[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-99cf4e74b7 putty-0.81-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-b002585dd2 openssl3-3.2.1-1.1.el8 The following builds have been

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing valkey-7.2.5-3.el7 Details about builds: valkey-7.2.5-3.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-86eb140ee3) A persistent key-value database

[Bug 2276274] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276274 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-637eeb63b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

Update Information: Updating golang-github-facebook-time to 20240423 ChangeLog: * Tue Apr 23 2024 Oleg Obleukhov - 0^20240423gitb998b76-2 - Update README.md * Tue Apr 23 2024 Oleg Obleukhov - 0

Re: Fedora 40 apache now giving errors

Steven A. Falco wrote: I upgraded to F40, and suddenly an apache cgi script that was working perfectly in \ F39 (and earlier) is giving me a "Read-only file system" error when trying to write \ data into a file. The directory where the cgi is trying to write is owned by apache:apache, and

[Bug 2222637] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-684108482c (fedora-obsolete-packages-39-22) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Fedora 40 apache now giving errors

Steven A. Falco wrote: > I upgraded to F40, and suddenly an apache cgi script that was working > perfectly in F39 (and earlier) is giving me a "Read-only file system" > error when trying to write data into a file. > > The directory where the cgi is trying to write is owned by > apache:apache, and

Fedora 40 apache now giving errors

I upgraded to F40, and suddenly an apache cgi script that was working perfectly in F39 (and earlier) is giving me a "Read-only file system" error when trying to write data into a file. The directory where the cgi is trying to write is owned by apache:apache, and it is mode 777. The file the

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

I get a slightly larger list with fedrq: $ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name CImg Field3D ImageMagick OpenColorIO OpenEXR_Viewers OpenImageIO OpenSceneGraph YafaRay blender darktable enblend freeimage gdal gegl04 gimp gmic gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free hugin jpegxl kdelibs3 kf5-kimageformats

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

You can use: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-tag_name=88169=1=1 So far it looks like we have openexr, gegl04, and jpegxl. On 4/23/24 7:13 AM, Tomas Smetana wrote: Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a): I tried to so synfig and

Re: Rust Stack Spring Cleaning - 2024 Edition

On 11/04/2024 15:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hello Rust packagers, I'm continuously working on reducing unnecessary accumulation of cruft in the Rust package stack in Fedora, and I have been keeping track of unused library packages for almost three years now. Thanks for working on this! For

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2024-04-24 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC At fedora-meet...@chat.fedoraproject.org The meeting will be about: https://chat.fedoraproject.org/#/room/#meeting:fedoraproject.org This is the weekly EPEL Steering

Fedora CoreOS rebasing to Fedora Linux 40

Fedora Linux 40 was released today[1]. The Fedora CoreOS `testing` stream has been rebased and is currently rolling out. In two weeks, it will be promoted to the `stable` stream. For more information about Fedora 40, see the Fedora Project’s list of official Changes[2] and the Fedora CoreOS

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 10:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Coming soon. > > > > Updating to Arrow 16.0.0 > > Thanks for the minimal notice, but that is not how this is supposed to > be done. > > You are supposed to mail all the

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) SONAME bump in rawhide

On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:04 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Coming soon. > > Updating to Arrow 16.0.0 Thanks for the minimal notice, but that is not how this is supposed to be done. You are supposed to mail all the maintainers of dependent components and provide at least a week to co-ordinate

[Bug 2275122] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275122 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Parse-PMFile-0.46-1.fc |perl-Parse-PMFile-0.46-1.fc

[Bug 2222637] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:43:22 +0200 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz > wrote: > > > > You're welcome. rust-appdirs got in and I believe is waiting to be > > available in the repositories. > > No, it's waiting for *you* to actually import the package.

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:44:26 +0200 Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:43 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz > > wrote: > > > > > > You're welcome. rust-appdirs got in and I believe is waiting to be > > > available in the

Re: Self Introduction: Łukasz W.

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:09:58 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 08:37:12PM +0200, Łukasz Wojniłowicz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > @decathorpe reviewed my first package positively at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 > > and now I'm looking

Re: Issues updating fedora 39 to rawhide

V Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:35:55AM -0300, Guinevere Larsen napsal(a): > Hi all, > > I just installed fedora 39 on a virtual machine with the plan to make it a > rawhide box. I followed the docs guide (namely using `dnf upgrade --refresh` > then `dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide`)

Issues updating fedora 39 to rawhide

Hi all, I just installed fedora 39 on a virtual machine with the plan to make it a rawhide box. I followed the docs guide (namely using `dnf upgrade --refresh` then `dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide`) and by chance noticed that the keys that were being installed were for

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

On 4/23/24 06:01, Josef Řídký wrote: So far only those two packages were built https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=88169=-build_id=1 E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240423.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240422.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240423.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 106 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 33.56 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Bug 2261448] perl-Curses: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448 --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- First error reported in the build.log is: In file included from Curses.c:434: CursesWide.c: In function ‘c_wstr2sv’: CursesWide.c:84:15: error: assignment to ‘wint_t *’ {aka ‘unsigned int *’} from

[Bug 2276324] perl-PDL-2.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276324 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.88.0-2.fc41

[Bug 2276324] perl-PDL-2.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276324 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-caf9cc52ff (perl-PDL-2.88.0-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-caf9cc52ff -- You are receiving this mail

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

So far only those two packages were built https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=88169=-build_id=1 E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly for others. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Tue,

[Bug 2276324] perl-PDL-2.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276324 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a): > I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of > the others rebuilt first: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log >

[Bug 2276620] perl-Curses fails to build on i686 architecture

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2261448 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2261448] perl-Curses: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2276620 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 2276620] perl-Curses fails to build on i686 architecture

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||179258 |

[Bug 2276620] New: perl-Curses fails to build on i686 architecture

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276620 Bug ID: 2276620 Summary: perl-Curses fails to build on i686 architecture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: i686 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2261448] perl-Curses: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261448 --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen --- Still only i686 build fails https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116767277 CursesFunWide.c: In function ‘XS_CURSES_addstring’: CursesFunWide.c:117:26: error: passing argument 2 of

[Bug 2276274] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47-1.fc

[Bug 2276324] perl-PDL-2.088 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276324 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2276274] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276274 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2024-637eeb63b5 (perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-637eeb63b5 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2276274] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

Re: F41 Change Proposal - Reproducible Package Builds (System-Wide)

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, 08:45 Tim Landscheidt wrote: > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > […] > > > > >> - use dynamic buildrequires to detect what plugins are needed > > > > > My problem is that the binary is linked

[Bug 2276274] perl-Parse-PMFile-0.47 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276274 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 1:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * David Abdurachmanov: > > > We most likely will not have ABIs installed in parallel, but we might > > change ABI. Currently Linux distributions target "RV64GC", but we > > don't really want that for the future RISC-V. I keep telling folks

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 1:08 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Daniel P. Berrangé: > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> There are multiple PRs and patches floating around that make RISC-V use > >> the /usr/lib64 directory, like other 64-bit ports. However,