On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 20.10.14 15:08, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:56:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
But again, I am not sure I understand what is going on here. Is
On Jul 2, 2014 11:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless
someone
adopts them. If you know
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
How many patches needed for the latest mule?
Are these[1] merged already?
I'm not sure how many of those will be needed. Several of them were
for building the old version of mule against newer dependencies (like
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:59 AM, tspaul...@yahoo.com
tspaul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm a mule developer and fedora user. Recently, I noticed that the version
of mule packaged with fedora is not only very behind the current upstream
version but it is also orphaned. I'd like to take
On Jun 18, 2014 5:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and if
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Dan Fruehauf malko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I tend to be against trimming. I was just looking at the binutils
changelog (goes back to 1997):
$ rpm -q --changelog binutils | wc -c
54984
That's around 50K, and compressed (RPMs are compressed):
$ rpm -q
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
Date: Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Packages in need of new maintainers
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
As stated eariler, the following packages have been retired in F-17 (and
therefore rawhide), due to either failing to build, or not having maintainers.
...
junit4
...
Whoa there.. .this one wasn't in any of the
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:26:26 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 23.1.2012 03:40, Cole Robinson napsal(a):
Hi Kevin,
I filed a feature page 2 Fridays ago that's been sitting in
ReadyForWrangler since:
I have taken these packages:
avalon-framework
avalon-logkit
bcel
bsf
jakarta-commons-httpclient
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
* Douglas Myers–Turnbull dmyersturnb...@gmail.com [2011-07-25 20:53]:
I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
Please do!
of bundled JARs that would never be accepted as an official
Fedora package.
so my original question about how to handle the guava-gwt dependency loop
still stands.
--Andy
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
I did see a spec file at http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org
Hi, everyone. I'm looking into packaging gwt (Google Web Toolkit) 2.3 and
guava r09. In this new version (unlike Fedora's current version r05), the
full guava build requires gwt. gwt, of course, requires guava to build.
So, I'm looking at doing the following:
* build guava without guava-gwt
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/autoqa_package_dependencies
If you already have talked to him, forget about this e-mail ;-)
-Johannes
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, everyone. I'm looking into packaging gwt (Google Web Toolkit) 2.3 and
guava r09
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On 05/13/2011 12:44 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 13/05/11 05:24, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
snip
I'm not seeing any interest in resolving this, so I'm going to go ahead
with a yum update
Correction, it looks like it was indeed impatience on my part.
On May 13, 2011 3:21 PM, Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On 05/13/2011 12:44 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 13/05/11 05:24, Philip
Hello, all. A brief bio on me:
I started using Red Hat Linux in college in 1997. I spent half a decade
as a Linux sys admin, and long ago I used to lurk in #redhat and #fedora
giving tech support to new users. I first met some of these fine Fedora
folks at FUDCon 2005. I finally signed up to
17 matches
Mail list logo
