[Bug 2250751] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptiv
   ||e-0.112-1.fc40
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-11-21 07:51:37



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3f087a0801 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250751%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250751] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-3f087a0801 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3f087a0801


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250751%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

dracut problems quick docs page requires help

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

We have this issue open on the quick-docs repo:
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/641

TLDR; the "debug-dracut-problems" quick doc seems to be out of date and
needs review/updating.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/debug-dracut-problems/

Unfortunately, I don't know enough about dracut to do this myself. Would
someone that knows this stuff please consider reviewing (even updating?)
the page so we know what to do with it next?


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250772] New: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.102 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250772

Bug ID: 2250772
   Summary: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.102 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.102
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.102
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.101-11.fc39
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Log-Any-Adapter-Callback

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/17925/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250772

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250772%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250763] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.031 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250763

Bug ID: 2250763
   Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.031 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 6.031
Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.031
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.030-2.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5898/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250763

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250763%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-bdf128f5d3   
audiofile-0.3.6-36.el8
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4a01799793   
chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

ndisc6-1.0.7-3.el8
python-specfile-0.25.0-1.el8

Details about builds:



 ndisc6-1.0.7-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-adb1499150)
 IPv6 diagnostic tools

Update Information:

EPEL8 build of ndisc6.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Nov 20 2023 Dominik Mierzejewski  - 1.0.7-3
- Switch to HTTPS URLs
- Enable tarball signature verification
- Drop unused patch
- Sort file list alphabetically
- Use SPDX identifiers in License: field
* Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.7-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun  6 2023 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.7-1
- New upstream
* Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.6-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Aug 16 2022 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.6-1
- New upstream
* Fri Jul 22 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Feb 25 2022 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.5-1
- New upstream
* Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.4-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.4-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.4-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Dec  1 2020 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.4-1
- New upstream release
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-11
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jan 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-10
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-9
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Feb  1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Feb  8 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Aug  3 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.3-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Nov  4 2016 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.3-2
- Fix dnssort tool patch by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski. Fixes BZ#1361815
* Fri May 27 2016 Michele Baldessari  - 1.0.3-1
- New upstream version
* Thu Feb  4 2016 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.2-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jun 17 2015 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.2-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Aug 22 2014 Stjepan Gros  - 1.0.2-1
- Bumped to a new upstream version
* Sun Aug 17 2014 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
* Sat Jun  7 2014 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
* Sat Aug  3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jul 17 2013 Petr Pisar  - 1.0.1-5
- Perl 5.18 rebuild
* Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Mar 15 2011 Stjepan Gros  - 1.0.1-1
- Bumped to a new upstream version
- Removed references to isatap daemon as it is deprecated
* Tue Feb  8 2011 Fedora Release Engineering  
- 1.0.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Dec  2 2010 Stjepan Gros  - 1.0.0-1
- Bumped to a new upstream version
* Mon Nov 16 2009 Stjepan Gros  - 0.9.9-1
- Bumped to a new upstream version
* Mon Dec 29 2008 Stjepan Gros  - 0.9.8-2
- Escaped unintentional macro in changelog section

[rpms/rt] PR #2: use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages

[FeRD]

ferdnyc commented on the pull-request: `use Droid Sans fonts from distro 
packages` that you are following:
``
Updated to use `/usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts` as the configured 
path, rather than `%{_datadir}/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/`, as per [the 
guidelines](https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_directory_dependencies):

> When declaring file and directory dependencies, installation path macros like 
> `%{_bindir}` MUST NOT be used. `%{_bindir}` of the package that provides 
> sometool may be different from `%{_bindir}` of a package that requires 
> sometool. In such case, `BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/sometool` does not work as 
> expected.

(That would certainly apply equally to hardcoding paths _within_ the package.)
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250760] New: perl-Software-License-0.104005 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250760

Bug ID: 2250760
   Summary: perl-Software-License-0.104005 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Software-License
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.104005
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.104005
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.104004-2.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Software-License/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3325/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Software-License


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250760

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250760%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0b847ca121 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-0b847ca121`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0b847ca121

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-74023c1af8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-74023c1af8`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-74023c1af8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-00d8d2586b has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-00d8d2586b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-00d8d2586b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 1731700] rt depends on files/directories from non-standard locations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700

"FeRD" (Frank Dana)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ferd...@gmail.com



--- Comment #13 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana)  ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #12)
> 
> However, while having zero knowledge about the package, I wonder if symlinks
> are the right solution. It seems to me that in this case the fonts can be
> considered web assets and should follow the appropriate guideline [1]. That
> means these should be served from the proper place and just the common
> virtual font requires should be used instead.
> 
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts

I've submitted https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2 which makes
changes along the lines of what Vit outlined here. It sets the internal
fontpath of the package to /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/ instead of
using the symlinked indirection via /usr/share/rt/fonts/, and depends on
font(droidsans) and font(droidsansfallback) instead of using filesystem paths.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201731700%23c13
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/rt] PR #2: use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages

[FeRD]

ferdnyc opened a new pull-request against the project: `rt` that you are 
following:
``
use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250751] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Scratch build failed. Details below:

BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-7b_93mey/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive.spec']' returned non-zero
exit status 1.

StdOut:
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1700524800
error: Bad file: ./Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112.tar.gz: No such file or
directory

RPM build errors:
Bad file: ./Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112.tar.gz: No such file or directory


Traceback:
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py",
line 56, in build
result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
 ^
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line
229, in build
raise BuilderException(

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report
it on the-new-hotness issue tracker:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250751%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-9b3386fd9b has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-9b3386fd9b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9b3386fd9b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c6
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250751] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 2000622
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2000622=edit
Update to 0.112 (#2250751)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250751%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250751] New: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Bug ID: 2250751
   Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.112 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 0.112
Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.112
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.111-3.fc39
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Getopt-Long-Descriptive

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7110/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250751

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250751%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0021855787 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2023-0021855787`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0021855787

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c6
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: chromium regression on EL9

[Nicolas Chauvet]

Le lun. 20 nov. 2023 à 01:38, Neal Gompa  a écrit :
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
>  wrote:
> >
> > Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
> > >  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be
> > >> installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not
> > >> have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free)
> > >> that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an
> > >> incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the
> > > libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common
> > workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed
> > (ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand
> > it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install
> > chromium now?
> > Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs"
> > has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages
> > libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.
> >
> >
>
> Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported
> beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.

@Neal
Can you clarify why you Conflicts about ffmpeg-libs from rpmfusion
whereas we have fixed the incompatibilities ?
Please don't push breaking packages without the needed coordination
notice, people aren't necessarily able to react at your own pace and
this is perceived as tremendously aggressive !

@Adrew, there is a rpmfusion-free-updates-testing ffmpeg package that
is compatible with the chromium newer releases. (for epel9)
It will be pushed to stable ASAP.
--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: chromium regression on EL9

[Leon Fauster via epel-devel]

Am 20.11.23 um 01:38 schrieb Neal Gompa:

On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
 wrote:


Am 19.11.23 um 14:30 schrieb Neal Gompa:

On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM Leon Fauster via epel-devel
 wrote:


Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be
installed on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not
have this problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free)
that conflicts with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an
incompatibility with rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?



Yes. If you want expanded codec support, install the
libavcodec-freeworld overlay package instead.







Not sure what scenario is supported now. A common
workstation setup has rpmfusion applications installed
(ffmpeg, mpv, libavcodec-freeworld). Do I understand
it correctly that I must remove ffmpeg-libs to install
chromium now?
Not sure if the new spec design with "Conflicts: ffmpeg-libs"
has more a fedora context in mind. As both packages
libavcodec-free and ffmpeg-libs provide the needed lib.




Strictly speaking, from a Fedora context, RPM Fusion is not supported
beyond limited cases. That said, EPEL has mpv itself too.

The "recommended" (as far as recommendations go when it comes to third
party repositories) path is to use Fedora's ffmpeg-free stack and then
install libavcodec-freeworld on top if there are codecs you are
missing that you need. That package overlays a libavcodec build that
includes things Fedora cannot ship at this time.



Thanks Neal for the overview.

The specific issue was addressed now.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/c/cfac4f7e0f0cae0daffbbad5c4c82b8c83e0c822?branch=epel9

Lets see when its in the repo.

--
Leon


--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250558] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558



--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Thank you, Paul.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250558%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250558] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27
   ||-1.fc40
Last Closed||2023-11-20 18:30:36



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ae6550530 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250558%23c6
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250558] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0ae6550530 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0ae6550530


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250558%23c5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250558] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |p...@city-fan.org
 CC||p...@city-fan.org



--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth  ---
I'll do it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250558%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250400] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2023-11-20 16:17:04




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250400] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.54-1
   ||.fc40
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 40.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250400%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250400] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.54 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250400
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

Co-maintainers welcome!  What's your FAS? :D

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:39 AM Pete Zaitcev  wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:48:58 +0100
> Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/
>
> > python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0
> weeks ago
>
> I was going to take ironicclient, but it looks like it is no longer
> an orphan. But jonathanspw already has 734 packages. Is everything okay
> down there?
>
> -- P
>
>

-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

[Neal Gompa]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 5:02 PM Leon Fauster via devel
 wrote:
>
> Am 14.11.23 um 22:04 schrieb Christopher:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:30 AM Michael Catanzaro  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 14 2023 at 08:16:39 AM -0500, Christopher
> >>  wrote:
> >>> I think for the sake of security, it'd be better if this were on by
> >>> default, and you just had to specify the --nogpgcheck
> >>> For convenience, the error message should probably say "Error: GPG
> >>> check FAILED (try again with '--nogpgcheck' to ignore)"
> >>> I don't think this use case is so important that everybody's security
> >>> should be lowered to avoid the minor inconvenience of passing a simple
> >>> flag.
> >>
> >> Thing is, when manually installing RPMs that don't come from a
> >> repository, 98% of the time they are not expected to be signed by a GPG
> >> key that you have installed, so the check is expected to fail.
> >
> > The failure indicates that the source and integrity of the RPM is
> > uncertain. The fact that the user is expected to make a conscious
> > decision to bypass it when they want to accept that risk, but to be
> > stopped if they don't want to accept that risk, is the whole point.
> > So, yes, the check is expected to fail under those circumstances.
> >
> > As for how common those circumstances are, I just surveyed my Fedora
> > systems, and 100% of the RPMs I've manually installed, including some
> > pertaining to Slack, Docker, Chrome, Jenkins, and InfluxDB, as well as
> > my own that I've built, all are signed. In my personal experience,
> > it's rare to come across an unsigned RPM. You may have a different
> > experience, but the frequency isn't the point... the point is to
> > provide protection by default and user choice to override and accept
> > the risks. Right now, we have acceptance of risk by default instead of
> > protection.
> >
> >> GPG check is just not the right thing to do in this case.
> >
> > I disagree. I think it *is* the right thing to do to check, and offer
> > the option to skip the check. That gives users the choice to be
> > insecure if they want, but leaves the default secure.
> >
> >> If we enable GPG checking when not appropriate,
> >
> > I disagree that the failure implies that GPG checking isn't
> > appropriate. I think the fact that an un-bypassed check failed, in
> > response to an RPM from an unknown or untrusted source, is very
> > appropriate. The only time it would not be appropriate, in my opinion,
> > is if the user chose to bypass it.
> >
> >> ***we will train users to reflexively ignore GPG errors.***
> >
> > So, your position is: "don't train users to ignore GPG errors... we'll
> > ignore them for you" ?!?!
> >
> > First, I don't agree that this will happen. I think it's more likely
> > that users who are lax with security will continue to be lax with
> > security, and users who aren't will pay attention to the failures and
> > use that as a signal to inform their acceptance of the risks. But
> > second, even if you're right, the worst case scenario here is the
> > scenario we already have as the default: the check being ignored by
> > the user is nearly the same as the check not being performed at all,
> > which is what's happening today. If you're concerned that GPG errors
> > will be ignored, I don't understand why you're not concerned with the
> > fact that the only reason why users aren't seeing those errors today
> > is because GPG checks aren't running at all! All the same security
> > risks are still there... including the risks for an invalid or
> > fraudulent signature when it is present on a local RPM, in addition to
> > the risks when the signature is missing... they're just being ignored
> > by default. You're worried about a situation where a user *might*
> > ignore security check errors... but I'm worried that they are
> > auto-ignored by the system, before the user even has a chance to take
> > them seriously.
> >
> >>
> >> (We have already trained users to approve importing new GPG keys as
> >> long as they claim to be from Fedora, since this is required every
> >> Fedora release. This is bad enough.)
> >
> > I don't agree with that either. I verify the signatures of Fedora keys
> > using https://fedoraproject.org/security and the keys of other repos I
> > use, and other users who care about security can do the same. I think
> > Fedora has done as good a job as one can expect, for the most part, in
> > trying to provide good security to those who care. But, of course,
> > users have to care first and do their part as well.
> >
> >>
> >> GPG check makes sense when installing RPMs from a configured
> >> repository, not when manually installing RPMs from a filesystem path or
> >> URL.
> >
> > Again, I completely disagree. The check protects against corrupt
> > and/or malicious software, and is one of the few steps the package
> > management system has to proactively prevent harm to the user's system
> > *before* the harm is done. Skipping these checks by 

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

[Vít Ondruch]

Not saying I am going to request Fedora to benefit from this, but since 
you have mentioned such feature, it would be super useful, if you also 
linked to an appropriate documentation.


Vít


Dne 14. 11. 23 v 14:12 Jaroslav Mracek napsal(a):

I would like to highlight a cool feature of DNF5 - drop-in directory for 
configuration overrides, where distribution may modify configuration of DNF5. 
Why I am mentioning it, because it allows to make a decision by distribution 
and the behavior might be modify outside of DNF5 package. Therefore the 
configuration option `localpkg_gpgcheck` might be modified by a Fedora 
distribution.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Neil Hanlon]

On 20.11.2023 06:21, Neil Hanlon wrote:

On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



   Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change


[...]

python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.


I've taken python-etcd, but am looking into what's going on with this package. 
aiui, this should be replaced with
etcd3gw, probably. The upstream for python-etcd hasn't updated in some time, 
save for some spurious updates a few weeks
ago.



python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.


I'm not sure I follow this--where are you seeing that ironicclient is a dep for 
samba? I would imagine that it would be
the other way around.


Oops. I see it now. Nevermind :) -- samba <- gluster <- pcs <- ... <- 
python-ironicclient

I am willing to help with ironicclient if needed.

--Neil


Best,
--Neil


Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
  -- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue





signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Wget2 as Wget (Self-Contained)

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:22:30PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> == User Experience ==
> This change should be largely transparent to users. Some of the more
> esoteric options and behaviors may have changed, but the commonly used
> ones mostly work as they did in 1.x.

Is there a list of which "esoteric options and behaviors" were dropped
so we can check this statement for ourselves?

I couldn't find any such list upstream.  A list of supported options
is below, but note that it suffers from the "-- is replaced by random
Unicode" doc bug so good luck trying to search for particular options:

https://rockdaboot.github.io/wget2/md_wget2_manual.html

I found that at least --retry-on-host-error is gone which is annoying
because that option is pretty useful (maybe it's been replaced by
something else or it is now implicit, but it's hard to tell).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Neil Hanlon]

On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change


[...]

python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago


It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.


I've taken python-etcd, but am looking into what's going on with this package. 
aiui, this should be replaced with
etcd3gw, probably. The upstream for python-etcd hasn't updated in some time, 
save for some spurious updates a few weeks
ago.



python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.


I'm not sure I follow this--where are you seeing that ironicclient is a dep for 
samba? I would imagine that it would be
the other way around.

Best,
--Neil


Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
   -- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-00d8d2586b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-00d8d2586b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-9b3386fd9b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-9b3386fd9b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-74023c1af8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-74023c1af8


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0231120-1.fc40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-11-20 13:03:36



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-a8aae6b9e4 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-a8aae6b9e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a8aae6b9e4


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|iarn...@gmail.com,  |
   |jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com  |




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023
   ||1120-1.fc40
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2023-11-20 12:42:35



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-24cfba705c has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-0021855787 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0021855787


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-2ad7c686d7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2023-24cfba705c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-24cfba705c


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 20 November (today)

[Ankur Sinha]

Hello everyone,

Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 20
November at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix.  The meeting
is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us
over:

Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/%23neuro:fedoraproject.org

You can use this link to see the local time for the meeting:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Open+NeuroFedora+Meeting=20231120T13=%3A=1

or you can use this command in a terminal:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1300 Monday'

The meeting will be chaired by @ankursinha. The agenda for the
meeting is:

- New introductions and roll call.
- Tasks from last meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/latest/neurofedora
- Open Pagure tickets: 
https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open=S%3A+Next+meeting
- Package health check: 
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?groups=neuro-sig
- Open package reviews check: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro
- CompNeuro lab compose status check for F39: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=30691
- Neuroscience query of the week
- Next meeting day, and chair.
- Open floor.

We hope to see you there!

The meeting announcement is also posted on the NeuroFedora blog here:
https://neuroblog.fedoraproject.org/2023/11/20/next-open-neurofedora-meeting-20-November-1300-utc.html

You can learn more about NeuroFedora here:
https://neuro.fedoraproject.org


-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

F40 Change Proposal: Systemd Security Hardening (System-Wide)

[Aoife Moloney]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemdSecurityHardening

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
Improve security by enabling some of the high level systemd security
hardening settings that isolate and sandbox default system services.

== Owner ==

* Name: [[User:Sundaram| Rahul Sundaram]]
* Email: methe...@gmail.com


== Detailed Description ==

systemd provides a number of settings that can harden security for
services. We are selecting a few high level ones to enable by default
on a service by service basis as suitable for that particular service.

* `PrivateTmp=yes`
* `ProtectSystem=yes/full/strict`
* `ProtectHome=yes/read-only`
* `ProtectClock=yes`
* `ProtectHostname=yes`
* `ProtectControlGroups=yes`
* `ProtectHostname=yes`
* `ProtectKernelLogs=yes`
* `ProtectKernelModules=yes`
* `ProtectKernelTunables=yes`
* `ProtectProc=invisible`
* `PrivateDevices=yes`
* `PrivateNetwork=yes`
* `NoNewPrivileges=yes`
* `User=`

If we want to go further, we could also consider:

* `CapabilityBoundingSet=`
* `DevicePolicy=closed`
* `KeyringMode=private`
* `LockPersonality=yes`
* `MemoryDenyWriteExecute=yes`
* `PrivateUsers=yes`
* `RemoveIPC=yes`
* `RestrictAddressFamilies=`
* `RestrictNamespaces=yes`
* `RestrictRealtime=yes`
* `RestrictSUIDSGID=yes`
* `SystemCallFilter=`
* `SystemCallArchitectures=native`


We will aim to cover all the default system services as well as some
of the high profile services such as Nginx or PostgreSQL. All of these
settings need to be configured on a per service basis instead of using
a global override to facilitate fine tuning the settings based on
service requirements and limit the impact for users on upgrades.
Certain services have a very targeted scope. For instance, a service
that only needs to read or write from only one directory could
leverage more fine grained settings to restrict access even further.
We will enable as many of these as feasible for the services but not
every knob is going to be applicable to every service. For example,
`PrivateNetwork=yes` can only be used for services that does not need
network connectivity by default.  We have to choose between
`DynamicUser=yes` or `User` if either is feasible for the service to
use. As a base starting point, from Fedora 39 workstation, we have the
following system services installed by default which should considered
within the scope of the change (excluding systemd associated ones
which already have a number of these security settings enabled). We
may also consider doing this for some of the high profile services
including say Nginx and PostgreSQL permitting time considerations and
other contributors if any joining this effort. We will prioritize
critical or long running services.

* `abrtd.service`
* `abrt-journal-core.service`
* `abrt-oops.service`
* `abrt-pstoreoops.service`
* `abrt-vmcore.service`
* `abrt-xorg.service`
* `accounts-daemon.service`
* `alsa-restore.service`
* `alsa-state.service`
* `anaconda-direct.service`
* `anaconda-fips.service`
* `anaconda-nm-config.service`
* `anaconda-nm-disable-autocons.service`
* `anaconda-noshell.service`
* `anaconda-pre.service`
* `anaconda.service`
* `anaconda-sshd.service`
* `arp-ethers.service`
* `auditd.service`
* `auth-rpcgss-module.service`
* `avahi-daemon.service`
* `blivet.service`
* `blk-availability.service`
* `bluetooth.service`
* `bolt.service`
* `brltty.service`
* `canberra-system-bootup.service`
* `canberra-system-shutdown-reboot.service`
* `canberra-system-shutdown.service`
* `chronyd-restricted.service`
* `chronyd.service`
* `chrony-wait.service`
* `colord.service`
* `console-getty.service`
* `cups-browsed.service`
* `cups.service`
* `dbus-broker.service`
* `dbus-daemon.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.import1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.locale1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.login1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.machine1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.portable1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.timedate1.service`
* `debug-shell.service` (opens a user shell that must
be able to do arbitrary stuff)
* `dm-event.service`
* `dnf-makecache.service`
* `dnf-system-upgrade-cleanup.service`
* `dnf-system-upgrade.service`
* `dnsmasq.service`
* `dracut-cmdline.service`
* `dracut-initqueue.service`
* `dracut-mount.service`
* `dracut-pre-mount.service`
* `dracut-pre-pivot.service`
* `dracut-pre-trigger.service`
* `dracut-pre-udev.service`
* `dracut-shutdown-onfailure.service`
* `dracut-shutdown.service`
* `emergency.service` (opens a user shell that must
be able to do arbitrary stuff)
* `fedora-third-party-refresh.service`
* `firewalld.service`
* `flatpak-add-fedora-repos.service`
* `flatpak-system-helper.service`
* `fprintd.service`
* `fsidd.service`
* `fstrim.service`
* 

F40 Change Proposal: Wget2 as Wget (Self-Contained)

[Aoife Moloney]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wget2asWget

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.



== Summary ==
Replace wget with wget2 (a modern implementation of wget intended to
replace wget 1.x) as the provider of wget.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Mruprich| Michal Ruprich]]

* Email: ngomp...@gmail.com, mrupr...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
GNU Wget2 is the successor to GNU Wget providing a modern
implementation of wget backed by a new library: libwget2.
The intent to switch from wget 1.x to wget2 is to switch to an
implementation that is more actively developed and provides a richer
interface for leveraging wget's functionality.

== Feedback ==


== Benefit to Fedora ==
The major benefit of switching to wget2 is leveraging the cleaner
codebase that leverages modern practices for development and
maintainability, including unit tests and fuzzing as a
security-sensitive component. Users will also see better support for
newer protocols over time as they are more easily and quickly plumbed
into wget2 than wget.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Add a wget2-wget subpackage that
replaces {{package|wget}} and ensure things don't break during mass
build. Then retire {{package|wget}}.

* Other developers: N/A

* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11790 #11790]

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)


* Alignment with Community Initiatives: N/A (not needed for this Change)


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
When upgrading to Fedora Linux 40, systems with {{package|wget}}
installed will be switched to {{package|wget2}} via the
wget2-wget package. The change should be mostly
transparent to users.


== How To Test ==
Users can test {{package|wget2}} now by installing the package and
using the wget2 command. The interface will be the
interface users have with wget on upgrade.


== User Experience ==
This change should be largely transparent to users. Some of the more
esoteric options and behaviors may have changed, but the commonly used
ones mostly work as they did in 1.x.

== Dependencies ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)



== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: Change owners will disable
wget2-wget subpackage and restore {{package|wget}}
* Contingency deadline: Final Freeze
* Blocks release? No


== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==
The wget command is now based on GNU Wget2, a modern
implementation of GNU Wget.




-- 
Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney
--
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

F40 Change Proposal: Systemd Security Hardening (System-Wide)

[Aoife Moloney]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemdSecurityHardening

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

== Summary ==
Improve security by enabling some of the high level systemd security
hardening settings that isolate and sandbox default system services.

== Owner ==

* Name: [[User:Sundaram| Rahul Sundaram]]
* Email: methe...@gmail.com


== Detailed Description ==

systemd provides a number of settings that can harden security for
services. We are selecting a few high level ones to enable by default
on a service by service basis as suitable for that particular service.

* `PrivateTmp=yes`
* `ProtectSystem=yes/full/strict`
* `ProtectHome=yes/read-only`
* `ProtectClock=yes`
* `ProtectHostname=yes`
* `ProtectControlGroups=yes`
* `ProtectHostname=yes`
* `ProtectKernelLogs=yes`
* `ProtectKernelModules=yes`
* `ProtectKernelTunables=yes`
* `ProtectProc=invisible`
* `PrivateDevices=yes`
* `PrivateNetwork=yes`
* `NoNewPrivileges=yes`
* `User=`

If we want to go further, we could also consider:

* `CapabilityBoundingSet=`
* `DevicePolicy=closed`
* `KeyringMode=private`
* `LockPersonality=yes`
* `MemoryDenyWriteExecute=yes`
* `PrivateUsers=yes`
* `RemoveIPC=yes`
* `RestrictAddressFamilies=`
* `RestrictNamespaces=yes`
* `RestrictRealtime=yes`
* `RestrictSUIDSGID=yes`
* `SystemCallFilter=`
* `SystemCallArchitectures=native`


We will aim to cover all the default system services as well as some
of the high profile services such as Nginx or PostgreSQL. All of these
settings need to be configured on a per service basis instead of using
a global override to facilitate fine tuning the settings based on
service requirements and limit the impact for users on upgrades.
Certain services have a very targeted scope. For instance, a service
that only needs to read or write from only one directory could
leverage more fine grained settings to restrict access even further.
We will enable as many of these as feasible for the services but not
every knob is going to be applicable to every service. For example,
`PrivateNetwork=yes` can only be used for services that does not need
network connectivity by default.  We have to choose between
`DynamicUser=yes` or `User` if either is feasible for the service to
use. As a base starting point, from Fedora 39 workstation, we have the
following system services installed by default which should considered
within the scope of the change (excluding systemd associated ones
which already have a number of these security settings enabled). We
may also consider doing this for some of the high profile services
including say Nginx and PostgreSQL permitting time considerations and
other contributors if any joining this effort. We will prioritize
critical or long running services.

* `abrtd.service`
* `abrt-journal-core.service`
* `abrt-oops.service`
* `abrt-pstoreoops.service`
* `abrt-vmcore.service`
* `abrt-xorg.service`
* `accounts-daemon.service`
* `alsa-restore.service`
* `alsa-state.service`
* `anaconda-direct.service`
* `anaconda-fips.service`
* `anaconda-nm-config.service`
* `anaconda-nm-disable-autocons.service`
* `anaconda-noshell.service`
* `anaconda-pre.service`
* `anaconda.service`
* `anaconda-sshd.service`
* `arp-ethers.service`
* `auditd.service`
* `auth-rpcgss-module.service`
* `avahi-daemon.service`
* `blivet.service`
* `blk-availability.service`
* `bluetooth.service`
* `bolt.service`
* `brltty.service`
* `canberra-system-bootup.service`
* `canberra-system-shutdown-reboot.service`
* `canberra-system-shutdown.service`
* `chronyd-restricted.service`
* `chronyd.service`
* `chrony-wait.service`
* `colord.service`
* `console-getty.service`
* `cups-browsed.service`
* `cups.service`
* `dbus-broker.service`
* `dbus-daemon.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.import1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.locale1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.login1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.machine1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.portable1.service`
* `dbus-org.freedesktop.timedate1.service`
* `debug-shell.service` (opens a user shell that must
be able to do arbitrary stuff)
* `dm-event.service`
* `dnf-makecache.service`
* `dnf-system-upgrade-cleanup.service`
* `dnf-system-upgrade.service`
* `dnsmasq.service`
* `dracut-cmdline.service`
* `dracut-initqueue.service`
* `dracut-mount.service`
* `dracut-pre-mount.service`
* `dracut-pre-pivot.service`
* `dracut-pre-trigger.service`
* `dracut-pre-udev.service`
* `dracut-shutdown-onfailure.service`
* `dracut-shutdown.service`
* `emergency.service` (opens a user shell that must
be able to do arbitrary stuff)
* `fedora-third-party-refresh.service`
* `firewalld.service`
* `flatpak-add-fedora-repos.service`
* `flatpak-system-helper.service`
* `fprintd.service`
* `fsidd.service`
* `fstrim.service`
* 

F40 Change Proposal: Wget2 as Wget (Self-Contained)

[Aoife Moloney]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wget2asWget

This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.



== Summary ==
Replace wget with wget2 (a modern implementation of wget intended to
replace wget 1.x) as the provider of wget.

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Ngompa| Neal Gompa]], [[User:Mruprich| Michal Ruprich]]

* Email: ngomp...@gmail.com, mrupr...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
GNU Wget2 is the successor to GNU Wget providing a modern
implementation of wget backed by a new library: libwget2.
The intent to switch from wget 1.x to wget2 is to switch to an
implementation that is more actively developed and provides a richer
interface for leveraging wget's functionality.

== Feedback ==


== Benefit to Fedora ==
The major benefit of switching to wget2 is leveraging the cleaner
codebase that leverages modern practices for development and
maintainability, including unit tests and fuzzing as a
security-sensitive component. Users will also see better support for
newer protocols over time as they are more easily and quickly plumbed
into wget2 than wget.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Add a wget2-wget subpackage that
replaces {{package|wget}} and ensure things don't break during mass
build. Then retire {{package|wget}}.

* Other developers: N/A

* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11790 #11790]

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)

* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)


* Alignment with Community Initiatives: N/A (not needed for this Change)


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
When upgrading to Fedora Linux 40, systems with {{package|wget}}
installed will be switched to {{package|wget2}} via the
wget2-wget package. The change should be mostly
transparent to users.


== How To Test ==
Users can test {{package|wget2}} now by installing the package and
using the wget2 command. The interface will be the
interface users have with wget on upgrade.


== User Experience ==
This change should be largely transparent to users. Some of the more
esoteric options and behaviors may have changed, but the commonly used
ones mostly work as they did in 1.x.

== Dependencies ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)



== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: Change owners will disable
wget2-wget subpackage and restore {{package|wget}}
* Contingency deadline: Final Freeze
* Blocks release? No


== Documentation ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Release Notes ==
The wget command is now based on GNU Wget2, a modern
implementation of GNU Wget.




-- 
Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney
--
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
   |mspa...@redhat.com, |
   |spo...@gmail.com,   |
   |st...@silug.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

> Package  (co)maintainers   Status 
> Change
> 
[...]
> python-etcd   orphan   0 weeks ago
> python-ironicclient   apevec, openstack-sig, orphan0 weeks ago

It looks like samba depends on these two. Needless to say, a lot of
stuff depends on samba.

python-etcd seems to have no co-maintainers.

python-ironicclient seems to have Alan Pevec and OpenStack SIG as
co-maintainers, so hopefully they will pick it up.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
-- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250655] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Bug ID: 2250655
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20231120 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 5.20231120
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.20231120
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20231025-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250655

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250655%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250558] perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.27 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
   Priority|unspecified |low



--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok  ---
This is a low priority update for me.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250558

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250558%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2250650] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Bug ID: 2250650
   Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20231120 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Module-CoreList
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com,
st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 5.20231120
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.20231120
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20231025-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3080/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-CoreList


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250650

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202250650%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: chromium regression on EL9

[Andrew C Aitchison]

On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:

Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed 
on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this 
problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts 
with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with 
rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?


From a recent post to this list:


Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 02:01:08 + (UTC)
From: upda...@fedoraproject.org
Reply-To: EPEL Development List 
To: epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report


...   ......


==
chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03f6b44faf)
A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use



Update Information:

...   ......

ChangeLog:

* Wed Nov 15 2023 Than Ngo  - 119.0.6045.159-1
- update to 119.0.6045.159, upstream security release
   High CVE-2023-5997, use after free in Garbage Collection
   High CVE-2023-6112, use after free in Navigation
- add Requires/Conflicts for ABI break in fmpeg-free 6.0.1

...   ......

So it does look like an intentional, but needed, incompatability :-(

--
Andrew C. Aitchison  Kendal, UK
   and...@aitchison.me.uk
--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue