Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 3:22 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > We will see whether that or redict will get the most attention. Cloud > companies like Amazon will probably prefer BSD, whereas contributors worried > about another "Redis, Inc." coming up and taking their forked code > proprietary too will most likely prefer the LGPL fork (redict) (unless they > are unhappy about the use of version 3.0 only of the LGPL by that fork). "It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future", but it appears that many of the recent non-redis contributors are cloud company entangled (and were previously willing to contribute under the BSD-3-Clause license). -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Neal Gompa wrote: > It looks like Redis, Inc. has announced that future versions of Redis > are no longer OSS and will be dual-licensed SSPL and RSAL[1]. Absent a > fork of Redis coming up, we will likely need to remove Redis from > Fedora. > > All I can say is... :( Amazon (AWS) is setting up a BSD-licensed fork, but has not yet decided on the final name: https://github.com/placeholderkv/placeholderkv We will see whether that or redict will get the most attention. Cloud companies like Amazon will probably prefer BSD, whereas contributors worried about another "Redis, Inc." coming up and taking their forked code proprietary too will most likely prefer the LGPL fork (redict) (unless they are unhappy about the use of version 3.0 only of the LGPL by that fork). Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c7 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-bf31852fe0 w3m-0.5.3-63.git20230121.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f653e0bbf9 chromium-122.0.6261.128-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4f9d0665fa csmock-3.5.3-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing koji-1.34.0-3.el8 suricata-6.0.17-1.el8 Details about builds: koji-1.34.0-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-19ab42ba8b) Build system tools Update Information: Add back in missing schema files. rhbz#2270743 Koji 1.34.0 upstream version. ChangeLog: * Fri Mar 22 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-3 - Add back in missing schema files. rhbz#2270743 * Mon Mar 18 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-2 - Carry scm policy plugin for hub, it's already upstream - Use dnf5 compatible 'group install' command - Allow specifying with a tag value what arches noarch builds happen on. - Fix image-build to not pass units to oz (to avoid GB/GiB issues) - Fix a typo in scheduler (already upstreamed) - Add back index for rpminfo table that was mistakenly dropped. * Thu Jan 25 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-1 - Update to 1.34.0. Fixes rhbz#2260055 * Thu Jan 25 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Jan 21 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 14 2023 Kevin Fenzi - 1.33.1-1 - Update to 1.31.1. Fixes rhbz#032 * Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint - 1.33.0-2 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 References: [ 1 ] Bug #2270743 - Missing koji db schema files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270743 suricata-6.0.17-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-a4cbda11c6) Intrusion Detection System Update Information: These are bug fix and security releases including MODERATE, HIGH, and CRITICAL issues. ChangeLog: * Wed Mar 20 2024 Steve Grubb 6.0.17-1 - New security and bugfix release References: [ 1 ] Bug #2128376 - Please port your pcre dependency to pcre2. Pcre has been deprecated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128376 -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-0398ebbbfa w3m-0.5.3-63.git20230121.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-879bfd3d5b chromium-122.0.6261.128-1.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-626c1844b4 csmock-3.5.3-1.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-684f77a897 podman-tui-1.0.0-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing koji-1.34.0-3.el9 pandoc-2.14.0.3-17.el9 patat-0.8.7.0-4.el9 prometheus-podman-exporter-1.11.0-1.el9 suricata-6.0.17-1.el9 Details about builds: koji-1.34.0-3.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-19d54f50cc) Build system tools Update Information: Add back in missing schema files. rhbz#2270743 Update to 1.34.0 + some small patches ChangeLog: * Fri Mar 22 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-3 - Add back in missing schema files. rhbz#2270743 * Mon Mar 18 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-2 - Carry scm policy plugin for hub, it's already upstream - Use dnf5 compatible 'group install' command - Allow specifying with a tag value what arches noarch builds happen on. - Fix image-build to not pass units to oz (to avoid GB/GiB issues) - Fix a typo in scheduler (already upstreamed) - Add back index for rpminfo table that was mistakenly dropped. * Thu Jan 25 2024 Kevin Fenzi - 1.34.0-1 - Update to 1.34.0. Fixes rhbz#2260055 * Thu Jan 25 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Jan 21 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 20 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.33.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 14 2023 Kevin Fenzi - 1.33.1-1 - Update to 1.31.1. Fixes rhbz#032 * Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint - 1.33.0-2 - Rebuilt for Python 3.12 References: [ 1 ] Bug #2270743 - Missing koji db schema files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270743 pandoc-2.14.0.3-17.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3e437ee2d0) Conversion between markup formats Update Information: backport pandoc fixes for CVE-2023-35936 and CVE-2023-38745 ChangeLog: * Fri Mar 22 2024 Jens Petersen - 2.14.0.3-17 - backport fixes for CVE-2023-35936 and CVE-2023-38745 References: [ 1 ] Bug #2220872 - TRIAGE pandoc: TRIAGE_CVE-2023-35936 pandoc: allows attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on the system [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220872 [ 2 ] Bug #2227033 - CVE-2023-38745 pandoc: allows attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on the system [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227033 patat-0.8.7.0-4.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3e437ee2d0) Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc Update Information: backport pandoc fixes for CVE-2023-35936 and CVE-2023-38745 ChangeLog: * Fri Jun 17 2022 Jens Petersen - 0.8.7.0-4 - rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2220872 - TRIAGE pandoc: TRIAGE_CVE-2023-35936 pandoc: allows attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on the system [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220872 [ 2 ] Bug #2227033 - CVE-2023-38745 pandoc: allows attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on the system [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227033 prometheus-podman-exporter-1.11.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-5d9511ad6e) Prometheus exporter for podman environment Update Information: release
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267917] perl-PAR-Packer-1.062 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Packer-1.062-1.fc4 |perl-PAR-Packer-1.062-1.fc4 |1 |1 ||perl-PAR-Packer-1.063-1.fc4 ||0 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-68f6c5e968 (perl-PAR-Packer-1.063-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267917 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267917%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2268208] perl-CGI-4.63 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268208 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.63-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.63-1.fc41 ||perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84 (perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268208 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268208%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270079] perl-CGI-4.64 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc41 ||perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84 (perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270079 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270079%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267294] perl-CGI-4.62 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267294 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-4.62-1.fc41|perl-CGI-4.62-1.fc41 ||perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-535c7c3d84 (perl-CGI-4.64-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267294 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267294%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2269338] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240313.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269338 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |40313.001-1.fc41|40313.001-1.fc41 ||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||40313.001-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-020e28b226 (perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240313.001-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269338 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202269338%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2268556] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240308.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268556 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |40308.001-1.fc41|40308.001-1.fc41 ||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||40313.001-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-020e28b226 (perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240313.001-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268556 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268556%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2258459] Upgrade perl-XML-RSS to 1.63
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-XML-RSS-1.63-1.fc40 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:36:41 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-9c4739db0c (perl-XML-RSS-1.63-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258459 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202258459%23c4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2268649] perl-Perl-Version-1.017 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268649 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.f |perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.f |c41 |c41 ||perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.f ||c40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-c5b86494d7 (perl-Perl-Version-1.017-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268649 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268649%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267133] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240229.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267133 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |40229.001-1.fc41|40229.001-1.fc41 ||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||40313.001-1.fc40 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-020e28b226 (perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240313.001-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267133 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267133%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267478] perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240302.001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267478 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 |40302.001-1.fc41|40302.001-1.fc41 ||perl-Business-ISBN-Data-202 ||40313.001-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-020e28b226 (perl-Business-ISBN-Data-20240313.001-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267478 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267478%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2268933] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.14 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268933 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1 |perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1 |4-1.fc39|4-1.fc39 ||perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1 ||4-1.fc40 