for example,
> VM-specific profiles and profiles for Intel features...etc., that
> gives us more room to think about how the UI can be improved. In this
> proposal, I listed the probabilities of UX changes to show how we can
> propose a new UX for the power panel. If it is difficult to achieve,
> the advanced mode can be dropped, and seek for alternative solutions.
> :)
> For the short-term plan, we would like to address the integration with
> tuned. The best result of the first step is that power-profiles-daemon
> is replaced by tuned and all the applications, such as gnome, kde,
> sysprof...etc run correctly. Then, we will start to think about how
> the UX can be improved or an alternative solution to set up the
> advanced tuned profiles.
>
> > If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd
> > suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them.
>  Okay. :)
>

I strongly recommend you reach out to the KDE folks as well. The
Visual Design Group is a good starting point[1] for discussing the UX
for tuned in KDE Plasma. A Matrix account is required to interact with
most of the KDE folks, but you should already have one through
chat.fedoraproject.org if you don't already have one from elsewhere.

I suspect many of your simple/advanced UX ideas will be fine, but need
to be refined with the VDG to figure out how it should be done.

From the KDE side, we are not strictly speaking, married to the
power-profiles-daemon concept. And the idea of having IHVs actually
provide useful energy tuning profiles so that battery life can be
further extended (thus supplanting tlp as well) is highly appealing.

[1]: https://matrix.to/#/#visualdesigngroup:kde.org




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

[Kate Hsuan]

Hi Allan,

Thank you for the comments.

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:31 AM Allan Day  wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan  wrote:
> >... By
> > integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra
> > features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd
> > can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the
> > efforts of the maintainer.
> ...
> > Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here.
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon
>
> I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line:
>
> "We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided
> through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user,
> the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the
> power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can
> switch to the advanced mode themselves."
>
> It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more
> of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that
> from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings
> mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined
> profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult
> to overcome.
>
- Simple (Basic) mode is the original UX design of the power panel so
we don't need to change or redesign it.
- The advanced mode only shows the profile that tuned provides and the
profile can be filtered based on the system architecture or platform
model (Dell, Lenovo...etc). It is my thought and any kinds of ideas
are welcome.

Since there are many kinds of profiles provided by tuned, for example,
VM-specific profiles and profiles for Intel features...etc., that
gives us more room to think about how the UI can be improved. In this
proposal, I listed the probabilities of UX changes to show how we can
propose a new UX for the power panel. If it is difficult to achieve,
the advanced mode can be dropped, and seek for alternative solutions.
:)
For the short-term plan, we would like to address the integration with
tuned. The best result of the first step is that power-profiles-daemon
is replaced by tuned and all the applications, such as gnome, kde,
sysprof...etc run correctly. Then, we will start to think about how
the UX can be improved or an alternative solution to set up the
advanced tuned profiles.

> If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd
> suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them.
 Okay. :)

>
> Thanks,
>
> Allan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
BR,
Kate
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:43 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> As part of the work to upgrade to KDE Plasma 6, appstream is being
> upgraded to a snapshot release as 1.0.0 is arriving soon. There are
> some consequences for this change:
>
> * appstream has gone through an API/ABI breakage, and consumers will
> need to adapt
> * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
> * Direct consumers of the C API will need to make changes to support
> appstream 1.0
> * Consumers of the Qt bindings moving to Qt6 will need to make changes
> to support appstream 1.0
> * Consumers of the Qt5 bindings will need to build against
> appstream0.16-qt-devel
>
> I've built appstream in a side-tag, and I'd appreciate it if folks
> could help by adapting their packages and submitting builds into it.
>
> This can be done with the following command: fedpkg build
> --target=f40-build-side-76936
>
> My simple query of the consumers of the libraries in question resulted in 
> this:
> ngompa@fedora ~> sudo dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires
> "libappstream.so.4()(64bit)" --qf "%{SOURCE_NAME}"
> appstream
> appstream-generator
> flatpak
> gnome-software
> libadwaita
> malcontent

I've handled appstream, appstream-generator, and appstream-data already.

* Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new release.
* GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
* libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
* malcontent needs work done.

Please address these ASAP in some meaningful way and submit the result
into the "f40-build-side-76936" side tag.

[1]: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/5563
[2]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/merge_requests/1810
[3]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libadwaita/-/merge_requests/1000



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2245689] perl-WWW-Curl core dumps perl if use of setopt CURLOPT_RESOLV

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245689

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-29.el9
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-11-07 03:29:02



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-458b180abe has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245689

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202245689%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2242157] perl-Math-Random-Secure for EL9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Math-Random-Secure-0.0
   ||8.0001-21.el9
Last Closed||2023-11-07 03:29:00



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f00c18e802 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242157

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202242157%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c11
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c10
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c8
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1c3e19a13a   
radare2-5.8.8-2.el9
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-27fd009f63   
optipng-0.7.8-1.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

afflib-3.7.20-1.el9
chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el9
gpaw-23.9.1-1.el9
libre-3.6.1-1.el9
libsocketcan-0.0.12-3.el9
munin-2.0.75-1.el9
php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.11.1-1.el9
python-hatch-vcs-0.4.0-1.el9
resalloc-5.1-1.el9
roundcubemail-1.5.6-1.el9
rust-blocking-1.4.1-1.el9
rust-h3-0.0.2-1.el9
rust-h3-quinn-0.0.3-1.el9
rust-piper-0.2.1-1.el9
rust-quinn-0.10.2-1.el9
rust-quinn-proto-0.10.5-1.el9
rust-quinn-udp-0.4.1-1.el9
rust-reqwest-0.11.22-3.el9
rust-rstest_reuse-0.6.0-1.el9

Details about builds:



 afflib-3.7.20-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-beb8fef8ac)
 Library to support the Advanced Forensic Format

Update Information:

bugfix release

ChangeLog:

* Sat Nov  4 2023 Michal Ambroz  - 3.7.20-1
- bump to version 3.7.20
* Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.7.19-11
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint  - 3.7.19-10
- Rebuilt for Python 3.12
* Wed Jan 18 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.7.19-9
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
3.7.19-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Jun 13 2022 Python Maint  - 3.7.19-7
- Rebuilt for Python 3.11




 chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-14c0898d9a)
 A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use

Update Information:

update to 119.0.6045.105. Security fixes:  High CVE-2023-5480: Inappropriate
implementation in Payments. High CVE-2023-5482: Insufficient data validation
in USB. High CVE-2023-5849: Integer overflow in USB. Medium
CVE-2023-5850: Incorrect security UI in Downloads. Medium CVE-2023-5851:
Inappropriate implementation in Downloads. Medium CVE-2023-5852: Use after
free in Printing. Medium CVE-2023-5853: Incorrect security UI in Downloads.
Medium CVE-2023-5854: Use after free in Profiles. Medium CVE-2023-5855: Use
after free in Reading Mode. Medium CVE-2023-5856: Use after free in Side
Panel. Medium CVE-2023-5857: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads.
Low CVE-2023-5858: Inappropriate implementation in WebApp Provider. Low
CVE-2023-5859: Incorrect security UI in Picture In Picture.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Nov  1 2023 Than Ngo  - 119.0.6045.105-1
- update to 119.0.6045.105
* Fri Oct 27 2023 Than Ngo  - 119.0.6045.59-1
- update 119.0.6045.59

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2247403 - CVE-2023-5480 chromium: chromium-browser: Inappropriate 
implementation in Payments [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247403
  [ 2 ] Bug #2247404 - CVE-2023-5480 chromium: chromium-browser: Inappropriate 
implementation in Payments [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247404
  [ 3 ] Bug #2247405 - CVE-2023-5482 chromium: chromium-browser: Insufficient 
data validation in USB [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247405
  [ 4 ] Bug #2247406 - CVE-2023-5482 chromium: chromium-browser: Insufficient 
data validation in USB [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247406
  [ 5 ] Bug #2247408 - CVE-2023-5849 chromium: chromium-browser: Integer 
overflow in USB [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247408
  [ 6 ] Bug #2247409 - CVE-2023-5849 chromium: chromium-browser: Integer 
overflow in USB [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247409
  [ 7 ] Bug #2247410 - CVE-2023-5850 chromium: chromium-browser: Incorrect 
security UI in Downloads [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247410
  [ 8 ] Bug #2247411 - CVE-2023-5850 chromium: chromium-browser: Incorrect 
security UI in Downloads [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247411
  [ 9 ] Bug #2247412 - CVE-2023-5851 chromium: chromium-browser: Inappropriate 
implementation in Downloads [fedora-all]

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c7
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2246565] perl-Log-Report-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-6d23b53956 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246565%23c9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2246528] perl-Log-Report-1.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40
   |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc37



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-6d23b53956 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246528%23c9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-b314a12323 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-b314a12323`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b314a12323

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-b314a12323 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-b314a12323`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b314a12323

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c8
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2246565] perl-Log-Report-1.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc40
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-11-07 01:38:53



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-51f5e2c200 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246565

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246565%23c8
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2246528] perl-Log-Report-1.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40 |perl-Log-Report-1.35-1.fc40
   ||perl-Log-Report-1.36-1.fc39
 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-11-07 01:38:51



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-51f5e2c200 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246528

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246528%23c8
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Julian Sikorski]

Am 06.11.23 um 18:32 schrieb Fabio Valentini:

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 6:28 PM Julian Sikorski  wrote:


Am 06.11.23 um 17:17 schrieb Michael J Gruber:



Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini
mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>>:

 On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski mailto:beleg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
  >
  > Hello,
  >
  > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and
  > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but
 rawhide and
  > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not
 worth
  > it? Thanks.

 Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog
 entries / Release field?
 Then I would not bother trying to fix it.

 It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place
 to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably
 something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other
 configurations ...

 Fabio

The spec files differ in content (as far as flatpaks are concerned). But
since this package uses separate branches without forwards/merges but
cherry-picks only, i.e. clearly separates branches in git, it would be
surprising not to care about the branch now ... I guess git branches are
still somewhat foreign to how we drive our dist.

Michael



Hello,

for gnome-chemistry-utils, the differences are only with release field
and changelog. For gnumeric, f37 has a slightly different
desktop-file-install call in addition.
I would prefer to fix it properly. Due to fewer mass rebuilds older
gnome-chemistry-utils branches should have lower release than the newer
ones. If the problem remains unfixed, I would have to bump the release
to make sure the numbers don't go backwards. For gnumeric this is a bit
less of a problem since there are new versions still being released so
release number would reset soon-ish anyway.
I tried untagging the erroneous builds with
$ koji untag-build
While it worked, I was not able to rebuild from correct branches because
koji was complaining that a build already exists:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108660999
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108661023

Can I request to have the builds removed so that they can be rebuilt
from correct branches?


No, NVRs for successful builds are unique in koji.
The only way to resubmit something that already succeeded is to bump release.

Fabio

Thanks for confirming. I have bumped the releases accordingly.

Best regards,
Julian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Sandro]

On 06-11-2023 17:08, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and 
gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but rawhide and 
f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not worth 
it? Thanks.


Maybe I'm missing something. But can you not just untag the builds from 
the side tag they don't belong in?


koji untag-build  

Then rebuild into the correct side tag. That step may require that you 
bump the release. I'm not entirely sure.


-- Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Heads up: jbig2dec 0.20 coming to rawhide

[Michael J Gruber]

jbig2dec 0.20 (a bugfix release) was released a while ago, and with the
current ghostscript update, everything is ready for it, as can be seen in
the copr rebuilds:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mjg/jbig2dec/builds/

I will build jbig2dec 0.20 into a rawhide side tag, along with updates to
dependent packages:

mupdf 1.23.5
python-PyMuPDF 1.23.6
zathura-pdf-mupdf 0.4.1

All of these are interdependent and - besides adjustments to the respective
versions - come with the latest bug fixes.

Cheers
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 6:28 PM Julian Sikorski  wrote:
>
> Am 06.11.23 um 17:17 schrieb Michael J Gruber:
> >
> >
> > Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini
> > mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>>:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski  > > wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Hello,
> >  >
> >  > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and
> >  > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but
> > rawhide and
> >  > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not
> > worth
> >  > it? Thanks.
> >
> > Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog
> > entries / Release field?
> > Then I would not bother trying to fix it.
> >
> > It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place
> > to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably
> > something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other
> > configurations ...
> >
> > Fabio
> >
> > The spec files differ in content (as far as flatpaks are concerned). But
> > since this package uses separate branches without forwards/merges but
> > cherry-picks only, i.e. clearly separates branches in git, it would be
> > surprising not to care about the branch now ... I guess git branches are
> > still somewhat foreign to how we drive our dist.
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
> Hello,
>
> for gnome-chemistry-utils, the differences are only with release field
> and changelog. For gnumeric, f37 has a slightly different
> desktop-file-install call in addition.
> I would prefer to fix it properly. Due to fewer mass rebuilds older
> gnome-chemistry-utils branches should have lower release than the newer
> ones. If the problem remains unfixed, I would have to bump the release
> to make sure the numbers don't go backwards. For gnumeric this is a bit
> less of a problem since there are new versions still being released so
> release number would reset soon-ish anyway.
> I tried untagging the erroneous builds with
> $ koji untag-build
> While it worked, I was not able to rebuild from correct branches because
> koji was complaining that a build already exists:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108660999
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108661023
>
> Can I request to have the builds removed so that they can be rebuilt
> from correct branches?

No, NVRs for successful builds are unique in koji.
The only way to resubmit something that already succeeded is to bump release.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Julian Sikorski]

Am 06.11.23 um 17:17 schrieb Michael J Gruber:



Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini 
mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>>:


On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski mailto:beleg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >
 > Hello,
 >
 > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and
 > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but
rawhide and
 > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not
worth
 > it? Thanks.

Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog
entries / Release field?
Then I would not bother trying to fix it.

It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place
to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably
something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other
configurations ...

Fabio

The spec files differ in content (as far as flatpaks are concerned). But 
since this package uses separate branches without forwards/merges but 
cherry-picks only, i.e. clearly separates branches in git, it would be 
surprising not to care about the branch now ... I guess git branches are 
still somewhat foreign to how we drive our dist.


Michael



Hello,

for gnome-chemistry-utils, the differences are only with release field 
and changelog. For gnumeric, f37 has a slightly different 
desktop-file-install call in addition.
I would prefer to fix it properly. Due to fewer mass rebuilds older 
gnome-chemistry-utils branches should have lower release than the newer 
ones. If the problem remains unfixed, I would have to bump the release 
to make sure the numbers don't go backwards. For gnumeric this is a bit 
less of a problem since there are new versions still being released so 
release number would reset soon-ish anyway.

I tried untagging the erroneous builds with
$ koji untag-build
While it worked, I was not able to rebuild from correct branches because 
koji was complaining that a build already exists:


https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108660999
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108661023

Can I request to have the builds removed so that they can be rebuilt 
from correct branches?


Best regards,
Julian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

[Julian Sikorski]

Thanks! I will take care of updates as soon as I sort out the gnumeric 
and gchemutils builds mishap.


Best regards,
Julian

Am 06.11.23 um 17:27 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel:


Thank you! Abiword is rebuilt in all 4 side tags with i686 excluded.


--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, November 5th, 2023 at 3:43 AM, Julian Sikorski  
wrote:



Correction, I had a mishap when cleaning up tags. The correct ones are:
f40-build-side-77026
f39-build-side-77030
f38-build-side-77032
f37-build-side-77036




Best regards,
Julian




Am 05.11.23 um 10:36 schrieb Julian Sikorski:




THanks! The side tags are:
f40-build-side-77026
f40-build-side-77028
f38-build-side-77032
f37-build-side-77034




Best regards,
Julian




Am 04.11.23 um 18:10 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel:




I can take care of Abiword. Let me know when to do so.




--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie




Sent from Proton Mail mobile




 Original Message 
On Nov 4, 2023, 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones < rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:




On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: >
Hello, > > I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to
1.12.46 today. > After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no
longer builds on > i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i686 should be
minimal, None at all, since we don't ship an i686 kernel. (Well, I
suppose someone might be mad enough to try running gnumeric in an
i686 container or chroot on top of an x86-64 kernel, but why'd you
want to do that ...) > I would > be inclined to just ExcludeArch:
%{ix86} and move on. Definitely! > According to > leafdrop,
gnumeric, abiword and gchemutils are the only downstream > consumers
of goffice. I can take care of gnumeric and gchemutils, > but I do
not have access to abiword so I would need help with that. > The
alternative would be to revert to 0.10.45. What would be your >
preference? > > Best regards, > Julian > > [1]
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/goffice/-/issues/70 > [2]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Rich. -- Richard
Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and
virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts
physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over
the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___ devel mailing list
-- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:




https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do 
not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: 

Fedora Developer Portal November 2023 release

[Jarek Prokop]

Hi all,

an update for the Fedora Developer Portal is here and soon to be 
available after the servers sync the changes.


* Add Fedora Specifc Notes For Golang Page PR#487
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/go/go-installation.html
* Fix GJS yaml to make it visible on the website PR#457
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/gjs/gjs-installation.html
* Revert "Align virtualenv advice for FastAPI with Django/Flask (#425)" 
PR#450

https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/fastapi-installation.html
*  Improving the latexpdf section on sphinx.md PR#488
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/sphinx.html
*  Update Ruby installation guide for rbenv PR#489
https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/ruby/ruby-installation.html

Thanks to all the contributors that help keep the content up-to-date.

Feedback on these changes and more welcome as an email reply or on the 
bug tracker https://github.com/developer-portal/content/issues .


Regards,
Jarek Prokop
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 06/11/2023 17:30, Allan Day wrote:

Hi Kate,

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan  wrote:

... By
integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra
features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd
can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the
efforts of the maintainer.

...

Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon


I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line:

"We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided
through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user,
the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the
power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can
switch to the advanced mode themselves."

It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more
of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that
from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings
mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined
profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult
to overcome.

If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd
suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them.


Wouldn't it also be logical for UPower to replace power-profiles-daemon? 
UPower is already integrated into GNOME Settings while tuned is not, not 
having an additional dependency might be nicer and beneficial for other 
distributions which might not have a tuned package at all.


Greetings,

Jelle van der Waa
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Request for comment- tuned replacing power-profiles-daemon plan

[Allan Day]

Hi Kate,

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 8:30 AM Kate Hsuan  wrote:
>... By
> integrating power-profiles-daemon with tuned, the user can get extra
> features to finetune the system, and the basic feature provided by ppd
> can be used according to the user's demand. It also can reduce the
> efforts of the maintainer.
...
> Moreover, the detailed change proposal can be found here.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TunedReplacesPower-profiles-daemon

I just noticed that the change proposal contains the line:

"We expected that the user can set those profile, tuned provided
through gnome-control-panel. To minimize the information to the user,
the power panel would provide a simple and advanced mode to show the
power profiles. If the users want to finetune the system, they can
switch to the advanced mode themselves."

It's a bit unclear if this is a definite plan, a requirement, or more
of a speculative ambition. However, I should probably be clear that
from a GNOME design perspective, an advanced power profile settings
mode would likely be a tough sell. Exposing arbitrary user-defined
profiles would also pose some challenges which it might be difficult
to overcome.

If this change proposal does require UXD changes to GNOME, then I'd
suggest reaching out to us in advance to discuss them.

Thanks,

Allan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Thank you! Abiword is rebuilt in all 4 side tags with i686 excluded.


-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, November 5th, 2023 at 3:43 AM, Julian Sikorski  
wrote:


> Correction, I had a mishap when cleaning up tags. The correct ones are:
> f40-build-side-77026
> f39-build-side-77030
> f38-build-side-77032
> f37-build-side-77036
> 

> Best regards,
> Julian
> 

> Am 05.11.23 um 10:36 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
> 

> > THanks! The side tags are:
> > f40-build-side-77026
> > f40-build-side-77028
> > f38-build-side-77032
> > f37-build-side-77034
> > 

> > Best regards,
> > Julian
> > 

> > Am 04.11.23 um 18:10 schrieb Gwyn Ciesla via devel:
> > 

> > > I can take care of Abiword. Let me know when to do so.
> > > 

> > > --
> > > Gwyn Ciesla
> > > she/her/hers
> > > 
> > > in your fear, seek only peace
> > > in your fear, seek only love
> > > -d. bowie
> > > 

> > > Sent from Proton Mail mobile
> > > 

> > >  Original Message 
> > > On Nov 4, 2023, 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones < rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 

> > > On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: >
> > > Hello, > > I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to
> > > 1.12.46 today. > After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no
> > > longer builds on > i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i686 should be
> > > minimal, None at all, since we don't ship an i686 kernel. (Well, I
> > > suppose someone might be mad enough to try running gnumeric in an
> > > i686 container or chroot on top of an x86-64 kernel, but why'd you
> > > want to do that ...) > I would > be inclined to just ExcludeArch:
> > > %{ix86} and move on. Definitely! > According to > leafdrop,
> > > gnumeric, abiword and gchemutils are the only downstream > consumers
> > > of goffice. I can take care of gnumeric and gchemutils, > but I do
> > > not have access to abiword so I would need help with that. > The
> > > alternative would be to revert to 0.10.45. What would be your >
> > > preference? > > Best regards, > Julian > > [1]
> > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/goffice/-/issues/70 > [2]
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846 Rich. -- Richard
> > > Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
> > > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and
> > > virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts
> > > physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over
> > > the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
> > > http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
> > > ___ devel mailing list
> > > -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> > > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > 

> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >  Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > > 

> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Michael J Gruber]

Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini <
decatho...@gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and
> > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but rawhide and
> > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not worth
> > it? Thanks.
>
> Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog
> entries / Release field?
> Then I would not bother trying to fix it.
>
> It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place
> to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably
> something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other
> configurations ...
>
> Fabio
>
> The spec files differ in content (as far as flatpaks are concerned). But
since this package uses separate branches without forwards/merges but
cherry-picks only, i.e. clearly separates branches in git, it would be
surprising not to care about the branch now ... I guess git branches are
still somewhat foreign to how we drive our dist.

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and
> gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but rawhide and
> f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not worth
> it? Thanks.

Are the contents of the package the same except for the changelog
entries / Release field?
Then I would not bother trying to fix it.

It is kind of unfortunate that koji does not have guardrails in place
to prevent building branch X against target Y!=X, but that's probably
something that actually needs to work for Modularity or other
configurations ...

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

[Julian Sikorski]

Hello,

I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and 
gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but rawhide and 
f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not worth 
it? Thanks.


Best regards,
Julian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248014] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248014

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.35-1
   ||.fc40
Last Closed||2023-11-06 13:46:29



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-ded5564741 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248014

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248014%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248014] perl-Module-ScanDeps-1.35 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248014

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-ded5564741 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ded5564741


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248014

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248014%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-11-06.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

belle-sip orphan, sdgathman4 weeks ago
clang11   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
clang13   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
darkhttpd cicku, orphan0 weeks ago
golang-gioui  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term   go-sig, orphan   1 weeks ago
golang-storj-common   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
lld13 orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
llvm12orphan, petersen,4 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille
llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen,   4 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille
mygnuhealth   orphan   1 weeks ago
onboard   orphan   0 weeks ago
ortp  orphan, sdgathman4 weeks ago
perl-Fennec   orphan   1 weeks ago
perl-Twiggy   orphan   5 weeks ago
php-kolab-net-ldap3   orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Date-Holidaysorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Date-Holidays-USAorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-HTTP-OAuth   orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-HTTP-Request2orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-DNS2 orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-LDAP2orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-URL2 orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Text-Passwordorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-XML-Serializer   orphan   1 weeks ago
python-gpiozero   orphan, python-packagers-sig 5 weeks ago
python-pyvhacdneuro-sig, orphan1 weeks ago
python-ratelimiterankursinha, neuro-sig, orphan2 weeks ago
rubygem-byebugorphan   0 weeks ago
rubygem-transaction-simpleorphan   5 weeks ago
scalacheckorphan   4 weeks ago
sqljetfiliperosset, orphan 2 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: clang13 (2), status change: 2023-10-03 (4 weeks ago)
zig (maintained by: sentry)
zig-0.9.1-4.fc39.src requires clang13-devel = 13.0.1-4.fc39
zig-0.9.1-4.fc39.x86_64 requires libclang-cpp.so.13()(64bit)

river (maintained by: alebastr)
river-0.2.1-3.fc39.src requires zig = 0.9.1-4.fc39, 
zig-rpm-macros = 0.9.1-4.fc39

Depending on: golang-gioui (4), status change: 2023-10-05 (4 weeks ago)
golang-github-ajstarks-deck (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-ajstarks-deck-0-0.15.20210114git30c9fc6.fc38.src requires 
golang(gioui.org/app) = 0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/io/key) 
= 0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/io/system) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/op) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/unit) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(github.com/ajstarks/svgo) = 
0-0.18.20210108git7a3c8b5.fc39, golang(github.com/ajstarks/svgo/float) = 
0-0.18.20210108git7a3c8b5.fc39


golang-github-ajstarks-svgo (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig, 

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-7d16dd8efd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c7
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Out-0.21-1.fc40




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-19b05203f3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c6
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231106.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231105.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231106.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  8
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   56
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  428.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages:282.15 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.82 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -1.40 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20231105.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: hyprland-0.31.0-1.fc40
Summary: Dynamic tiling Wayland compositor that doesn't sacrifice on its looks
RPMs:hyprland hyprland-devel
Size:30.79 MiB

Package: libsixel-1.10.3-3.fc40
Summary: SIXEL encoding and decoding
RPMs:libsixel libsixel-devel libsixel-utils
Size:860.58 KiB

Package: libsocketcan-0.0.12-3.fc40
Summary: Library for SocketCAN
RPMs:libsocketcan libsocketcan-devel
Size:178.17 KiB

Package: lowdown-1.0.2-4.fc40
Summary: Simple markdown translator
RPMs:lowdown lowdown-devel lowdown-libs
Size:1.07 MiB

Package: python-sphinx-argparse-cli-1.11.1-2.fc40
Summary: Render CLI arguments defined by the argparse module
RPMs:python3-sphinx-argparse-cli
Size:25.93 KiB

Package: qoi-0^20230911-2.fc40
Summary: The "Quite OK Image Format" for fast, lossless image compression
RPMs:qoi-devel qoi-tools
Size:231.31 KiB

Package: rocsparse-5.7.1-2.fc40
Summary: SPARSE implementation for ROCm
RPMs:rocsparse rocsparse-devel
Size:395.50 MiB

Package: rust-logos-derive-0.13.0-1.fc40
Summary: Create ridiculously fast Lexers
RPMs:rust-logos-derive+default-devel rust-logos-derive-devel
Size:22.92 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: flintqs-1.0-13.fc39
Summary: William Hart???s quadratic sieve
RPMs:flintqs
Size:158.73 KiB

Package: rust-normpath0.3-0.3.2-2.fc39
Summary: More reliable path manipulation
RPMs:rust-normpath0.3+default-devel rust-normpath0.3+serde-devel 
rust-normpath0.3-devel
Size:37.84 KiB

Package: rust-strum0.24-0.24.1-1.fc39
Summary: Helpful macros for working with enums and strings
RPMs:rust-strum0.24+default-devel rust-strum0.24+derive-devel 
rust-strum0.24+phf-devel rust-strum0.24+std-devel 
rust-strum0.24+strum_macros-devel rust-strum0.24-devel
Size:49.26 KiB

Package: rust-test-case2-2.2.2-1.fc40
Summary: Procedural macro attribute for generating parametrized test cases
RPMs:rust-test-case2+default-devel rust-test-case2+regex-devel 
rust-test-case2+with-regex-devel rust-test-case2-devel
Size:36.33 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CSFML-2.5.2-3.fc40
Old package:  CSFML-2.5.2-2.fc39
Summary:  C Interface for the Simple and Fast Multimedia Library
RPMs: CSFML CSFML-devel CSFML-doc
Size: 1.08 MiB
Size change:  -86 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 2.5.2-3
  - Rebuild for SFML-2.6.1


Package:  PyQt4-4.12.3-27.fc40
Old package:  PyQt4-4.12.3-26.fc39
Summary:  Python bindings for Qt4
RPMs: PyQt4-doc PyQt4-qsci-api python3-PyQt4 python3-PyQt4-devel 
python3-PyQt4-webkit
Size: 27.91 MiB
Size change:  -9.49 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Antonio Trande  - 4.12.3-27
  - Simple fix for Python 3.13 (rhbz#2247256)


Package:  R-htmltools-0.5.7-1.fc40
Old package:  R-htmltools-0.5.5-2.fc39
Summary:  Tools for HTML
RPMs: R-htmltools
Size: 1.61 MiB
Size change:  26.51 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Tom Callaway  - 0.5.7-1
  - update to 0.5.7


Package:  R-rlang-1.1.2-1.fc40
Old package:  R-rlang-1.1.1-2.fc39
Summary:  Functions for Base Types and Core R and 'Tidyverse' Features
RPMs: R-rlang
Size: 7.06 MiB
Size change:  -18.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Tom Callaway  - 1.1.2-1
  - update to 1.1.2


Package:  R-rprojroot-2.0.4-1.fc40
Old package:  R-rprojroot-2.0.3-5.fc39
Summary:  Finding Files in Project Subdirectories
RPMs: R-rprojroot
Size: 135.81 KiB
Size change:  4.57 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Tom Callaway  - 2.0.4-1
  - update to 2.0.4


Package:  R-waldo-0.5.2-1.fc40
Old package:  R-waldo-0.5.1-9.fc40
Summary:  Find Differences Between R Objects
RPMs: R-waldo
Size: 120.76 KiB
Size change:  184 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Tom Callaway  - 0.5.2-1
  - 0.5.2


Package:  SDL2-2.28.5-1.fc40
Old package:  SDL2-2.28.4-1.fc40
Summary:  Cross-platform multimedia library
RPMs: SDL2 SDL2-devel SDL2-static
Size: 9.57 MiB
Size change:  238 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Nov 05 2023 Tom Callaway  - 2.28.5-1
  - update to 2.28.5


Package:  SFML-2.6.1-1.fc40
Old package:  SFML-2.5.1-15.fc39
Summary:  Simple and Fast Multimedia Library
RPMs: SFML SFML-devel
Size: 5.87 MiB
Size change:  1.05 MiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 04 2023 S??

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7d731eb090


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c5
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247795] perl-Time-Out-0.20 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-b314a12323 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b314a12323


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247795

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247795%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-b314a12323 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b314a12323


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Swift on aarch64 and 39 and Rawhide...suggestions?

[Peter Robinson]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:31 AM Ron Olson  wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I’m still having a difficult time trying to figure out what to do about this 
> issue I’m having. Swift 5.9 was released awhile ago and I’ve been able to 
> build it for x864_64 on all versions of Fedora (Rawhide, 39, 38, 37) just 
> fine. On aarch64 (the only other architecture supported), it fails to build 
> for 39 and Rawhide, where the Swift compiler crashes with an LLVM stacktrace 
> while in the process of building the rest of the toolchain (in other words, 
> it’s not that Swift builds and packages correctly and then doesn’t work when 
> installed, it crashes during one of the compilation phases it uses to build 
> the entire toolchain).
>
> I’ve been trying to troubleshoot this problem and have it seems that the 
> issue may lay with ld-linux-aarch.so.1:
>
> [root@6ba0f8c47e54 swift-source]# lldb 
> ./build/buildbot_linux/swift-linux-aarch64/bin/swift-frontend
> (lldb) target create 
> "./build/buildbot_linux/swift-linux-aarch64/bin/swift-frontend"
> Current executable set to 
> '/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/swift-source/build/buildbot_linux/swift-linux-aarch64/bin/swift-frontend'
>  (aarch64).
> (lldb) ru
> Process 142 launched: 
> '/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/swift-source/build/buildbot_linux/swift-linux-aarch64/bin/swift-frontend'
>  (aarch64)
> Process 142 stopped
>
> thread #1, name = 'swift-frontend', stop reason = exec
> frame #0: 0xf7fd84c0 ld-linux-aarch64.so.1`_start at dl-start.S:22
>
> That’s as far as I’ve gotten. I not sure what the next move should be; 
> troubleshooting core libraries is not something I’ve done before and have no 
> idea where to start.
>
> Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I’ve been extremely 
> busy on non-packaging things and honestly don’t really have the time to dig 
> into this.

Maybe start with a bug against glibc with the information you
currently have and a means to reproduce it and the toolchains team may
have some pointers to where the problem lies.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras because the original license was
restored.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248029%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Groff: Revert the mapping of special characters for UTF-8 devices introduced in 1.23.0 version

[Lukas Javorsky]

Hi,

I'm writing this email to the Fedora community to give you a heads-up about
what we are going to do with the new change introduced to the groff 1.23.0
version [1].
Upstream of groff stopped mapping the special characters (like hyphens,
tilde, ...) to the Basic Latin codes like it previously did.

This change was quite controversial in the Debian community as the
upstreams/maintainers of the man-pages that use these characters in a "not
correct way" wanted this mapping back in the system. It leads to a 1+ hour
read-long email thread [2] with discussions in other threads as well.

The final conclusion in Debian was to revert this change and leave the old
mapping in place as the maintainer of groff received a ton of emails [3]
and didn't want to spend all of his capacity on this issue.

After reading through all of the emails, we've decided to align with the
Debian decision and revert this change, thereby retaining the current
mapping. The main reason for this was to eliminate a bunch of bugs reported
to the groff/man-pages packages about broken manual pages. Our capacity
also has its limits, and we need to spend our resources wisely, and this
decision was based on that. The reproducer and the issue description were
reported in Bugzilla [4], so please read through it, if you are interested.


[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2023-07/msg1.html
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/947941/
[3] https://lwn.net/ml/debian-devel/zs0av4xyjh+o1o%...@riva.ucam.org/
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224123

-- 
S pozdravom/ Best regards

Lukáš Javorský

Software Engineer, Core service - Databases

Red Hat 

Purkyňova 115 (TPB-C)

612 00 Brno - Královo Pole

ljavo...@redhat.com

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

perl-Time-Out-0.21 license change

[Petr Pisar]

perl-Time-Out-0.21 changed a license back from

Artistic-2.0 AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl)

to
GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Miro Hrončok]

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will fail to install and/or build when the affected package gets 
retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-11-06.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

belle-sip orphan, sdgathman4 weeks ago
clang11   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
clang13   orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
darkhttpd cicku, orphan0 weeks ago
golang-gioui  go-sig, orphan   4 weeks ago
golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term   go-sig, orphan   1 weeks ago
golang-storj-common   go-sig, orphan   2 weeks ago
lld13 orphan, sergesanspaille  4 weeks ago
llvm12orphan, petersen,4 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille
llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen,   4 weeks ago
  sergesanspaille
mygnuhealth   orphan   1 weeks ago
onboard   orphan   0 weeks ago
ortp  orphan, sdgathman4 weeks ago
perl-Fennec   orphan   1 weeks ago
perl-Twiggy   orphan   5 weeks ago
php-kolab-net-ldap3   orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Date-Holidaysorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Date-Holidays-USAorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-HTTP-OAuth   orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-HTTP-Request2orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-DNS2 orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-LDAP2orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Net-URL2 orphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-Text-Passwordorphan   1 weeks ago
php-pear-XML-Serializer   orphan   1 weeks ago
python-gpiozero   orphan, python-packagers-sig 5 weeks ago
python-pyvhacdneuro-sig, orphan1 weeks ago
python-ratelimiterankursinha, neuro-sig, orphan2 weeks ago
rubygem-byebugorphan   0 weeks ago
rubygem-transaction-simpleorphan   5 weeks ago
scalacheckorphan   4 weeks ago
sqljetfiliperosset, orphan 2 weeks ago

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: clang13 (2), status change: 2023-10-03 (4 weeks ago)
zig (maintained by: sentry)
zig-0.9.1-4.fc39.src requires clang13-devel = 13.0.1-4.fc39
zig-0.9.1-4.fc39.x86_64 requires libclang-cpp.so.13()(64bit)

river (maintained by: alebastr)
river-0.2.1-3.fc39.src requires zig = 0.9.1-4.fc39, 
zig-rpm-macros = 0.9.1-4.fc39

Depending on: golang-gioui (4), status change: 2023-10-05 (4 weeks ago)
golang-github-ajstarks-deck (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig)
		golang-github-ajstarks-deck-0-0.15.20210114git30c9fc6.fc38.src requires 
golang(gioui.org/app) = 0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/io/key) 
= 0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/io/system) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/op) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(gioui.org/unit) = 
0-13.20201225git18d4dbf.fc39, golang(github.com/ajstarks/svgo) = 
0-0.18.20210108git7a3c8b5.fc39, golang(github.com/ajstarks/svgo/float) = 
0-0.18.20210108git7a3c8b5.fc39


golang-github-ajstarks-svgo (maintained by: eclipseo, go-sig, 

[Bug 2248029] perl-Time-Out-0.21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248029
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247944] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Locale-1.40-1
   ||.fc40
Last Closed||2023-11-06 10:49:27



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3108d435c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247944%23c2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2247944] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.40 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3108d435c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3108d435c8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247944%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [status] Fedora CI / 2023-11-03

[Kamil Paral]

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:32 AM Miroslav Vadkerti 
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates
>> like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status
>> updates.
>>
>> Find us on the Fedora CI matrix chat 
>> in case you would like to discuss something.
>>
>>
>> ⏱️ Plans
>>
>>-
>>
>>Close the mailing list and replace it with the Discourse tag
>>-
>>
>>Move Fedora CI Jenkins under Testing Farm infrastructure |
>>fedora-ci/general#440 
>>-
>>
>>Deprecate STI tests via Fedora 40 Change Proposal | general/issue#443
>>
>>
>>
>>  Info
>>
>>-
>>
>>It is now easy to do integration testing of Fedora packages hosted on
>>GitHub, see this blog post for details:
>>https://cockpit-project.org/blog/tmt-cross-project-testing.html
>>-
>>
>>Support for testing on AWS instances with dedicated AMD GPUs was
>>deferred to November | fedora-ci/general#422
>>
>>-
>>
>>A prototype for running tmt tests against aarch64 on a pagure.io
>>project was implemented for pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions
>>project
>>https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/441
>>https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions/pull-request/48
>>
>>
>>

Thanks, it's nice to see a status report like this from time to time.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [status] Fedora CI / 2023-11-03

[Miroslav Vadkerti]

Forgot to CC devel list for a larger audience ...

On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates
> like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status
> updates.
>
> Find us on the Fedora CI matrix chat  in
> case you would like to discuss something.
>
>
> ⏱️ Plans
>
>-
>
>Close the mailing list and replace it with the Discourse tag
>-
>
>Move Fedora CI Jenkins under Testing Farm infrastructure |
>fedora-ci/general#440 
>-
>
>Deprecate STI tests via Fedora 40 Change Proposal | general/issue#443
>
>
>
>  Info
>
>-
>
>It is now easy to do integration testing of Fedora packages hosted on
>GitHub, see this blog post for details:
>https://cockpit-project.org/blog/tmt-cross-project-testing.html
>-
>
>Support for testing on AWS instances with dedicated AMD GPUs was
>deferred to November | fedora-ci/general#422
>
>-
>
>A prototype for running tmt tests against aarch64 on a pagure.io
>project was implemented for pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions
>project
>https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/441
>https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions/pull-request/48
>
>
>
>  Status
>
>-
>
>Pull requests created
>-
>
>   Installability support for CS8 and CS9 prepared for review |
>   fedora-ci/general#439
>   
>   https://github.com/fedora-ci/mini-tps/pull/27
>   https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/24
>   -
>
>Closed issues
>-
>
>   general/issue#423  -
>   moved to upstream Zuul
>   -
>
>   general/issue#441  -
>   prototype for testing on aarch64 for
>   https://pagure.io/fedora-asahi/kiwi-descriptions
>
>
>-
>
>Outages
>-
>
>   Occasional missing triggers for dist-git testing | general/issue#442
>   
>   -
>
>  currently, the reason is unknown, please let us know if you
>  encounter this in the above issue
>
>
> 輸 *Status **Contributors*
>
>- Aleksandra Fedorova (bookwar)
>- Miroslav Vadkerti (mvadkert)
>
>
> Best regards,
> /M
>


-- 
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE
IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252
Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248104] perl-DateTime-1.65 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248104

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-1.65-1.fc40
Last Closed||2023-11-06 08:58:26



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-46eda8e198 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248104

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248104%23c4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248104] perl-DateTime-1.65 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248104

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-46eda8e198 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-46eda8e198


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248104

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248104%23c3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue