Re: GNOME 3 - font point sizes now scaled?

2011-10-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts with GNOME 3, systemd, etc. On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small (152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots

Re: GNOME 3 - font point sizes now scaled?

2011-10-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the people in charge

Re: Request update of shared-mime-info

2011-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:36 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Folks, Can someone please push the update that I made (with permission) to shared-mime-info? I'm getting jcm does not have commit access when I try to make the F16 update. This fix is required to actually be able to play many MP3 files

Re: Is PulseAudio dead?

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 23:50 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering snip Which is great and I understand that but systemd will basically cover the release time frame for F-13 and F-14 and in that timeframe the support and issues for PA are going

Re: Is PulseAudio dead?

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 05:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: I wrote: s/desktop/GNOME/ KDE packages are tracking upstream closely and are regularly updated, including upstream bugfixes. Plus, we backport or sometimes even develop bugfixes of our own. To me, this shows that a model where

Re: Is PulseAudio dead?

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 23:37 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:01:02 -0400, Carl wrote: Perhaps we could organize a bug zapping day for the pulseaudio bugs? Sure, i'm willing to _try_ to help if we can get Lennart to participate and/or pulseaudio experts to assist

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:24 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: Hi, I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in the commit

Re: Gnome 3 delayed

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:27 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, It seems that Gnome 3 will be released in march 2011. How will this affect Fedora 14? Gnome 3 was an important feature of F14. This is being discussed on the fedora-desktop list, and Matthias, as the person who has the best view

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

2010-08-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't seem to find it at all. Parts of it will reappear soon, in different form. The whole of it will reappear

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

2010-08-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:58 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote

Re: haldaemon seems dead...

2010-08-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:53 +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: Hi, I've installed F13 on my home box, updated and then moved it to rawhide. Everything seems more or less happy now, but it looks like haldaemon is dead. I can't burn to DVD, USB pens won't mount, the printer is unrecognised and the

Re: Broken package EOL instructions (Was Re: Retire gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux in F14/devel?)

2010-08-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 18:13 +0800, Chen Lei wrote: 2010/8/6 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 17:23 +0800, Chen Lei wrote: sudo yum install gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux Package gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc13.x86_64 is obsoleted by gstreamer

Re: broken dependencies caused by GNOME bouncing between 3 and 2.x without any advance notice

2010-08-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi Matthias, On Thursday, 19 August 2010 at 16:39, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 16:24 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Dear GNOME maintainers, I would appreciate it if you announced

Busted F13 buildroot?

2010-08-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, Trying to build an updated control-center on F13, I ended up with the following errors: DEBUG util.py:255: Error: Package: udisks-1.0.1-1.fc13.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:255: Requires: liblvm2app.so.2.1 DEBUG util.py:255: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:46 +0400, Mahmoud Abdul Jawad wrote: Hi all,, before two weeks, a discussion started in ambassadors mailing-list about a work around to deliver the important notifications to the fedora desktop (whatever the desktop is). after some discussion, we started with some

Re: Busted F13 buildroot?

2010-08-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:51:21 +0100, Bastien wrote: Heya, Trying to build an updated control-center on F13, I ended up with the following errors: DEBUG util.py:255: Error: Package: udisks-1.0.1-1.fc13.i686 (build) DEBUG

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:03 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: Why isn't this idea merged into PackageKit and the rest of the update infrastructure, which should take care of important notifications to users? Or were you expecting

Re: clutter - 1.3

2010-08-31 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:57 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote: Heads up to Clutter consumers - I'm updating it in f15 to the 1.3 (master) branch. I've tested GNOME Shell and quadrapassel, feel free to CC me for other

Re: Tsclient

2010-09-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 13:27 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: Hi, I briefly took this over and looked at reviving this but upstream is dead and show little sign of revival. The new tsclient 2.0 GUI is terrible and these days there are far superior alternatives in the form of gnome-rdp and

Re: Review swap?

2010-09-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 21:11 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Anyone want to do package review swapsies? meego-panel-datetime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624204 That panel will be integrated into gnome-control-center by 3.0 time. Cheers -- devel mailing list

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: - downloads updates in parallel too Package updates? - uses IP geolocation to guess the user's timezone and keyboard settings (it's been 100% correct for me each time) We can do this, it's just never really been brought up.

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. Some of the things it does which are IMHO

Re: fedora 14: pulseaudio eating cpu and memory without reason...

2010-11-09 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 21:43 +0200, Marius Andreiana wrote: Hi, Even when not playing any audio, pulseaudio uses CPU and memory PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2257 marius20 0 941m 7524 3188 S 2.9 0.4 14:22.57 chrome 2956

Re: LibRaw: possible license issues

2012-11-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:13 +, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+. If the license of libraw changed significantly, the libraw package should be updated to reflect

Re: Fedora 18 laptop regression

2013-01-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +, alex...@hushmail.com wrote: On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so...

Re: Orphaned package: ushare

2013-01-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 19:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Ter, 2013-01-08 at 17:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm tossing ushare to the wolves.

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

2013-01-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
15baf34186c6b5886b26e5a37698893be36f510b Author: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net Date: Tue Nov 6 19:13:12 2012 +0100 keyboard: Prevent potential infinite loop XKB would notify us in the same way if the lockedMods changed because of a programmatic, or a physical/human change

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults - confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: Hello Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: 1. i insert a blank 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd - so far so good 3. i get a new window stating how much free

Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet

2010-01-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 11:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 01/12/2010 01:13 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Good idea, apart from: On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:39 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: For Fedora-14 (to be released November 2010) it would be nice to have a gtk application

Re: OT: writing gobject-based plugins

2010-01-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 15:03 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Christoph H?ger wrote: Hi, I am currently playing with gobject to learn some of this boilerplate stuff. For my small application I'd like to be able to write plugins that are derived

Re: Orphaning isight-firmware-tools

2010-01-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 15:55 +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote: Which devices is that actually needed for? The webcam in my macbook air didn't need any firmware, nor was it needed on a macbook early 2009. I need it on my Intel Macbook bought in mid-2007. It is neither a MacbookPro nor an Air. It is

Re: usb_modeswitch by default

2010-03-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:42 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have taken over the maintainership from Robert, and the new usb_modeswitch rpms are in rawhide now. And F-13? Let me know if you guys need anything fixed on that :) --

libgpod rebuilds needed in F-13/devel

2010-03-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, libgpod has been rebuilt with a new libimobiledevice (1.0.0) and all the applications that link against libgpod will need a rebuilt. Rhythmbox is being rebuilt as we speak, I'll let others to their respective owners. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Macbook Pro 13.3 (5,5) Fedora 12 notes

2010-04-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:12 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: Folks, In case this helps anyone else setting up a Macbook Pro 13.3 model 5,5. snip 2). The new install has no networking because the 432b reversion part is unsupported by the b43 Open Source driver (they are working on it). Look for the

Re: New maintainer for lirc/Jarod Wilson's packages

2013-10-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hi, Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably his other four packages need a new maintainer as, well[1]:

Re: New maintainer for lirc/Jarod Wilson's packages

2013-10-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - 2013/10/1 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com - Original Message - Hi, Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably his other four packages need

Re: FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien Nocera
It will need changes then. See: http://www.hadess.net/2013/10/more-power-management-changes.html and: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.devicekit.devel/1473 - Original Message - Dne 29.10.2013 14:10, Richard Hughes napsal(a): Hi, Although all interested parties

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :) - Original Message - On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 11/04/2013 10:45 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :) I realize Fedora throwing overboard it basic working principles (open source) Did I say that? No, I don't believe I did

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 1 November 2013 19:27, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: Cleaned up the appdata xml Thanks, https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/yumex.appdata.xml but I get errors from appdata-validate Can see what the problem is :( You've

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 11:16, Bastien Nocera a écrit : I want upstream to control their distribution of software and not be reliant on distributions shipping this or that update ie I don't want to make the api stabilization process in my software

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
You're confusing stand-alone applications and extensions to the core desktop. An easy mistake to make. - Original Message - Le Dim 3 novembre 2013 19:34, drago01 a écrit : On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: since it is a free operating

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
Unless the hammer has a cool new feature that you want to try out, or a bug that was hampering your work has been fixed and you want to test that the problem's solved. You can see that analogies only get us so far... - Original Message - On 04.11.2013 11:13, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Nov

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
Emacs is more than 30 years old, gnome-shell is nearing 3 years since its first stable release. When gnome-shell is this mature, I'm sure the extensions breaking will be less of a problem :) - Original Message - On 11/04/2013 12:32 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 04.11.2013 12:18,

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Bastien Nocera wrote: As an application developer, I'd sure be happy if I didn't have to wait 6 months for my app to show up in the distribution I use, and for that application to be usable on all compatible distributions. That's a problem with the distribution's update policies

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: When my application runs on all Fedora distributions without changes? No. I wasn't talking about core apps that are tightly integrated to the desktop, just of the time it took for somebody to package up office-runner from my 1.0 release

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent environment. Let it be 10, 100 or 1000 different packages but they're chosen, compiled and adjusted to work together. This is the

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - And the application developer suddenly gains back control on how and when his app gets delivered to users. And this is supposed to be a good thing? Looking at much much crap distro packagers had to fix in the past I really can't think of it as that. You

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:15 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent environment. Let it be 10, 100

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees we want to offer? I'll stop short of paraphrasing you. The fact that bundling is even

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Am 06.11.2013 10:56, schrieb Bastien Nocera: - Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees we want

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote: Has this sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream proposal been discussed with other distributions? If the final result is that the Universal Linux Package only

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
It's only for GUI applications, which BitchX isn't, and if it has become a GUI application in the ten years since I last looked at it, it's probably lacking AppData files. - Original Message - Is / was a rather political decision to make BitchX unavailable through this app-market /

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which is unacceptable! Just don't use GNOME? More seriously, this is the bug with the instructions on how to write the terminal chooser patch for glib:

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
No. - Original Message - On 2013-11-11, Branislav Blaskovic blaskovic.branis...@gmail.com wrote: Of course there have to be mentioned that the app is made for terminal. BTW, is there an XDG way how to spawn an user-preferred terminal emulator (and and application inside)? --

Re: F20 Beta upgrade issues - network status gone

2013-11-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - - I don't have any Bluetooth status or display in gnome-shell now. I did previously. I do not know what I need to install or tweak to get it back, or where to report it. I'm not as sure about this one, but it's probably the same thing: no

Re: F20 Beta upgrade issues - network status gone

2013-11-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - but I do have a number of bluetooth devices (mouse, speakers, headset) that I use to be able to connect with a couple of clicks once paired but now every time I want to use them I have to go into the control panel which is a good dozen or more clicks.

Re: Fedora Workstation Desktop Environment Concept

2013-11-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip Document Link: http://goo.gl/0IzNgK *this is a Google Documents link I think it would have more of a chance to get discussed if you added the contents of your document in the body of a mail, rather than on Google Docs. It would make it easier for people to

Re: Rawhide unannounced ABI bumps: gnome-bluetooth

2013-12-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump. gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 and dropped

Re: Rawhide unannounced ABI bumps: gnome-bluetooth

2013-12-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: snip vfrnav I didn't know this software, and I didn't know it used gnome-bluetooth. Even with older versions of gnome-bluetooth it throws: (vfrnav:1959): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid

Re: Unannounced soname bump: tracker

2014-01-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip Plus it wasn't just happening on its own; the state of Rawhide when everyone else bogged off for Christmas was that it was suffering from this, the borkage in libevdev, the gnome-bluetooth soname bump / library drop (which affects other desktops), library

Re: Unannounced soname bump: tracker

2014-01-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
One hiding in a private directory: /usr/lib64/gnome-bluetooth/ that gnome-shell explicitely adds to its path. It has no headers and is only usable through introspection. - Original Message - On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 05:52 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - snip

Re: gnome-shell and panel applets

2010-11-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 11:52 -0600, j...@ocjtech.us wrote: Is there a replacement in the gnome-shell world for panel applets? In particular I'm a heavy user of SSH Menu (for accessing network gear and Linux servers over SSH) and Remmina (for accessing Windows servers). Without something

Why does my mail client/web browser not appear in GNOME?

2010-11-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
Or why is my dingus click not working? Your web browsers and mail clients need to handle x-scheme-handler/http[1] and x-scheme-handler/mailto respectively to be listed in the GNOME default applications in the new control-center. Once our default applications are setup, I'll make the necessary

Re: Why does my mail client/web browser not appear in GNOME?

2010-11-11 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:14 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 19:21 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: Or why is my dingus click not working? Your web browsers and mail clients need to handle x-scheme-handler/http[1] and x-scheme-handler/mailto respectively to be listed

Re: updates-testing trainwreck.

2010-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 09:20 +1000, Brendan Jones wrote: Isn't there any way we can update the icon cache spec to add a checksum or something? Or is the corruption just wrong data, not bad data? I periodically get nm-applet crashes due to a bad icon cache that I'd rather not have to care

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

2010-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:44 +, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with any luck). Not without a pile of X changes, which themselves are blocking on upstream kernel

Re: Fedora 15, new and exciting plans

2010-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 10:23 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: On 11/15/2010 10:11 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 09:35 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with any luck). Only 30 packages left requiring it,

Re: x86_64 rawhide: No CPU frequency scaling anymore?

2010-12-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:16 -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: It used to say there was none; after updating gnome-settings-daemon to 2.91.4-1.fc15.x86_64 (which prevented Gnome fromn starting) and downgrading back to 2.91.3-1.fc15.x86_64 it works (?!). Very highly unlikely to actually be

Re: Firewall

2010-12-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:53 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: snip One thing is e.g notifications to users when some service/app requests to open a port. First version won't have network zones yet, but he and Dan Williams are working on that for the next generation which will then basically

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:01 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. You better not. The lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3 exceptions, these 110

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:12 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:05:06 + Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: ...snip... The lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3 exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:37 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: snip GNOME's dup finder: http://git.gnome.org/browse/bugzilla-newer/tree/dupfinder The README is probably outdated, as per: http://live.gnome.org/BugzillaUpgrade/UpgradeStatus#Simple-dup-finder Filed as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 00:50 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:05 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: And I'll go back to fixing actual bugs encountered by people instead of random bot-driven bugs. every abrt report, ever, is an actual bug encountered by an actual person

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: snip 4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel. - added as: share bz credential with other apps - not sure if we can share the credentials

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote: So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have to make sure whatever method

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Hi, beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature freeze.

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Hi, beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 00:38 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: 04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote: Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream? What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 18:01 +, Paul F. Johnson wrote: Hi, I'm having two problems on two different boxes, both running rawhide. Problem 1 (my main box) - whoever decided to remove the default applications thing from the menu, please put it back. I can understand the rational, but it

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:09:41 +0100, Christoph wrote: * At the graphical login screen, I cannot log in. I did the useradd manually, and it appears as an empty entry to click on. Authentication fails. Cursor doesn't show any

Re: Preferred Startup applications gone?

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the desktop providing a central config point. To the GNOME developers

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a service is SysV or systemd? Or, is this app being replaced by some other UI? Also is there a plan to modify

Re: Backported gtk3 for F14 available

2011-02-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: snip Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0. We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other packages in F14

Re: Trying to contact David Zeuthen for nonresponsive maintainer process

2011-02-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: Hello fellow Fedorans. With this email I'm trying to contact David Zeuthen. There is a bug [1] filed for Festival speech synthesis which is open for almost four years now (besides a few others, but the particular one is bothering me).

Re: Trying to contact David Zeuthen for nonresponsive maintainer process

2011-02-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:52 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: On 22.02.2011 05:00, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: Is David still around? Yes, and hacking on GNOME 3. And no five minutes to care about older duties or at least reply? Too bad

Orphaning some (GNOMEy) packages

2011-02-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
Here's the list of packages, with reasons: - gnome-launch-box, replaced by gnome-shell's builtin features (mostly, filed bugs for the rest) - libgalago, libgalago-gtk, replaced within GNOME with session-wide features, but could still be used by supported applications. First come, first serve.

Re: rawhide report: 20110222 changes

2011-02-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 12:09 +0100, Alexandre Mazari wrote: Hi, The following update breaks gdm and gnome-session at runtime for me: gsettings-desktop-schemas-0.1. 7-1.fc16 -- * Mon Feb 21 2011 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 0.1.7-1 - Update

Re: rawhide report: 20110222 changes

2011-02-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Alexandre Mazari sca...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The following update breaks gdm and gnome-session at runtime for me: gsettings-desktop-schemas-0.1. 7-1.fc16 -- * Mon Feb 21 2011 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 0.1.7

Re: F15 Alpha impressions

2011-02-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:46 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:03:02 +0100, drago01 wrote: Btw, I think the GNOME 3 roll-out in Fedora should be all or nothing,

Re: F15 Alpha impressions

2011-02-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:06 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 16:20 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 02/27/2011 03:55 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: When in a program (Evolution for example), it seems this is the only one I see in the task window/panel or whatever up

Re: Orphaning and retiring HAL

2011-03-17 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:16 +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps? It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've dropped the hal

GStreamer Provides script updated

2011-03-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
Third-party packagers of GStreamer, please make sure that gstreamer-0.10.32-3.fc15 (or newer) is in your buildroots when rebuilding GStreamer plugins, as it will add GStreamer element names to the packages' provides scripts, making it possible to auto-install through PackageKit. Cheers -- devel

Re: GStreamer Provides script updated

2011-03-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 07:55 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/21/2011 05:21 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Third-party packagers of GStreamer, please make sure that gstreamer-0.10.32-3.fc15 (or newer) is in your buildroots when rebuilding GStreamer plugins, as it will add GStreamer element

Re: GNOME 3 Fallback Mode

2011-04-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:27 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: On 04/27/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: Lots of things are unfortunate. This is software, after all. I regret not working on this earlier, since it would probably have saved the effort invested in fallback mode entirely. I

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:26 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote: Hi, I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like youtube, dailymotion, etc ... This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will read the video as a stream. The default value in the

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2012-04-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: (Note: *DO NOT* run the installer that is on this image. You'll probably end up with a broken grub. Should be fixed soon) I've put a test image up at http://mjg59.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Mac-EFI-test.iso - this should work if

Re: Replacing libusb1 with libusbx

2012-05-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 13:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and a drop in replacement for libusb1. The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers (almost all of them *), because the official maintainer of

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-01-27 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote: And also I've been told this desktop is available for ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering how feasible is to port

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 00:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: As far as I'm aware, Canonical were reasonably good about proposing the libindicator patches for upstream inclusion, but many upstream projects - especially those that are part of GNOME - weren't exactly rushing

  1   2   3   4   >