Re: do we need CONFIG_UPROBES=y in our kernels?

> On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > Hi, > > I excuse myself if this has been already discussed, bastion ML server was > blacklisted (has been removed btw). > > Short summary(for details use the source link): > > In a german developer blog article was the topic raised, that

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 5:24 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello Mirek, > > This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. > > On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > > But doesn't satisfy our security requirements. If the kernel dbus project > > > had been

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 1:29 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:25 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 25.04.2021 20:39, Artem Tim wrote: > > > Please provide full PREEMPT mode by default in 5.12 kernel for desktop > > > variants. With 5.12 it is possible for

Re: Fedora TPM1.2 Support

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:08 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > > We are looking to no longer support TPM1.2 in RHEL9. Than raised the > question with regards to opencryptoki-tpmtok if it should be changed in > Fedora as well, so I thought I'd see what everyone thinks about future > TPM1.2 support in

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 29.09.20 03:49, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote: > > > Search domains have absolutely nothing to do with routing. Search > domains are > > specifically used for resolving non-FQDN to FQDN. This isn't a reliable >

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:19 AM PGNet Dev wrote: > On 9/28/20 11:03 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > I have the strong suspicion that the same people who are > > able to deploy working DNSSEC client side and are educated enough in > > DNSSEC to know what that even means are also capable of

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

00, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Andrew Lutomirski: > > > > > > > > > Paul may well have been mixing different things here, but I don't > > > > > think you answered the one that seems like the most severe problem: > > > > > systemd-resolved rem

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > After reading https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8967, I really > > don't think that systemd-resolved's

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:04 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 28.09.20 18:36, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > * Andrew Lutomirski: > > > > > Paul may well have been mixing different things here, but I don't > > > think you answered the

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:27 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:48 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: >> > >> > >Subject: Re: Fedora 33 Sys

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:48 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > >Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved > > > > > paul@thinkpad:~$ dig +dnssec vpn.nohats.ca @127.0.0.53 >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:34 AM Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said: > > The DNS servers in edge routers are awful at supporting > > either. i.e. the DNS servers you usually get informed about in DHCP > > leases are typically too crap at supporting either kind of

Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative

On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 1:48 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 13:29 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:52 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > And I have a user story: Andy wants to use a password manager to store > > >

Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:51:35AM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Jan 16, 2020, at 3:48 AM, Sarah Finn wrote: > > > > > >  > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I hope you are all w

Re: Update: AAA replacement login Initiative

> On Jan 16, 2020, at 3:48 AM, Sarah Finn wrote: > >  > Hi all, > > I hope you are all well. > > I would like to invite you to contribute to our new initiative: AAA > replacement login. > I’ll offer a couple of suggestions: Right now, I enter my Fedora developer password into GNOME Online

Re: systemd 244-rc1

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:19 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > Hi, > > a new systemd has been sent to rawhide. I don't expect any major > trouble, but please report any issues. > > Quoting %changelog: > Biggest items: cgroups v2 cpuset controller, fido_id builtin in

Retiring u2f-hidraw-policy soon!

u2f-hidraw-policy is obsoleted by an upstream systemd change. Thanks to the systemd people for doing this! I have asked systemd to obsolete u2f-hidraw-policy in all branches when they apply the update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753381 and I'll be retiring u2f-hidraw-policy

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:16 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > > > Georg Sauthoff writes: > > > > > > I ended up tweaking my code to avoid the assertions, rather than > > > > disabling

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:16 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Georg Sauthoff writes: > > > > I ended up tweaking my code to avoid the assertions, rather than disabling > > > them. For this particular situation, my original change was to try > > > > > > std::copy([0], [0]+foo.size(),

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 4:30 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Tom Hughes writes: > > > But I think upstream is giving very bad advice... > > > > That define does not "add extra crashes" in the way that they > > seem to think - well I mean it does literally but those crashes > > are reports of program

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:52 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/x86-64_micro-architecture_update > > == Summary == > > After preliminary discussions with CPU vendors, we propose AVX2 as the > new baseline. AVX2 support was introduced into CPUs from 2013 to > 2015.

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

> On Jul 22, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:11:32PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> With my FESCo hat on, I can't support this action as currently stated. >> I think I'd be more inclined to consider it if the Change was proposed >> as a new architecture

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > > On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote > > > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon? I > packaged > > > it because I tho

Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:33 PM Jerry James wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:26 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > Updates of coin-or-Sample/CoinUtils/Ipopt packages are coming on > > Rawhide; involved packages: > > I didn't know you were working on this. I noticed

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 3:56 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. > +1000 > > > > Is there a definitive reason why those are necessary to go in RPM > fusion? Was > > Tom Hughes right? > > > >

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

> On Nov 23, 2018, at 6:16 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Jonathan Dieter: > >>> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 12:45 +, Michael Schroeder wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:30:14PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: Just to be clear on this, unlike deltarpm, zchunked rpms shouldn't require

How should the nvme-cli package generate its host "NQN"?

There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814 I'm wondering what the right approach is. For the various Atomic variants, ISTM it's not very nice for the package to

Re: Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

On Jul 30, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Jul 27, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Owen Taylor wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/27/2018 03:33 PM, John Reiser wrote:The key principle is that > sizeof(foo) must be the stride of an array

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

> On Aug 2, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: >> Wearing a lib developer hat, I don't see how you can make a .pc that >> doesn't overlink if you provide something a bit entangled with other >> libs. >> The problem is

Re: Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

On Jul 27, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Owen Taylor wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/27/2018 03:33 PM, John Reiser wrote:The key principle is that > sizeof(foo) must be the stride of an array of foo, > > and the array must guarantee alignment of each element in the

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

>>> On Jul 15, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>> On 07/12/2018 10:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> Does each build start with its own fresh VM? Do you care about the >>> data in that build VM if either

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

> On Jul 12, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 07:32 +, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On 2018-07-11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> The effects of fsync are impossible to see unless you hard-reboot >>> the >>> machine. >> >> Are you sure non-fsynced changes are

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On 07/11/2018 06:37 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > From my perspective as an occasional Fedora packager, I'm regularly > > surprised by just how long it takes for Koji builders to install > > dependencies.

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of GCC from the buildroot

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 06:03:33PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:52 PM Kevin Kofler > wrote: > > > > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > As per Changes/Remove GCC from BuildRoot > >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

> On Jun 25, 2018, at 3:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Fr, 22.06.18 14:17, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >>> On Fr, 22.06.18 19:01, Javier Martinez Canillas (jav...@dowhile0.org) wrote: >>> >

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

> On Jun 25, 2018, at 3:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Mo, 25.06.18 11:23, Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote: >>> >>> That would break applications like libguestfs which run as non-root and >>> have

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

> On Jun 18, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas >>> wrote: > >>> Yes for EFI systems but no otherwise. On EFI the BLS snippets

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

> On Jun 18, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Chris Murphy >> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Adam Williamson >> wrote a monolithic config > > >> The cited BLS spec requires $BOOT be VFAT, are we doing that? >> > > Yes

Re: f29 bootloader changes / raid1 installs + efi

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 15/06/18 22:50, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> >>> "KM" == Kyle Marek writes: >> >> >> KM> I can't remember what else I discovered in reading the manual >> KM> last. Do you know if there are any other discovery/identification >>

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 01-06-18 20:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> First of all I want to thank everyone f

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

> On Jun 1, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > First of all I want to thank everyone for their input. > > I also want to make clear that the hide the menu + > not listening for a keypress at all (aka fastboot) is a > Fedora 30 thing, quoting myself: > > "For F29, single OS

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

ack in DOS days with a third-party tool > that permitted 'BAT files' to query for Shift, Alt, and Ctrl > key states, and to build boolean decision trees: > > On Thu, 31 May 2018, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> If the protocol were that the boot menu would be shown if >> any ke

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "JK" == Jan Kurik writes: > > JK> 1. Add patches to grub to also make pressing F8 show the menu > > One thing I've never really understood is the reason for using such a > small set of keys to interrupt the boot process. I seem

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:27:15PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > Fedora package maintainers, >> > >> > FESCo approved an updated policy for

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

On May 2, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: Hans, can't this be affected also by different disk vendors (drive vendor in Lenovo laptop can vary even in same model) and different firmware of disks? Also, drive FW is upgradeable in Lenovo laptops. On Wed, May 2,

DNF producing nonsense results (and a bogus F28 updates compose?)

I just got some very strange behavior from dnf: $ sudo dnf upgrade --best --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:26 ago on Sat 05 May 2018 09:13:56 PM PDT. Dependencies resolved. PackageArch

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

> On Mar 2, 2018, at 6:42 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:48:46PM +0330, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: >> I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in >> mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these questions. > > A

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi All, > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable > Panel Self Refresh

Re: cflag ffast-math

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > Question about gcc cflag ffast-math . > Should I enable cflag ffast-math on opencv build explicitly > ( -DENABLE_FAST_MATH=ON ) ? and I keep disable cflag ffast-math in mlt > build [1] ? > > I have no meaningful

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 10 January 2018 at 14:46, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> > > wrot

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 14:23, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 01/08/2

Re: Security updates and batched pushes

> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 01/08/2018 10:53 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Well, if this firefox update was urgent, shouldn't it have been marked >>> urgent? >> >> Urgency is always in the eye of the beholder. I as a user consider

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/11/2017 10:26 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> I ran into this unannounced change: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels >> >> If this is accepted, all x86 hardware on which Fedora

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

> On Jul 20, 2017, at 5:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Richard Hughes wrote: >> Sure they can. If you install the KDE runtime and the GNOME runtime, >> these are both built upon the Freedesktop runtime and share a huge >> number of files. Any duplicate files get

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > The app store model also assumes that the app store operator acts as > some sort of gate keeper, so there has to be some policy enforcement at > this level, too. It is not sufficient to pass through just what the >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14 July 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: >> As above, it could be the exact same sandbox technology with the same >> portals and everything. The sand

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: >> > F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of >> > their

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

I'll bite, sort of. When bugs get reported through normal upstream channels that affect parts of the kernel that I'm involved in, they generally get fixed. That includes i686 and even 486. I flipped through several of the open i686 Fedora bugs, and they look familiar and look like issues that

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

After reading this, I think there's a false dichotomy here: On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:26 PM, wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote: >> >> There ought to be better ways to sandbox applications than to turn them >> into >>

Re: power management

On Apr 10, 2017 7:39 AM, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 04:47:54PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > 01.org has several projects related to power management, but most > aren't in Fedora repositories. Are any of these useful for the recent > effort to make power

Re: httpd illegal instruction by rebuild with rpmrc file

On Apr 10, 2017 2:28 PM, "Dominik Kucher" wrote: when i rebuild the src.rpm with my .rpmrc file i became the error "illegal instruction", when i create the rpm without the .rpmrc file it works perfectly! other builds (pure-ftpd, mpd, mpdscribble, samba, openssl) works

Re: Fedora kernel crashing in virtio when running on qemu

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 20:48 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 19:40 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> > >

Re: packaging work is becoming increasingly cumbersome

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > While I am sure these changes are done with an aim of improving things > in the long run, the churn caused by them is really starting to take a > toll on my motivation. Could something be done to mitigate the >

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On Jan 31, 2017 6:34 AM, "Chris Adams" wrote: Once upon a time, Jan Kurik said: > LVM RAID provides same functionality as MD > RAID (it shares the same kernel code) with better flexibility and > additional features expected in future. How do LVM RAID

Re: Increasing compatibility with rpm-ostree for host packages

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 02:03 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> How about you just explain here what it is you want rather than making >> everybody go and read some bug? > > OK, here's a copy of the text: > > rpm-ostree is a

Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support

On Jan 5, 2017 9:03 AM, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:. The main > difference would be installation/deployment. The idea would be that > instead of > the 32-bit and 64-bit runtimes being installed directly in parallel on the > base > system, they would instead be installed

Debugging random suspend?

My laptop occasionally randomly suspends itself. When this happens, it seems to happen quite a few times in a row, several seconds apart. The journal has this to say: Jan 03 20:44:25 ... systemd-logind[1106]: Suspending... So *why* is logind suspending? It's happened five or six times while

Re: Status of microcode updates

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 12/09/2016 11:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Florian Weimer >> wrote: >>> >>> We would like to enable hardware-assisted lock optimizations in glibc on >>>

Re: i686 [was Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:51:35AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> into it, and it's in the middle of his priorities somewhere between >> "actual urgent work" and "other actual important work"), but >> preliminary

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Pretty sure this predates CONFIG_EFI_MIXED, so it's predicated on > creating 32-bit EFI GRUB *and* 32-bit OS which makes it easier to > create dedicated media that boots properly. Easier being relative, of > course. >

Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jack Howarth > wrote: >>While evaluating various Linux distributions for repurposing a >> MacBook Pro 2,1 as a Linux box, I was pleasantly

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Nov 24, 2016 2:03 AM, "Carlos Garnacho" wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Carlos Garnacho > > > I'm objecting to whatever piece of software opens thoroughly untrusted > > files out of ~/Downloads and parses them. If that's

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > There is nothing specific in Tracker *design* about opening files, at all. > Tracker is a semantic database with a focus on local access/content, period. > Your gripe happens to be against a certain implementation of

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> >> > >> > I would go even farther and argue that Fedora should not, by default, >> > ever >> > enable a miner that isn't running in *strict* seccomp mode. If that

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Nov 23, 2016 2:21 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Nov 23, 2016 8:11 AM, "Stephen John Smoogen" > wrote: > > > > Can we leave tracker enabled but disable literally every miner? AFAIK the > > That is literally, overreacting. Of all tracker processes,

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Nov 23, 2016 10:12 AM, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 16:36 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I don't think that is entirely true. I've recently been trying > > to get gnome3 to run on under-powered machines like cheap ARM > > tablets, and I can do

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Nov 23, 2016 8:11 AM, "Stephen John Smoogen" wrote: > > On 23 November 2016 at 09:36, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> What about the larger picture? Can tracker be made optional again > >>

Re: F24 GStreamer zero day

On Nov 23, 2016 6:37 AM, "Michael Catanzaro" wrote: > > or sandboxing tracker miners (e.g. maybe with > SELinux?) that would be a more practical way forward. This seems like it would be a fantastic use of the infrastructure behind xdg-app.

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said: > > The thread on Fedora Devel revealed some other issues which need to be > > considered carefully. One of these is that of privacy: for example, the > DHCP >

Re: RFC (round 2): Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 11.11.16 11:12, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > The hostname may always be set manually and the result will (for the vast > > majority of people) be unique within their environment.

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zb

Re: RFC: Change the default hostname for Fedora 26+

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! > > I kinda hate kicking off discussions like this without having a solid > solution to propose or being able to promise to work on one, but this > really seems important. Unfortunately I can't claim

Re: Pondering security update time frames

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 17:59 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> 2. There doesn't appear to be a working process to get updates out >> quickly. As a current and pressing example, there is no

Pondering security update time frames

It seems to me that Fedora has three severe distribution wide issues relating to security updates: 1. Updates, even critical security updates, are very slow. Getting an update out involves creating a build and an update (which is reasonably fast for most packages), pushing the update to

Re: F25 workstation, and (almost) hidpi displays

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 05:16 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > > Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > > If you use

Re: grub, grubby, btrfs, was: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE ...

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> Changed this subject to match the other one I changed, so if I'm doing >> it wrong at least I'm consistent! >> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Modifying the image at all breaks the existing media verification > option in the boot menu, and we know people get bad writes using bad > or flaky media This part, at least, should be relatively straightforward to

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Oct 7, 2016 1:29 PM, "Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote: > > > >> > [...] I always run dnf manually from the > >> > command line, in a VT logged in as root. And I can run X while doing > >> > this and I've never had a dnf update issue. > > To the extent that the problem is that dnf

Re: F26 proposal: Make Fedora Media Writer the officially supported USB install media creator

On Oct 7, 2016 12:39 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 20:03 +, John Florian wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 12:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If we do not 'support' livecd-iso-to-disk any more, we no longer > > support: > > > > 1)

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:51:16 -0700 > Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> By that standard, why do we support dnf at all? >> >> $ sudo dnf upgrade >> Error: dnf upgrade is

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 10/04/2016 12:06 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > On Oct 4, 2016 8:52 AM, "Adam Williamson" <adamw...@fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.o

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

On Oct 4, 2016 8:52 AM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > Recently several reports of people getting 'duplicated packages' and > 'kernel updates not working' have come through to us in QA from Fedora > 24 users. I managed to get one reporter to explain more specifically >

Re: t460s fedora 24 - display freeze

On Sep 20, 2016 7:31 AM, "Dusty Mabe" wrote: > > > Several times over the past month my t460s has just blank screens > when I come back to it after some time. I don't know if the thing > froze up completely or if it is just the display not working. I lock > my screens (laptop

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

On Aug 20, 2016 4:50 PM, "Andrew Lutomirski" <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > How about ordinary earlyprintk to serial? > > Try booting with nokaslr, though. There was a bug, now fixed upstream (I think) that broke AMD early microcode if kaslr was used. You would li

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

On Aug 20, 2016 4:38 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > On 19/08/16 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 18:53 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > >>> On 19/08/16

Re: User instances of systemd and SELinux

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 08/10/2016 03:42 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016

Re: User instances of systemd and SELinux

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:32:10PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 10:24 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Most of you are probably aware that systemd except running as

Re: Snaps and Fedora

On Jul 22, 2016 5:48 PM, "Neal Gompa" wrote: > This is done through the "plugs" and "slots" that can be used to > create interfaces among them. This is a true superset of the > capability provided by Flatpak through Portals, since it can be used > to export non-DBus oriented

  1   2   3   4   >