Hi,
I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I
am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is agoode.
Thanks,
Adam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 08/01/2010 01:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 07/31/2010 05:05 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Hi,
I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I
am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is agoode.
Thanks,
Adam
According to
https
On 08/01/2010 08:12 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Those were added recently, because I needed to do a bodhi commit. But I
definitely was able to push even without those ACLs. I could try
revoking my commit ACL (but not ACL ACL) and see what happens.
I just revoked my el5 commit ACL, but managed
On 08/01/2010 09:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:18:38 -0400
Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org wrote:
On 08/01/2010 08:12 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
Those were added recently, because I needed to do a bodhi commit.
But I definitely was able to push even without those ACLs. I could
Hi,
In the package jai-imageio-core, my patches contain RCS
keywords that are part of the patch or context. These
include $RCSfile$, $Date$, etc.
After the dist-git conversion, my patches are now
different. It seems that keyword substitution was
in effect though it never happened before. The
On 08/02/2010 01:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 8/2/10 7:59 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
Does this warrant re-converting the package? Or I can fix up the patches
myself.
I suspect parsecvs got confused by the contents of the file having RCS
keywords. I could try re-converting it using git
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:06, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:00 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
just tried -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections on F15 xulrunner and got
libxul.so 24947928 - 23631640 (5.28% gain) and it still works.
ld.gold --icf is a
I don't have time to maintain python-gdata nor googlecl. python-gdata
seems well covered, so I will just remove myself.
googlecl has a single other maintainer for all but EPEL. I will remove
myself there as well, but it would be good if others could take
maintainership, especially for EPEL.
Hi,
I'd like to give up ownership for htmldoc. Please, if anyone is
interested, take it.
Here are the packages that depend on it:
htmldoc-0:1.8.27-13.fc12.src
LabPlot-0:1.6.0.2-8.fc12.src
diveintopython-0:5.4-18.fc15.src
mathomatic-0:15.5.0-1.fc15.src
mlton-0:20100608-3.fc15.src (my
Hi,
I have not used Coda in some time, so I am going to release ownership
of items in the coda stack. The only concern is that EPEL packages
won't have an owner, but Coda itself isn't supported there because of
the missing kernel module.
Adam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I am orphaning fvwm and libstroke. It's been fun!
Adam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/25/2010 10:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Why couldn't we just replace libjpeg with the libjpeg-turbo upstream?
(For the primary architectures anyway).
I think this is a great idea, libjpeg is the bottleneck for a lot of my
code.
One issue: are there C fallbacks for all the
On 06/23/2010 12:02 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
I've just orphaned xmms-modplug. Now that modplugtools is in (#600835) and
ships modplugplay, I have no need for xmms-modplug. Go grab it if you want
it.
I took it.
Adam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
I am orphaning minirpc, it is declared deprecated upstream:
http://minirpc.cs.cmu.edu/ and we at CMU are not using it anymore for
our projects.
It also has some never-fixed bugs occasionally triggered by its test
suite, related to threading and (probably) use-after-free. Because of
this, the test
Hi,
I have a review request for the golang package, which obsoletes the
old stale go package request. This package compliments the existing
gccgo implementation already in Fedora.
Someone interested in having the go-based go toolchain in Fedora
should review it!
Is the Raspberry Pi firmware now ok to be packaged in Fedora proper?
It looks like the Fedora guidelines for firmware can now include RPi stuff.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Binary_Firmware
https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/blob/master/boot/LICENCE.broadcom
Yes? No?
This
Now that golang is packaged
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950281), we might want to
have some packaging guidelines.
I have never done this, does anyone want to give it a try?
renich has started this but it is quite preliminary:
Hi,
I know this is old news, but Ghostscript switched to AGPL with version
9.07 (Feb 2013). I was not able to find any announcement of this on
the Fedora lists.
Fedora 18 was the last release with the non-AGPL Ghostscript.
This is a surprise, because since Fedora 19 we've possibly introduced
a
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 22:40 -0400, Adam Goode wrote:
I know this is old news, but Ghostscript switched to AGPL with version
9.07 (Feb 2013). I was not able to find any announcement of this on
the Fedora lists.
Here's the discussion from this list at the time:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I am working on packaging Google Cloud Print CUPS Connector,
which lets you share your CUPS printers with Chrome, Chrome OS,
and Android.
https://github.com/google/cups-connector
This is a small binary that replaces the previous recommended
solution of using Chrome in a headless mode.
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Jakub Cajka wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Adam Goode"
> > To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Cc: "Matthew Miller"
> > Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 3:47:42 PM
> > Subjec
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:05:09AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> > >are there some fedora guidelines for golang apps?
> > >are there macros and helpers for rpm?
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
>
> This needs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279660
This is a pre-req for packaging https://github.com/google/cups-connector
Happy to take a package to review. Note that I am not a sponsor.
Thanks,
Adam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> My FAS name is "agoode".
>
>
> Thanks!
This worked, thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On Do, 08.03.18 16:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl)
> wrote:
>
>
> Urks. That form doesn't support searching by real name. Adam, what's
> you fedora user name?
>
My FAS name is "agoode".
Thanks!
___
devel mailing list --
I am following the unresponsive maintainer policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544608
Does anyone know how to reach the maintainer?
Thanks,
Adam
___
> It looks like you'll be "it" if the maintainers don't respond. Do you
> want to be a maintainer?
Yes, I can be the maintainer.
I'm currently the main upstream contributor:
https://github.com/lathiat/nss-mdns/graphs/contributors
___
devel mailing list
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -0000, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately.
> I'll ping him, but you can expect that he will want to give the
> package away.
>
Thanks, and I hope he
openslide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107428492
Thanks,
Adam
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:23 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> vtk build submitted:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107377295
>
> Orion
>
> On 10/11/23 16:17, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
