is more widely ignored than it is being
implemented.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the xdg basedir spec to standardize it.
Lennart
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:14:22 -0400
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 07/27/2011 05:00 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 7/27/11 1:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Depends on the PATH-Order
if something is intended to be first in PATH and any attacker is
able to write there his ls would
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:24:48 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/27/2011 03:14 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:54:09 +0200
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
If you don't hide ~/.local and ~/.config then users who are less
savvy than us might
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:00:28 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/28/2011 12:54 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:24:48 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
There are already quite a few things that may place executables
under . prefixed paths in home
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:35:27 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:00:28 +0100
Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com wrote:
It is nevertheless an *added* avenue to do some phishing. And for
what benefit?
No, it's
. There is no guarantee that
this will _always_ finish everything sooner than some other, arbitrary
ordering. In this kind of environment, usually it will go faster, but
not always.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do this is because booting takes a long time compared to
starting the set of applications they use.
If you could boot and start applications in say, 1/2 second, usage
patterns would be completely different.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:27:49 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:14 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Many computers are booted very rarely, once a day or so, and then
sit idle for very long periods of time. This is very wasteful. The
reason people do
that they are not following this debate.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of the accounts will be compromised.
2) We could require
everyone to change keys.
And some time after that, some accounts will be compromised again. Some
of the same accounts as before, and some other accounts. Not maybe.
Certainly, 100%.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
signature.asc
make
tools are doing a part of building the world. Should we try to make
it better, or simple more convenient?
Computers are tools, and using them the wrong way can cause a lot
of damage. The most convenient interface for the lazy is not always the
best.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:06:33 +0530
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/27/2011 09:20 PM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
I think this is going a little far. Saying that people are better
off being able to read is not elitist.
Yes it is. Because you are assuming that it is because
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:09:46 +0530
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/28/2011 12:01 AM, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Call me elitist then, I think it is better when more people can
read, and when they actually do it.
Unfortunately for someone talking about so much about
On 6/13/13 17:33 Sérgio Basto wrote:
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 6/13/13 17:33 Sérgio Basto wrote:
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
to use a Unique Local Address prefix,
following
http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/ipv6/ipv6-address-types
Rich.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
with
any new ideas.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
?
Doesn't live up to my expectation is very different from Doesn't
comply with spec and both are different from Is a bad design.
How about a spec then of what Gnome3 was trying to achiece, and how
about those who like it telling us how Gnome3 achieved those things?
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:44:45 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 00:30 +0900, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:04 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900
夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Considering
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:02:14 -0400
Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:05:08PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
I think it fails on #1:
Makes it easy for users to focus on their current task and reduces
distraction and interruption
First, this point
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:25:53 -0400
Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
One could do that, but that would be an idiotic thing to do. So one
doesn't.
Its what you said. You explicitly want to divide your attention
between
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:16:46 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:02, Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:05:08PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
I think it fails on #1:
Makes it easy for users to focus
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:41:21 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:34, Bernd Stramm bernd.str...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:16:46 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:02, Casey Dahlin cdah
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:47:38 -0400
Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:32:12PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
So Gnome Shell is not for a good many of the people who had been
using Gnome before that.
YES! I don't know why more people don't realize this: GNOME
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:46:46 -0300
Evandro Giovanini efgiovan...@gmail.com wrote:
Em Sex, 2011-06-17 às 15:21 -0400, Bernd Stramm escreveu:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:47:38 -0400
Casey Dahlin cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:32:12PM -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
So
if it is not under user control, otherwise it is a very useful
feature.
Nevertheless, the feature page contains no documentation about what it
actually is. Neither does the sourceforge.net page of the project.
It seems like a reasonable request that this documentation be added.
Simo.
--
Bernd Stramm
/technology/security/downloads/315168.htm
but is that it? How would anyone know?
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
to hypothetical testers.
Would you help out with testing if given these specific instructions?
If not yourself, who would actually do this?
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:09:53 + (UTC)
JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Bernd Stramm bernd.stramm at gmail.com writes:
...
Would you help out with testing if given these specific
instructions? If not yourself, who would actually do this?
...
I am only suggesting a mini form of so
because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699812
There is some rationale in that bug, but I think it's extremely bogus.
Oh it seems every useful for purposes like installing executables that
most users will never find.
Rich.
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 02:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2010/4/20 Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folk,
I want to propose new idea about names of command line utilites...
For example, all present utilites have sence
not simply
dead.package this unless I absolutely have to.
I would be happy to return the favor with work that is in my skillset,
licensing, packaging, reviewing, triage, etc, etc.
Thanks in advance,
~spot
--
Bernd Stramm bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 16:56 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote:
tis 2010-04-20 klockan 01:51 +0300 skrev Slava Zanko:
For example, all present utilites have sence just for guru's (ls, rm,
fsck etc), but for novies it's hard to use. Is good idea to symlink'ing
(shell aliasing) these and much
on the job
Bernd
--
Bernd Stramm
bernd.str...@gmail.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 04 May 2010 20:42:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Bernd Stramm wrote:
I would like to pick the packages that I'm adventurous with.
Currently that's not very easy, either an adventurousness level is
enabled in the repos or it isn't. That means my package manager
On Tue, 04 May 2010 14:26:34 -0700
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 15:20 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2010 20:42:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Bernd Stramm wrote:
I would like to pick the packages that I'm
On Tue, 04 May 2010 21:08:23 -0400
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:44 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
Too costly with the current tools, I have no doubt. The method you
describe doesn't look manageable, you're right.
Perhaps I should go research
38 matches
Mail list logo
