On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
So the plan is:
1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
2) put 4.8 to compat-db
3)
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
push updates of the same EVR to
Infrastructure is aware of the issue.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the packages and builds I'm getting these for, yes, I'd say
so, probably a script error, but I'm not sure.
-J
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
another package I'd like to submit.
Pivy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
zipios++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812058
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I have got the following error message from the build system:
dist-f15-updates f16 (stellarium-0.11.1-1.fc15
stellarium-0.11.0-1.fc16)
Unforunately,
Outage: setup kdump on koji01 - 2010-04-17 17:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2010-04-17 17:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-17 17:00 UTC'
but in the
interim I've heard the solution is to just re-submit and hope you get
an x86/x86_64 host selected the next time :)
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 04/29/2010 03:27 AM, Rafał Psota wrote:
Hello
I don't have enough time to maintain my packages so i need to orphan
them. Some of them are a little bit outdated, so they need some love.
I would like to keep one small package - wklej. You can take any other
package. Here's the full list:
On 04/29/2010 09:12 AM, Rafał Psota wrote:
2010/4/29 Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net:
I'll take angrydd, biloba, monsterz, penguin-command, and pingus once
orphaned.
Thanks for your work on all of these.
-J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
/*
%changelog
+* Sun May 02 2010 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com - 2.17-1
+- Update to 2.17
+
* Sun May 13 2007 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.14-1
- update to 1.14
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-JSON/EL-5
On 05/06/2010 07:28 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Rudolf Kastlche...@gmail.com wrote:
one of the questions raised in the meeting posted by mcepl was... why
dont those people leave if they are unhappy. simple... they put alot
sweat blood and tears into a project,
On 05/07/2010 08:56 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Totally off-topic, but I think Spiralling Downward Towards a CapsLock
Doomsday would be a fantastic band name.
Or possibly a Cory Doctrow book.
-sv
That totally skipped my mind
On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote:
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone
think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a
combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are:
6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
12M
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good
On 05/11/2010 01:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora
On 05/11/2010 02:10 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and peek at it every
On 05/12/2010 04:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from
the maintainers requesting the games.
I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the
updates?
On 05/12/2010 11:11 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 16:22:13 -0500,
Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
My understanding was that we would still open a rel-eng ticket for a
freeze exception. Which I didn't do for Wesnoth. Because the outcry
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
(jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency as far as changelog
trimming and revision numbering goes. I could not find anything on that
point on wiki.
So:
On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
we recently started a relatively big rename of several packages
(jakarta-commons). There seems to be inconsistency
On 05/13/2010 12:04 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:30:30AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 11:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:12:39AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/13/2010 10:05 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote
On 05/13/2010 01:23 PM, Julian Aloofi wrote:
I have just taken ownership of the recently orphaned package
'diveintopython' in pkgdb as announced on this thread [1].
Now, while going through [2] I have a question about the instructions
given there.
If a package was last updated more than
disagree. I think it's a sad day we have reached that we're
so concerned about pretty booting that we don't keep around even a 1-2
second delay for the technical user we keep saying we're targeting.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
be zero. This is what I was saying yesterday. Now
if Fedora is really targeting end users who are non-technical (can we
decide this finally, sometime, please?) then this is valid. But if it's
true that we favor experienced computing users, it should not be zero.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 15:43 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:34:22AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Of course it shouldn't be zero. This is what I was saying yesterday. Now
if Fedora is really targeting end users who are non-technical (can we
decide this finally
. And then
there's the bad upgrade[0] case in which grub proves useful too.
Jon.
[0] Fedora kernels are generally high quality, but the overall upgrade
philosophy (or non-philosophy) espoused on this list means that the
kernel is just one of many packages yum is told never to touch.
--
devel mailing list
different story/thread.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 12:11 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) said:
If we put a bit more trust into our kernel updates, and can start making
people a bit angry and filing bugs when there are regressions, maybe we
can do away with that crappy crutch
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 23:27 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
Another +1 for Bill's suggestion, that seems like a nice elegant way of
trying to catch the broken cases.
Some distros take this a stage further with the failure safe mode boot
option, and that's also not a hugely wrong idea.
Jon
by making them compiled.
I *very* strongly agree also. I do change init scripts, but even more
than this, I see a growing trend for Linux systems to be less friendly
to user modification. We are not so smart that we should do this.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
to
attach the right magic dongle to fix it when it breaks.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
breakage.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) said:
There are various projects implementing LiveCD, rescue, or snapshotted
updates. I would like to propose a feature in which some of the
rescue/LiveCD bits are (optionally) installed
.
So I'm willing to help out on this (once RHEL stuff calms down a bit).
Do you think it's worth us putting together a wiki feature proposal?
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. It could just basically be the
rescue mode anaconda bits in one image shoved in place to start.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:39 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 21:22 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:13:21PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Is it better to have a separate volume for this, or to just have a sort
of rescue
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 16:47 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 06/02/2010 04:02 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
That said, of course eventually you could have two of these images and
allow for them to be upgraded, etc. etc. To start with though, I think
there's a lot of value in pre-committing
? Maybe you copied and
created this by hand, but in that case you get to keep both pieces when
it breaks. I'm talking about out-of-the box regular user issues :)
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
a lot more usable than
wading through the 5,000 BZ emails I get each week.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:10 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:05:49AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:52 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Is it reasonable for a package owner to exclude themselves on bugzilla
email when they are the assignee
On 06/03/2010 01:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:29:15PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it
is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all.
Yes please. This is why I
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 14:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:02:21PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
Hm. I can see the use of this, but I can also see issues with how you
do updates for it sanely (if at all.)
Yea. I think you don't do updates for it in general. I think I
On 06/09/2010 06:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 09/06/10 11:39, Pierre-Yves wrote:
Hi all,
On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
life from the original submitter.
The question is then, can I do the
On 06/26/2010 07:03 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
is there someone interested in lzip? It is a lmza compression tool, that
was for a short time used by upstream of one other package of mine.
Upstream of lzip is very responsive, but since I do not use it at all, I
have a lack of interest in
On 06/28/2010 07:36 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I maintain upx, from which I'm in the process of unbundling lzma-sdk, so
while this isn't necessarily directly related, I might as well try to
maintain some consistency if possible.
So
/IRC/etc.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/01/2010 09:58 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:54:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl
returns nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else,
though it may have value to developers
On 07/01/2010 11:17 AM, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:14 +0100, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Jon Ciesla wrote:
repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires iasl returns
nothing. It looks like we may not need it for anything else, though
On 07/06/2010 05:59 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
Sad to hear that ... It was close :/
I didn't expect to be that hard to contribute to Fedora...
Good luck with your new job.
Regards,
Sylvestre
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 21:54 -0700, Henrique de Castro a écrit :
Hello, my
On 07/09/2010 01:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 05:23:40PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 14:28 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings Fedora developers...
c) Just leave them open and let people pick pick pick away at them a
On 07/12/2010 06:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
After FESCO's decision that the wordpress package needs to unbundle the
included libraries nothing happened for over three months. The hope that
somebody would step up and claim wordpress in the FESCO ticket [1] did
not fulfill itself and therefore I
On 07/13/2010 07:55 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
If you are changing the locate of an executable or libraries the
executables write to, please make sure SELinux labels are still
consistant or contact the selinux developers for help. IF you update a
package in a released version of Fedora and
On 07/19/2010 08:19 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Rahul Sundarammethe...@gmail.com wrote:
It is all listed at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TillMaas
Rahul
Thanks mate.
Chris
I found the following more immediately useful:
On 07/21/2010 01:35 AM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
I want to thank everyone for their get well wishes. I am already a lot
better than I was when I wrote the initial mail and have full internet
access again. The mail might have been a little premature, but this is
what happens if one has access to
, which indicates what kinds of
devices to scan. I forwarded your mail to some LVM folks for input.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of documentation out there -
books, online resources, etc. that will all be out of date for Fedora
(and perhaps other projects later) but not for other distributions.
Jon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
Jon.
P.S. Also, about the use of Change. Change is good, but not all change
is good, and change for the sake of change isn't always good either.
Just like in politics, we can use the word Change to reflect a liberal
agenda (which I personally agree very strongly with), and cast those who
have
be able to
decide argument at the door, there's a way around it if we can
think about the *best* way to do it, rather than the *worst*.
cheers,
jon
ps: the horse I *do* have a race in is which ever one can stop
this endless mine is better and should be the default
argument
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
wrote:
I disagree. Fedora's lack of popularity is largely thanks to these
issues.
In this context, I feel the Cinnamon request rsp. the give users a
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/05/2013 09:31 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 5 February 2013 20:10, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't say Fedora follows blindly but rather chooses an upstream
from
some alternatives (their ability
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
Heya,
since a while now logind has replaced CK in Fedora. I'd like to retire
it entirely from the distribution now.
Most deps on CK are gone. Holdouts are cdm, lightdm, lxsession,
lxdm.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
On Tue, 12.02.13 12:38, Jon Ciesla (limburg...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
Heya,
since a while now logind has replaced CK in Fedora
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
On Tue, 12.02.13 13:52, Jon Ciesla (limburg...@gmail.com) wrote:
So to clarify, you're not actually retiring anything currently, just
expressing to the community that you'd like to and that we should
work
On 02/15/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
Please see the following link for further details:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks
Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels
running under qemu models with gdb. It will simply cover
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
Hello,
I've released ownership of the following low maintenance packages I
haven't used in a while. None of these have any co-maintainers.
Branches in Fedora and EPEL:
- seeker: Random access disk benchmark utility
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote:
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by
orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed
over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work?
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**curlish/https://pypi.python.org/pypi/curlish/
It's calling out
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kamil Dudka kdu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass
rebuild:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411
Thanks for heads up! This
spe taken.
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
* fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc)
* hunt
* ip-sentinel
* kismet
* libextractor
Taken.
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.comwrote:
Greetings,
* fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc)
* hunt
* ip-sentinel
* kismet
* libextractor
Taken.
Also took dietlibc
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/01/2013 11:20 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:46:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Historical footnote: I believe it was initially added to help squeeze
the
boot portion
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
I recalled this set of issues too from my previous time in fesco but I
didn't find the meeting logs with the information. I did find this
meeting
log:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
I see no reason not to keep dietlibc around for development use, but I'd
rather see packages use glibc.
We agree then. But if we want to keep dietlibc, it needs to be fixed to
comply
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.comwrote:
Building LibreOffice for x86_64 starting to fail in an odd way recently,
http://koji.fedoraproject.**org/koji/getfile?taskID=**
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
I just got notification of this broken dependency:
libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) =
0:1.9.1
[etc]
No problem
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 13.3.2013 14:01, Jon Ciesla napsal(a):
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
I just got notification of this broken dependency:
libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
Users shouldn't have to go searching out that kind of thing in a
separate package IMHO, it could just be part of stock yum install.
If it
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:45:03AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:47 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 23:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 18/03/13 10:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:34 -0600, Kevin
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Eduardo Jorge bonvivant150...@gmail.comwrote:
There is a fresh, new version of Maxima in sourceforge: 5.30.0. Please
update Maxima. Thank you.
Eduardo Jorge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Has been open for a long time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=923974https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923974
Can someone push an update?
I'll update to 1.3.1 sometime this morning unless
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Has been open for a long time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=923974https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923974
Can
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity
Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later, so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Why not just make the assumption that administrators will use the
netinstall
and or ks
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to get trac10 (trac 1.0.1) into EL-6 sooner rather than later,
so
I'll take one of yours in return. Thanks!
-J
--
http
/
)
What's the current status of dietlibc in Fedora and how can it be checked?
Last built was done by Jon Ciesla on 2013-03-27.
Unmaintained how? Speaking as the current maintainer, my plans have been
to migrate any packages using it to glibc, but the keep dietlibc in the
distro for developer
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Frank Bergmann fedora-de...@tuxad.dewrote:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann [1]
fedora-de...@tuxad.de
wrote:
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading
w00t!
On May 10, 2013 3:55 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
You may have noticed me poking random packages, I'm preparing rawhide
(and only rawhide) for an update to lua 5.2.
Please be patient. :)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I actually
have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I picked it up in the
first place.
So please anyone interested in abiword might
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
mailto:johannes.lips@gmail.**com johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Johannes Lips wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
mailto:johannes.lips@gmail.**com johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am going
I've just updated LibRaw to 0.15.2. This is a soname change, so I've also
rebuilt:
entangle
evas-generic-loaders
luminance-hdr
nomacs
oyranos
shotwell
These all rebuilt locally on the new LibRaw with no modifications except
shotwell, which required a minor patch to remove references to a
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
Hey, fun times!
I'm not the roundcubemail maintainer, but as a user and provenpackager I
more or less co-maintain it with Jon. I was just doing a 'routine' bump
to 0.9.2 and noticed the license situation was rather
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
When systemd was first adopted by Fedora a requirement mandated by FESCO
(or was it FPC?) was that the script systemd-sysv-convert (which I
EPEL for EL-6 has a cmake28 RPM available.
-J
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.frwrote:
Le vendredi 05 juillet 2013 12:54:27, Mathieu Bridon a écrit :
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 12:45 +0200, Alain Portal wrote:
Le jeudi 04 juillet 2013 19:44:04, John
701 - 800 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
