On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Dave Love <d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dave Johansen <davejohan...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> We do have docker images that can be used [0] - but we currently don't
> >> have a user friendly way to find them. You currently ha
I'm working on packaging hgsubversion (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run into
some test failures on F23/Rawhide that seem to be caused by the update to
subversion 1.9.0. Upstream has recommended that I try and bisect the source
of the failure (
I just finished the review for cppformat (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 ) and went to submit
the updates. I noticed that bodhi 2.0 won't autocomplete the names of
updates. I believe that would happen before the update to 2.0.
Is this a known issue? I didn't find it when
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 22:52:42 -0700
> Dave Johansen <davejohan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on packaging hgsubversion (
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mike Ruckman <ro...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 10:52:42PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > I'm working on packaging hgsubversion (
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run into
>
I'm working on packaging hgsubversion (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 ) and I've run into an
issue where some of the tests pass on F22 and F23 but fail on Rawhide. I've
done some simple debugging, but it would be much easier if upstream could
do some testing on their own (
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:05:01 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/daveisfera/odb_2.4/build/102224/
What's the correct way to handle a single failed build on COPR
During the review of cppformat, it was pointed out that it contained a font
that should be removed because it's packaged with Fedora (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279#c3 ). While working on
resolving this, I was looking into what package provided this font so I
could add the
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/daveisfera/odb_2.4/build/102224/
What's the correct way to handle a single failed build on COPR? In the
above, it failed on F22 ppc64le. Will clicking resubmit rebuild on all of
the platforms? Or just the one that failed?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I
would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn
around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time
to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 08/07/15 20:02, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly?
Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not
finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a
while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or
am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding
qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
Sorry
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
+ '%{__python2}' setup.py build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N6A81W: line 31: fg: no job control
Any
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or
am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding
qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
Here's the output from the process:
[dlj@JohansenDev ~]$ fedora-review -b 1231427
INFO:
On Jun 28, 2015 11:39 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 29.6.2015 v 06:13 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for
stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a
best practice for this sort of thing?
The main question
I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for
stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a best practice for this
sort of thing?
The main question I have is:
Is it better to use a single repo and continue to update it with the
latest release?
Or is it better to have a
I just built QGIS 2.8.2 for RHEL/EPEL 7 (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9997800 ) and it is
available in the testing repo (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qgis-2.8.2-1.el7 ). I built it
without PyQwt because it doesn't support Qwt 6 (
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 14:19 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 2.6.2015 v 06:56 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mock#Mock_on_EL_6_and_EL_7:_Yum.2C_a
nd_DNF
I just ran
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 3.6.2015 v 17:10 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
I don't mean to start an argument and this is a question out of honest
curiosity. I'm not familiar with the details of
yum or dnf's requires resolution
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com
wrote:
iwyu: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651015
A clang/llvm 3.6 compatible version of include-what-you-use (iwyu
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mock#Mock_on_EL_6_and_EL_7:_Yum.2C_and_DNF
I just ran into this issue and I was wondering if it's possible for this
flag to be add to the default config on RHEL 6/7.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 05/15/2015 10:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Mon
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 04/21/2015 08:48 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 04/20/2015 09:32 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
iwyu: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651015
A clang/llvm 3.6 compatible version of include-what-you-use (iwyu) hasn't
been released yet. Once that's available, I will update iwyu and
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/28/2015 05:05 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I had rebuilt odb for F22 because of a gcc version change (it's a
plugin) and submitted an update [1]. Then another build was done and an
update submitted [2]. Do I need
I had rebuilt odb for F22 because of a gcc version change (it's a plugin)
and submitted an update [1]. Then another build was done and an update
submitted [2]. Do I need to revoke my request? Or what's the right way to
handle this?
Thanks,
Dave
[1]:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Kaustubh Deorukhkar kaustubh@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for glibc-static packages for RHEL 7 (ppc64 and ppc64le) but
these are not available in EPEL repo. Is it possible to get these in epel
repo please?
They are available as part of the base
Is Breathe for python-sphinx ( https://github.com/michaeljones/breathe )
available for Fedora? My searching with yum and such seems to indicate no,
but I just wanted to ask on here in case it was packaged in a way that I
didn't expect.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run as root) on a F21
machine with no swap and the slow down was still visible in the CPU
bound task
surely
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Dave Johansen:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 22:53, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
You're right that is a problem because my purely CPU bound task was
actually writing to disk every 10 seconds, so I've attached an updated
version
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening
that
CPU bound tasks slow down. I have been able to reproduce
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:32:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I am not familiar with the low level details of disk I/O but I'm sure
that
they are far more complicated than my basic assumptions, but my concern
I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that
CPU bound tasks slow down. I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21
as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a
simple test:
1) Build the disk_test.cc (the CPU bound task) and run it.
2)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:15 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zn...@znmeb.net
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:43 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
https://lwn.net/Articles/572911/
https://lwn.net/Articles/467328/
Thanks for the info. That's very helpful, but it looks like that discussion
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:36:41 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the current update policy for EPEL? The stated one seems to be
along the lines of no major changes (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:00:35 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that really true? The Qt 5 package in EPEL 6 has been updated
several times and I don't recall ever seeing an
email/announcement/etc
What is the current update policy for EPEL? The stated one seems to be
along the lines of no major changes (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy ) but it seems more like
whatever the packager is willing to maintain is the actual policy.
I ask because a bugzilla was just opened against a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:15:38PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 03/10/2015 03:13 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
#0 0xb76debac in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7510d03 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/10/2015 03:13 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
#0 0xb76debac in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb7510d03 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 0xb6fa4842 in rpmScriptRun () from /lib/librpm.so.3
#3
I posted this issue on the users mailing list but didn't get a response (
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-March/459083.html ),
so I thought I'd try here.
I did a yum remove on F21 and it hung after the 2nd of 8 .rpms and
systemd has been using ~40% of the CPU since then.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only packages which
fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[5][6] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Alpha composes. Other builds will remain
in
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
wrote:
Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:33:34AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This looks cool.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
- Enable the monitoring flag for that Fedora
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 02/22/2015 10:21 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
mailto:or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 02/21/2015 08:07 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm looking into another issue on F22 but there's no .cfg for that. Is
that still just coming down the pipeline since the branch just recently
happened? Or is there a way
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18.02.2015 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm running into an issue where odb
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:15:19PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network
aware
services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and
myself)
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 18/02/15 15:12, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447 ) and I need
to be able to take a look at the config.log file
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 18.02.2015 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
before
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 14 February 2015 at 11:00, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it's failing tests on
PowerPC. I don't have access to PowerPC hardware to do
I rebuilt libcutl the other day and then noticed that later boost was
rebuilt. libcutl depends on boost, so is it a problem that it was rebuilt
before boost was?
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
I'm running into an issue where odb won't build on rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8966447 ) and I need to
be able to take a look at the config.log file but it's not available from
the standard koji output.
So what's the easiest way for me to get access to that file?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:04:53AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
odb-2.3.0-8.fc22.src.rpm
build failure because the gcc plugin API has changed.
odb has been updated to 2.4.0 which supports the new gcc 5.0 plugin API,
but whenever I try to do the rebuild it fails to find
n Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm working
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091659
I've been working on packaging include-what-you-use and it's pretty well
all ready to go, but just needs a review. Is someone able to do it? I would
potentially be able to do a review swap, if needs be.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:50 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to build llvm after applying a patch and I keep getting an
error
about lldb-3.4.src.tar.gz not being found
I'm trying to build llvm after applying a patch and I keep getting an error
about lldb-3.4.src.tar.gz not being found, but that file has been there for
previous builds and fedpkg says it has already been uploaded. Any ideas on
what's wrong?
The build.log can be found at:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Zhiwei Zhu z_...@wargaming.net wrote:
Dear all,
I am not sure whether this has been discussed before or whether it’s
appropriate to discuss this in this list.
My question is about c++11 support for the projects on epel (probably more
specifically,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083292
I know that this isn't directly related to Fedora, but I was wondering if
anyone had any recommendations on how to proceed with this. clang and icpc
generate code that has the correct behavior
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:04:07 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but there are
\n's in the messages from taskotron's depcheck. The problem is that
some
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, but there are \n's in
the messages from taskotron's depcheck. The problem is that some email
clients (gmail in particular) parse that as part of the URL and make the
links incorrect. It's a pretty minor thing, but would make it a lot easier
to
-0.5.1.0-2.el7.noarch:
file:///var/tmp/koji/tasks/4663/8514663/repo_442593_premerge/
0 free 0 open 0 done 2 failed
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just tried building llvm on EPEL 7 and received an unknown origin build
error ( http
I just tried building llvm on EPEL 7 and received an unknown origin build
error ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8516490 ). Is
this some temporary issue because of a recent update that will resolve
itself?
Thanks,
Dave
___
epel-devel
Nevermind, I guess. It appears to be working now.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8517009
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes. That's the error.
On Jan 2, 2015 4:15 PM, Moez Roy moez@gmail.com wrote:
you mean like
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Dave Johansen wrote:
I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before
opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Dave Johansen wrote:
I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before
opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here.
I have spec files and source RPMs available
I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before opening
the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here. I have
spec files and source RPMs available at:
https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/qwt-qt5/qwt-qt5.spec
I just submitted a re-build of ODB for GCC 4.9.2 in rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8051892 ) and it ran
into an issue ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8051895
).
I don't have access to a machine with rawhide to do any more debugging, but
I've
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:58:01AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just submitted a re-build of ODB for GCC 4.9.2 in rawhide (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8051892 ) and it ran
into an issue (
http
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
However, there are and will be cases where somebody would like to
create a non-SCL RPM depended on a software collection, which is
something not
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
wrote:
On 08/26/2014 11:07 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
No they can not. Every package we ship in EPEL must only rely on what is
shipped in either
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
wrote:
On 08/22/2014 06:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:46:05 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7370474
There was a failure building odb during the rebuild. A later rebuild
worked, but is this something I should worry about or file a report against?
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
The simple solution to this is for me to just rebuild against 4.8.3, but
upstream said that in Debian they package the GCC plugins in
/usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y/plugin instead of /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y.z/plugin so
The simple solution to this is for me to just rebuild against 4.8.3, but
upstream said that in Debian they package the GCC plugins in
/usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y/plugin instead of /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y.z/plugin so
that it doesn't break when there are minor version upgrades like this. Is
doing something
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings!
Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than
2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is
also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date.
At this point, all accepted
Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I resolved the issue with ODB not building with gcc 4.9, but it
appears that there's something going wrong with the ARM build. I
don't have access to a Fedora 21
I resolved the issue with ODB not building with gcc 4.9, but it appears
that there's something going wrong with the ARM build. I don't have access
to a Fedora 21 machine or ARM hardware to debug this issue, so does anyone
have any ideas on what I can do to get the ARM build working on Fedora 21?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I resolved the issue with ODB not building with gcc 4.9, but it appears
that there's something going wrong with the ARM build. I don't have access
to a Fedora 21 machine or ARM hardware to debug this issue, so does
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Update: testing packages work as advertised. Just wanted to keep you
updated and thank you again.
Will this go into the standard EPEL
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Quite a lot; they make no attempt at compatibility. I think I'd respond
with
that. EPEL packages might work on Amazon Linux, and they
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested it on the latest amazon linux and it works perfectly. Thank you!
What are the next steps to get the change into EPEL?
-Tyler
I'll add the patch to the git branch of llvm for EPEL6 and do the build. It
will
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Dave, hope you had a nice weekend.
Any update on the rpms?
Repos for x86 32-bit and 64-bit can be found at:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/yum/llvm-3.4/
___
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anssi Johansson e...@miuku.net wrote:
1.4.2014 23.11, Tyler Brock kirjoitti:
Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed.
It might be worth mentioning that the Amazon-provided libstdc++-devel is
4.6.3-3.10.amzn1, and it doesn't
process on Red Hat 6.4, Fedora 20, and Amazon Linux
2013.09, and it fails on all three of these distributions with the same
errors. In fact, the only distribution on which I have been able to get it
to work is CentOS 6.4.
-Tyler
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Tyler Brock tyler.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I've been trying to use clang package on Amazon linux via EPEL and have
installed version 3.4-9.el6 yet am unable to compile even the simplest of
programs:
#include iostream
int main(){
I just tried building qt-creator for EPEL 7 beta, but it failed because the
appdata-tools package doesn't seem to be available. Is that not part of
EL/EPEL 7 beta? Should I just remove the use of it from the .spec? Or is
there a better solution?
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On 11/03/14 14:59, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
mailto:ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:10:10 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:10:10 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net wrote:
Hello everyone,
are the EPEL7 branch requests on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests still being
processed
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Jeff Sheltren j...@tag1consulting.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, waiting did work for that issue (
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-February/195156.html),
but this is another
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:54:07 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to do a build on koji and ran into an error during the mock
buildroot setup
( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
I'm trying to do a build on koji and ran into an error during the mock
buildroot setup ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6488038
).
I posted previously on the Fedora devel mailing list but haven't figured it
out yet (
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:53 -0700
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying
101 - 200 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
