On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that.
>> >
>&g
t are disabled in the RHEL spec file. Similar to the previous
option, this would be EPEL-only and would be allowed because the srpm
and rpm names don't conflict with RHEL.
- Rebuild the Fedora spec file with all subpackages somewhere where
replacing base packages is allowed, such as a copr or a CentOS
This would allow epel-release to recommmend
centos-release-crb. There was push back to this idea because there is
a desire for the "enable crb" action in CentOS Stream to look roughly
similar to how it works in RHEL (`dnf config-manager --set-enabled
crb` and `subscription-manager rep
t; List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
This was approved [0] in today's EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
Please continue with the proc
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:05 PM Carl George wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 5:17 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:00 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 13:08 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >&
the exception flag because it would fall under the second bullet
point for exceptions.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process
If the package is intended to be EPEL-only, make sure to retire the
rawhide branch.
--
Carl George
___
inary
relationship.
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/webkitgtk/webkit2gtk4.0/
Whichever way you discover the source name, use that as the component
for your bugzilla request.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=webkitgtk
--
Carl George
. To avoid hard
dependencies on the tools I wrap the commands in an if statement that
checks for the relevant binary.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/caddy/blob/rawhide/f/caddy.spec#_232-250
Grepping through other spec files I see a quite a few other examples
of setsebool and semanage commands in script
__
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Gui
-US/epel/epel-policy-retirement/#process_package_in_rhel
--
Carl George
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-retirement/#process_package_in_rhel
--
Carl George
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
es/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Carl George
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel
is
probably premature, but is anyone opposed to me marking the package as
deprecated so that new packages can't (build)require it?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/deprecating-packages/
--
Carl George
___
python-devel mailing list
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:27 PM Maxwell G via epel-devel
wrote:
>
> On Wed Nov 23, 2022 at 00:52 CST, Carl George wrote:
> > I would also ask that feedback be provided there instead of as email
> > replies here on the list.
>
> I don't think there's been a formal disc
this thread on the Fedora Discussion site for the full proposal.
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal/44304
I would also ask that feedback be provided there instead of as email
replies here on the list.
--
Carl George
___
epel-devel mailing
el@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
ail to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ep
am.com/dberrange :|
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://doc
ist -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archiv
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 9:43 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 6:31 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:16 PM Carl George wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Troy Dawson wrote
>>> >
>>
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 11:38 AM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote:
>> >>
&
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:52 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:48 PM Carl George wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:42 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > There is also the case of the RHEL rebuilds whose us
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>
oraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_g
update in
> EPEL so the RHEL version can have a higher version and release.
> When RHEL . is released, EPEL automation will remove
> from EPEL and close this bug.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 9:14 AM Carl George wrote:
>
>> I'm also late to the party with this feedb
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:20 AM Dave Dykstra via epel-devel
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:11:46AM -0500, Carl George wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:20 AM Dave Dykstra via epel-devel
> ...
> > > The summary of the CVE is that the way that apptainer & si
le update across all three platforms, especially
this late in the RHEL 7 lifecycle.
> install the rpm on RHEL8 & 9 directly from github, and it would not
> be good to have different behavior when installed from EPEL.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:42:13A
___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: htt
bugs.
Package maintainers can create branches with fedpkg, e.g. `fedpkg
request-branch epel9`.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/fedora-package-in-epel/
--
Carl George
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
only be exploited by someone with write access to the
> > > filesystem
> > > > > boots, that is, root. Only with setuid-root apptainer/singularity
> > > does it
> > > > > become a privilege escalation.
> > > > > >
> > > &g
edoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
We discussed this today at the EPEL Steering Committee meeting.
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-15/epel.2024-05-15-18.00.html
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
