On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:22 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> botan orphan 0 weeks
> ago
Is botan1 still considered safe? Perhaps the python which causes the FTI
apparently could be removed?
Of course we have botan2 (but not botan3) in Fedora...
(I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-ea406abb46 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3699640048 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-ac18018db8
tcpreplay-4.4.4-5.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-bf31852fe0
w3m-0.5.3-63.git20230121.el8
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-0465fc03b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1b24d0ba2e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1d89caddb4 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-054b591230 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
scfc opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-AnyEvent-I3` that you
are following:
``
Fix URL
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-AnyEvent-I3/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Redis is not shipped in EPEL9, because it's in RHEL9. Same with EPEL8
and RHEL8. It is shipped in EPEL7 at version 3.2, presumably because
updating any further would be an incompatible update.
The license change announcement clearly states it will only be for 7.4
and up. The prior branches
Yeah, I was going to say it depends on the dotnet8 runtime. There are
containers for it, but that's a lot of extra dependency load. Otherwise, it
would be viable.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Dne 21. 03. 24 v 19:47 kloc...@fedoraproject.org napsal(a):
Those trivial substs probably would cover +90% of all packages in time in my
estimation.
See
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit#gid=0
The "trivial" conversion is possible for
Hi,
Some days ago I notice that shogun-data still in Fedora [1] but shogun
is retired for 4 years [2], just run `fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION` is
enough ?
Thank you,
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun-data
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/shogun
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
The Fedora Linux 40 Beta RC 1.10 compose is GO and will be shipped
live on Tuesday, 26th March 2024.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1] or log[2].
[1]
(NOTE: Some packages in this report were already retired in distgit but
still show up in the orphaned packages list due to
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12028)
Report started at 2024-03-21 16:05:32 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks,
The Fedora Linux 40 Beta RC 1.10 compose is GO and will be shipped
live on Tuesday, 26th March 2024.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1] or log[2].
[1]
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:53 PM Tomasz Kłoczko
>
> While I agree with some of what you're saying here, the problem is
> that it is, in fact, *not trivial* in many cases.
> Migrating the License tag from Callaway to SPDX identifiers is only
> the "easy" part of the transition.
> Re-reviewing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
Bug ID: 2270834
Summary: perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Weaver
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:24 PM Scott Williams
> wrote:
> >
> > > If we have some clue that a v7 merge/release
> > > is on the very near horizon for KeyDB
> >
> > This doesn't look promising for v7 in time for Fedora 40 or shortly
> after,
My concern there is that it has 7 code contributors with just one person having
the vast majority of those commits. That's not a problem for including the
package, but it could be a concern for replacing redis with it given how young
the project is and for it having significantly less
FYI - It looks like there is a redis-7 to keydb-6 path:
https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB/issues/527#issuecomment-1370606311
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
In Addition to that, I would rather wait a little bit and see about another
fork (s) and see ship possible redis-7+ versions instead of downgrading it.
Also PR shows very slow process so I wouldn't go for it.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:24 PM Scott Williams wrote:
> > If we have some clue that a
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:24 PM Scott Williams wrote:
>
> > If we have some clue that a v7 merge/release
> > is on the very near horizon for KeyDB
>
> This doesn't look promising for v7 in time for Fedora 40 or shortly after,
> unfortunately: https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB/issues/420
>
>
> If we have some clue that a v7 merge/release
> is on the very near horizon for KeyDB
This doesn't look promising for v7 in time for Fedora 40 or shortly after,
unfortunately: https://github.com/Snapchat/KeyDB/issues/420
The choice of shipping an ever-stale v7 database versus a maintainable
Redis-6 is currently shipped in EPEL9, so it seems like a more obvious
step-forward wrt EPEL.
> Honestly trying to replace redis with KeyDB in Fedora would be a step
> backwards and cause headaches so I don't think it's feasible, at least
> until redis v7 features are merged into KeyDB.
On 2024-03-21 09:22, Maxwell G wrote:
gnome-shell-extension-freon orphan 2
weeks ago
I've picked this up.
Cheers
Davide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Anything that was new in Redis 7 is not currently in KeyDB. This is a
decent list of features I found that would be impacted.
https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/redis-7-new-features/
KeyDB has it on their roadmap to merge in the latest features from Redis 7
but that's not complete yet (nor can I
Assuming KeyDB gets accepted (it looks close from the Bugzilla review), we
should obsolete redis for KeyDB in Fedora 40+ and consider eventually doing
likewise with EPEL as well, since we aren't going to be able to ship any redis
patches moving forward. I feel less strongly about that for EPEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-ea406abb46 (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240321-1.fc39) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-ea406abb46
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1d89caddb4 (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240321-1.fc40) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-1d89caddb4
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1d89caddb4 (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240321-1.fc40) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-1d89caddb4
--
You are
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:29:09AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> just noticed one fork, might be worth keeping eye on:
> https://codeberg.org/redict/redict
On the newly launched "Write Free Software" Discourse[0], Drew noted
that he is creating and leading this fork due to his reliance on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
Il 21/03/24 03:00, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto:
> Since xz consistently compresses better than zstd, I would strongly suggest
> using xz everywhere to minimize download sizes. However:
>
>> especially after zlib-ng has been made the default in Fedora and brought
>> performance improvements.
(NOTE: Some packages in this report were already retired in distgit but
still show up in the orphaned packages list due to
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12028)
Report started at 2024-03-21 16:05:32 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270514
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
OLD: Fedora-40-20240320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 35
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Dear Jun,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 2:29 PM Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:16 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Jun,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04 AM Jun Aruga (he / him)
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 84
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 554.60 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 08:29:09AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:19:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > It looks like Redis, Inc. has announced that future versions of Redis
> > are no longer OSS and will be dual-licensed SSPL and RSAL[1].
Hi Jan,
> On 21. Mar 2024, at 14:28, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote:
>
>
> * https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/722
>> The Engine API was deprecated in OpenSSL 3 and there seems to be
> no alternatives for it at the moment using Provider API. The providers
> can only be loaded, but there seems
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:16 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> Dear Jun,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04 AM Jun Aruga (he / him)
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
>> wrote:
>> >
>> ...
>> >> > == Detailed Description ==
>> >> > We are going to build OpenSSL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> There are two parts to this which users will see as 'slowness'. Part one
> is downloading the data from a mirror. Part two is uncompressing the data.
> In work I have been a part of, we have found that while xz gave us much
> smaller files, the time to uncompress was so
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:20 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 22:01, Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> > The zstd compression type was chosen to match createrepo_c settings.
>> > As an alternative, we might want to choose xz,
>>
>> Since xz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-1b24d0ba2e (perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240320-1.fc38) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-1b24d0ba2e
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3699640048 (perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240320-1.fc39) has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3699640048
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 22:01, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > The zstd compression type was chosen to match createrepo_c settings.
> > As an alternative, we might want to choose xz,
>
> Since xz consistently compresses better than zstd, I
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10568/
--
___
devel
Dear Zbyszek,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:41 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > > Could you provide the upstream OpenSSL project's issue ticket(s) or
> > > pull-request(s) about
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
> Dear Jun,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04 AM Jun Aruga (he / him)
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > ...
> > >> > == Detailed Description ==
> > >> > We are going to
Dear Jun,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04 AM Jun Aruga (he / him)
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
> >
> ...
> >> > == Detailed Description ==
> >> > We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
> >> > FIPS compatible and
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:28 AM Jan Staněk wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher writes:
> > That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default
> > version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it.
>
> Provides is something I did not consider at all, and it looks like the
>
Miro Hrončok writes:
> Python does this similarly to nodejs (we have python3.11, pytohn3,
> python3.13 in rawhide today), with one difference. The python3 package
> provides python3.12. So when you do:
>
> requires:
> - python3.12
>
> It just works.
>
> I believe nodejs should
Stephen Gallagher writes:
> That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default
> version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it.
Provides is something I did not consider at all, and it looks like the
easiest way forward! Let me know when you get around to it;
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hello Richard and Guys,
> >
> > I plan to package rublk to Fedora, and it is one Rust project.
>
> Hi, I'm on holiday at the moment, but please do look at how we
> packaged
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:36 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
...
>> > == Detailed Description ==
>> > We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
>> > FIPS compatible and corresponding API is deprecated since OpenSSL 3.0.
>> > The engine functionality we are aware of
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 06:19:28PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It looks like Redis, Inc. has announced that future versions of Redis
> are no longer OSS and will be dual-licensed SSPL and RSAL[1]. Absent a
> fork of Redis coming up, we will likely need to remove Redis from
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello Richard and Guys,
>
> I plan to package rublk to Fedora, and it is one Rust project.
Hi, I'm on holiday at the moment, but please do look at how we
packaged libblkio in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
Hey Folks!
Fedora 40 is going to ship with Podman 5[0] and as part of this changeset,
there will be a lot of breaking changes which can affect your
container workflow.
To ensure a smooth transition, the Podman team and the Quality team of
Fedora have
decided to host a test week[1].
The idea is
61 matches
Mail list logo
