On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 19:03 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 4:41 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > Michel Lind just prompted me to notice that the 'network' service
> > appears to have been removed from initscripts in Fedora 40+. This
> > change seems to have landed in
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I would like for us to consider evaluating a global change to -O3. I
> am not convinced that there's a good reason anymore to remain at -O2.
>
> If we get this kind of benefit from Python, I would be interested in
> seeing what we'd get elsewhere.
How much larger is Python
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 4:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_built_with_gcc_O3
> Discussion.fpo -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-python-built-with-gcc-03-self-contained/112743
>
>
> This is a proposed Change for Fedora
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 4:41 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Michel Lind just prompted me to notice that the 'network' service
> appears to have been removed from initscripts in Fedora 40+. This
> change seems to have landed in February without any fanfare -
>
Hi folks,
We are still seeing a few blockers for the Fedora Linux 40 final
milestone being filed in the blocker bugs app[1]. Your help in
reproducing the bug, suggesting fixes and verifying updates would be
greatly appreciated before the next Go/No-Go meeting[2][3] on Thursday
April 18th to have
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Also, these days, most authenticator apps support some kind of backup
> mechanism. FreeOTP lets you back up to a file (which you should, of
> course, keep somewhere safe and ideally encrypted). Google
> Authenticator can backup To The Cloud.
If you use Keysmith, you can
On 4/12/24 16:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
it seems since I last looked at this, NM has grown some level of
openvswitch support, but it seems to be limited, and I don't know off-
hand if it's sufficient for what openQA needs. I will need to look into
that.
jjames commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
I have updated the PR to include the comment above the License tag.
The php stack is [dropping its i386
builds](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php_no_32_bit). The flamegraph
package
The idea is rather to scan the same QR twice, for two yubikeys, and then
screenshot it and save it securely in case you lose one yubikey and need to
load it into a new one.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 2:39 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_built_with_gcc_O3
Discussion.fpo -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-python-built-with-gcc-03-self-contained/112743
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_built_with_gcc_O3
Discussion.fpo -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-python-built-with-gcc-03-self-contained/112743
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said:
> So the problem with github is they don't allow you to have 2FA on a
> backup device (or rather, it *is* possible, but the process is
> ludicrous[1]). If you have your phone as second FA and lose it then
> you have to immediately fall back to the piece
On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 14:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> unnoticed. There *are* still reasons to use the network service; I
> still use it on the openQA worker hosts, for instance, because there is
> integration between openvswitch and the legacy network service, but no
> integration between
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReproduciblePackageBuilds
Discussion.fpo -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-reproducible-package-builds-system-wide/112740
== Summary ==
A post-build cleanup is integrated into the RPM build process so that
common causes of
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReproduciblePackageBuilds
Discussion.fpo -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-reproducible-package-builds-system-wide/112740
== Summary ==
A post-build cleanup is integrated into the RPM build process so that
common causes of
Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], the Fedora Linux 40 Final RC -1.13
was declared NO-GO in today's meeting[2][3].
The next Fedora Linux 40 Final Go/No-Go meeting[4] will be held at
1700 UTC on Thursday 18th April in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on
Matrix.
The new target date for the F40 Final
Michel Lind just prompted me to notice that the 'network' service
appears to have been removed from initscripts in Fedora 40+. This
change seems to have landed in February without any fanfare -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/initscripts/c/414789841de9247310ebfd37cd043b75963f7cac?branch=rawhide
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 19:52 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> > I was hesitant to have MFA for a while. Imagine losing a phone with tons
> > of tokens. What a hassle to recover from that. I found it less than
> > ideal
The pygobject3-devel compat provides was recently removed from python3-
gobject-devel:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pygobject3/c/0eda657eab55405bdbebc6eb3112fcf7dcb517ba?branch=rawhide
However, a number of packages still use it, and now FTBFS as a result:
accerciser.spec:BuildRequires:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:59:46AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in
> bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just
> missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40.
>
What about simply blocking access to the git repos/koji/bodhi for those
without 2fa?
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 12:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:49:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 00:09 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > >
> > > What is the best
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:09:31AM -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
> Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC
> libteam orphan 0 weeks
> ago
>
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: libteam (56), status change:
On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 10:10 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> Yes that works too. By the time I was setting up MFA everywhere, and
> doing the code printing, I recall not all systems giving me that option,
Yeah, FreeOTP resisted doing backups for a long time on the basis that
it wasn't
Yes that works too. By the time I was setting up MFA everywhere, and
doing the code printing, I recall not all systems giving me that option,
and finding the paper thing not very good as recovery mechanism for me,
so I went with Yubikeys and my own backup-in-the-cloud mechanism. I was
just
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:47:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 19:52 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> > I was hesitant to have MFA for a while. Imagine losing a phone with tons
> > of tokens. What a hassle to recover from that. I found it less than
> > ideal
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 19:52 -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote:
> I was hesitant to have MFA for a while. Imagine losing a phone with tons
> of tokens. What a hassle to recover from that. I found it less than
> ideal for practical reasons.
This is one reason most systems provide a sheet of
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:41:02PM -0500, Michel Lind wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the recent EOL of the Django 3.2 LTS series[^1], and Django being a
> key component of our mailing list infra for both Fedora and CentOS, I
> would like to propose the following plan to maintain Django in both
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:49:27PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 00:09 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >
> > What is the best way to formally propose
> > that 2FA is required for packagers after
> > some date
>
> There is already a FESCo ticket.
OLD: Fedora-40-20240411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-40-20240412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 5
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:03:01PM -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:39:32PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/filesystem/pull-request/11
>
> The commit "Symlink /usr/sbin to /usr/bin if possible" would wipe out
> any
Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in
bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just
missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40.
On 4/12/24 07:09, Maxwell G wrote:
Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 157
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 12.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On 12. 04. 24 11:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3+ to
AGPL-3.0-or-later
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
simarrange
I had a look at this package of mine and realized I borked the rpmautospec
conversion, so I
I think missing easy to use documentation is the most missing part of
current rpmautospec package. Manual page does not exist, readme is in
wrong package.
I have proposed to be able to include extra section just for changelog.
I do not remember which exactly way was merged instead, there
Before any such ideas continue, I think rpmautospec should have more
decent documentation. Unfortunately it does not have even manual page
for rpmautospec command, core of its functionality. I find that missing.
While I think rpmautospec is great idea, I do not think it is ready
universally.
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from AGPLv3+ to
AGPL-3.0-or-later
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
conspy
fastx_toolkit
fondo
libgtextutils
libquvi-scripts
netstat-monitor
pyhoca-cli
pyhoca-gui
python-x2go
python-surt
simarrange
Unless somebody stop
Dne 05. 04. 24 v 10:49 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the license from EUPL 1.2 to EUPL-1.2.
The proposed diff is in attachment.
Affected packages:
AusweisApp2
rust-tpm2-policy
dbus-parsec
Unless somebody stop me, I will do this change directly in
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 15:26 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> - alciregi (1): rust-backoff
>
Hello. This is required by a package still under review (waiting for a
reviewer actually).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268499
Thank you,
Alessio
--
> I'm continuously working on reducing unnecessary accumulation of cruft
in the Rust package stack in Fedora, and I have been keeping track of
unused library packages for almost three years now.
Thanks for taking the time and looking into this!
> - blinxen (8): rust-btoi,
Hot news:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ contains usage column for licenses that are allowed for
something (documentation, firmware...)
Automated migration of "trivial" conversions have started (see other threads
in this mailing list).
Two weeks ago we had:
42 matches
Mail list logo
