[Bug 2165567] Upgrade perl-Sub-Exporter-Lexical to 1.000

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
Bug 2165567 depends on bug 2184280, which changed state.

Bug 2184280 Summary: Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165567
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2184280] Please upgrade perl-Lexical-Var to >= 0.010

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed||2024-01-26 07:49:21



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
There is no proper solution for perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop failure related to
this update. I don't push it into Fedora 38.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184280

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202184280%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-0bba74eab3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0bba74eab3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260267%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-327738d28a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-327738d28a


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260267%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
   ||0240120-1.fc40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2024-01-26 07:21:14



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-f45a728554 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260267%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260267] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240120 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-f45a728554 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-f45a728554


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260267

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260267%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260428] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240126.001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
   ||40126.001-1.fc40
Last Closed||2024-01-26 06:39:21



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-05b7a19c5d has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260428%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260428] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240126.001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-05b7a19c5d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-05b7a19c5d


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260428%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260409] perl-URI-5.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-2bacc114e2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-2bacc114e2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260409%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260428] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240126.001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260409] perl-URI-5.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260409] perl-URI-5.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-URI-5.23 is available  |perl-URI-5.24 is available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Releases retrieved: 5.24
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.24
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.22-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/URI/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3485/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260409%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Anirban Mitra via devel]

I want to retake fbf-mukti-fonts and uniol-fonts of which i am the upstream 
developer. I have lost my membership in packager group and I could not log in 
the pkg maintenance systtem 






On Monday, 25 December, 2023 at 05:10:57 pm IST, Neal Gompa 
 wrote: 





On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM Ondrej Mosnáček  wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres  wrote:
> >
> > virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT 
> > easier.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > virtme                            orphan                          4 
> >> > weeks ago
> >>
> >> I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the
> >> article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng.  In particular
> >> virtme-ng uses virtiofs (instead of 9p) which is a more modern way to
> >> export filesystems into VMs.  We (the virt team) have for a very very
> >> long time recommended people steer clear of 9p, for security,
> >> performance and maintainability reasons.
> >>
> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/951313/
>
> FWIW, I wanted to try out virtme-ng, so I packaged it and submitted for 
> review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2255805
>
> If anyone is interested in having it in Fedora, please consider taking
> the review. Co-maintainer offers are also welcome :)

I grabbed the review. :)




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260428] New: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240126.001 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Bug ID: 2260428
   Summary: perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240126.001 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Business-ISBN-Data
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 20240126.001
Upstream release that is considered latest: 20240126.001
Current version/release in rawhide: 20240123.001-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Business-ISBN-Data/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2674/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Business-ISBN-Data


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260428

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260428%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaning bes

[Orion Poplawski]

I've orphaned bes.  I never really used it, and I don't think anything 
depends on it in Fedora.



--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-flit

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Maxwell G  wrote:
>
> On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
>
> Hi Miro,
>
> Thanks for the announcement!
>
> > Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer
> > have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.
>
> For context, flit-core is the PEP 517 build backend that we need for use
> with %pyproject_* in RPM builds. python3-flit provides the flit CLI that
> can be used for basic Python project management (publishing to PyPI and
> such). python3-flit and python3-flit-core used to be built from the same
> SRPM, but we recently split it into two separate packages to simply the
> specfile and help with RHEL builds.

What is the *fascination* with splitting and renaming packages this
way? Ansible did this, and confused the heck out of their users by
shoving a hundred add-ons into "ansible" and leaving the actually
useful tools in "ansible-core". Why isn't the core packages left in
the original name for the package, and add-ons published as the
distinct package, rather than this apparently popular and breaking
change reverse procedure?

I've recently tried RHEL builds for these flit tools, and they
interweave badly with a circular build dependency involving  of flit,
flit-core, flit-scm. setuptools-scm and exceptiongroups. The dodging
and weaving names of the base packages for their dependencies compound
the difficulties resolving these, at least resolving them from scratch
for RHEL backports.


> While Python developers can always install the flit CLI with pipx or in
> a virtual environment, it is nice to have a global version managed by
> the system package manager.