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d03c88d6ba (perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.14-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268933 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268933%23c7 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2269007] perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269007 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |c41 |c41 |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |c38 |c38 |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f |c39 |c39 ||perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.f ||c40 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d2a14df308 (perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.20-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269007 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202269007%23c10 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2268603] perl-Locale-Codes-3.78 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268603 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.78-1.fc ||40 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:31:44 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-c4f7fa0b66 (perl-Locale-Codes-3.78-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268603 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268603%23c4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2264507] perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.28-11.fc41 FTBFS: Failed test 'Load the default public key store' at t/04-taint.t line 257: died: Crypt::SMIME#setPublicKeyStore: failed to store the public cert at t/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264507 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.29-1.fc4 ||0 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:29:27 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-e291ff3534 (perl-Crypt-SMIME-0.29-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264507 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202264507%23c7 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2259172] perl-Tk-804.036-12.fc40 FTBFS: objGlue.c: In function ‘Tcl_GetByteArrayFromObj’: /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/sv.h:1952:31: error: passing argument 3 of ‘Perl_SvPV_helper’ from incompatible poi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Tk-804.036-15.fc41 |perl-Tk-804.036-15.fc41 ||perl-Tk-804.036-15.fc40 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:28:46 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-dd6041feab (perl-Tk-804.036-15.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259172 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259172%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267821] perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267821 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12 |perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12 |-1.fc41 |-1.fc41 ||perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12 ||-1.fc40 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-ebb877a346 (perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.12-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267821 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267821%23c7 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2265706] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240223 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265706 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |0223-1.fc41 |0223-1.fc41 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |0223-1.fc39 |0223-1.fc39 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 |0223-1.fc38 |0223-1.fc38 ||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2024 ||0223-1.fc40 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-1a8263175b (perl-Module-CoreList-5.20240223-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265706 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202265706%23c11 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267677] perl-PAR-1.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267677 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc41 |perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc41 ||perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-0bd51a599d (perl-PAR-1.020-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267677 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267677%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267343] perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267343 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc41 |perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc41 ||perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-55cbd4c6e6 (perl-Sys-Virt-10.1.0-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267343 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267343%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2265725] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240223 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265725 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |0240223-1.fc41 |0240223-1.fc41 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |0240223-1.fc38 |0240223-1.fc38 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |0240223-1.fc39 |0240223-1.fc39 ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 ||0240223-1.fc40 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-60d87e7ca7 (perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240223-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265725 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202265725%23c11 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267329] perl-Date-Manip-6.95 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267329 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc41 |perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc41 ||perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-4dbe1fcab9 (perl-Date-Manip-6.95-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267329 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267329%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2267126] perl-IO-Zlib-1.15 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267126 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc41|perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc41 ||perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc40 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-72a53e7953 (perl-IO-Zlib-1.15-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267126%23c5 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2266177] perl-Test-Inter-1.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Inter-1.11-1.fc40 Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:25:00 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-9d4c795bd2 (perl-Test-Inter-1.11-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266177 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202266177%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2266126] perl-SNMP-Info-3.970001 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc |perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc |41 |41 |perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc |perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc |39 |39 ||perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc ||40 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d0bdd47fde (perl-SNMP-Info-3.970.1-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266126 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202266126%23c16 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2259171] perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI-2.22-52.fc40 FTBFS: speedy_perl.c:918:29: error: passing argument 2 of ‘perl_parse’ from incompatible pointer type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259171 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI-2.22-54. ||fc40 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2024-03-23 00:26:22 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-d6b58b2508 (perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI-2.22-54.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259171 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202259171%23c4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2266150] perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.12 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266150 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-31010e39f0 (perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.12-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266150 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202266150%23c11 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2265887] perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265887 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0- |perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0- |1.fc41 |1.fc41 ||perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0- ||1.fc40 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-416583674a (perl-Number-Fraction-3.1.0-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265887 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202265887%23c6 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: reprodubible builds (re)introduction
On 2024-03-07 04:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi, The effort to make package builds in Fedora reproducible has picked up steam again. I gave a talk at SCALE 21x last week covering this work, the current state and what's coming down the pipe. You can find the recording at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c4gfXVPAbU if you're interested, and a copy of the slides at https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/21x/presentations/making-fedora-linux-more-reproducible Cheers Davide -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2271131] New: perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9013 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271131 Bug ID: 2271131 Summary: perl-Catalyst-Manual-5.9013 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Catalyst-Manual Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 5.9013 Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.9013 Current version/release in rawhide: 5.9012-1.fc40 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Catalyst-Manual Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/18257/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Manual -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271131 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202271131%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Review swap: 2 GAP packages
With the arrival of GAP 4.13.0 in Rawhide, I find myself in need of 2 more GAP packages (which do some work in C rather than in the GAP language, for speed): - gap-pkg-anupq: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270581 - gap-pkg-fplsa: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856 I am happy to swap reviews. Let me know what I can review for you. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Look for help: how to package Rust project
I have the same problem for an internal project that I'm working on. Since some of the crates we use are not yet in Fedora we took the decision to package them ourselves following the Rust Package Guidelines[1] and submit them to the distribution. This is more work but remember that if you create the package for the crates you're using you are helping another developer and making Fedora better :) Cheers, Iván [1]https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ El vie, 22 mar 2024 a las 10:00, Fabio Valentini () escribió: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:26 PM Ming Lei wrote: > > > > I love this easy way. > > > > But when I try to build in this way, I got the following failure: > > > > Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(ilog/default) >= 1.0.1 > > with crate(ilog/default) < 2.0.0~) > > Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(libublk/default) >= > > 0.3.0 with crate(libublk/default) < 0.4.0~) > > Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(qcow2-rs/default) >= > > 0.1.2 with crate(qcow2-rs/default) < 0.2.0~) > > Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(shared_memory/default) > > >= 0.12.4 with crate(shared_memory/default) < 0.13.0~) > > Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(smol/default) >= 1.3.0 > > with crate(smol/default) < 2.0.0~) > > > > I guess it is because that all above crate aren't packaged in Fedora, > > can you share how to > > deal with this issue? > > Yes, these error messages represent all the crate dependencies that > cannot be resolved from Fedora repositories. > They will need to be packaged separately if you want to submit this as > an official package for Fedora. > Or if you want a "quick and dirty" solution for unofficial packages, > you can use "rust2rpm --vendor". > > Fabio > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
> >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
> >
> > The meeting will be about:
>
> * Schedule the "%{rhel} == 11" mass-rebuild
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: eln
=
Meeting started by @sgallagh:fedora.im at 2024-03-22 16:01:00
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:01:11)
* TOPIC: Agenda (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:04:45)
* INFO: Agenda Item: ELN mass-rebuild to adapt to `%{rhel} == 11`
(@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:05:14)
* INFO: Agenda Item: Flock to Fedora CfP (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:06:52)
* TOPIC: ELN mass-rebuild to adapt to `%{rhel} == 11`
(@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:07:35)
* AGREED: Out of interest in not burning people out, we'll plan to
do the mass-rebuild in May and check in with toolchain teams for
additional features to pull in at that time. (@sgallagh:fedora.im,
16:43:43)
* INFO: The conversation also lead to a reminder that we have
https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/dbs_status.html as a guide for
packages in ELN and ELN Extras that need some love. Help would be
appreciated. (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:44:54)
* TOPIC: Flock to Fedora CfP (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:45:43)
* TOPIC: Open Floor (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:53:39)
Meeting ended at 2024-03-22 17:00:57
Action items
People Present (lines said)
---
* @sgallagh:fedora.im (67)
* @conan_kudo:matrix.org (58)
* @yselkowitz:fedora.im (21)
* @nhanlon:beeper.com (14)
* @davide:cavalca.name (13)
* @zodbot:fedora.im (6)
* @tdawson:fedora.im (4)
* @meetbot:fedora.im (2)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[heads up] update to astyle 3.4.13 without soname bump in rawhide
Hi, I have updated astyle to the latest 3.4.13 version that changes ABI, but keeps soname. The 2 dependent packages were successfully rebuilt in a side-tag. [dan@talos ~]$ sudo dnf --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src repoquery --whatrequires astyle-devel codeblocks-0:20.03-21.20240128svn13434.fc40.src kdevelop-9:24.02.1-1.fc41.src Dan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Look for help: how to package Rust project
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:26 PM Ming Lei wrote: > > I love this easy way. > > But when I try to build in this way, I got the following failure: > > Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(ilog/default) >= 1.0.1 > with crate(ilog/default) < 2.0.0~) > Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(libublk/default) >= > 0.3.0 with crate(libublk/default) < 0.4.0~) > Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(qcow2-rs/default) >= > 0.1.2 with crate(qcow2-rs/default) < 0.2.0~) > Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(shared_memory/default) > >= 0.12.4 with crate(shared_memory/default) < 0.13.0~) > Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(smol/default) >= 1.3.0 > with crate(smol/default) < 2.0.0~) > > I guess it is because that all above crate aren't packaged in Fedora, > can you share how to > deal with this issue? Yes, these error messages represent all the crate dependencies that cannot be resolved from Fedora repositories. They will need to be packaged separately if you want to submit this as an official package for Fedora. Or if you want a "quick and dirty" solution for unofficial packages, you can use "rust2rpm --vendor". Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Look for help: how to package Rust project
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:04:13AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > Hello Richard and Guys, > > > > > > I plan to package rublk to Fedora, and it is one Rust project. > > > > Hi, I'm on holiday at the moment, but please do look at how we > > packaged libblkio in Fedora: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > > > > > Can you provide a little guide about how to do that? such as, > > > where can I find the guide doc? And is it github or crates which > > > should be used as source for Fedora packaging? > > > > Everything has to start with a source tarball, so normally github > > would be the best source. > > > > > [1] https://github.com/ublk-org/rublk > > > [2] https://crates.io/crates/rublk > > If the project is a single "crate" (i.e. one compilation unit) and > will continue to be published on crates.io, I would recommend using > the sources published there instead of GitHub sources. Using files > distributed via crates.io makes packaging a bit easier and avoids some > work that is necessary for non-crate Rust packages. > > I would recommend reading the Rust packaging guidelines for this case: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/#_rust_crates > You should get a working spec file by just running "rust2rpm -s rublk". Hello Fabio, I love this easy way. But when I try to build in this way, I got the following failure: Problem 1: nothing provides requested (crate(ilog/default) >= 1.0.1 with crate(ilog/default) < 2.0.0~) Problem 2: nothing provides requested (crate(libublk/default) >= 0.3.0 with crate(libublk/default) < 0.4.0~) Problem 3: nothing provides requested (crate(qcow2-rs/default) >= 0.1.2 with crate(qcow2-rs/default) < 0.2.0~) Problem 4: nothing provides requested (crate(shared_memory/default) >= 0.12.4 with crate(shared_memory/default) < 0.13.0~) Problem 5: nothing provides requested (crate(smol/default) >= 1.3.0 with crate(smol/default) < 2.0.0~) I guess it is because that all above crate aren't packaged in Fedora, can you share how to deal with this issue? Thanks, Ming -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not > be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 > that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to > put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed code to be compatible with newer > GPL versions.) Filed: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict/issues/10 – not holding my breath though… Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
On Fri, Mar 22 2024 at 02:44:33 PM +01:00:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed code to be compatible with newer GPL versions.) So I'm not an expert on redis, but it's primarily accessed via sockets, so the license doesn't actually matter for most users. I expect it will probably be fine regardless of the choice of license (as long as it doesn't go crazy and use AGPL). But redis also has "modules" and I'm not familiar with them. The modules were switched back to BSD-3-Clause yesterday after I complained to Neal and then Neal complained to Drew: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict/commit/d47ce2f24063728c09c3449e5deef3eddb9eceec But I'm not sure how much that really achieves. If the modules also link to LGPL-3.0-only code, then that probably accomplishes nothing. I agree that most GPL or LPGL projects won't be willing to touch anything that uses an -only license rather than an -or-later license because the risk of not being able to "upgrade" the license in the future is extreme and prohibitive. And of course permissively-licensed projects will not touch anything that uses LGPL-3.0-only or LGPL-3.0-or-later anyway. But as long as there is the IPC/socket boundary in the middle, most programs should be fine. I wonder about these modules, though Michael -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240322.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240321.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240322.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 73 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 161.18 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.86 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 28.10 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue ociarchive ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Silverblue-Rawhide.20240322.n.0.ociarchive Image: Robotics live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20240322.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: perl-Future-Mojo-1.003-1.fc41 Summary: Use Future with Mojo::IOLoop RPMs:perl-Future-Mojo Size:19.00 KiB Package: perl-HTTP-Tiny-Paranoid-0.07-4.fc41 Summary: Safer HTTP::Tiny RPMs:perl-HTTP-Tiny-Paranoid Size:18.38 KiB Package: rust-roxmltree0.18-0.18.1-1.fc41 Summary: Represent an XML as a read-only tree RPMs:rust-roxmltree0.18+default-devel rust-roxmltree0.18+positions-devel rust-roxmltree0.18+std-devel rust-roxmltree0.18-devel Size:123.79 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: 4ti2-1.6.10-9.fc41 Old package: 4ti2-1.6.10-6.fc40 Summary: Algebraic, geometric and combinatorial problems on linear spaces RPMs: 4ti2 4ti2-devel 4ti2-libs Size: 4.23 MiB Size change: -705.31 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jerry James - 1.6.10-9 - Stop building for 32-bit x86 - Drop maxnorm patch which was only needed for i386 Package: annobin-12.45-1.fc41 Old package: annobin-12.44-1.fc41 Summary: Annotate and examine compiled binary files RPMs: annobin-annocheck annobin-docs annobin-libannocheck annobin-plugin-clang annobin-plugin-gcc annobin-plugin-llvm Size: 5.37 MiB Size change: -582 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Nick Clifton - 12.45-1 - GCC Plugin: Fix bug extracing the value of target specific command line options. Package: apache-commons-configuration-2.10.1-1.fc41 Old package: apache-commons-configuration-2.10.0-1.fc41 Summary: Read configuration data from a variety of sources RPMs: apache-commons-configuration apache-commons-configuration-javadoc Size: 1.49 MiB Size change: 2.36 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jerry James - 2.10.1-1 - Version 2.10.1 (CVE-2024-29131, CVE-2024-29133) Package: atomes-1.1.14-2.fc41 Old package: atomes-1.1.14-1.fc41 Summary: An atomistic toolbox RPMs: atomes Size: 9.20 MiB Size change: 1.04 KiB Changelog: * Wed Mar 20 2024 S??bastien Le Roux - 1.1.14-2 - Bug corrections and improvements (see: https://github.com/Slookeur/Atomes-GNU/releases/tag/v1.1.14) Package: autorestic-1.8.1-1.fc41 Old package: autorestic-1.7.11-2.fc40 Summary: Config driven, easy backup cli for restic RPMs: autorestic Size: 11.70 MiB Size change: 2.58 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Major Hayden - 1.8.1-1 - Update to 1.8.1 rhbz#2269326 Package: breakid-3.1.2-2.fc41 Old package: breakid-3.1.2-1.fc40 Summary: Symmetry detecting and breaking library RPMs: breakid breakid-devel Size: 527.54 KiB Size change: -140.37 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jerry James - 3.1.2-2 - Stop building for 32-bit x86 - Improve man page description Package: cddlib-1:0.94m-16.fc41 Old package: cddlib-1:0.94m-9.fc40 Summary: A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons RPMs: cddlib cddlib-devel cddlib-static cddlib-tools Size: 3.89 MiB Size change: 18.37 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jerry James - 1:0.94m-16 - Add upstream thread safety patch Package: csdp-6.2.0-27.20181018git0dcf187.fc41 Old package: csdp-6.2.0-18.fc40 Summary: C library for SemiDefinite Programming RPMs: csdp csdp-devel csdp-octave csdp-tools Size: 1.40 MiB Size change: -285.23 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jerry James - 6.2.0-27 - Update to git HEAD for performance improvements - License change from CPL-1.0 to EPL-2.0 - Drop upstreamed printf patch - Stop building for 32-bit x86 - Minor spec file cleanups Package: ddccontrol-1.0.3-1.fc41 Old package: ddccontrol-1.0.1-1.fc40 Summary: Control your monitor by software using the DDC/CI protocol RPMs: ddccontrol ddccontrol-devel ddccontrol-doc ddccontrol-gtk Size: 667.29 KiB Size change: 1.35 KiB Changelog: * Thu Mar 21 2024 Jaroslav ??karvada - 1.0.3-1 - New version Resolves: rhbz#2270628 Package: deepin-dock-5.5.81-4.fc41 Old package: deepin-dock-5.5.81-3.fc40 Summary: The dock of Deepin Desktop Environment RPMs: deepin-dock deepin-dock-devel Dropped RPMs: deepin-dock-onboard-plugin Size: 6.86 MiB Size change: -95.06 KiB
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first >> release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict > > Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not > be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 > that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to > put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed code to be compatible with newer > GPL versions.) Also, the discussion under: https://discourse.writefreesoftware.org/t/redis-switches-to-dual-source-available-licensing-model/154 makes it pretty clear that the person behind the fork has no intent to make any compromises on this issue. For the redis executable, I guess this is not a blocking issue, but they also intend to fork the hiredis library (which currently is still BSD- licensed upstream [https://github.com/redis/hiredis]), and there, LGPL 3.0 only would really be a problem in the long run. Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
* Schedule the "%{rhel} == 11" mass-rebuild
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Scott Williams wrote: > Yeah, I was going to say it depends on the dotnet8 runtime. There are > containers for it, but that's a lot of extra dependency load. It is actually already packaged in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dotnet8.0 But yes, it is bloat. Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Neal Gompa wrote: > I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first > release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed code to be compatible with newer GPL versions.) Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F41 Change Proposal: Change Compose Settings (system-wide)
Neal Gompa wrote: > Regular zstd compression is less optimized due to the lack of > dictionaries, but it's also effectively the fallback path, though much > faster to decompress while providing pretty good compression (which is > why we have been gradually switching *everything* to zstd). "pretty good" if you only really care about speed. It loses to the much older xz in almost all compression ratio benchmarks, often significantly (e.g., xz compresses text (enwik8 testcase) with a factor 4 (*), zstd only with a factor 2.5 [1]). So I still think zstd is a step backwards compared to xz. (*) The factor 4 is with xz -9, but you should always use that because the decompression is no slower, and in fact actually slightly faster, with it than with lower compression levels, only the compression is slower, but the compression happens once on the server. [1] source: https://quixdb.github.io/squash-benchmark/ Kevin Kofler -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 40 compose report: 20240322.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-40-20240321.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240322.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 21 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 750.05 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 1.65 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 153.40 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Robotics live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-40-20240322.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: clang17-17.0.6-7.fc40 Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM RPMs:clang17 clang17-analyzer clang17-devel clang17-libs clang17-resource-filesystem clang17-tools-extra clang17-tools-extra-devel git-clang-format17 Size:242.18 MiB Package: compiler-rt17-17.0.6-6.fc40 Summary: LLVM "compiler-rt" runtime libraries RPMs:compiler-rt17 Size:7.61 MiB Package: lld17-17.0.6-4.fc40 Summary: The LLVM Linker RPMs:lld17 lld17-devel lld17-libs Size:6.08 MiB Package: llvm17-17.0.6-7.fc40 Summary: The Low Level Virtual Machine RPMs:llvm17 llvm17-cmake-utils llvm17-devel llvm17-doc llvm17-googletest llvm17-libs llvm17-static llvm17-test Size:489.85 MiB Package: spirv-llvm-translator17-17.0.0-1.fc40 Summary: LLVM 17 to SPIRV Translator RPMs:spirv-llvm-translator17 Size:4.33 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: arm-trusted-firmware-2.10.2-1.fc40 Old package: arm-trusted-firmware-2.10.0-8.fc40 Summary: ARM Trusted Firmware RPMs: arm-trusted-firmware-armv8 Size: 210.59 KiB Size change: 18.18 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 10 2024 Peter Robinson - 2.10.2-1 - Update to 2.10.2 - Add rk356x to rk3588 branch Package: clang-18.1.0~rc4-2.fc40 Old package: clang-17.0.6-6.fc40 Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM RPMs: clang clang-analyzer clang-devel clang-libs clang-resource-filesystem clang-tools-extra clang-tools-extra-devel git-clang-format python3-clang Size: 247.72 MiB Size change: 8.29 MiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 27 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.0.1-rc4 Release * Wed Feb 28 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-2 - Fix gcc triple on i686 Package: clazy-1.11^git20240128.69fedb4-5.fc40 Old package: clazy-1.11^git20240128.69fedb4-4.fc40 Summary: Qt oriented code checker based on clang framework RPMs: clazy Size: 2.57 MiB Size change: 12.11 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 02 2024 Tom Stellard - 1.11^git20240128.69fedb4-5 - Rebuild for clang 18 Package: compiler-rt-18.1.0~rc4-1.fc40 Old package: compiler-rt-17.0.6-5.fc40 Summary: LLVM "compiler-rt" runtime libraries RPMs: compiler-rt Size: 8.71 MiB Size change: 37.00 KiB Changelog: * Wed Feb 28 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release Package: flang-18.1.0~rc4-2.fc40 Old package: flang-17.0.6-4.fc40 Summary: a Fortran language front-end designed for integration with LLVM RPMs: flang flang-doc flang-runtime Size: 100.46 MiB Size change: 14.58 MiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 29 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release * Fri Mar 01 2024 Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho - 18.1.0~rc4-2 - Fix relationship with flang-devel. Fixes rhbz#2267221. Package: libclc-18.1.0~rc4-1.fc40 Old package: libclc-17.0.6-3.fc40 Summary: An open source implementation of the OpenCL 1.1 library requirements RPMs: libclc libclc-devel Size: 49.94 MiB Size change: 469.04 KiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 29 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release Package: libcxx-18.1.0~rc4-2.fc40 Old package: libcxx-17.0.6-3.fc40 Summary: C++ standard library targeting C++11 RPMs: libcxx libcxx-devel libcxx-static libcxxabi libcxxabi-devel libcxxabi-static llvm-libunwind llvm-libunwind-devel llvm-libunwind-doc llvm-libunwind-static Size: 10.17 MiB Size change: -18.18 KiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 29 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release * Mon Mar 04 2024 Nikita Popov - 18.1.0~rc4-2 - Disable LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER (rhbz#2267690) Package: libomp-18.1.0~rc4-1.fc40 Old package: libomp-17.0.6-3.fc40 Summary: OpenMP runtime for clang RPMs: libomp libomp-devel Size: 4.75 MiB Size change: 1.63 MiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 29 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release Package: lld-18.1.0~rc4-2.fc40 Old package: lld-17.0.6-4.fc40 Summary: The LLVM Linker RPMs: lld lld-devel lld-libs Size: 8.27 MiB Size change: 2.13 MiB Changelog: * Wed Feb 28 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-1 - 18.1.0-rc4 Release * Sat Mar 02 2024 Tom Stellard - 18.1.0~rc4-2 - Enable s390x arch Package: lldb-18.1.0~rc4-1.fc40 Old package: lldb-1
[Bug 2271053] biber-2.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release which requires bcfversion 3.11 from biblatex-3.20. Waiting on updated texlive (bug #2271057). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202271053%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2271053] biber-2.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2271057 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271057 [Bug 2271057] Upgrade biblatex to 3.20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2271053] biber-2.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC|ppi...@redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2271053] New: biber-2.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 Bug ID: 2271053 Summary: biber-2.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: biber Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: c...@m.fsf.org, c...@musicinmybrain.net, jn...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.20 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.20 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.19-5.fc40 URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6443/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/biber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271053 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202271053%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F41 Change Proposal: Disable openSSL Engine Support (system-wide)
For an example of missing critical functionality, see this comment: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/29539#issuecomment-1760243611 Aside from that, trying to use the pkcs11 and tpm2 providers just ended up with unintelligible errors being vomited on the console. No, I did not keep a copy of those tests, and no, I am not going to try again, as I most definitely do not have the time nor the interest to become an openssl or pkcs11 expert. This stuff needs to "just work" by default, without spending days tinkering, and engines do that just fine, because they have been developed for years. Providers are just too new, and those that exist need a few more years as optional features for enthusiasts and experts to adopt and fix all the bugs, add all the needed features, and make sure they work out of the box. We are not there yet, and jumping the gun is not going to help anybody. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
soname bump: mupdf 1.24.0 coming to rawhide
Hi there, We recently switched mupdf to shared builds because part of the ecosystem relies on this, and because we finally could get upstream to version the libs. As a consequence, major mupdf updates will include an soname bump now, and this is the first one. I built mupdf in a side-tag for rawhide and will rebuild the following dependencies: python-PyMuPDF zathura-pdf-mupdf There is one more dependency that I'm aware of. Since I don't have commit rights I filed a PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qpdfview/pull-request/3 In case I missed a dependency feel free to: fedpkg build --target=f41-build-side-86089 I have been using copr builds already for a while, so I'm confident this update can go into F40 as well before the freeze (in a separate side-tag). Upstream's focus is not so much on distro-packaging and linux rather than bundling and other platforms. So we have to see how this goes abi/bumpwise in the future, but they have been willing to do quite some work to adjust - kudos to them (Artifex) for that. Cheers Michael -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc38) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3780f7d6ee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c4 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-13e8e62b59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c3 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990 (perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5b9bcd8990 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c2 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what?
Le 21/03/2024 à 19:19, Scott Williams a écrit : can we really continue to ship redis-7 in Fedora 40 if we can't patch and maintain it? I don't see any problem keeping Redis 7.2 in Fedora 40 and up for a while. And having some alternatives (keydb...), to be installed simultenously (especially for tests) Then wait for stabilization of the community. Remi -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020-1.fc4 ||1 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202270834%23c1 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2270834] perl-Pod-Weaver-4.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270834 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
