https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
Hi Benson,
I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback.
Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could
sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC
Thanks again
Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-63d2fd37d2
radare2-5.8.8-2.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6e863522f4
chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el8
The following builds
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-87285c6aca
radare2-5.8.8-2.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ca644cad1f
chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el7
The following builds
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:58 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm writing this email to the Fedora community to give you a heads-up about
> what we are going to do with the new change introduced to the groff 1.23.0
> version [1].
> Upstream of groff stopped mapping the special
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:05:13AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty. Issues:
>
> https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407
>
> If anyone has any constructive comments, it
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> > >
> > > Hmm, odd.
> > >
Hi,
I am trying to enable debug information for a programming language that
produces debuginfo in a custom (non-DWARF) format. I was thinking that
adding that programming-language-specific debuginfo to existing
-debuginfo packages seems like a good idea.
(Is that a bad idea?)
Any suggestions on
Fedora Linux 39 was released today [1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing` stream has
been
rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it will be promoted to the
`stable` stream.
For more information about Fedora 39, see the Fedora Project's list of official
Changes [2] and the Fedora CoreOS
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> >
> > Hmm, odd.
> >
> > Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:16 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> > * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> > /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
>
> I think this is the third time they change path. BTW,
Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
I think this is the third time they change path. BTW, 'app-info' was the
previous one, 0.16 used 'metainfo' [1], now 'swcatalog'...
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> we've decided to align with the Debian decision and revert this change
I read the article on LWN and parts of the Debian discussion, and I
think this is the right decision.
Zbyszek
___
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
>
> Hmm, odd.
>
> Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> it).
>
Taken care of it:
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
Hmm, odd.
Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
it).
Thanks and bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:42 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".
>
> That would break the:
>
> > >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
>
> because appstream-devel
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".
That would break the:
> >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
because appstream-devel Provides:
pkgconfig(appstream) = 1.0.0
no? I know, I can try
On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
>
> I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> the spec file
Welcome. Have
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".
>
> Hi,
> I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
> "1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".
Hi,
I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
"1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than "1.0.0-2.fc40"?
That sounds odd to me.
Both flatpak and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Out-0.22-1.fc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:55 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> > appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> > once it says that the package is available in the
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-11-08 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> once it says that the package is available in the repo?
Hi,
it changed the problem to:
DEBUG
On 07.11.23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple
of months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted
gdal soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the
3.6.x series.
I'm preparing a
Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 22:20 Uhr schrieb Michael J Gruber <
m...@fedoraproject.org>:
> jbig2dec 0.20 (a bugfix release) was released a while ago, and with the
> current ghostscript update, everything is ready for it, as can be seen in
> the copr rebuilds:
>
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> this is not the first time I saw a bodhi update that breaks dozens of
> dependencies, goes unnoticed for a week and is automatically pushed
> stable, only to discover many packages fail to install.
The most important measure would be to abolish automatic pushes. This update
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:13:12 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
I can confirm we have a problem, bout++-5.1.0-1 (latest in rawhide
branch) builds OK under F-38 mock, but fails in Rawhide mock. Some
tests won't complete, like
prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty. Issues:
https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407
If anyone has any constructive comments, it would be appreciated.
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least
On 07. 11. 23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months
ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in
F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series.
I'm preparing a
On 07. 11. 23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months
ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in
F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series.
I'm preparing a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Prima-1.71-1.fc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
Bug ID: 2248515
Summary: perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Time-Out
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:19:23 -
"David Bold" wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> > David Schwörer >
> >
> > if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> > was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> > arches. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456
Bug ID: 2248456
Summary: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.71
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Prima
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Prima
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453
Bug ID: 2248453
Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.084
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/IO-Socket-SSL
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248457
Bug ID: 2248457
Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-MultiMarkdown to 1.002
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Text-MultiMarkdown
Status: NEW
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231107.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 3.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> David Schwörer
>
> if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> arches. The libmpi_cxx.so.40 doesn't exist at all in openmpi 5.0, so
> people on x86_64 or
Hi
Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of
months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal
soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x
series.
I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this,
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:18 AM Milan Crha wrote:
> I'm sorry for a late response, I forgot of this. I tried to build
> gnome-software in your side tag, but it fails due to the appstream
> packages cannot be installed together:
>
> Error: Transaction test error:
> DEBUG util.py:446:file
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
David Schwörer wrote:
> MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from
> source after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I
> would be unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
>
> I think having more
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:34 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.
>
> Please address
MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from source
after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I would be
unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
I think having more time to adapt dependent packages would have been helpful,
as I do not
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:48:38 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/28/23 13:36, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm going to start building openmpi 5.0.0 and its requirements (pmix
> > 4.2.7, prrte 3.0.2) and dependencies in a side-tag starting tomorrow.
> > Notable changes are:
> >
> > * Dropping
Hey Neal,
On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:43 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > As part of the work to upgrade to KDE Plasma 6, appstream is being
> > upgraded to a snapshot release as 1.0.0 is arriving soon. There are
> > some
On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.
Hi,
I'm
53 matches
Mail list logo