Agreed, especially considering the recent "bitcoin miner" burdened
modules published at pypi.org. It's very hard to maintain confidence
in a tool suite when any author of a module, upstream, may insert
quite baroque dependency chains.


>
> I'll probably end up taking the package.
>
> > $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
> > python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
> > python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
> > python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.fc39.src
> > python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
> > python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
> > weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src
> >
> > The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with 
> > that
> > if you are interested).
>
> Regardless, those packages should switch to using flit-core to build.
> Pulling in all of flit is not necessary for RPM builds.
>
> --
> Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
> Pronouns: He/They
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0d11a63127   
chromium-120.0.6099.224-1.el9
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-601a7ad770   
vorbis-tools-1.4.2-10.el9
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-11c0b9b06a   
prometheus-podman-exporter-1.7.0-1.el9
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-5e8a045fdd   
atril-1.26.2-1.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

efl-1.27.0-2.el9
ocserv-1.2.4-2.el9
python-google-auth-2.27.0-1.el9
retsnoop-0.9.8-1.el9
rust-rayon-1.8.1-1.el9
rust-rayon-core-1.12.1-1.el9
uwsgi-2.0.23-3.el9

Details about builds:



 efl-1.27.0-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-815f68cdf0)
 Collection of Enlightenment libraries

Update Information:

Upstream update to efl

ChangeLog:

* Tue Jan  2 2024 Ding-Yi Chen  - 1.27.0-2
-  Build ecore_sdl versioned so. So efl no longer requires efl-devel
* Tue Jan  2 2024 Ding-Yi Chen  - 1.27.0-1
- Fixes Bug 2255716 - efl-1.27.0 is available
- Add BuildRequires: libjxl-devel
- Documents:
  + Remove NEWS, because upstream no-longer have it
  + Rename README to README.md
* Tue Aug  1 2023 Tom Callaway  - 1.26.3-8
- fix headerless .po files that modern gettext does not like (bz2225767)
* Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.26.3-7
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild




 ocserv-1.2.4-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4c3d304343)
 OpenConnect SSL VPN server

Update Information:

New upstream release: 1.2.4

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 25 2024 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos  - 
1.2.4-2
- spec: added ipcalc and updated the location of ocserv-fw
* Wed Jan 24 2024 Packit  - 1.2.4-1
- [packit] 1.2.4 upstream release




 python-google-auth-2.27.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-bf23c148f1)
 Google Auth Python Library

Update Information:

Update python-google-auth to 2.27.0

ChangeLog:

* Wed Jan 24 2024 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 1:2.27.0-1
- Update to 2.27.0 (#2260260)
* Mon Jan 22 2024 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1:2.26.2-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2260260 - python-google-auth-2.27.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260260




 retsnoop-0.9.8-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3751046bbf)
 A tool for investigating kernel error call stacks

Update Information:

* A few small fixes and clean ups by @anakryiko in #53 * bpftool: Pass
additional compile flags as EXTRA_CFLAGS, not CFLAGS by @qmonnet in #52 *
sidecar: Update addr2line dependency to 0.21 by @danielocfb in #55

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 25 2024 Michel Lind  - 0.9.8-1
- Update to 0.9.8
* Mon Jan 22 2024 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.9.7-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2260339 - retsnoop-0.9.8 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260339




 rust-rayon-1.8.1-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-6bee04d829)
 Simple work-stealing parallelism for Rust

Update Information:

- Update the rayon crate to version 1.8.1. - Update the rayon-core crate to
version 1.12.1.

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 25 2024 Fabio Valentini  - 1.8.1-1
- Update to version 1.8.1; Fixes 

[Bug 2260363] perl-URI-5.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-URI-5.22-1.fc40
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2024-01-25 23:45:13



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-9344637ed6 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260363%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-flit

[Maxwell G]

On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.

Hi Miro,

Thanks for the announcement!

> Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer 
> have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.

For context, flit-core is the PEP 517 build backend that we need for use
with %pyproject_* in RPM builds. python3-flit provides the flit CLI that
can be used for basic Python project management (publishing to PyPI and
such). python3-flit and python3-flit-core used to be built from the same
SRPM, but we recently split it into two separate packages to simply the
specfile and help with RHEL builds.

While Python developers can always install the flit CLI with pipx or in
a virtual environment, it is nice to have a global version managed by
the system package manager.

I'll probably end up taking the package.

> $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
> python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
> python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
> python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.fc39.src
> python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
> python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
> weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src
>
> The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with 
> that 
> if you are interested).

Regardless, those packages should switch to using flit-core to build.
Pulling in all of flit is not necessary for RPM builds.

-- 
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260409] New: perl-URI-5.23 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Bug ID: 2260409
   Summary: perl-URI-5.23 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-URI
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 5.23
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.23
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.21-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/URI/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3485/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260409

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260409%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-flit

[Maxwell G]

On Thu Jan 25, 2024 at 20:34 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello.

Hi Miro,

Thanks for the announcement!

> Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer 
> have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.

For context, flit-core is the PEP 517 build backend that we need for use
with %pyproject_* in RPM builds. python3-flit provides the flit CLI that
can be used for basic Python project management (publishing to PyPI and
such). python3-flit and python3-flit-core used to be built from the same
SRPM, but we recently split it into two separate packages to simply the
specfile and help with RHEL builds.

While Python developers can always install the flit CLI with pipx or in
a virtual environment, it is nice to have a global version managed by
the system package manager.

I'll probably end up taking the package.

> $ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
> python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
> python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
> python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.fc39.src
> python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
> python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
> weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src
>
> The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with 
> that 
> if you are interested).

Regardless, those packages should switch to using flit-core to build.
Pulling in all of flit is not necessary for RPM builds.

-- 
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 40 Mass Rebuild *finish* delayed

[Aoife Moloney]

Sorry folks, that's my fault, I missed a (rather important) line to update
:(

I *think* it is correct now, but please tell me if there are still any
errors and I will readjust
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html

Thank you Troy for your clarification, it really helped!

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:16 PM Troy Dawson  wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:01 AM Miroslav Suchý  wrote:
>
>> Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
>> >
>> > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the published
>> schedule[4] has been updated to reflect these changes.
>>
>> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html
>>
>> Branching is set to 2024-02-06 while mass rebuilds are supposed to finish
>> by 2024-02-20. That means we will branch
>> during mass rebuilds?
>>
>> Historically we always branched *after* the mass rebuilds finishes.
>>
>
> The proposal that passed was this.
> "Delay the F40 schedule 1 week for everything up to and including the
> start of the Beta Freeze"
> Branching falls into the list of tasks that is affected by one week.
> Although they didn't change the schedule yet (and you aren't the first to
> notice that) it has been pushed back a week.
> So branching *should* be 2024-02-13
>
> Troy
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 

Aoife Moloney

Fedora Operations Architect

Fedora Project

Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im

IRC: amoloney
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 7:00 AM  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-01-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
>

* Status of the mass-rebuild
* Status of the impending branch of EL10

Also note that we have published an updated SOP[1] document for ELN
branching at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/branching/

[1] Standard operating procedure
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260383] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.76 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260383

Bug ID: 2260383
   Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.76 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-libwww-perl
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 6.76
Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.76
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.74-1.fc40
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3024/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-libwww-perl


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260383

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260383%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

openQA Rawhide update failures - we're working on it!

[Adam Williamson]

Hi folks! I want to apologize to packagers who have Rawhide updates 
stuck on failed openQA tests, and provide an update.


There were two big problems today. First, the Server base disk image 
used for some of the tests got regenerated (this happens weekly). 
Unfortunately, this meant it got affected by 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259266 , and no longer 
booted. I should have got that grub2 build untagged or the change 
reverted sooner - sorry. I was expecting the package to be fixed sooner, 
and it didn't occur to me that this image being regenerated was a risk. 
I've now got the package untagged, and forced a rebuild of the disk 
image using a grub2 build with the patch re-applied (otherwise I'd have 
had to wait for the next Rawhide compose to rebuild the image). I'm now 
working through re-running all affected tests.


Second, shell-color-prompt was changed[0] to apply the color prompt to 
virtual consoles. This broke a large number of openQA tests, as they 
often need to do things at root consoles, and to do that they need to 
know when they've actually managed to log in to one, and they do this by 
screen matching the prompt. Any test which needed to know it was at a 
root console was failing. I've updated the 'needle' to match the color 
prompt, and am re-running all affected tests.


I anticipate the mess should be cleaned up in about three or four hours 
(there are a lot of failures to re-run, and some of the tests take a 
while to run). Sorry again for the inconvenience.


I'll probably propose adding shell-color-prompt to the critical path. 
That would mean openQA would have gated the update (allowing me to 
update the needles *before* it got pushed and broke tests for every 
other update), but it also just seems appropriate - theoretically, a bad 
change to the package could cause all sorts of consequences, since it 
fiddles with the default prompt.


[0] 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shell-color-prompt/c/1dd8c6c16d760cacfb9fd70a249b28a1fd853dd1?branch=rawhide

--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaning python-flit

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello.

Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer 
have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.


$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.fc39.src
python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src

The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with that 
if you are interested).


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaning python-flit

[Miro Hrončok]

Hello.

Now when python-flit-core has been split out of python-flit, I do no longer 
have a use-case for python-flit and hence I have orphaned it.


$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires flit
python-perky-0:0.8.2-3.fc39.src
python-pydyf-0:0.8.0-1.fc40.src
python-pyrpm-0:0.14.1-3.fc39.src
python-signature-dispatch-0:1.0.1-4.fc39.src
python-vecrec-0:0.3.1-11.fc40.src
weasyprint-0:60.2-1.fc40.src

The packages would probably build fine with flit-core (happy to help with that 
if you are interested).


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Chris Kelley]

>
> Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
> backlog?
>
I don't know about Pagure, but you can make bespoke packager dashboards to
show whatever combination of packages/packagers/groups you like :-)
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/custom

Cheers,

Chris

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 18:18, Florian Weimer  wrote:

> * Miroslav Suchý:
>
> > I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where
> > you can act on:
> >
> >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable=open
> >
> > (your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)
> >
> > Please check it, maybe you will discover some PR that is waiting on
> > your feedback and you are not aware of it.
>
> Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
> backlog?  We try to keep an eye on the bug list for our components, but
> that only works (to some extent …) because Bugzilla allows us to
> consolidate everything into a single list.  If we had this for PRs, it
> would really help, I think.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Miro Hrončok]

On 25. 01. 24 19:17, Florian Weimer wrote:

* Miroslav Suchý:


I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where
you can act on:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable=open

(your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)

Please check it, maybe you will discover some PR that is waiting on
your feedback and you are not aware of it.


Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
backlog?  We try to keep an eye on the bug list for our components, but
that only works (to some extent …) because Bugzilla allows us to
consolidate everything into a single list.  If we had this for PRs, it
would really help, I think.


You can use the packager dashboard:

https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?users=fweimer,churchyard

On the top right corner, you can click the git icon to only see PRs (probably 
not possible via a bookmarked URL but if that is the only blocker for your 
workflow, open an issue).


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Florian Weimer]

* Miroslav Suchý:

> I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where
> you can act on:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable=open
>
> (your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)
>
> Please check it, maybe you will discover some PR that is waiting on
> your feedback and you are not aware of it.

Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
backlog?  We try to keep an eye on the bug list for our components, but
that only works (to some extent …) because Bugzilla allows us to
consolidate everything into a single list.  If we had this for PRs, it
would really help, I think.

Thanks,
Florian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Smith, Stewart via devel]

On Jan 24, 2024, at 11:07 PM, Miroslav Suchý  wrote:
> During my work on SPDX migration I filed hundreds of pull request and as part 
> of that work I always check if there is
> already open PRs for a package.
> 
> It surprised me how many packages has open PR. I understand when there is 
> open PR with blocker or ongoing discussion.
> But I have seen PRs that are open for year+ without any comment from anyone.

This is something that has also caused some amount of frustration amongst the 
Amazon Linux team and can end up as a pretty large de-motivator for 
contributing changes back to Fedora. The context switching back to a long time 
ago, and then likely having to re-adapt your changes can certainly lead to 
choosing the path of not submitting the change as it’s less hassle.

Is a possible solution to tweak how/what provenpackagers can/do do, and perhaps 
surface at a higher level what the global list of “pull requests without 
comments for a month” and “open pull requests mentioning CVE or the word 
security”?  Have it be more of a common pattern to have provenpackagers ack and 
merge CRs across the board? Perhaps some tweaking around SIGs so that experts 
in the ecosystem in question are looking at CRs there?

We have a similar-ish model to how we maintain packages in Amazon Linux 
internally - the key being to avoid SPoF in knowledge, and to enable us to move 
fast when needed (e.g. getting an important security update out to customers).
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 7:07 AM Miroslav Suchý  wrote:

> I understood that it may happen that you miss the notification. Or postponed 
> the work because you were busy and later
> forget about it... Lots of valid reasons.

While I am certainly not in favor of more
"Are we there yet?" emails, I wonder if
a gentle reminder every few months
might not be appropriate if there are
open PR's, as, as you say, sometimes
there are valid reasons.

I also wonder if a PR open for more
than, say, 18 months might trigger
a check to make sure the packager
is still active.

Both are un-resourced ideas, of course.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260363] perl-URI-5.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-9344637ed6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-9344637ed6


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260363%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259168] perl-re-engine-PCRE-0.17-37.fc40 FTBFS: PCRE.h:22:5: error: initialization of ‘REGEXP * (*)(PerlInterpreter *, SV * const, U32)’ {aka ‘struct p5rx * (*)(struct interpreter *, struct sv

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259168

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2024-01-25 16:44:02




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259168
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260363] New: perl-URI-5.22 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Bug ID: 2260363
   Summary: perl-URI-5.22 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-URI
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mspa...@redhat.com,
p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 5.22
Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.22
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.21-1.fc40
URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/URI/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3485/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260363

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260363%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Staled PRs at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> During my work on SPDX migration I filed hundreds of pull request and as
> part of that work I always check if there is already open PRs for a package.
> 
> It surprised me how many packages has open PR. I understand when there is
> open PR with blocker or ongoing discussion. But I have seen PRs that are
> open for year+ without any comment from anyone.
> 
> I understood that it may happen that you miss the notification. Or postponed
> the work because you were busy and later forget about it... Lots of valid
> reasons.
> 
> I want to point to nice feature of Pagure - it can show you PR where you can 
> act on:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/msuchy/requests?type=actionable=open
> 
> (your account icon -> My Pull Request -> PR I can act on)
> 
> Please check it, maybe you will discover some PR that is waiting on
> your feedback and you are not aware of it.

Hear, hear.

BTW, https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ also shows those
pull requests.

Zbyszek
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

[Sérgio Basto]

On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 17:38 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> lmms thm

I fixed the build ,  I base it on opensuse packages
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-15-SP6/lmms?linkrev=base=9


> lxc  hguemar, sagarun, thm

I'm also thinking update lxc from 4 to 5 based on
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/lxc


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259087] perl-Imager-1.023 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259087

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Imager-1.023-1.fc40
Last Closed||2024-01-25 15:33:14



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6d3f7d3f04 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259087

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259087%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260127] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0210 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260127

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-XML-LibXML-2.0210-1.fc
   ||40
Last Closed||2024-01-25 15:06:12



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6fbec8b0cb has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260127

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260127%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259976] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.45 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2024-01-25 15:03:12



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-da1d9b7935 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259976%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259087] perl-Imager-1.023 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259087

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6d3f7d3f04 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6d3f7d3f04


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259087

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259087%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260127] perl-XML-LibXML-2.0210 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260127

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6fbec8b0cb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6fbec8b0cb


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260127

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260127%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259976] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.45 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-da1d9b7935 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-da1d9b7935


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259976%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Dear maintainers.
> > 
> > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> > packages
> > should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.
> 
> 
> 
> > yaksa    zbyszek
> 
> I updated and build yaksa and checked that mpich is still building against
> the updated version. We have quite a few packages depending on mpich in the
> neuro-sig pool of packages, so we wouldn't want to see mpich going FTBFS.
> 
> @zbyszek, feel free to add neuro-sig as co-maintainers to the package. For
> now there's a PR [1] for you.
> 
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yaksa/pull-request/1
Thanks! I'll merge this when the CI passes.

I cannot log in to src.fp.o unfortunately, so I can't change the
settings. I'll try to remember to do that later.

Zbyszek
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

[Sandro]

On 24-01-2024 17:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:

Dear maintainers.

Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following 
packages

should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching.





yaksa    zbyszek


I updated and build yaksa and checked that mpich is still building 
against the updated version. We have quite a few packages depending on 
mpich in the neuro-sig pool of packages, so we wouldn't want to see 
mpich going FTBFS.


@zbyszek, feel free to add neuro-sig as co-maintainers to the package. 
For now there's a PR [1] for you.


[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yaksa/pull-request/1

-- Sandro
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259976] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.45 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Parse-PMFile-0.45-1.fc
   ||40




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259976
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259168] perl-re-engine-PCRE-0.17-37.fc40 FTBFS: PCRE.h:22:5: error: initialization of ‘REGEXP * (*)(PerlInterpreter *, SV * const, U32)’ {aka ‘struct p5rx * (*)(struct interpreter *, struct sv

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259168

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Link ID||Github
   ||avar/re-engine-pcre/pull/6
 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
   Fixed In Version||perl-re-engine-PCRE-0.17-39
   ||.fc40




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259168
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?

[Richard Shaw]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:56 PM Mamoru TASAKA 
wrote:

> Richard Shaw wrote on 2024/01/25 12:43:
>
> See:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/build-constraints-rpm-macros/blob/rawhide/f/macros.build-constraints
>
> The macro attemps to reduce parallel make jobs when the build needs
> more memory than usual.
>

I figured it was something like that... That should probably be linked to
the CMake Packaging guidelines somewhere!



> Your [2] ppc64le build log actually says:
> 
> g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus
> compilation terminated.
> gmake[2]: ***
> [openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_shared.dir/build.make:625:
> openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_shared.dir/instantiations/GridOperators.cc.o]
> Error 1
> gmake[2]: *** Deleting file
> 'openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_shared.dir/instantiations/GridOperators.cc.o'
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/openvdb-11.0.0/redhat-linux-build'
> gmake[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:261:
> openvdb/openvdb/CMakeFiles/openvdb_shared.dir/all] Error 2
> gmake[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> 
> So perhaps g++ process was killed by OOM.
>

So it looks like there needs to be further restrictions placed on ppc64le
and s390x at a minimum and should probably look at discontinuing i686
builds long term.

Thanks,
Richard
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2260337] New: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-8.12 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260337

Bug ID: 2260337
   Summary: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-8.12 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Search-Elasticsearch
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Releases retrieved: 8.12
Upstream release that is considered latest: 8.12
Current version/release in rawhide: 8.00-3.fc39
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Search-Elasticsearch/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/10543/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Search-Elasticsearch


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260337

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260337%23c0
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

[sgallagh]

Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   ELN SIG on 2024-01-26 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat

The meeting will be about:



Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sequoia PGP : What are the options for expired third party GPG signing keys?

[Neal H . Walfield]

Antoine Zellmeyer via devel  writes:
> Sorry for the late answer, It seems to be working :) I was able to import and 
> install packages signed with this certificate.

Thanks for confirming that it works as expected.  I've made a new
release of rpm-sequoia, which includes this fix.  I expect that
decathorpe will package it in the coming days.

:) Neal
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide aarch64 Thunderbird FTBFS "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

[Eike Rathke]

Hi,

On Thursday, 2024-01-25 11:03:21 +, Peter Robinson wrote:

> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937

Yes, very much, specifically
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113485#c6 (pointed to by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113573 being a duplicate
of) mentions Firefox, which has the identical source code there.

Thanks
  Eike

-- 
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide aarch64 Thunderbird FTBFS "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

[Dan Horák]

On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:03:21 +
Peter Robinson  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> > Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
> 
> There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
> checking if it looks related.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937

and I have opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260321
for EFL a moment ago


Dan

> 
> > | 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as 
> > a bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
> > | 34:29.97 Event| Plugins
> > | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT   | annobin: Generate final 
> > annotations
> > | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_START_UNIT| annobin: Generate global 
> > annotations
> > | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_START  | annobin: Generate 
> > per-function annotations
> > | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END| annobin: Register 
> > per-function end symbols
> > | 34:29.97 during RTL pass: split1
> > | 34:29.97 In file included from 
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/core/SkOpts.cpp:43:
> > | 34:29.97 
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:
> >  In function ‘void neon::blit_mask_d32_a8(SkPMColor*, size_t, const 
> > SkAlpha*, size_t, SkColor, int, int)’:
> > | 34:29.97 
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:234:1:
> >  internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> > | 34:29.97   234 | }
> > | 34:29.97   | ^
> > | 34:30.04 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by 
> > using -freport-bug).
> > | 34:30.04 See  for instructions.
> >
> > I'm not going to jump through hoops there.
> > All other platforms finished the build fine, f39 and f38 builds
> > completed also for aarch64.
> >
> > See https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9052/112279052/build.log 
> > of
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112279052 of
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112278913
> >
> >   Eike
> >
> > --
> > GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 
> > 2D3A
> > --
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: rawhide aarch64 Thunderbird FTBFS "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

[Peter Robinson]

Hi,

> Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with

There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
checking if it looks related.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937

> | 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a 
> bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
> | 34:29.97 Event| Plugins
> | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT   | annobin: Generate final 
> annotations
> | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_START_UNIT| annobin: Generate global 
> annotations
> | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_START  | annobin: Generate per-function 
> annotations
> | 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END| annobin: Register per-function 
> end symbols
> | 34:29.97 during RTL pass: split1
> | 34:29.97 In file included from 
> /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/core/SkOpts.cpp:43:
> | 34:29.97 
> /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:
>  In function ‘void neon::blit_mask_d32_a8(SkPMColor*, size_t, const SkAlpha*, 
> size_t, SkColor, int, int)’:
> | 34:29.97 
> /builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:234:1:
>  internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> | 34:29.97   234 | }
> | 34:29.97   | ^
> | 34:30.04 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by 
> using -freport-bug).
> | 34:30.04 See  for instructions.
>
> I'm not going to jump through hoops there.
> All other platforms finished the build fine, f39 and f38 builds
> completed also for aarch64.
>
> See https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9052/112279052/build.log of
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112279052 of
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112278913
>
>   Eike
>
> --
> GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 
> 2D3A
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

rawhide aarch64 Thunderbird FTBFS "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault"

[Eike Rathke]

Hi,

Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with

| 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a 
bug unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
| 34:29.97 Event| Plugins
| 34:29.97 PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT   | annobin: Generate final 
annotations
| 34:29.97 PLUGIN_START_UNIT| annobin: Generate global 
annotations
| 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_START  | annobin: Generate per-function 
annotations
| 34:29.97 PLUGIN_ALL_PASSES_END| annobin: Register per-function 
end symbols
| 34:29.97 during RTL pass: split1
| 34:29.97 In file included from 
/builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/core/SkOpts.cpp:43:
| 34:29.97 
/builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:
 In function ‘void neon::blit_mask_d32_a8(SkPMColor*, size_t, const SkAlpha*, 
size_t, SkColor, int, int)’:
| 34:29.97 
/builddir/build/BUILD/thunderbird-115.7.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts/SkBlitMask_opts.h:234:1:
 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
| 34:29.97   234 | }
| 34:29.97   | ^
| 34:30.04 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using 
-freport-bug).
| 34:30.04 See  for instructions.

I'm not going to jump through hoops there.
All other platforms finished the build fine, f39 and f38 builds
completed also for aarch64.

See https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9052/112279052/build.log of
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112279052 of
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=112278913

  Eike

-- 
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [rawhide] libavif soname bump

[Frantisek Zatloukal]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones 
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> > with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> > ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 ,
> > soname bump from 15 to 16).
>
> I'm confused .. Wouldn't it be better to do this after branching?
> Otherwise you're introducing an SONAME bump into the stabilising
> Fedora 40.
>

I would prefer to have this in F40 too (not to block gamescope rebases
(which do require libavif >= 1.0) there for the lifetime of the F40
release), and, this isn't a big of a risky rebase in my opinion (there will
be more impactful and riskier rebases coming far later in the cycle, such
as LLVM rebase, again, in my opinion).

-- 

Best regards / S pozdravem,

František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK] PR #1: SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK

[Daniel P . Berrange]

berrange closed without merging a pull-request against the project: 
`perl-Sys-Virt-TCK` that you
are following.

Closed pull-request:

``
SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK 
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK] PR #1: SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK

[Daniel P . Berrange]

berrange commented on the pull-request: `SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK ` that 
you are following:
``
Closing since this never merged upstream
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [rawhide] libavif soname bump

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:14:04AM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start
> with bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3
> ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ libavif/pull-request/2 ,
> soname bump from 15 to 16).

I'm confused .. Wouldn't it be better to do this after branching?
Otherwise you're introducing an SONAME bump into the stabilising
Fedora 40.

> If I am not missing anything, it should mean ABI-only change, so all
> the dependencies that aren't FTBFS should rebuild fine. Should
> anything not build, I'll add a compat package not to cause any new
> FTIs.
>
> This would affect the following packages:
> avif-pixbuf-loader
> celestia-common
> darktable
> efl
> gd
> kf5-kimageformats
> plasma-wallpapers-dynamic
> python-imagecodecs
> webkit2gtk4.0
> webkit2gtk4.1
> webkitgtk6.0
> xpra
>
> If any of the maintainers would prefer to do the rebuild themselves,
> please do feel free to speak up, I'll send the side-tag id here
> before the rebuild starts. Otherwise, I'll handle all the rebuilds.
>
> I probably don't have to wait until the mass rebuild is finished,
> but doing so will leave me with a calmer sleep.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rawhide] libavif soname bump

[Frantisek Zatloukal]

In about a week (after mass rebuild before branching), I'll start with
bumping libavif in rawhide from 0.11.x to 1.0.3 (
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/pull-request/2 , soname bump
from 15 to 16). If I am not missing anything, it should mean ABI-only
change, so all the dependencies that aren't FTBFS should rebuild fine.
Should anything not build, I'll add a compat package not to cause any new
FTIs.

This would affect the following packages:
avif-pixbuf-loader
celestia-common
darktable
efl
gd
kf5-kimageformats
plasma-wallpapers-dynamic
python-imagecodecs
webkit2gtk4.0
webkit2gtk4.1
webkitgtk6.0
xpra

If any of the maintainers would prefer to do the rebuild themselves, please
do feel free to speak up, I'll send the side-tag id here before the rebuild
starts. Otherwise, I'll handle all the rebuilds.

I probably don't have to wait until the mass rebuild is finished, but doing
so will leave me with a calmer sleep.

-- 

Best regards / S pozdravem,

František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259771] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.482 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259771

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Verilog-Perl-3.482-1.f
   ||c40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2024-01-25 10:03:38



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-97662868d3 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259771

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259771%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259771] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.482 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259771

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-97662868d3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-97662868d3


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259771

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259771%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259452] perl-Math-Int64-0.57 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259452

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Math-Int64-0.57-1.fc40
Last Closed||2024-01-25 09:39:37



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-33f560e7de has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259452

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259452%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2259452] perl-Math-Int64-0.57 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259452

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-33f560e7de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-33f560e7de


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259452

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259452%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Math-Int64] PR #1: Package tests

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-Int64` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Package tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-Int64/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Announcement: Retiring zlib and minizip-compat from Rawhide

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:14:06AM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho 
wrote:
> The zlib-ng-compat and minizip-ng-compat packages have been in Rawhide for
> more than a month.
> Considering things have been working well, we believe it's time to retire the
> zlib and minizip-compat packages.
> 
> This step should not cause any changes, because zlib-ng-compat and
> minizip-ng-compat already obsoleted them.
> However, if you find any issues, please contact us.
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZlibNGTransition
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MinizipNGTransition

Great work on this BTW.  In my tests it improves zlib uncompression
speed by something like 40%, which for a few tasks (unpacking qcow2
files was one) noticably improves overall performance.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-Math-Int64] PR #1: Package tests

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-Int64` that 
you are following:
``
Package tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-Int64/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2258864] perl-App-Cme-1.040 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258864

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-App-Cme-1.040-1.fc40
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2024-01-25 08:03:32



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-e877252833 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258864

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202258864%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue