Hi!
Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would encourage
you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages in koji to give
dependent packages time to rebuilt:
1) Find a provenpackager / releng member to work on rebuilding all the
packages quickly
Hi!
I'm no longer interested in maintaining of visualvm -
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/visualvm/ - Simply I didn't used it for last three
years
If somebody still is using it, I will happily retire ownership to him/her.
Looking forward to meet the successor,
J.
--
On 02/26/2015 02:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
== Detailed Description ==
This is no real work proposal.
Stepping back, I’m not sure this has been
in Fedora
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently
On 02/27/2015 11:48 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:46 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02
On 02/27/2015 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:43:53 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/26
On 02/27/2015 11:58 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
On 02/27/2015 12:57 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are
meaningless.
Sound good.
J.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel
On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with
the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That
way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME
On 02/24/2015 01:34 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
option one - introducing new packages - preferred
1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is derived
as new package prviousName-legacy
Fedora
Package maintainers are responsible for their packages. If maintainer of
main JDK is also maintaining legacy JDK then (s)he should be
responsible for both of them. I don't see why any special rule should be
defined.
You missed very important point. The maintainer will never be same. We (people
On 02/24/2015 01:50 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 13:34, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
option one - introducing new packages - preferred
1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or policy for legacy JDK packages. I
don't think that any such policy is needed and it would only encourage
adoption of old packages for which there might be no security updates.
Well thats the point - people are
On 02/24/2015 04:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:51 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
2.) Ensure dist upgrades remove old JDK package (which may no longer
get security updates).
Firstly, as I understand upgrade isn't supposed to remove packages by
default, unless they are
On 02/24/2015 02:58 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were several attempts in past like can you please support jdk
7,6...in newer fedoras and we always told no. When come speech about do it
on your own suddenly many
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/24
On 02/24/2015 03:11 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were several attempts
On 02/26/2015 09:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require
On 02/26/2015 04:20 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently
On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
On 02/24/2015 08:36 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something I
wanted to say. It's kind
of a long mail, I apologize for taking so much of your time but request you to
please bear with me.
I work as a technical consultant on IBM
On 02/24/2015 06:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or policy
On 02/26/2015 09:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/25/2015 06:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On 02/24/2015 06:41 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
java would be the preferred JRE in Fedora. The package would have no
content, but it would have Requires on preferred Fedora JRE, currently
On 02/26/2015 09:31 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:16:26 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:29]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were several attempts in past like can you please support
wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:29]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24 09:04]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
[...]
There were
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 04:59 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015 8:32 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:17 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
I would much rather live without any legacy jdk, and if so then
without any
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require the latest JDK, solves this
problem in a different way, without modifying ordinary Java
On 02/25/2015 10:07 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
However, if there are JAR files which are useful
for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too!
There is no technical reason to suffix anything - you can put JARs that
depend on old version
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
/*Kevin Kofler*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:31:59 +0100:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s):
On 06/22/2015 02:56 PM, gil wrote:
HI
I have intention to orphaning/retire jasperreports [1] ,
because it fails build [2] with new batik (1.8)
and newer release use non free itext 5.x library.
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/jasperreports/
[2]
On 06/16/2015 05:16 PM, gil wrote:
hi
I'm working for upgrade springframework-batch (spring-batch) [1].
There are still some packages under review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228503
Hello!
this link
> [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/fesco/fesco.2016-01-08-17.22.html
Do not explain more about the missing mass rebuild. Are there more infomration
about?
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule
Thanx!
J.
--
devel mailing list
On 12/01/2016 10:55 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I'm trying to create a new update and
I'm getting this error:
Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session;
lazy load
operation of attribute
On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I'm trying to create a new update and
I'm getting this error:
Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a Session;
lazy load
operation of attribute 'release' cannot proceed
The build looks
d an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
yway, what are general thoughts?
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/10/2017 01:44 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:29:19 +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello all!
I seek advice how to proceed with following situation.
There is new package for f27 - java-9-openjdk.
The issue is, RPM do not like change of directory to symlink which
/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/P3KFTJMDNO42POS5N3Z4UXDNPFGAQH73/
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
List of packages and respective maintainers:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
Done in packages where I am admin.
TY!
J.
___
ttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/java-openjdk-10
Owner(s):
* Jiri Vanek
OpenJDK have release cadence of 6 months. but 3/4 of them are Short Term
Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbore them.
Currently it is build on openJDK 10. LTSs (next is 11) will go a
On 04/17/2018 05:38 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 04/15/2018 11:18 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Note - page was updated for what you asked.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/java-openjdk-10
Dont hesitate toask for more :)
TY!
J.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:58:56PM +0200, Jan
will be
with us for some time.
Again, thank you very much for your passion on this battlefield.
J.
On 03/21/2018 10:28 PM, Jonny Heggheim wrote:
Hi,
I do not have time maintaining openjfx, it would be better if is
maintained by someone that can give it more love than me.
Jonny
--
Jiri
t.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/arch
ists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
ee and
open support, provided
by project groups, which consists from nearly all oepnjdk8 interested
corporations, and namely RH,
which is Openjdk8 project lead, and hundreds of community members.
Please really do not spread miss-informations like this.
J.
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior
On 10/26/19 4:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> any package can switch to jdk11, but sysem jdk should be jdk8, at least for
>> some more time...
>>
>
> If anything, we're late to the party of moving to JDK 11
va works in this regard, but since
> this is the default
> stream etc., wouldn't it be wise to coordinate such change with a general
> OpenJDK 11 default Fedora
> system wide change?
>
> E.g. would the dependent OpenJDK 8 packages still build in stable releases if
> this chan
Sounds like good idea..the way how to go. Only I'm not familiar with how it
works.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
> me.
Sure. If I did, then not intentionally. By jira ticket in the above I had in
mind general ticket on
pagure or similarly. The word jira did not belonged here. fixed the doc.
>
Thanx!
thanx a lot,
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@r
On 3/30/20 5:26 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11 .
>>
>> == Summary ==
>> Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk.
>>
>&g
Hello fellow java package maintainers!
We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for
F33. Please see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11
Short Story:
* if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide
* Ensure your package
Hello fellow java package maintainers!
We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk for
F33. Please see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11
Short Story:
* if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide
* Ensure your package
On 5/4/20 12:59 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 11:22, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, but as I said above, the RStudio rpms don't pull the JVM,
>>> because it's not required at runtime. So I suppose that, beyond fixing
>>> the java-devel ve
_64.cfg .
>> Eg:
>>
>> sudo cp downloaded-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg
>> /etc/mock/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg
>>or
>> cp downloaded-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg
>> ~/.config/mock/jvanek-java11-fedora-32-x86_64.cfg
>>then
>> # change spe
On 5/4/20 11:15 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Hi, thanks for your assistance, comments inline:
>
> On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 10:48, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> Generally, no program can say, that do not support jdk11, because any
>> javac/java application can be
>> *hacked* t
, future steps will be based.
Thanx!
J.
On 4/30/20 6:29 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello fellow java package maintainers!
>
> We are planning to bump the JDK from java-1.8.0-openjdk to java-11-openjdk
> for F33. Please see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11
>
> Sho
On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Current stats from my testing samples:
> 408 failing
> 263 passing
>
>
> Are these nu
On 7/1/20 4:09 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Fabi
; Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senio
.
Thoughts?
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le
List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
it, and stat
rebuilding on pretty fresh field
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
gt; Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
ct.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.com
g_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
___
devel maili
a.2C_eg_java-11-openjdk.29
Thanx for investigations!
J.
>
> Reference here:
>
> https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=99750
>
> Best regards,
> Ondrej
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:42 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 6/9/20 5:
yyang maven-plugin-testing maven-plugin-tools maven-wagon maven2 modello
plexus-active-collections plexus-component-api plexus-containers
zbyszekclosure-compiler diffoscope gnulib hdfview jblas jhdf5 js-zlib
neurord nom-tam-fits
Thanx!
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE
ore information.
Very bad timing:(
I hope it will get fixed asap.
I'm really sorry for troubles!
J.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 5:05 PM Jiri Vanek <mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Please see
>
&g
On 6/9/20 5:07 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 4:05 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> Please see
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java11#common_issues_packagers_can_face_and_gathe
contriute, or sugest next steps here. I would liek to have it java-packaging
gudelines change, and
self-contained f33 change, but it may be to late.
I see yo already track the Fabio's to-high bytecode issue, but my proposal is
to prevent it in
future. However, it do not seem to be facing to much symp
Hi!
Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK.
Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving!
J.
On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 whi
t at:
>
> * https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-33/
>
> or just go ahead and grab it from:
>
> * https://getfedora.org/
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jva...@redhat.comM: +420775390109
Hello!
Without system integration it have no reason to keep this component alive.
To enable accessibility in java applications, follow the upstream guidelines.
J.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-atk-wrapper
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775
.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for epel8:
Package openjdk-asmtools builds fine in fedora, epel7 and rhel8, but not in
epel8:
CentOS
On 6/22/21 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 13:22, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras
fedora-infrastructure
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
an one version... and had no major issues. I wonder
how far back its possible to start from and walk through the version updates.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 3:55 AM Jiri Vanek mailto:jva...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hello good people!
I would like to thanx to everybody for
downlaod. in f31,
gpgcheck could be enabled again.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec
On 10/11/21 12:28, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:55:05AM +0200, Jiri Vanek napsal(a):
f30-> f34 died again on python stack.. (yah, dnf and freinds should stop
using that or keep embedded interpreter)
DNF 5 is going be written in C++ without any Python.
with all its p
Hello fellow java package maintainers!
We are planning to bump the JDK from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk for
f36. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17
Short Story:
* if you have some java package, be aware that we are bumping JDK in rawhide
* Ensure your package
check what
is the result of:
%if 1
echo 1;
%else
echo 0;
%endif
Best regards,
[1]
https://rpm-packaging-guide.github.io/#rpm-conditionals
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list
+1
as in upvoting on stack exhcanges.
On 11/29/21 14:25, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
rpmspec --parse $FILE
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
nes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420
Hello!
For wide hearing/reading, before final announcement,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17 have anybody any opinion or
anything to say for/against?
Happy Hacking,
J.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
vtk
On 12/1/21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/30/21 01:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/e
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/spammer/exemplarResults/verboseResults.txt
Here you go.
J.
On 12/1/21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/30/21 01:53, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote
On 11/29/21 15:01, Mat Booth wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 13:16, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I would kindly ask you to search yourself in this list:
https://github.com/judovana/FedoraSystemJdkBump/blob/main/scritps/fillCopr/exemplarResults/maintainers.jbump
This list contains dead/retired packages
awesome ty!
On 11/30/21 04:50, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:16 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
Thank you very much for your help, there are 107 failures, and 270 java
packagers, but only 2 active members of java sig. Without your help, the JDK
bump will be very hard.
All
the copr repo.
Thank you very much for your help, there are 80 failures, and 270 java
packagers, but only 2 active members of java sig. Without your help, the JDK
bump will be very hard.
Thank You!
J.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420
:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:25 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Welcome to RHEL-8 modularity and the joy it brings anyone trying to
port software to 8. The problem is not with EPEL but with the way
hmm. Thanx a lot of for a bt of light in darknes.. or mayb emore
Btw, not sure who did what, but thanx a lot. Without any touches, the epel8
package now builds fine.
So thank ou fedora relengs!
J.
On 6/22/21 6:27 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for epel8:
Package openjdk
Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java
proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody
from JDK maintainers beeing aware.
Still ti remains valid.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA
~pre16468670g9f253544-1.fc36.x86_64
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
