Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-12)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:57:15AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > Meeting summary >> >> Do we have the full log somewhere? > > html: > >

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org aliases are currently broken (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768). I will send another announcement once that's fixed. --- Report started at 2024-02-13 01:07:53 UTC The following packages are orphaned and

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-12)

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:57:15AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Meeting summary > > Do we have the full log somewhere? html: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-12/fesco.2024-02-12-19.30.log.html plain text:

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-12)

Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Meeting summary Do we have the full log somewhere? Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-b17c8fc3fc engrampa-1.26.2-1.el9 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-9a7708876e mbedtls-2.28.7-1.el9 3

Re: Does ccache ever help with kernel mock build?

Am 12.02.24 um 22:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Dne 12. 02. 24 v 19:29 Julian Sikorski napsal(a): Hello, has anyone successfully managed to get ccache to speed up kernel mockbuilds, be it SRPMS from kernel-ark or from dist-git? I gave it a brief shot but saw no difference, if anything the build

Re: FYI: removal of bastion server in DNSBL spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de requested

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:04:25AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 06:12, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as die Infrastructure ML did not react ( or could not react ;) ), I > > requested the removal at that antispam blacklist. > > > > > I did not see any email to

Re: Does ccache ever help with kernel mock build?

Dne 12. 02. 24 v 19:29 Julian Sikorski napsal(a): Hello, has anyone successfully managed to get ccache to speed up kernel mockbuilds, be it SRPMS from kernel-ark or from dist-git? I gave it a brief shot but saw no difference, if anything the build was slower. The machine I am building on has

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-12)

= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco = Meeting started by @sgallagh:fedora.im at 2024-02-12 19:30:38 Meeting summary --- * TOPIC: Init Process (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 19:32:09) * TOPIC: #3165 Requesting FESCo

webrtc-audio-processing

The upcoming releases of gstreamer1 will require webrtc-audio-processing >= 1.0, and the package currently is at 0.3. There are 4 consumers: dino gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free pipewire pulseaudio I've set up webrtc-audio-processing0.3, and updated webrtc-audio-processing to 1.3. I've updated

Re: cloud-init switching to udhcpc

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024, at 11:11, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:58:19AM -0600, Major Hayden wrote: > I'm curious, why not systemd-networkd? It's mentioned once in > the bug, but there's not explanation about the choice later. That might be possible, but upstream cloud-init only

Does ccache ever help with kernel mock build?

Hello, has anyone successfully managed to get ccache to speed up kernel mockbuilds, be it SRPMS from kernel-ark or from dist-git? I gave it a brief shot but saw no difference, if anything the build was slower. The machine I am building on has 32 GB RAM which is not quite enough to fit

do we need CONFIG_UPROBES=y in our kernels?

Hi, I excuse myself if this has been already discussed, bastion ML server was blacklisted (has been removed btw). Short summary(for details use the source link): In a german developer blog article was the topic raised, that with uprobes enabled, userland apps can i.e. circumvent tls

Re: FAS issue (was Re: Another mass rebuild blocker: glibc qsort regression)

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 09:04:53AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > > The authentication issue being this one: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11733 > > I'd be interested in an after report on this one... as someone who has > managed

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James wrote: > I need reviews for the following new packages. I am willing to swap reviews. > - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354 > - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355 > - lusol:

Re: cloud-init switching to udhcpc

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:58:19AM -0600, Major Hayden wrote: > Hey there, > > For those of you who use Fedora often on public cloud providers where > cloud-init handles the initial configuration, there's a change coming for > the very early DHCP request during the boot. ☁️ > > [0]

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-02-12)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:30 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-02-12 19:30 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Fedora Linux 40 Mass Branching will be held Tomorrow

Hi All, Fedora Linux 40 is going to be branched tomorrow as per the experience of the previous release we are going to disable the new koji builds for the duration of this event. For more on this please refer to the past discussion[1] All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide

Fedora Linux 40 Mass Branching will be held Tomorrow

Hi All, Fedora Linux 40 is going to be branched tomorrow as per the experience of the previous release we are going to disable the new koji builds for the duration of this event. For more on this please refer to the past discussion[1] All builds that will be running at that time for the rawhide

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 3 weeks, i.e. around 2024-02-28. Since

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hau idatzi du Miro Hrončok (mhron...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2024 ots. 3(a), lr. (18:18)): > > > Package (co)maintainers > > golang-github-gatherstars-com-jwz eclipseo, go-sig >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 2/3/24 12:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4

Re: x86-64 -mtls-dialect=gnu2 change needs to be postponed

* Stephen Smoogen: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 09:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > > We've hit an ABI ambiguity/bug: > >gcc: -mtls-dialect=gnu2 produces wrong code on x86-64 > > > Was this set for the Fedora 40 mass rebuild or something that

Re: Koji: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

>> Building the current version of my opengrm-ngram package on Koji fails >> with the error "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" >> as indicated below. This happens only for i686; all of the other >> architectures build. Is this the fault of my package, or did something >> change at

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240212.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240211.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240212.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 287 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.96 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: FYI: removal of bastion server in DNSBL spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de requested

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 06:12, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > as die Infrastructure ML did not react ( or could not react ;) ), I > requested the removal at that antispam blacklist. > > I did not see any email to the infrastructure list about this so I am wondering if your email (and other

Re: x86-64 -mtls-dialect=gnu2 change needs to be postponed

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 09:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > We've hit an ABI ambiguity/bug: > > gcc: -mtls-dialect=gnu2 produces wrong code on x86-64 > > > Was this set for the Fedora 40 mass rebuild or something that was put in later? If it

Re: Bisecting an older kernel

Am 12.02.24 um 10:03 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am So., 11. Feb. 2024 um 23:14 Uhr schrieb Julian Sikorski : Hello, I am trying to bisect an issue which appears to have regressed between 5.18 final and 5.19-rc2. This is somewhat challenging as most of the kernels are since gone from koji, and

Re: Koji: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:02:28 -0600 "W. Michael Petullo" wrote: > Building the current version of my opengrm-ngram package on Koji fails > with the error "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" > as indicated below. This happens only for i686; all of the other > architectures build. Is

Koji: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

Building the current version of my opengrm-ngram package on Koji fails with the error "virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory" as indicated below. This happens only for i686; all of the other architectures build. Is this the fault of my package, or did something change at

FYI: removal of bastion server in DNSBL spam.dnsbl.anonmails.de requested

Hi, as die Infrastructure ML did not react ( or could not react ;) ), I requested the removal at that antispam blacklist. 2024-02-11 05:20:16 H=bastion-iad01.fedoraproject.org (bastion.fedoraproject.org) [38.145.60.11] X=TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256 CV=no F= rejected RCPT : found in

[Bug 2263833] perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263833 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0-1.fc38.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=113394230 --

[Bug 2263833] New: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263833 Bug ID: 2263833 Summary: perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-MIME-EncWords Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2263833] perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263833 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 2016434 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2016434=edit Update to 1.015.0 (#2263833) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 12 February, 2024 (today)

Hello everyone, Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 12 February at 1300UTC in the NeuroFedora channel on Matrix. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over: Matrix in the Fedora meeting channel:

[Bug 2263687] perl-Business-ISBN-3.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263687 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2263687] perl-Business-ISBN-3.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263687 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Current status of OSTree and its handling RPM scriptlets?

Hi all, there was an issue (either due a bug or due design) in the past about RPM OSTree treating %post scriptlets in SPEC file differently than on Fedora Linux - IIUC the explanation was %post scriptlets were applied on the server side of the system with RPM OSTree, thus any configuration

Re: Bisecting an older kernel

Am So., 11. Feb. 2024 um 23:14 Uhr schrieb Julian Sikorski : > > Hello, > > I am trying to bisect an issue which appears to have regressed between > 5.18 final and 5.19-rc2. This is somewhat challenging as most of the > kernels are since gone from koji, and the ark os-build branch seems to > have

[Bug 2260493] Retiring perl-Test-Vars, needed by perl-Test-Apocalypse

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260493 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---