On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 3:22 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
> We will see whether that or redict will get the most attention. Cloud
> companies like Amazon will probably prefer BSD, whereas contributors worried
> about another "Redis, Inc." coming up and taking their forked code
> proprietary
Neal Gompa wrote:
> It looks like Redis, Inc. has announced that future versions of Redis
> are no longer OSS and will be dual-licensed SSPL and RSAL[1]. Absent a
> fork of Redis coming up, we will likely need to remove Redis from
> Fedora.
>
> All I can say is... :(
Amazon (AWS) is setting up a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-bf31852fe0
w3m-0.5.3-63.git20230121.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f653e0bbf9
chromium-122.0.6261.128-1.el8
2
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0398ebbbfa
w3m-0.5.3-63.git20230121.el9
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-879bfd3d5b
chromium-122.0.6261.128-1.el9
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Packer-1.062-1.fc4 |perl-PAR-Packer-1.062-1.fc4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268208
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.63-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.63-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267294
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.62-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.62-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269338
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268556
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258459
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268649
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.f |perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267133
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267478
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268933
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1 |perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269007
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268603
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.78-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259172
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12 |perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265706
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267677
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc41 |perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267343
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc41 |perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267329
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc41 |perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267126
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc41|perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc41
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc |perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259171
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266150
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-31010e39f0 (perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.12-1.fc40) has been pushed to
the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265887
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0- |perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0-
On 2024-03-07 04:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
The effort to make package builds in Fedora reproducible has picked up
steam again.
I gave a talk at SCALE 21x last week covering this work, the current
state and what's coming down the pipe. You can find the recording at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271131
Bug ID: 2271131
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9013 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Catalyst-Manual
Keywords: FutureFeature,
With the arrival of GAP 4.13.0 in Rawhide, I find myself in need of 2
more GAP packages (which do some work in C rather than in the GAP
language, for speed):
- gap-pkg-anupq: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270581
- gap-pkg-fplsa: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
I
I have the same problem for an internal project that I'm working on. Since
some of the crates we use are not yet in Fedora we took the decision to
package them ourselves following the Rust Package Guidelines[1] and submit
them to the distribution.
This is more work but remember that if you create
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
> >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
> >
> > The meeting will
Hi,
I have updated astyle to the latest 3.4.13 version that changes ABI,
but keeps soname. The 2 dependent packages were successfully rebuilt in
a side-tag.
[dan@talos ~]$ sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery
--whatrequires astyle-devel
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:26 PM Ming Lei wrote:
>
> I love this easy way.
>
> But when I try to build in this way, I got the following failure:
>
> Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(ilog/default) >= 1.0.1
> with crate(ilog/default) < 2.0.0~)
> Problem 2: nothing provides requested
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Hello Richard and Guys,
> > >
> > > I plan to package rublk to Fedora, and it is one Rust project.
> >
> >
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not
> be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2
> that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to
> put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed
On Fri, Mar 22 2024 at 02:44:33 PM +01:00:00, Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This
will not
be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the
LGPLv2 that
allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 73
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 161.18 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first
>> release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict
>
> Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not
> be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
* Schedule the "%{rhel} == 11" mass-rebuild
--
Scott Williams wrote:
> Yeah, I was going to say it depends on the dotnet8 runtime. There are
> containers for it, but that's a lot of extra dependency load.
It is actually already packaged in Fedora:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dotnet8.0
But yes, it is bloat.
Kevin Kofler
--
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first
> release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict
Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not
be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 that
allowed
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Regular zstd compression is less optimized due to the lack of
> dictionaries, but it's also effectively the fallback path, though much
> faster to decompress while providing pretty good compression (which is
> why we have been gradually switching *everything* to zstd).
"pretty
OLD: Fedora-40-20240321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 750.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
An enhancement release which requires bcfversion 3.11 from biblatex-3.20.
Waiting on updated texlive (bug #2271057).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2271057
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053
Bug ID: 2271053
Summary: biber-2.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: biber
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
For an example of missing critical functionality, see this comment:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29539#issuecomment-1760243611
Aside from that, trying to use the pkcs11 and tpm2 providers just ended up with
unintelligible errors being vomited on the console. No, I did not keep a copy
Hi there,
We recently switched mupdf to shared builds because part of the
ecosystem relies on this, and because we finally could get upstream to
version the libs. As a consequence, major mupdf updates will include
an soname bump now, and this is the first one.
I built mupdf in a side-tag for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc38) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc39) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990 (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990
--
You are receiving this mail
Le 21/03/2024 à 19:19, Scott Williams a écrit :
can we really continue to ship redis-7 in Fedora 40 if we can't patch and maintain it?
I don't see any problem keeping Redis 7.2
in Fedora 40 and up for a while.
And having some alternatives (keydb...), to be installed
simultenously (especially
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
63 matches
Mail list logo
