, daemon(7), daemon man
page, man daemon section 7, etc turns up nothing.
There is a man page for daemon(3), but it doesn't look like the man page
you seem to be citing.
Thanks!
In systemd:
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man7/daemon.7.gz
systemd-37-3.fc16.x86_64
--
José Matos
--
devel
On Friday 30 July 2010 20:21:20 seth vidal wrote:
As opposed to leaving off
a ; which NEVER happens.
Or adding an extra one:
while
(some_condition);
{
do_something;
}
;-)
-sv
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sunday 31 October 2010 02:58:21 Dominic Hopf wrote:
I think it's likely something like a BuildRequires: fltk already
should be enough. I'd suggest to just try out that and see what
happens. :)
Most probably it should be
BuildRequires: fltk-devel
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
ignoring the suggests and the checks
and on a second round adding those back. Probably this is easier said
then done. :-)
Regards,
--
José Matos
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum?rd=YumUpgradeFaq
On a humorous note citing bad memories from FC2 seems a really
_outdated_ excuse. :-)
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. :-)
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
The unfriendly aspect of the fork is due to the fact that pillow will
have more features that PIL.
This is IMHO. :-)
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I had the same problem with a desktop machine that was fixed with the -204.
I had submitted this as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896579.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sunday 24 January 2010 12:18:23 Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
2010/1/23 Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu:
$ pdflatex simple.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdflatex.fmt
I can't find the format file
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 11:58:06 Pierre-Yves wrote:
We could imagine a monthly reminder if you are interested.
A once a month reminder is perfect. :-)
Best regards,
Pierre
--
José Abílio
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:36:35 David Malcolm wrote:
How about this:
A SIG for people who are interested in Python on Fedora. This includes
packaging and optimizing the various Python 2 and Python 3 runtimes
(CPython, Jython), packaging libraries and applications, setting and
improving
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 16:06:46 Pierre-Yves wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:18 +, José Matos wrote:
One request, would it be possible for R2rpm to read the personal
rpmmacros
instead of forcing a given directory layout?
I have just commit this change to the git, could you test
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 14:12:36 Pierre-Yves wrote:
If I am not asking too much it would be nice if r2rpm could fetch the
sources directly from CRAN if we pass only the package name (or with a
special option for that matter).
I have this idea in my mind for some time, I will look
On Monday 06 January 2014 12:53:04 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
rdieter:BADURL:lyx-2.0.7.tar.xz:lyx
lyx-2.0.7 is in the release stage and I am waiting for the release announce to
move it to stable (for F18-F20).
It seems that eventually the tar ball will be changed to have a patch to fix a
bug specific
On Friday 10 January 2014 16:51:37 Matt Robinson wrote:
Hi, I've been going through the process of becoming a package
maintainer, and thought it would be a good time to introduce myself. My
name is Matt Robinson and I'm currently working at Rutgers University. I
build a lot of RPMs there
if maintainers don't get
around to doing it.
Rahul
LyX requires some of the wv* binaries, it does not link with the library
so there is not any need to recompile it.
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 16:42:36 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4. Testing so far as been mixed:
** rdieter did quick test against gmail imap: ok
** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail, initial sync
of
On Saturday 05 February 2011 21:11:34 Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm planning on dropping libnc-dap. It is no longer supported and
functionality has moved into the netcdf 4 library.
The only package currently requiring libnc-dap is:
octave-forge-0:20090607-17.fc14.i686
Also, apparently
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:46:07 Jochen Schmitt wrote:
For KDE-4.6 we have the same situation. In this case you can
get it from the http://apt.kde-redhat.com which is maintained
by Rex Dieter.
It is .org not .com
The url is
http://apt.kde-redhat.org
--
José Abílio
--
devel
Hi,
I have the yum-langpacks plugin installed and it works. :-)
My problem in a sense is that it is limited in scope. :-(
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YumLangpackPlugin was the feature page
for when the feature was initially deployed. The purpose of this is post is to
raise
On Sunday 12 June 2011 16:56:33 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello list,
Any tips how to debug why laptop CPU temperature is around 30 degrees
celsius higher on Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 compared to Windows 7 ? Both
Linux and Windows were idle when measuring..
I tried both Fedora 14 (Linux 2.6.35)
On Thursday 02 June 2011 16:28:56 Bill Nottingham wrote:
1) This feature will also allow firefox and thunderbird to earn
langpacks as they deserve.
It certainly allows for it - it requires that the packagers take advantage
of it. ISTR discussions in the past that the mechanics of creating
On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What is the graphics card?
It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card?
I think so (but I think that are mixing the references :-) ):
# lspci | grep ATI
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc
On Monday 13 June 2011 08:09:48 Honza Horak wrote:
I think bodhi behaves correctly, but this auto-generated message is a
failure, while according https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy a
non critical package must spend at least one week in updates-testing.
I've reported the same
On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:54:14 Clément David wrote:
Hi,
My name is Clément DAVID (aka davidcl) and I'm a french software
developer. I'm currently working on Scilab [1].
Welcome to Fedora. :-)
I'm interested to become a packager for Scientific application or just
software toys :). My
On Tuesday 14 June 2011 01:05:57 Kevin Kofler wrote:
And NNTP(S)?
This list is gatewayed as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel on
news.gmane.org (NNTP) and snews.gmane.org (NNTPS), you can use any Usenet
News client (e.g. KNode) to read and post to this list.
Kevin Kofler
On Thursday 16 June 2011 14:07:56 Mario Santagiuliana wrote:
In data 16/6/2011 14:46:59, Rex Dieter ha scritto:
I don't think that's required, just take ownership, and update as
normal.
I see you've done that, but you missed Fedora Devel too.
-- Rex
I take the ownership for
On Friday 17 June 2011 20:03:53 Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
You can embed rpm macros, like %name, in your .rpmmacros file. That
way, you can create a directory per package containing SPECS, RPMS,
SRPMS, etc. directories. I use it like this (out of the back of my
head)
I use the same scheme but I
-tmp.DdN0bT (%check)
Regards,
--
José Matos
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
. :-)
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On a related note I have orphaned ifplugd and I suggest it to be retired
from F-18 I took its maintenance when networkmanager was not reliable
enough for my needs but that time is long gone and only inertia insured
that it stayed alive.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel
Feature
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18Boost150
IIRC it was already approved (confirmed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/FeatureList).
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
here. :-)
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
source
that has changed.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
was
necessary to bootstrap the process, and not even speaking about circular
references. Clearly a fun project... :-)
So this always makes a fun read. :-)
--
José Matos
___
r-devel mailing list
r-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
-base. Changing it in BR and
removing it since it is required by tex(latex) I have applied the patch
that is attached and it build for me locally.
--
José Matos
diff --git a/tex-musixtex.spec b/tex-musixtex.spec
index a0e77fb..6fc6fa0 100644
--- a/tex-musixtex.spec
+++ b/tex-musixtex.spec
@@ -13,8
since 3.6 is no longer maintained and 3.800 is API backwards
compatible with previous 3.x versions.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2013-03-02 13:55, José Matos wrote:
Latest version of armadillo 3.800 has changed the license from LGPLv2.1
to MPLv2.
Correction the license has changed from LGPLv3+ to MPLv2.
The implications are the same as previously stated.
Regards,
--
José Matos
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Thursday 25 April 2013 17:03:20 Tom Callaway wrote:
[tex-musixtex]
tex-musixtex-0.114-11.fc18.noarch requires texlive-texmf
Fixed in updates-testing.
~tom
I had a fix on the same line of what you have done ready.
The reason why I have not applied it is because I think that
On Saturday 20 July 2013 17:04:47 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
How exactly is it different from when gcc grew standard C++ behaviour and
most C++ apps broke right and left?
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html
The same can be said about C++/11 that clearly looks (at least to me) as a new
and better
I intend to orphan conglomerate (http://www.conglomerate.org/).
The source code has not been updated for a long time and my interest in the
package is gone.
If no one is interested in maintaining it I will retire it from the
distribuition in the next weeks.
Regards,
--
José Abílio Matos
--
Hi,
I am using copr to build another candidate for lyx-2.1 and the build
fails for me with no message related with the failure:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-21/builds/
The only file I get is in this case build-9287.log that is useless.
I have built the package
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 18:43:22 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Honestly, I kinda like the pragmatism on Fedora, so far, that there's
no need to split up packages into a myriad of mini packges. And I
think that texlive packaging is an absolute disaster, where things are
split up to the maximum
On Friday 29 August 2014 10:54:19 David Parsons wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to the Fedora Project and I understand I should introduce myself
here.
I'm a french research engineer in bioinformatics and computational biology.
My main interests are about Evolution and its dynamics but I'm also
In version 1.7-12 (-11 really but I did not package that) the license of R-zoo
changed from
GPL2
to
GPL2 or GPL3
so that there no changes from our point of view.
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
On Tuesday 03 March 2015 21:27:42 Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm orphaning the following R packages as we don't use them anymore and
I don't have the time for them:
R-TH-data -- Data for other R packages ( master f22 f21 f20 epel7 el6 )
R-car -- Companion to Applied Regression package for R (
On Monday 18 May 2015 23:22:58 Rex Dieter wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/51cc8aa9f6b784f806b1d9cc97fe0749ffac29af/lyxgit
thanks for the hint, I pulled in the fix today and it worked (among several
other small fixes).
-- Rex
Upstream suggested either to pick this changeset or to
I will update a belated bump of armadillo (that happened in May) in rawhide.
# dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires
'libarmadillo.so.4()(64bit)'
armadillo-devel-0:4.650.2-3.fc23.x86_64
gdal-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
gdal-java-0:1.11.2-10.fc23.x86_64
On Monday 06 July 2015 14:20:20 Orion Poplawski wrote:
qtoctave-0.10.1-17.fc22.src.rpm
Why is this still being built?
Upstream has been abandoned. And some of the code has migrated/inspired octave
GUI so qtoctave is no more relevant or useful and it should be retired. The
introduction of
On Tuesday 11 August 2015 07:28:26 Neal Becker wrote:
Is there somewhere I can see a summary of changes?
Regarding texlive I saw it first on:
http://www.latex-community.org/home/news/46-news-latex-distributions/517-texlive-2015
and the list of changes:
On Saturday 18 July 2015 12:46:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Hi,
I've pushed a new version of Boost, 1.58.0, to rawhide and f23, which
will require all packages that depend on Boost to be rebuilt. The plan
was to update to 1.59.0 but that isn't going to be released in time
for the F23 schedule,
On Wednesday 22 July 2015 10:51:58 Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Thanks for the change to caching. I have some problems with my current
router getting hung up during large wireless file transfers and having
to redownload updates made it harder to get a successful update. I did file
an RFE for this
On Monday 27 July 2015 07:19:06 opensou...@till.name wrote:
emacs-common-ess alexlan 62 weeks ago
I rebuilt emacs-common-ess for rawhide, and I am doing the same for f23.
In the process I have obsoleted the xemacs sub-packages since the build process
fails and
I will update PyX, a Python graphics package, to version 0.14.
Since version 0.13, released in December of 2013, that PyX transitioned from
python 2 to 3.
So the new version (and version 0.13 before) only supports python 3, while
version 0.12 was a strict python 2 version.
The update will be
Hi,
according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
to have a package monitored we should:
1) Add the project to anitya.
2) Map the project to a Fedora package in anitya.
3) Enable the monitoring flag for that package in pkgdb2.
Steps 1 and 2 are easy but I
On Tuesday 21 July 2015 13:15:30 Jakub Jelen wrote:
These are the crypted buttons under Monitoring: label. Changing it
from No Monitoring to something else triggers the bug creation (Bugs
only), or possibly the scratch build (Bugs Build).
Thank you. I would never found that without your
On Tuesday 07 July 2015 23:44:03 Kevin Kofler wrote:
I am one of the comaintainers of the qtoctave package. I know the package is
dead upstream. But last I checked, it worked. (There had been some issues,
but I
fixed those that I found.) If it still works fine, I object to retiring it.
On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:58:38 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems there was a new build of armadillo in the last days that broke
> at least gdal in F-22 and F-23
>
> from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13135380
> ...
> DEBUG util.py:399: Error: Package:
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote:
> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of
> broken dependencies.
>
> # dnf update --releasever=24 --best --allowerasing
Does it helps if instead of update/upgrade you use distro-sync?
I have updated last
On Sunday, February 21, 2016 9:28:08 AM WEST Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'll be updating gsl to 2.1 in Rawhide on Monday and rebuilding
> dependent packages. See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276893 for some tracking
> info. A fair amount of work was done to get everything
On 2012-05-11 20:43, José Matos wrote:
Hello,
while chasing the several dependencies to build R-Sim-DiffProc I had
to build R-rJava, at moment that is failing while testing the examples.
Are there any suggestions to overcome this?
Right, I got over this by installing R-java-devel
On 2012-02-29 21:21, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 19:21 +, José Matos wrote:
After almost two months going on what is the outcome of this project?
Well the structure is there and a number of rpms available.
I have started on the update mechanism but I have only got
to
the latest texlive.
FWIW I am having this problem because I have texlive-2012 installed from
Jindrich Novy's repo.
The affected packages are:
R-RCurl
R-rtracklayer
R-biomaRt
R-bigmemory
R-Rcompression
Regards,
--
José Matos
___
r-devel mailing list
r-devel
Hi,
recently I have installed rstudio in my machine to see how it works, it
insists to install two packages rstudio and another.
I found then later that R created a directory called R in my home directory. I
find that behavior annoying to have a program installing a directory right in
65 matches
Mail list logo
