Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:57:15 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley wrote: > > > Blender already excludes i686: > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207 > > > > So does prusa-slicer: > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/prusa-slicer/blob/44359e4b53c503cb61a60842abf991a01d1cb9db/f/prusa-slicer.spec#_68 > > > > Packages depending directly on openvdb are: > > > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s openvdb > > OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src > > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > > openvkl-2.0.0-5.fc40.src > > prusa-slicer-2.4.2-13.fc40.src > > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > > > Of these, it looks like only OpenImageIO builds on i686. Packages > > depending on it are: > > > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenImageIO > > OpenColorIO-2.2.1-6.fc40.src > > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > > embree-4.3.0-2.fc40.src > > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > > oidn-2.1.0-1.fc40.src > > openshadinglanguage-1.12.14.0-9.fc40.src > > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > > > Of those, only OpenColorIO builds on i686. Packages depending on it are: > > > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenColorIO > > OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src > > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > > calligra-3.2.1-25.fc39.src > > krita-5.2.2-1.fc40.src > > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > > > Of those, only calligra builds on i686, and it’s a leaf package. So, if > > I haven’t missed anything, as long as i686 support is dropped from all > > of calligra, OpenColorIO, OpenImageIO, and openvdb, then it should be OK. > > > > Well I just re-tried openvdb with _smp_build_ncpus 1 and it still failed so > I don't think we have a choice at this point. Perhaps it was hitting the > 4GB max per process due to being 32bit? yes, it could be. Another workaround is to reduce the debuginfo level, if not done already, eg. from -g to -g1 (or even -g0) Dan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8e93f1b716 indent-2.2.13-5.el9 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-5e8a045fdd atril-1.26.2-1.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-44533eb648 chromium-121.0.6167.85-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing dispenso-1.2.0-4.el9 tito-0.6.25-1.el9 Details about builds: dispenso-1.2.0-4.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9c6e941e47) A library for working with sets of tasks in parallel Update Information: Fix build against moodycamel-concurrentqueue 1.0.4 ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 28 2024 Michel Lind - 1.2.0-4 - Fix finding moodycamel-concurrentqueue 1.0.4 * Wed Jan 24 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2.0-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jan 19 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2.0-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild tito-0.6.25-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-723ea9a9b5) A tool for managing rpm based git projects Update Information: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/tito/releases/tag/tito-0.6.25-1 ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 28 2024 Jakub Kadlcik - Use rpm.ds instead of deprecated hdr.dsFromHeader (fros...@email.cz) - Support branch aliases in releasers (fros...@email.cz) - Document how to automate bodhi updates (msu...@redhat.com) - Use raw strings for regex patterns (fros...@email.cz) - Allow tito build without .tito directory (fros...@email.cz) - Unify README and index.md (msu...@redhat.com) - Fix PEP8 issues found by runtests.py (fros...@email.cz) - Replace egrep with grep -E (fros...@email.cz) - Don't use --cacheonly on DNF5 (fros...@email.cz) -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 25 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3a29f0d349 python-paramiko-2.12.0-2.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-76443fce3f indent-2.2.13-5.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-272d6fcaca atril-1.26.2-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-93d34f40f0 chromium-121.0.6167.85-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing tito-0.6.25-1.el8 Details about builds: tito-0.6.25-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-24d8e603da) A tool for managing rpm based git projects Update Information: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/tito/releases/tag/tito-0.6.25-1 ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 28 2024 Jakub Kadlcik - Use rpm.ds instead of deprecated hdr.dsFromHeader (fros...@email.cz) - Support branch aliases in releasers (fros...@email.cz) - Document how to automate bodhi updates (msu...@redhat.com) - Use raw strings for regex patterns (fros...@email.cz) - Allow tito build without .tito directory (fros...@email.cz) - Unify README and index.md (msu...@redhat.com) - Fix PEP8 issues found by runtests.py (fros...@email.cz) - Replace egrep with grep -E (fros...@email.cz) - Don't use --cacheonly on DNF5 (fros...@email.cz) -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4ff425606f openssl11-1.1.1k-7.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-54270ec4b3 clojure-1.8.0-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing tito-0.6.25-1.el7 Details about builds: tito-0.6.25-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-7a56376808) A tool for managing rpm based git projects Update Information: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/tito/releases/tag/tito-0.6.25-1 ChangeLog: * Sun Jan 28 2024 Jakub Kadlcik - Use rpm.ds instead of deprecated hdr.dsFromHeader (fros...@email.cz) - Support branch aliases in releasers (fros...@email.cz) - Document how to automate bodhi updates (msu...@redhat.com) - Use raw strings for regex patterns (fros...@email.cz) - Allow tito build without .tito directory (fros...@email.cz) - Unify README and index.md (msu...@redhat.com) - Fix PEP8 issues found by runtests.py (fros...@email.cz) - Replace egrep with grep -E (fros...@email.cz) - Don't use --cacheonly on DNF5 (fros...@email.cz) -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
El dom, 28 ene 2024 a las 18:06, Maxwell G () escribió: > > Report started at 2024-01-28 16:04:44 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > > Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package > or > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your > package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. > > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ > > Full report available at: > https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > For all orphaned packages, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan > > Package (co)maintainersStatus > Change > > 3proxy orphan 3 weeks ago > applet-window-buttons @kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago > bismuth@kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago > cdsclient @astro-sig, orphan 4 weeks ago > csmith orphan 4 weeks ago > drumstick0 orphan, yanqiyu 1 weeks ago > elpa @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago > kpipewire5 @kde-sig, orphan2 weeks ago > lightlyorphan 0 weeks ago > php-PHP-CSS-Parser orphan 3 weeks ago > plasma-bigscreen @kde-sig, orphan0 weeks ago > python-GridDataFormats @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago > python-compressed-rtf orphan 4 weeks ago > python-extractcode @python-packagers-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago > python-flit@epel-packagers-sig, @python- 0 weeks ago >packagers-sig, orphan, salimma > python-jupyter-collaboration orphan 2 weeks ago > python-jupyter-server-fileid orphan 2 weeks ago > python-jupyter-ydocorphan 2 weeks ago > python-kaitaistructorphan 3 weeks ago > python-maya@neuro-sig, orphan 5 weeks ago > python-mmtf@scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago > python-mrcfile orphan 3 weeks ago > python-red-black-tree-mod orphan 4 weeks ago > python-represent orphan 0 weeks ago > python-y-py@python-packagers-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago > python-ypy-websocket orphan 2 weeks ago > qterm orphan 4 weeks ago > rubygem-hrxjcpunk, orphan, tdawson 5 weeks ago > rubygem-linked-listjcpunk, orphan, tdawson 5 weeks ago > rubygem-rubygems-mirror@ruby-packagers-sig, orphan 1 weeks ago > rust-lib0 @rust-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago > rust-yrs @rust-sig, orphan 2 weeks ago > scamp @astro-sig, orphan 4 weeks ago > sphinxbase @epel-packagers-sig, orphan 0 weeks ago > tachyon@scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago > virtme orphan 3 weeks ago > xdrawchem @scitech_sig, orphan3 weeks ago > I have taken scamp and cdsclient Regards -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 2:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin > > > > One additional item to consider is to review > the packager guidelines for use of /sbin > (and /usr/sbin) in additional locations from > those involved directly with installing binaries. > > In particular, I am thinking of the sysusers > examples where the use of /sbin/nologin > should, perhaps, be changed to /usr/bin/nologin. > > There are almost certainly other places > in the docs/guidelines. > > The documentation updates are always > the most annoying in my experience. Please, don't. Deliberately ignoring years of the File System Hierarchy for some big-vision architectural ideal is one of the things that has consumed thousands if not millions of man-hours of sysadmin time since UNIX was invented. Nico Kadel-Garcia -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Beasley wrote: > Blender already excludes i686: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207 > > So does prusa-slicer: > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/prusa-slicer/blob/44359e4b53c503cb61a60842abf991a01d1cb9db/f/prusa-slicer.spec#_68 > > Packages depending directly on openvdb are: > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s openvdb > OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > openvkl-2.0.0-5.fc40.src > prusa-slicer-2.4.2-13.fc40.src > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > Of these, it looks like only OpenImageIO builds on i686. Packages > depending on it are: > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenImageIO > OpenColorIO-2.2.1-6.fc40.src > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > embree-4.3.0-2.fc40.src > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > oidn-2.1.0-1.fc40.src > openshadinglanguage-1.12.14.0-9.fc40.src > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > Of those, only OpenColorIO builds on i686. Packages depending on it are: > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenColorIO > OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src > blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src > calligra-3.2.1-25.fc39.src > krita-5.2.2-1.fc40.src > luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src > usd-23.11-2.fc40.src > > Of those, only calligra builds on i686, and it’s a leaf package. So, if > I haven’t missed anything, as long as i686 support is dropped from all > of calligra, OpenColorIO, OpenImageIO, and openvdb, then it should be OK. > Well I just re-tried openvdb with _smp_build_ncpus 1 and it still failed so I don't think we have a choice at this point. Perhaps it was hitting the 4GB max per process due to being 32bit? Thanks, Richard -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 8:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > We cannot change this without breaking backward compatibility. It'll > have to stay that way until RHEL 9 falls out of support. Is someone collecting the cleanup TODO list for ~ mid-2032? (schedules subject to change, of course) -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 7:54 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin > > > > One additional item to consider is to review > the packager guidelines for use of /sbin > (and /usr/sbin) in additional locations from > those involved directly with installing binaries. > > In particular, I am thinking of the sysusers > examples where the use of /sbin/nologin > should, perhaps, be changed to /usr/bin/nologin. > > There are almost certainly other places > in the docs/guidelines. > > The documentation updates are always > the most annoying in my experience. We cannot change this without breaking backward compatibility. It'll have to stay that way until RHEL 9 falls out of support. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change Proposal: F40 Change Proposal: Unify /usr/bin and /usr/sbin (System-Wide)
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin > One additional item to consider is to review the packager guidelines for use of /sbin (and /usr/sbin) in additional locations from those involved directly with installing binaries. In particular, I am thinking of the sysusers examples where the use of /sbin/nologin should, perhaps, be changed to /usr/bin/nologin. There are almost certainly other places in the docs/guidelines. The documentation updates are always the most annoying in my experience. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240116.0 coming to F40/Rawhide
In one week, 2024-02-04, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20230802.1 to 20230116.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Jan 2024)[1] in side tags for F40/Rawhide. If I miss getting the update into Rawhide before F40 branching, I plan to do the update in both F41/Rawhide and F40/Branched. Like all new calendar versions of abseil-cpp, this breaks ABI compatibility and bumps the SONAME version. There are also some small intentional breaking API changes[2]. Testing in COPR[3] indicates all directly-dependent packages are compatible, except mozc, which can be fixed by a PR[4]. Besides abseil-cpp, I plan to rebuild all dependent packages using maintainer/co-maintainer or provenpackager privileges. I also plan to merge the mozc PR if it is still open. These packages are: - bear - bloaty - credentials-fetcher - CuraEngine_grpc_definitions - fastnetmon - fcitx5-mozc - frr - grpc - ilbc - libarrow - libphonenumber - mozc - onnxruntime - parlaylib - plasma-dialer - qmlkonsole - qt6-qtgrpc - spacebar - syslog-ng Of these, I expect plasma-dialer and syslog-ng to FTBFS in the side tag since they already FTBFS in Rawhide. Maintainers of all affected packages should have received this email directly (by BCC rather than CC, to keep the message from being held for moderation due to a long CC list). If you want to handle the rebuild of the package yourself, or you have other questions or concerns, please just let me know before 2024-02-04. – Ben Beasley (FAS: music) [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/pull-request/16 [2] https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/releases/tag/20240116.0 [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/music/abseil-cpp/packages/ [4] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mozc/pull-request/6 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: HEADS UP: update to tesseract-5.3.4
On 28.01.24 10:48 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 28.01.24 4:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 23:20 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be updating to tesseract-5.3.4 in rawhide shortly, which carries a soname bump (despite it being a minor version, unfortunately upstream versions the SO with the package version). I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: ffmpeg gimagereader mupdf opencv python-PyMuPDF qpdfview R-tesseract skanpage zathura-pdf-mupdf Since it's not clear from your email, please be sure to do this in a side tag. Yes, the builds will be submitted to f40-build-side-82395 This is now done, except for ffmpeg which was already FTBFS. Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?
Blender already excludes i686: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender/blob/8088da10c20e53ab0e1dd5de6fd3a2344bd288aa/f/blender.spec#_207 So does prusa-slicer: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/prusa-slicer/blob/44359e4b53c503cb61a60842abf991a01d1cb9db/f/prusa-slicer.spec#_68 Packages depending directly on openvdb are: $ fedrq wrsrc -s openvdb OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src openvkl-2.0.0-5.fc40.src prusa-slicer-2.4.2-13.fc40.src usd-23.11-2.fc40.src Of these, it looks like only OpenImageIO builds on i686. Packages depending on it are: $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenImageIO OpenColorIO-2.2.1-6.fc40.src blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src embree-4.3.0-2.fc40.src luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src oidn-2.1.0-1.fc40.src openshadinglanguage-1.12.14.0-9.fc40.src usd-23.11-2.fc40.src Of those, only OpenColorIO builds on i686. Packages depending on it are: $ fedrq wrsrc -s OpenColorIO OpenImageIO-2.4.17.0-1.fc40.src blender-1:4.0.2-1.fc40.src calligra-3.2.1-25.fc39.src krita-5.2.2-1.fc40.src luxcorerender-2.7-0.10.beta1.fc40.src usd-23.11-2.fc40.src Of those, only calligra builds on i686, and it’s a leaf package. So, if I haven’t missed anything, as long as i686 support is dropped from all of calligra, OpenColorIO, OpenImageIO, and openvdb, then it should be OK. On 1/28/24 10:18, Richard Shaw wrote: Well I upped the memory to 10GB and got it to build but the issue on i686 with the wrong tbb package being pulled in has not been corrected by any of the 4 maintainers of the package. So I did a minimal update and changed the tbb BR's from pkgconf to cmake and a scratch build completed pulling in the correct tbb-devel on i686, but now two attempts at real builds fail... I think it's time to retire openvdb on i686 but blender and prusa-slicer would need to stop building for i686 first as first level BRs, I didn't dig any deeper into the dependency chain. Thanks, Richard -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2260642] perl-URI-5.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260642 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-URI-5.25-1.fc40 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Last Closed||2024-01-28 15:40:16 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-7eb07ce2c2 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260642 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260642%23c2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?
Well I upped the memory to 10GB and got it to build but the issue on i686 with the wrong tbb package being pulled in has not been corrected by any of the 4 maintainers of the package. So I did a minimal update and changed the tbb BR's from pkgconf to cmake and a scratch build completed pulling in the correct tbb-devel on i686, but now two attempts at real builds fail... I think it's time to retire openvdb on i686 but blender and prusa-slicer would need to stop building for i686 first as first level BRs, I didn't dig any deeper into the dependency chain. Thanks, Richard -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/rt] PR #2: use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `use Droid Sans fonts from distro packages` that you are following: `` I'll have a look at the proposed font-path changes, but I'll definitely will not apply %autosetup changes, because I don't consider them to be helpful. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #4: Do not depend on files from /usr/share
corsepiu closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Do not depend on files from /usr/share `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #4: Do not depend on files from /usr/share
corsepiu commented on the pull-request: `Do not depend on files from /usr/share` that you are following: `` I've applied a differerent hack to work around this dnf5 regression. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2260642] perl-URI-5.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260642 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-7eb07ce2c2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7eb07ce2c2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260642 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260642%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2260475] Redundant test requirements in perl-BZ-Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260475 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-BZ-Client-4.4004-13.fc ||40 Status|NEW |CLOSED Last Closed||2024-01-28 10:34:42 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Thank you for the bug report, Paul. I have both removed the build dependencies and fixed the license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260475 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260475%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2260004] perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20240124 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260004 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Mail-DKIM-1.20240124-1 ||.fc40 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2024-01-28 10:33:33 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2391411 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260004 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202260004%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2259416] perl-Data-Printer-1.002001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259416 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Printer-1.002001- ||1.fc40 Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2024-01-28 10:31:19 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2391421 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259416 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259416%23c2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2258922] perl-Email-Sender-2.601 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258922 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Email-Sender-2.601-1.f ||c40 Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2024-01-28 10:30:39 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2391433 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258922 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202258922%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Regaining Packager Status
I have already done so https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/618 On Saturday, 27 January, 2024 at 10:28:24 am IST, Benson Muite wrote: Hi Anirban, On 26/01/2024 08.13, Anirban Mitra via devel wrote: > I want to retake fbf-mukti-fonts and uniol-fonts of which i am the upstream > developer. I have lost my membership in packager group and I could not log in > the pkg maintenance systtem > Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/#returning You will need to open a ticket at https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/new_issue/ and reconfirm your identity. Once done am happy to review the packages. Please create tickets in Bugzilla. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: HEADS UP: update to tesseract-5.3.4
On 28.01.24 4:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 23:20 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be updating to tesseract-5.3.4 in rawhide shortly, which carries a soname bump (despite it being a minor version, unfortunately upstream versions the SO with the package version). I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: ffmpeg gimagereader mupdf opencv python-PyMuPDF qpdfview R-tesseract skanpage zathura-pdf-mupdf Since it's not clear from your email, please be sure to do this in a side tag. Yes, the builds will be submitted to f40-build-side-82395 Thanks Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
