[Bug 2248515] perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2023-11-08 07:43:00




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Cristian Delgado]

Hi Benson,
I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback.

Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could
sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC

Thanks again

Cristian Delgado
"You can't improve until you make mistakes"

On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 12:40, Benson Muite 
wrote:

> On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> > Hi, everyone
> >
> > I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> > moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
> >
> > I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> > the spec file
> Welcome. Have taken the package until you get sponsored to become a
> packager.  Can you make a pull request at:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gpiozero
> >
> > SPEC:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
> <
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
> >
> > SRPM:
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
> <
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
> >
> > my FAS username is crisdel
> > I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
> > proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.
> >
> See
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> > Thanks for your time.
> > Cristian Delgado
> > "You can't improve until you make mistakes"
>
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-63d2fd37d2   
radare2-5.8.8-2.el8
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-6e863522f4   
chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

scitokens-cpp-1.1.0-1.el8
squidclamav-7.2-4.el8

Details about builds:



 scitokens-cpp-1.1.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f9dc18f284)
 C++ Implementation of the SciTokens Library

Update Information:

- Allow the scitokens library user to setup a custom CA file - Fix typecast
errors in scitoken_status_get_*() that caused async queries to fail - Fix logic
error in deserialize_continue() that caused async deserialization to fail

ChangeLog:

* Tue Nov  7 2023 Derek Weitzel  - 1.1.0-1
- Allow the scitokens library user to setup a custom CA file
- Fix typecast errors in scitoken_status_get_*() that caused async queries to 
fail
- Fix logic error in deserialize_continue() that caused async deserialization 
to fail
* Sat Jul 22 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.2-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild




 squidclamav-7.2-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b48258af09)
 HTTP Antivirus for Squid based on ClamAv and the ICAP protocol

Update Information:

First build of the package.

ChangeLog:

* Thu Oct 19 2023 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-4
- Review fixes; bundle external GPL license file:
  https://github.com/darold/squidclamav/issues/69
* Thu Sep 28 2023 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-3
- Review fixes.
* Sat Aug 20 2022 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-2
- Initial import.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2119985 - Review Request: squidclamav - HTTP Antivirus for Squid 
based on ClamAv and the ICAP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119985


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-87285c6aca   
radare2-5.8.8-2.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ca644cad1f   
chromium-119.0.6045.105-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

scitokens-cpp-1.1.0-1.el7
squidclamav-7.2-4.el7

Details about builds:



 scitokens-cpp-1.1.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f0f162d810)
 C++ Implementation of the SciTokens Library

Update Information:

- Allow the scitokens library user to setup a custom CA file - Fix typecast
errors in scitoken_status_get_*() that caused async queries to fail - Fix logic
error in deserialize_continue() that caused async deserialization to fail

ChangeLog:

* Tue Nov  7 2023 Derek Weitzel  - 1.1.0-1
- Allow the scitokens library user to setup a custom CA file
- Fix typecast errors in scitoken_status_get_*() that caused async queries to 
fail
- Fix logic error in deserialize_continue() that caused async deserialization 
to fail




 squidclamav-7.2-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4e1293686)
 HTTP Antivirus for Squid based on ClamAv and the ICAP protocol

Update Information:

First build of the package.

ChangeLog:

* Thu Oct 19 2023 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-4
- Review fixes; bundle external GPL license file:
  https://github.com/darold/squidclamav/issues/69
* Thu Sep 28 2023 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-3
- Review fixes.
* Sat Aug 20 2022 Simone Caronni  - 7.2-2
- Initial import.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2119985 - Review Request: squidclamav - HTTP Antivirus for Squid 
based on ClamAv and the ICAP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119985


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:58 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, odd.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> > > > it).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Taken care of it: 
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108712482
> > >
> > > Once it's done building and it shows up in the side-tag, you can try
> > > again with gnome-software.
> > >
> >
> > gnome-software is building fine now:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108713434
> >
>
> malcontent builds with no changes, so I've submitted it into the
> side-tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108715187
>

Side tag submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a39bc414b2

The remaining KDE/Qt stuff is going to be resolved as we upgrade to Plasma 6.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Groff: Revert the mapping of special characters for UTF-8 devices introduced in 1.23.0 version

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm writing this email to the Fedora community to give you a heads-up about
> what we are going to do with the new change introduced to the groff 1.23.0
> version [1].
> Upstream of groff stopped mapping the special characters (like hyphens, tilde,
> ...) to the Basic Latin codes like it previously did.

Yes ..  '~' is being replaced by

U+02DC SMALL TILDE character

and the replacement looks terrible.  If you have
nbdkit-protect-filter(1) installed you can see this important
meta-character becomes almost invisible, rendering the documentation
and examples very confusing.

> This change was quite controversial in the Debian community as the upstreams/
> maintainers of the man-pages that use these characters in a "not correct
> way" wanted this mapping back in the system. It leads to a 1+ hour read-long
> email thread [2] with discussions in other threads as well.
> 
> The final conclusion in Debian was to revert this change and leave the old
> mapping in place as the maintainer of groff received a ton of emails [3] and
> didn't want to spend all of his capacity on this issue.
> 
> After reading through all of the emails, we've decided to align with the 
> Debian
> decision and revert this change, thereby retaining the current mapping. The
> main reason for this was to eliminate a bunch of bugs reported to the groff/
> man-pages packages about broken manual pages. Our capacity also has its 
> limits,
> and we need to spend our resources wisely, and this decision was based on 
> that.
> The reproducer and the issue description were reported in Bugzilla [4], so
> please read through it, if you are interested.

I read the LWN discussion.

Did we try to persuade upstream to revert the problem?  But if they're
not receptive then a downstream fix aligned with Debian looks right.

Thanks,

Rich.

>  
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2023-07/msg1.html
> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/947941/
> [3] https://lwn.net/ml/debian-devel/zs0av4xyjh+o1o%...@riva.ucam.org/
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224123
> 
> --
> S pozdravom/ Best regards
> 
> Lukáš Javorský
> 
> Software Engineer, Core service - Databases
> 
> Red Hat
> 
> Purkyňova 115 (TPB-C)
> 
> 612 00 Brno - Královo Pole
> 
> ljavo...@redhat.com
> 
> [logo--200]
> 
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: /usr/bin/pterm conflicts

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:05:13AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty.  Issues:
> 
> https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407
> 
> If anyone has any constructive comments, it would be appreciated.

I wrote a longer comment in the upstream ticket.
But here in Fedora, I think we should rename prrte's binary to
something different (prrte-pterm most likely). It's newer and less
popular than the other contender for the name.

Having to use a different name is annoying, but predictable.
A script that wants to be portable wrt. to the new and old names
can do something like this:
  pterm=(command -v prrte-pterm || echo pterm)
  $pterm arg1 arg2

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> > >
> > > Hmm, odd.
> > >
> > > Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> > > it).
> > >
> >
> > Taken care of it: 
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108712482
> >
> > Once it's done building and it shows up in the side-tag, you can try
> > again with gnome-software.
> >
>
> gnome-software is building fine now:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108713434
>

malcontent builds with no changes, so I've submitted it into the
side-tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108715187



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Is it possible (or a good idea) to add additional files to the -debuginfo packages?

[Omair Majid]

Hi,

I am trying to enable debug information for a programming language that
produces debuginfo in a custom (non-DWARF) format. I was thinking that
adding that programming-language-specific debuginfo to existing
-debuginfo packages seems like a good idea.

(Is that a bad idea?)

Any suggestions on how I can add additional files to the auto-generated
-debuginfo packages (which already contain some useful DWARF debuginfo).

Thanks,
Omair

--
PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108  E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora CoreOS rebasing to Fedora Linux 39

[Dusty Mabe]

Fedora Linux 39 was released today [1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing` stream has 
been
rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it will be promoted to the
`stable` stream.

For more information about Fedora 39, see the Fedora Project's list of official
Changes [2] and the Fedora CoreOS analysis of each Change [3].

As mentioned in a previous announcement, there are a few changes related to
modularity, AWS AMIs, and `moby-engine` that require special attention. For
more information, see [4].

Thank you to everyone helping find issues by running the `next` and `testing` 
streams!

Dusty Mabe, for the Fedora CoreOS team

[1]: https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-linux-39/
[2]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/39/ChangeSet
[3]: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1491
[4]: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/90321
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:54 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
> >
> > Hmm, odd.
> >
> > Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> > it).
> >
>
> Taken care of it: 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108712482
>
> Once it's done building and it shows up in the side-tag, you can try
> again with gnome-software.
>

gnome-software is building fine now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108713434



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:16 PM Mattia Verga via devel
 wrote:
>
> Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> > * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> > /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}
>
> I think this is the third time they change path. BTW, 'app-info' was the
> previous one, 0.16 used 'metainfo' [1], now 'swcatalog'... let's hope
> they're happy with this last name.
>

Per package stuff was /usr/share/appdata -> /usr/share/metainfo.

Our packaged AppStream repodata needs to move from /usr/share/app-info
to /usr/share/swcatalog. This change is a unique issue for us because
nobody else does packaged AppStream repodata.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 03/11/23 02:43, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> * appstream-data needs to move its content from
> /usr/share/app-info/{xmls,icons} to /usr/share/swcatalog/{xml,icons}

I think this is the third time they change path. BTW, 'app-info' was the 
previous one, 0.16 used 'metainfo' [1], now 'swcatalog'... let's hope 
they're happy with this last name.

Mattia

[1] 
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Quickstart.html#sect-Quickstart-DesktopApps

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Groff: Revert the mapping of special characters for UTF-8 devices introduced in 1.23.0 version

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:36:19PM +0100, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> we've decided to align with the Debian decision and revert this change

I read the article on LWN and parts of the Debian discussion, and I
think this is the right decision.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:48 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.
>
> Hmm, odd.
>
> Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
> it).
>

Taken care of it: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108712482

Once it's done building and it shows up in the side-tag, you can try
again with gnome-software.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Milan Crha]

On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.

Hmm, odd.

Anyway, a rebuild of flatpak is needed (I do not have commit rights for
it).

Thanks and bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:42 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".
>
> That would break the:
>
> > >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
>
> because appstream-devel Provides:
>
> pkgconfig(appstream) = 1.0.0
>
> no? I know, I can try it, but this feels kinda bizarre.
>

It works because 1.0.0~ < 1.0.0.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Milan Crha]

On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".

That would break the:

> >BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}

because appstream-devel Provides:

pkgconfig(appstream) = 1.0.0

no? I know, I can try it, but this feels kinda bizarre.

Bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Benson Muite]

On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote:
> Hi, everyone
> 
> I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the
> moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community.
> 
> I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find
> the spec file
Welcome. Have taken the package until you get sponsored to become a
packager.  Can you make a pull request at:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gpiozero
> 
> SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero.spec
>  
> 
> SRPM: 
> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/crisdel/python3-gpiozero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06589716-python-gpiozero/python-gpiozero-2.0.0-11.fc40.src.rpm
>  
> 
> my FAS username is crisdel
> I kindly request if someone can sponsor me, I really want to become a
> proficient package maintainer so all feedback is always welcome.
> 
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
> Thanks for your time.
> Cristian Delgado
> "You can't improve until you make mistakes"

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 12:33 PM Milan Crha  wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".
>
> Hi,
> I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
> "1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than "1.0.0-2.fc40"?
> That sounds odd to me.
>

Yes. So your %appstream_version macro should have "1.0.0~".

> Both flatpak and gnome-software have
>
>Requires: appstream%{?_isa} >= %{appstream_version}
>
> adding the tilde only here and not into:
>
>BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}
>
> will lead to a problem in the future (at least for me, I'll forget
> about it very soon).
>
> What about removing that `Requires`? There is added un-versioned
> dependency on libappstream.so.5()(64bit) anyway, which may work, as
> long as the .soname versions are properly bumped on API/ABI changes,
> right? I understand these `Requires` as "to be on a safe side" only.
>

You can do that too if you like.




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Milan Crha]

On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:58 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".

Hi,
I'm sorry, I do not follow. Do you mean "1.0.0" is higher than
"1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-1.fc40", but lower than "1.0.0-2.fc40"?
That sounds odd to me.

Both flatpak and gnome-software have

   Requires: appstream%{?_isa} >= %{appstream_version}

adding the tilde only here and not into:

   BuildRequires: pkgconfig(appstream) >= %{appstream_version}

will lead to a problem in the future (at least for me, I'll forget
about it very soon).

What about removing that `Requires`? There is added un-versioned
dependency on libappstream.so.5()(64bit) anyway, which may work, as
long as the .soname versions are properly bumped on API/ABI changes,
right? I understand these `Requires` as "to be on a safe side" only.

Bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248515] perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Out-0.22-1.fc40
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
This release replaces plain string exceptions with a class exception. Upstream
calls it an experimental. Safer for Rawhide only.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248515%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248515] perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:55 AM Milan Crha  wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> > appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> > once it says that the package is available in the repo?
>
> Hi,
> it changed the problem to:
>
> DEBUG util.py:446:  Error:
> DEBUG util.py:446:   Problem: package flatpak-devel-1.15.4-4.fc40.x86_64 from 
> build requires flatpak(x86-64) = 1.15.4-4.fc40, but none of the providers can 
> be installed
> DEBUG util.py:446:- conflicting requests
> DEBUG util.py:446:- nothing provides appstream(x86-64) >= 1.0.0 needed by 
> flatpak-1.15.4-4.fc40.x86_64 from build
>
> You can see the build here:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108705408
>

It needs to be "appstream%{?_isa} >= 1.0.0~".


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

[tdawson]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-11-08 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat

The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.

A general agenda is the following:

#topic aloha

#topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues
* https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting=Open

#topic Old Business (if needed)

#topic General Issues / Open Floor




Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Milan Crha]

On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 12:12 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
> appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again
> once it says that the package is available in the repo?

Hi,
it changed the problem to:

DEBUG util.py:446:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:446:   Problem: package flatpak-devel-1.15.4-4.fc40.x86_64 from 
build requires flatpak(x86-64) = 1.15.4-4.fc40, but none of the providers can 
be installed
DEBUG util.py:446:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:446:- nothing provides appstream(x86-64) >= 1.0.0 needed by 
flatpak-1.15.4-4.fc40.x86_64 from build

You can see the build here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108705408

Bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: HEADS UP: broken dependencies due to gdal-3.6.2-7.fc37

[Sandro Mani]

On 07.11.23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:


Hi

Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple 
of months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted 
gdal soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 
3.6.x series.


I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this, please 
don't rebuild any dependencies in the meantime, as the new package 
will bring back the previous soname.



The new update is now pushed to testing: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c0ac8784e8


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Heads up: jbig2dec 0.20 coming to rawhide

[Michael J Gruber]

Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 22:20 Uhr schrieb Michael J Gruber <
m...@fedoraproject.org>:

> jbig2dec 0.20 (a bugfix release) was released a while ago, and with the
> current ghostscript update, everything is ready for it, as can be seen in
> the copr rebuilds:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mjg/jbig2dec/builds/
>
> I will build jbig2dec 0.20 into a rawhide side tag, along with updates to
> dependent packages:
>
> mupdf 1.23.5
> python-PyMuPDF 1.23.6
> zathura-pdf-mupdf 0.4.1
>
> All of these are interdependent and - besides adjustments to the
> respective versions - come with the latest bug fixes.
>
> Cheers
> Michael
>

Bodhi update submitted from rawhide side-tag. Let's see how happy gs is
with this jbig2dec update.

If all goes well, the contained fixes would justify updating on f39 also
(and maybe f39 - gs updated all the way down), unless maintainers
of zathura-pdf-mupdf and python-PyMuPDF object.

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Automatic check for bodhi updates not to break RPM dependencies

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Miro Hrončok wrote:
> this is not the first time I saw a bodhi update that breaks dozens of
> dependencies, goes unnoticed for a week and is automatically pushed
> stable, only to discover many packages fail to install.

The most important measure would be to abolish automatic pushes. This update 
was automatically pushed after 7 days with no feedback whatsoever. Promoting 
an update to stable should require a human to explicitly click a "push to 
stable" button, thereby acknowledging the lack of feedback.

> How come we don't have an automatic check for this? What can be done?

I also do not understand why the gating stuff that was recently added does 
not complain about this.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 13:13:12 -
"David Bold"  wrote:

> Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.

I can confirm we have a problem, bout++-5.1.0-1 (latest in rawhide
branch) builds OK under F-38 mock, but fails in Rawhide mock. Some
tests won't complete, like being in deadlock or in an endless loop.


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

/usr/bin/pterm conflicts

[Orion Poplawski]

prrte 3.0 introduces /usr/bin/pterm which conflicts with putty.  Issues:

https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/issues/1836
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247407

If anyone has any constructive comments, it would be appreciated.

Orion

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Automatic check for bodhi updates not to break RPM dependencies

[Miro Hrončok]

On 07. 11. 23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi

Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months 
ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in 
F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series.


I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this, please don't 
rebuild any dependencies in the meantime, as the new package will bring back 
the previous soname.


Apologies for the troubles.


Hello,

this is not the first time I saw a bodhi update that breaks dozens of 
dependencies, goes unnoticed for a week and is automatically pushed stable, 
only to discover many packages fail to install.


How come we don't have an automatic check for this? What can be done?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Automatic check for bodhi updates not to break RPM dependencies

[Miro Hrončok]

On 07. 11. 23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote:

Hi

Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months 
ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in 
F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series.


I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this, please don't 
rebuild any dependencies in the meantime, as the new package will bring back 
the previous soname.


Apologies for the troubles.


Hello,

this is not the first time I saw a bodhi update that breaks dozens of 
dependencies, goes unnoticed for a week and is automatically pushed stable, 
only to discover many packages fail to install.


How come we don't have an automatic check for this? What can be done?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248453] Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.084

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.084-1.
   ||fc40
Last Closed||2023-11-07 14:00:55




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248456] Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.71

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Prima-1.71-1.fc40
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
Some symbols renamed (e.g. text_shaper_core_text() →
prima_text_shaper_core_text()), some obsolete ones removed (e.g.
Prima::CheckBoxGroup). Suitable for Rawhide only.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248456%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248456] Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.71

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-11-07 13:39:36




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248515] New: perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Bug ID: 2248515
   Summary: perl-Time-Out-0.22 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Time-Out
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.22
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.22
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.21-1.fc40
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-Out/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3468/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Time-Out


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248515

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248515%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[David Bold]

Thanks Dan, I will have a go at your machine + mock to reproduce and debug.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:19:23 -
"David Bold"  wrote:

> > On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> > David Schwörer  > 
> > 
> > if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> > was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> > arches. The libmpi_cxx.so.40 doesn't exist at all in openmpi 5.0, so
> > people on x86_64 or aarch64 are affected as well.
> > 
> > 
> > Dan
> 
> Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was taking about s390x, and only 
> remembered it is one of those once where I do no easy access to. Thus it is 
> hard for me to resolve it [0].

ah, I see, I will take a look if I can reproduce that locally, and I can
provide you access to our public s390x machine too.


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248453] Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.084

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth  ---
Already built, but CI tests failing (almost certainly unrelated to
perl-IO-Socket-SSL):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c5ad61d3c3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248453%23c1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248456] New: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.71

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456

Bug ID: 2248456
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Prima to 1.71
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Prima
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Prima
  Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.70 version. Upstream released 1.71. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248456

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248456%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248453] New: Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.084

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453

Bug ID: 2248453
   Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Socket-SSL to 2.084
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/IO-Socket-SSL
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com, rhug...@redhat.com,
rstr...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 2.083 version. Upstream released 2.084. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248453

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248453%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2248457] New: Upgrade perl-Text-MultiMarkdown to 1.002

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248457

Bug ID: 2248457
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-MultiMarkdown to 1.002
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Text-MultiMarkdown
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.001000 version. Upstream released 1.002. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2248457

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202248457%23c0
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20231107.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20231106.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20231107.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  7
Added packages:  12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   92
Downgraded packages: 1

Size of added packages:  3.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.42 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 2.27 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   -16.37 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 21.33 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le
Path: 
Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: 
Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: Sericea dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Sericea/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Sericea-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.iso
Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-Rawhide-20231106.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: deepin-wayland-protocols-1.6.0.deepin.1.2-1.fc40
Summary: Deepin Specific Protocols for Wayland
RPMs:deepin-wayland-protocols-devel
Size:297.45 KiB

Package: pagure-exporter-0.1.1-1.fc40
Summary: Simple exporter tool that helps to migrate repository contents
RPMs:pagure-exporter
Size:67.56 KiB

Package: python-coincidence-0.6.5-1.fc40
Summary: Helper functions for pytest
RPMs:python3-coincidence
Size:41.19 KiB

Package: python-domdf-python-tools-3.7.0-1.fc40
Summary: Helpful functions for Python
RPMs:python3-domdf-python-tools
Size:194.47 KiB

Package: python-hatch-requirements-txt-0.4.0-1.fc40
Summary: Hatchling plugin to read project dependencies from requirements.txt
RPMs:python3-hatch-requirements-txt
Size:17.79 KiB

Package: rust-bigdecimal-0.4.2-1.fc40
Summary: Arbitrary precision decimal numbers
RPMs:rust-bigdecimal+default-devel rust-bigdecimal+serde-devel 
rust-bigdecimal+std-devel rust-bigdecimal+string-only-devel 
rust-bigdecimal-devel
Size:98.95 KiB

Package: rust-h3-quinn-0.0.3-1.fc40
Summary: QUIC transport implementation based on Quinn
RPMs:rust-h3-quinn+default-devel rust-h3-quinn-devel
Size:21.80 KiB

Package: rust-piper-0.2.1-1.fc40
Summary: Async pipes, channels, mutexes, and more
RPMs:rust-piper+default-devel rust-piper+futures-io-devel 
rust-piper+portable-atomic-devel rust-piper+portable-atomic-util-devel 
rust-piper+portable_atomic_crate-devel rust-piper+std-devel rust-piper-devel
Size:68.30 KiB

Package: rust-rstest_reuse-0.6.0-1.fc40
Summary: Reusable test attributes for rstest
RPMs:rust-rstest_reuse+default-devel rust-rstest_reuse-devel
Size:32.12 KiB

Package: rust-rustsec-0.28.3-1.fc40
Summary: Client library for the RustSec security advisory database
RPMs:rust-rustsec+default-devel rust-rustsec+dependency-tree-devel 
rust-rustsec+git-devel rust-rustsec+osv-export-devel rust-rustsec-devel
Size:105.40 KiB

Package: rust-serde_derive_internals-0.26.0-1.fc40
Summary: AST representation used by Serde derive macros
RPMs:rust-serde_derive_internals+default-devel 
rust-serde_derive_internals-devel
Size:39.46 KiB

Package: rust-speakersafetyd-0.1.4-1.fc40
Summary: Speaker protection daemon for embedded Linux systems
RPMs:speakersafetyd
Size:2.11 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  SFML-2.6.1-2.fc40
Old package:  SFML-2.6.1-1.fc40
Summary:  Simple and Fast Multimedia Library
RPMs: SFML SFML-devel
Size: 5.87 MiB
Size change:  1.02 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Nov 06 2023 S??rgio Basto  - 2.6.1-2
  - Fix License tag


Package:  abiword-1:3.0.5-9.fc40
Old package:  abiword-1:3.0.5-8.fc39
Summary:  Word processing program
RPMs: abiword libabiword libabiword-devel python3-abiword
Size: 23.95 MiB
Size change:  -30.62 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 04 2023 Gwyn Ciesla  1:3.0.5-9
  - Drop i386 on f40+


Package:  alsa-sof-firmware-2023.09.1-1.fc40
Old package:  alsa-sof-firmware-2023.09-1.fc40
Summary:  Firmware and topology files for Sound Open Firmware project
RPMs: alsa-sof-firmware alsa-sof-firmware-debug
Size: 4.36 MiB
Size change:  7.00 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Nov 06 2023 Jaroslav Kysela  - 2023.09.1-1
  - Update to v2023.09.1


Package:  bootc-0.1.3-1.fc40
Old package:  bootc-0.1.2-1.fc40
Summary:  Bootable container system
RPMs: bootc
Size: 7.35 MiB
Size change:  51.83 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Oct 21 2023 Colin Walters  - 0.1.2-2
  - Add a requirement on skopeo

  * Tue Oct 24 2023 Colin Walters  - 0.1.2-3
  - Add Recommends: bootupd

  * Mon

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[David Bold]

> On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
> David Schwörer  
> 
> if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
> was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
> arches. The libmpi_cxx.so.40 doesn't exist at all in openmpi 5.0, so
> people on x86_64 or aarch64 are affected as well.
> 
> 
>   Dan

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was taking about s390x, and only 
remembered it is one of those once where I do no easy access to. Thus it is 
hard for me to resolve it [0].

I assume the MUSIC maintainer are in a similar position that they did not 
manage to resolve the FTBFS, but I think obsoleting FTBFS packages is not the 
way to go. There is an issue for MUSIC to switch to the C API [1], thus I would 
assume they would be happy to get some help, I know I would be happy if someone 
could figure out why bout++ has issues with openmpi 5 on s390x.

I am aware that until I can rebuild bout++, and until MUSIC can be rebuild, the 
packages are FTI, blocking upgrade of openmpi. I am stuck on the old openmpi as 
well.

Best,
David

[0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107756851
[1] https://github.com/INCF/MUSIC/issues/27
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

HEADS UP: broken dependencies due to gdal-3.6.2-7.fc37

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of 
months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal 
soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x 
series.


I'm preparing a gdal-3.6.2-8.really3.5.3.fc37 to address this, please 
don't rebuild any dependencies in the meantime, as the new package will 
bring back the previous soname.


Apologies for the troubles.

Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Kalev Lember]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:18 AM Milan Crha  wrote:

> I'm sorry for a late response, I forgot of this. I tried to build
> gnome-software in your side tag, but it fails due to the appstream
> packages cannot be installed together:
>
> Error: Transaction test error:
> DEBUG util.py:446:file /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/AppStream-
> 1.0.typelib conflicts between attempted installs of appstream0.16-
> 0.16.3-1.fc40.x86_64 and appstream-1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-
> 1.fc40.x86_64
>
> Thus I guess the dependencies need to be built in certain order, to not
> pull in old and new appstream packages or there's some problem with
> packaging of the two.
>

Hi Milan,

I went ahead and dropped the conflicting typelib file from the
appstream0.16 compat package in
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/appstream0.16/c/1f216a9f459dcfa5dec851b252c593629bf0cd7c?branch=rawhide

Can you do 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-76936 --build
appstream0.16-0.16.3-2.fc40' and try building gnome-software again once it
says that the package is available in the repo?

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:17:06 -
David Schwörer  wrote:

> MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from 
> source after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I 
> would be unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.
> 
> I think having more time to adapt dependent packages would have been helpful, 
> as I do not have the time right now to fix the issue on some strange 
> architecture, and I would assume MUSIC developer and maintainer also need 
> more time to port to a different API.

if you mean strange as ppc64le, then it's in the output just because I
was updating a rawhide/ppc64le system, but the problem exists on all
arches. The libmpi_cxx.so.40 doesn't exist at all in openmpi 5.0, so
people on x86_64 or aarch64 are affected as well.


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Kalev Lember]

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:34 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:

> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.
>
> Please address these ASAP in some meaningful way and submit the result
> into the "f40-build-side-76936" side tag.
>

Hi Neal,

I've backported the appstream 1.0 patches to libadwaita and built it in the
side tag.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[David Schwörer]

MUSIC is an independent package, that just happens to fail to build from source 
after a new openmpi has been landed. bout++ is affected as well, and I would be 
unhappy if it would be obsoleted by openmpi.

I think having more time to adapt dependent packages would have been helpful, 
as I do not have the time right now to fix the issue on some strange 
architecture, and I would assume MUSIC developer and maintainer also need more 
time to port to a different API.

I think obsoleting FTBFS packages after a soname bump is not something we 
generally do.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: openmpi 5.0.0 update coming - drops i686 and C++ API

[Dan Horák]

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:48:38 -0600
Orion Poplawski  wrote:

> On 10/28/23 13:36, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > I'm going to start building openmpi 5.0.0 and its requirements (pmix 
> > 4.2.7, prrte 3.0.2) and dependencies in a side-tag starting tomorrow. 
> > Notable changes are:
> > 
> > * Dropping support for 32-bit
> > * Dropping support for C++ API
> > * Change in the environment variable to allow oversubscription (running 
> > with more processes than available cores)
> > 
> > I will be making changes to dependent packages to address these changes.
> > 
> > I've been rebuilding deps in COPR 
> > (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orion/pmix-4.2/builds/) and 
> > most rebuild fine.  One exception is MUSIC which depends on the C++ API. 
> >   There is a longstanding upstream issue to address this.  Hopefully 
> > this will finally get dealt with.
> > 
> > There are no soname bumps, but pmix has proved problematic in the past 
> > but its deps will be rebuilt.
> 
> The side tag has been merged.  I rebuilt all packages that depended on 
> libmpi_cxx.so - except MUSIC which needs upstream to drop it's 
> requirement on the C++ API.

this is causing broken deps in rawhide

 Problem 1: cannot install both openmpi-5.0.0-2.fc40.ppc64le from rawhide and 
openmpi-4.1.5-7.fc40.ppc64le from @System
  - package MUSIC-openmpi-1.1.16-13.20201002git8c6b77a.fc39.ppc64le from 
@System requires libmpi_cxx.so.40()(64bit)(openmpi-ppc64le), but none of the 
providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
openmpi-4.1.5-7.fc40.ppc64le
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
MUSIC-openmpi-1.1.16-13.20201002git8c6b77a.fc39.ppc64le

Couldn't openmpi Obsolete the MUSIC-openmpi subpackage?


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Debarshi Ray via devel]

Hey Neal,

On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:43 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> > 
> > Hey folks,
> > 
> > As part of the work to upgrade to KDE Plasma 6, appstream is being
> > upgraded to a snapshot release as 1.0.0 is arriving soon. There are
> > some consequences for this change:
> > 
> > [...]
> >
> > I've built appstream in a side-tag, and I'd appreciate it if folks
> > could help by adapting their packages and submitting builds into
> > it.
> > 
> > This can be done with the following command: fedpkg build
> > --target=f40-build-side-76936
> > 
> > My simple query of the consumers of the libraries in question
> > resulted in this:
> > ngompa@fedora ~> sudo dnf repoquery -q --whatrequires
> > "libappstream.so.4()(64bit)" --qf "%{SOURCE_NAME}"
> > appstream
> > appstream-generator
> > flatpak
> > gnome-software
> > libadwaita
> > malcontent
> 
> I've handled appstream, appstream-generator, and appstream-data
> already.
> 
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.

I am working on the Flatpak backport.

Cheers,
Rishi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: appstream soname bump in Rawhide (special info for AppStreamQt users!)

[Milan Crha]

On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 22:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> * Flatpak has an upstream change that needs backporting[1] or a new
> release.
> * GNOME Software has a merge request open[2].
> * libadwaita has an upstream change that needs backporting[3].
> * malcontent needs work done.

Hi,
I'm sorry for a late response, I forgot of this. I tried to build
gnome-software in your side tag, but it fails due to the appstream
packages cannot be installed together:

Error: Transaction test error:
DEBUG util.py:446:file /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0/AppStream-
1.0.typelib conflicts between attempted installs of appstream0.16-
0.16.3-1.fc40.x86_64 and appstream-1.0.0~git20231102.d88ed03-
1.fc40.x86_64

Thus I guess the dependencies need to be built in certain order, to not
pull in old and new appstream packages or there's some problem with
packaging of the two.
Bye,
Milan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue