The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-76db503610
seamonkey-2.53.18-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ad7d095358
rdiff-backup-2.2.6-3.el8
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254783
Bug ID: 2254783
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.113 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254783
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2004461
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2004461=edit
Update to 0.113 (#2254783)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254783
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
Hi,
On 12/5/23 14:38, Aoife Moloney wrote:
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
Hi,
On 12/6/23 11:26, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
Hi,
Does that mean that the Linux EFI boot code knows how to call back to
shim to get the certificates instead of reading the firmware directly?
No. The linux efi stub doesn't need that.
shim.efi does:
(a) Set
Hello Pythonistas,
pyproject-rpm-macros 1.11.0 is available in Rawhide + updates-testing for older
releases.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=pyproject-rpm-macros
I plan to sync it to c9s eventually early next year.
It contains one new feature and several smaller bugfixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2254730
Bug ID: 2254730
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.061 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
I'll see if I can remember that next time.
In the meanwhile, how does it get fixed? Does the package get pulled and
0.7.0-1 re-released until the maintainer builds, perhaps, a 0.7.1-2?
Obviously, untagging 0.7.1 and re-tagging 0.7.0 won't help anyone who
has already picked up the update.
On
The way to stop it from being pushed is to give it negative karma in it's
bodhi testing.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4e7c9d636e
You know what's strange, the updates-testing report that get's
automatically generated, doesn't put the bodhi link in for the new
packages.
I’m canceling the meeting today as we don’t have anything urgent to discuss.
The next meeting will be in January.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 7:00 AM wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2023-12-15 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At
Hi folks,
Just an FYI. Morphio has changed its license from LGPL-3.0 to Apache-2.0
in the latest version 3.3.7:
https://github.com/BlueBrain/MorphIO/pull/467
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone:
On 15/12/2023 08:20, Nick Howitt wrote:
When it was announced that wsdd-0.7.1-1.el7 was available for testing,
I responded to the announcement that it was a bad installation with
breaking changes and raised a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253415. Unfortunately, my
bug
When it was announced that wsdd-0.7.1-1.el7 was available for testing, I
responded to the announcement that it was a bad installation with
breaking changes and raised a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253415. Unfortunately, my
bug report and mailing list response have been
sassc
rubygem-hrx
rubygem-linked-list
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
15 matches
Mail list logo
