[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2024-02-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-10430622fd syncthing-1.27.3-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0b7ba715af pdns-recursor-4.8.6-1.el8 2

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2024-02-18 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing c-icap-0.6.2-1.el7 c-icap-modules-0.5.7-1.20240112git56d0179.el7 chromium-121.0.6167.184-1.el7 Details about builds:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2024-02-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4a6bba707d libmodsecurity-3.0.12-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing anope-2.1.2-1.el7 bgpq4-1.12-1.el7

Re: Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

2024-02-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2024-02-18 at 23:45 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber > wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys > > that > > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not > >

Re: Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

2024-02-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:25 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > (snip) > > I see this somehow connected to the discussion about signing keys that > we had recently. A radical solution would be: branch rawhide, not from > rawhide. So, at the "F40 branch point we had last week", we would: > - switch

Upgrade to Sundials-6.7.0

2024-02-18 Thread Antonio T. sagitter
Hi all. Next release of Sundials is coming in Rawhide in some days. Related dependent packages are: cantera octave bout++ Probably, the following one will be a major release (the 7.0) Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter mailto:

Re: Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

2024-02-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 02. 24 13:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote: In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large and they stay forever as rawhide is never EOLed. We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I want to ask you - the users of Copr - what will be

Re: Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

2024-02-18 Thread Michael J Gruber
Am So., 18. Feb. 2024 um 13:54 Uhr schrieb Miroslav Suchý : > > In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large > and they stay forever as rawhide is never > EOLed. > We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I > want to ask you - the

Feedback wanted - pruning old rawhide chroots in Copr

2024-02-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý
In Copr build system, we noticed that Fedora rawhide chroots can became large and they stay forever as rawhide is never EOLed. We plan to work on this soon, but we are not sure what is best approach. I want to ask you - the users of Copr - what will be convenient for you? The problem is

Re: The semiannual "Transaction failed: Signature verification failed." exercise

2024-02-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > In my earlier message I quoted this case: > > > > > [1] From > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/actions/runs/7919159325/job/21619276641?pr=31338:

Fedora 40 compose report: 20240218.n.0 changes

2024-02-18 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-40-20240217.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240218.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 54 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.97 MiB Size of dropped packages:54.00 KiB Size

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240218.n.0 changes

2024-02-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240217.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240218.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 12 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:27.83 KiB

Re: Help with creating first PR for a package

2024-02-18 Thread Priscila Gutierres
I created this post based on my own experience: https://dev.to/prinewgirl/a-recipe-made-to-create-your-first-pr-for-the-fedora-project-21be Hope it helps. Em dom., 18 de fev. de 2024 às 05:32, Ondrej Mosnáček escreveu: > On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 09:23, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On

Re: Help with creating first PR for a package

2024-02-18 Thread Ondrej Mosnáček
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 09:23, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Loren M. Lang wrote: > > I've cloned it down and worked on bringing it more up-to-date. Now that > > I have something passing the test suite, I thought I'd file a PR and > > start a discussion. I

Re: Help with creating first PR for a package

2024-02-18 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
Hi, On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, at 10:52 AM, Loren M. Lang wrote: > I've cloned it down and worked on bringing it more up-to-date. Now that > I have something passing the test suite, I thought I'd file a PR and > start a discussion. I forked the project on Pagure.io, but found that > even with my own