I'm re-posting to @devel as I forgot that posting to @devel-announce is
restricted:
In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
can
I get the following output:
--
sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM Michel Lind
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:53:38PM +, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> > On 14/02/2024 17.35, Michel Lind wrote:
> > > As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list
> > > where this tends to get posted, apart from devel?
On 2/16/24 16:58, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/16/24 01:29, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Am Fr., 16. Feb. 2024 um 07:15 Uhr schrieb Elliott Sales de Andrade
:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:39 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
We're hitting this with h5py on i686:
I don't see any info googling it.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
No errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-47da280c4e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
I have my dnf configured with installonly_limit=6 and now and then find
it useful to get rid of old kernels (for example after a move from
Fedora n to n+1).
I know in the early days of DNF5 you couldn't do this, but can you do it
now?
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c2135dc540
3proxy-0.9.4-2.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
perl-MIME-EncWords-1.015.0-1.el7
Details about builds:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
No problems experienced on my primary desktop.
Thanks!
--
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 5:50 PM Maxwell G wrote:
>
> Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
From the Fedora systems I have immediate access to:
Well-used F39 Workstation:
Problem: problem with installed package
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>
>> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
>> try to run:
>>
>> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
>> # next time
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> # This is
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 08:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265425
Bug ID: 2265425
Summary: perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.202 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator
Keywords:
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
Greetings. After the outage that just completed, koji has been upgraded
to 1.34.0 plus a few patches from upstream. Some highlights:
* The scheduler has been redone completely, hopefully this will allow
for more complex scheduling adjustments. In the mean time it should be
pretty similar from the
Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:11:49 AM EST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:41:22PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:38:20PM -, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> > Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
>
> It's planned ... Join us on #fedora-riscv.
I should say if you just want a disk image right now
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:38:20PM -, Ryan Bach via devel wrote:
> Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
It's planned ... Join us on #fedora-riscv.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization
eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Add support for riscv64` that you are
following:
``
While the upstream repo hasn't seen activity in a while, it is labelled
"Maintenance Only" and the maintainer is still active on Github. @davidlt,
would you be willing to submit a PR to the upstream
Ubuntu already has a sever risc-v iso. Thoughts?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64
- telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not
belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.6.1 needed by
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 07:37 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> I'd like to use NFLOG to log firewall drops (so that the kernel
> message
> log isn't spammed by them), but it doesn't appear there's anything
> currently in Fedora that can read that other than "tcpdump -i nflog".
> It looks like ulogd was
Hi,
I'd like to unretire ulogd (aka ulogd2).
Please see the re-review bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2265387
Thank you,
Thomas
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-21/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-02-21-16.34.log.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-02-21/fedora-coreos-meeting.2024-02-21-16.34.txt
Log:
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 18:34 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
But I am afraid I am customizing the file
/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64.cfg . It's not the original one from
the RPM any more.
I should use the original one and it's better to manage my own custom
setting in the `~/.config/mock.cfg`?
Le 21/02/2024 à 08:11, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Erreur :
Problème 1: problème
> That said, DNF3 should work too. But instead of hunting this bug it may be
> easier to update configs and use DNF5 that should be used anyway.
As my mock-core-configs RPM version is below, I got the same version's
RPM from the koji build link below, and plan to recover the files in
the
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:38, Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:09 PM Stephen Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >>
> >> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
> >>
> >> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
On Wed, Feb 21 2024 at 05:38:00 PM +01:00:00, Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol:
g_once_init_enter_pointer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265336
This means dnf was built against a newer version of glib than is
available at runtime.
Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On 21. 02. 24 17:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:09 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>>
>> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>>
>>
>>
>> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:05 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>
>
>
> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
> --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
>
> This is
On 2/21/24 11:46 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:34:37AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
It is a warning, but you've asked for
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 12:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
>
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
>
>
>
> --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
> --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
>
> This is
Dne 21. 02. 24 v 17:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --shell
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf-3
--disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
This is suspicious. It should use DNF5 now.
What is
rjones commented on the pull-request: `Add support for riscv64` that you are
following:
``
Note upstream seems dead: https://github.com/mzsanford/perl-sys-cpu
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3
--
rjones commented on the pull-request: `Add support for riscv64` that you are
following:
``
(Adding @davidlt @tekkamanninja )
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel mailing
rjones opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Sys-CPU` that you
are following:
``
Add support for riscv64
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-CPU/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:34:37AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
> according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
It is a warning, but you've asked for all warnings to be errors, right?
As
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
> aliases are currently broken
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
(Side note: This should now be fixed)
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
Hello,
I faced the following error by running the mock for Fedora rawhide on
my Fedora 39 local environment.
Anyone, do you know how to avoid this error? Thanks for your help.
I filed this issue to the Bugzilla ticket below.
ImportError: /lib64/libdnf.so.2: undefined symbol:
I am getting an error "template-id not allowed for constructor in C++20" but
according to the Copr log [0], the compiler is being given -std=c++17:
Building CXX object
thirdparty/clipper2/CMakeFiles/clipper2.dir/Clipper2Lib/src/clipper.engine.cpp.o
cd
OLD: Fedora-40-20240220.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240221.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 109
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.60 MiB
Size of dropped packages:319.35 KiB
NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org
aliases are currently broken
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768
---
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265317
Jakub Jelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
V Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Assume I have two "stacks" of RPM packages available:
>
> postgresql16
> provides postgresql-any version 16
> conflicts with other postgresql-any
> postgresql16-plugin
> provides postgresql-any-plugin
> requires
Am 20.02.24 um 15:25 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski:
Some quick nitpicks for your spec:
I think I've addressed everything [1], thank you very much for taking
the time! :) I'll keep the default->sysconfig switch, though—it's a
one-line patch anyway. The change was motivated by an old
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-47da280c4e (perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.037-1.fc38)
has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-47da280c4e
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-9d50db148f (perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.037-1.fc39)
has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-9d50db148f
--
You
Miroslav Suchý wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100:
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Error:
Problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265317
Jakub Jelen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265229
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
What is missing?
> Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265317
Bug ID: 2265317
Summary: pcsc-perl-1.4.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: pcsc-perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265317
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-8qyqx3km/pcsc-perl.spec']' returned
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265317
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 2018000
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2018000=edit
Update to 1.4.16 (#2265317)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM hhlp wrote:
> Error:
>
> Problem: problem with installed package
> gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-1.fc39.noarch
> - package gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-3.fc40.noarch
> from fedora requires (gnome-shell >= 45~ with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265313
Bug ID: 2265313
Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap to 2024.001
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Text-Tabs+Wrap
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265311
Bug ID: 2265311
Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-Async to 0.803
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/IO-Async
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265220
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ppi...@redhat.com |
Status|NEW
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:07 PM hhlp wrote:
> al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
>
Please don't add --allowerasing when doing this test because it hides the
issues that we are interested in.
--
Kalev
--
___
devel mailing
al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
Installing weak dependencies:
boost-numpy3 x86_64 1.83.0-3.fc40 fedora 30 k
cups-filters-driverless x86_64 1:2.0.0-6.fc40 fedora 29 k
gnome-software-fedora-langpacks x86_64 46~beta-1.fc40 fedora
Hello.
Assume I have two "stacks" of RPM packages available:
postgresql16
provides postgresql-any version 16
conflicts with other postgresql-any
postgresql16-plugin
provides postgresql-any-plugin
requires postgresql16
conflicts with other postgresql-any-plugin
postgresql20
provides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265216
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.20 |perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.20
I just found that my visidata issue is likely being handled via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264975
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265038
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/285
--
___
devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:24 ago on Wed Feb 21 10:16:20 2024.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch
- visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides /usr/bin/-S needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265215
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.2 |perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265216
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265215
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 09:13 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
>
> Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
> >
> > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> >
Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265222
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jples...@redhat.com,|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265216
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-7208e1fe93 (perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.208-1.fc40) has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-7208e1fe93
--
You are receiving
81 matches
Mail list logo
