out there which can give me a hint to solve this issue.
Add this to your spec file:
%global __requires_exclude perl\\\(for\\\)
Yes, you really do need all of those backslashes
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
\' + arg + '\'])
return check_output(cmd).decode('utf-8').strip()
# Last (cached?) output from rpmlint, list of lines.
Just a heads up for you other package reviewers.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
a list of package reviews I need. Are you
willing to take the first of those in exchange for this review? That
would be gap-pkg-atlasrep:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
GAP, and GAP has its own
documentation viewer for the contents of doc subdirectories, so both
of those go into the main package.
Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
to inform them of
the nature of the problem. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3
I asked the question below on the virt mailing list about 2 weeks ago.
There have been a grand total of zero responses so far. I'll ask the
same question here, in hopes that somebody knows something that could
help.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
wrote:
tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James:
5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018
Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
Hi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3. gap-pkg-io: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185016
4. gap
!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
the
porting_to
document for more details.
The bigloo failure had nothing to do with -Wimplicit-int. One file
that should have been compiled with -fPIC wasn't. I don't know why
this didn't cause problems before. Fixed in Rawhide.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
to be
fixed somewhere. It would be good to track down the actual source of
the problem. I'll jump onto gil's thread and comment.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
/devel/2015-January/207322.html
Also, I just had another instance of this pop up, with an attempt to build csdp:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8909645
Does anybody have any clue as to what is going wrong?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
isn't valid, because you can't tack with exceptions onto the
end of QPL. Off to talk to the licensing folks about that
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
/pipermail/devel/2014-April/198525.html
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
? If so, do I have any other option
besides disabling hardening for gfan? Is there some way to get
aliases to play well with the hardening flags?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
to work out right with gcc 4.x, but the fact that
it doesn't work out right with gcc 5.x is not gcc's fault.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
4 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 bar
So the asm approach changes the name that is emitted, rather than
aliasing it. Thanks for the suggestion, though.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Moez Roy moez@gmail.com wrote:
When I set the target to f21 it fails on the test:
Yes, the gfan update I have prepared addresses test failures, among
other things. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
but, alas, gfan still
fails to link in exactly the same way.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
system? If so, could you
please monkey it back to its previous state?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
apparently uninformed brain is not teaching me anything. What
am I supposed to be able to glean from those links? I need a Rosetta
Stone
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
0
at the top of the spec file, and in both cases, I still see the
hardened specs in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS when %configure is invoked. I've
got the right spec file inside the mock root. I don't understand
why this worked for you and isn't working for me.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org
library.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
useless at this point. Perhaps it could be replaced with a
page that discusses the current state of the hardening flags.
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
to reproduce later and
file a bug report.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
. I'm still
experimenting to discover the answer to that question. (Polymake
builds take awhile and gobble memory like it was doughnuts, so this
isn't a fast process.)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
in mock. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203331.html
That's what this problem looks like to me: something has erroneously
concluded that this is a noarch build. I just don't know what that
something is, or why it reached such a conclusion. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
-integrale packages. I will fix the build failures
at the same time.
qepcad-B: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651446
I just fixed this one.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
.
Ah, so that explains why both builds in the final stage got terminally
confused. No big deal, Kevin. Don't worry about it. All's well that
ends well, eh? :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
look on koji, it shows
that all of the subparts are green:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698461
So why is the build itself not marked as complete? Did this suffer a
similar fate as the sagemath part?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
was started. I don't see a who anywhere, but maybe I am
overlooking something.
The builder in charge of that build was in a weird state.
I restarted it and koji handed the build to another builder.
Hopefully it will complete as expected now.
Thank you, Kevin. I appreciate the help.
--
Jerry
of a chainbuild.
Can you try just bumping the release and doing a new non chain build?
ie, make a 1.6-12...
Okay, will do. Thanks for checking.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
now breaking
lazily loaded modules. I have several packages that have been broken by
that.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
the 1.6-11.fc23 build as still being in progress, which is consistent
with the old build still showing up in the Rawhide report. Can you
check on this again and see what is going on? Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
no clear license.
When I enquired about that, upstream agreed to release it under the
GPL. My thanks to upstream for being so responsive to this issue.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:04 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
taken
can you review this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
thanks in advance
gil
Taken, and thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
that, give me some reviews to do for you in exchange
for these. Thanks in advance.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
MPIR 2.7.0 has arrived, and brings an soname bump with it. As far as
I can tell, nothing in Fedora uses mpir, so I don't think anything
needs to be rebuilt. If I'm wrong about that, send me some hate mail
and I'll rebuild your package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing
control?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
This sounds like a different issue. On thing we would need is to know which
email you are talking about.
All the emails coming from FMN (https
with pretty much every perl
update). I am working with polymake upstream to resolve the issue.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
The
CEO replied, "Okay, we can get some more of those. Where do you get
them, [warehouse store]?")
Thanks for the information, Adam.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
d
11560232 buildArch (subunit-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm, armv7hl): open
(arm02-builder12.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> canceled
0 free 0 open 2 done 3 failed
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
packages before finally arriving at the
HAP package, which sagemath wants. Whew!
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274568
Note that gap-pkg-semigroups BRs gap-pkg-smallsemi. Thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
straight forward.
Sure, will do. Thanks, Sandro!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
free
time. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Take!
> can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299 for
> me?
> regards
> gil
Will do. Thanks, gil!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
Some of the GAP packages require TTH (TeX To HTML) to generate their
documentation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276831
I'll review something for you if you review this for me. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
.
--
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
take
regards
gil
Thank you! Let me know if you have packages I can review for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
, and won't build at all against the current
versions. I'll have to dig into it and see how to update for current
versions.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
in testing for 10 days, and the minimum is only
7, right? The depchecks passed. http://status.fedoraproject.org/ says
that all systems are go. I don't understand what the problem is.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
why some of my packages show up on this list, as
they use %configure or invoke gcc with both $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and
$RPM_LD_FLAGS. For example, memtailor, which I just built yesterday,
shows as lacking a canary, but it uses the %configure macro. What is
going on there?
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://w
ers in 32-bit
perl yet. Nonetheless, once the problem was identified, they helped
me fix it and promised to add a test for this problem to their test
suite to prevent its reappearance.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
The license for eclib has changed from GPLv3+ in version 20120830 to
GPLv2+ in version 20150827, which I will build for Rawhide shortly.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
The license for bliss has changed from GPLv3 for version 0.72 to
LGPLv3 for version 0.73, which I will build for Rawhide shortly.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
, BLAST itself turned out to have license issues that were
never resolved. It has since been replaced by other tools, which
don't use csisat, so I see no point in keeping this package in Fedora.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
for me,
and tell me what bribe I can send to you in the mail to make it worth
your while. :-)
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
; should work ...
I had to add --enablerepo=local to the mock flags, and now
fedora-review is happy.
> i try to build before in my system and now on koji [1] mathicgb
> but seem there are some problems on i386 arch ...
Okay, I'll look into it. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.or
would be good to also check for dangling references inside comps.
For example, in the servers category, the grouplist includes
clustering, but there is no clustering group
definition to be found.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://li
number of
complaints from python-sphinx, probably related to the new version of
python-sphinx built in Rawhide a few days ago. So documentation may
be in a partially broken state, but that is unrelated to the ntl
soname bump.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
I need a review for this package:
mathicgb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287183
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists
build them myself, except I
could use some help with the opencsv update. I don't see an updated
spec file anywhere. Or is that not necessary?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
script; i.e., it really is a local
definition.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A new version of arb has been released with a new soname. As far as I
can tell, sagemath is the only consumer. I will build the new arb in
Rawhide and rebuild sagemath as well.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
hinx
Makefile:56: recipe for target 'html' failed
make: *** [html] Error 1
make: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/networkx-networkx-1.10/doc'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QfC9Z8 (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QfC9Z8 (%build)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone
I'd like to swap reviews with somebody for this package:
mathic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286322
Let me know what I can review for you. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340551
- python-zope-testrunner: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341815
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
elf. I haven't seen it before this morning. What does it mean?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
that the tbb package dropped its
ExclusiveArch tag a year ago, so all of these packages can theoretically
use tbb on all arches now. I will not make that change myself; I'm just
doing a straight rebuild of your packages.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
e individual package owners beat me to it.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
fact started the
rebuilds pretty much simultaneously with sending the previous message,
so I did not rebuild in the side tag. I apologize for my impatience.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
es" mantra is
not providing the motivations and demotivations that we really want.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
olymake break and let me fix it as soon as
I can. Perl updates should not be delayed. Will that be possible?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ciated.
The maddening thing is that upstream polymake has released a new
version, and the release notes say this new version brings "full C++11
compatibility". But I can't update to it, because it needs Singular
4.x and normaliz 3.x, and updating those 2 packages will break both
Macaul
?
python-orderedset: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312406
python-pybtex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312407
python-sphinx-testing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312408
Thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
for the Z specification language
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301219
Welcome, Brandon! Did you know that there have been previous attempts
at packaging racket? See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676124
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.ja
mple build showing the error.
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely
<jwak...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I'll take a look.
Thank you Jonathan.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
it around. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
so those will be fixed en passant (possibly not
until tomorrow, depending on how fast I am).
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Macaulay2
polybori
sagemath
Singular
Note that some of the builds take a very long time on arm, so the next
Rawhide compose may very well happen before all of these packages are
done rebuilding. If so, broken deps will be reported tomorrow, but
should be gone again the following day.
--
Jerry James
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Björn Esser <fed...@besser82.io> wrote:
> .*shogun.* has been rebuilt successfully [1], which implies octave has been
> rebuilt successfully [2], too. Do the others still need to be rebuild?
I rebuilt latte-integrale (4ti2), cbmc, and python-cvxop
e speedups are substantial, so this is
worth doing, if it can be done well.
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
lt;< (shift - 1)) << 1) - 1))
The (int)(long) is so that gcc doesn't complain about reducing the bit
width AND changing signedness in a single typecast. They really ought
to be using unsigned integers for all of this anyway, but that's an
issue for upstream to sort
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Change the definition of VMW_BIT_MASK in lib/include/x86cpuid.h to this:
>
> #define VMW_BIT_MASK(shift) ((int)(long)(((1UL << (shift - 1)) << 1) - 1))
No, make that:
#define VMW_BIT_MASK(
der, no problem.
> Thanks for the suggestion!
Oh, absolutely. Getting it fixed upstream is definitely the right way
to go. I'm just a bit short on time at the moment, but thought I
could still be helpful. :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
age for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333930
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
5XYYEECCDF6KVN5XPNSWQCRV4AXBKTWF/
I believe this explains the problem:
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/khxUtu5iDco
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
package has already been informally reviewed and it should be fairly
> straight-forward to finish the review. I'm happy to do a review of
> similar difficulty in return.
I can take this one. Can you take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332605 for me? It should
be a fairly eas
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332764: gap-pkg-factint
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333204: gap-pkg-utils
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333235: gap-pkg-crisp
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333916: gap-pkg-polenta
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http
/show_bug.cgi?id=1327784
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Strangely installing Coin3 from f23 on a f24 system seems to fix the
> problem...
Try building Coin3 with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks in the CFLAGS.
I've had to add that to several packages on F24 to fix mysterious
segfaults.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
301 - 400 of 1264 matches
Mail list logo