[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning EPEL Branches

2022-08-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote: > Hi EPEL folks, > > In the past couple EPEL SCo meetings, we have been discussing adding a > new package retirement policy for EPEL packages. That reads amusingly to me... to be clear 'new policy' not 'new packages'.

Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1

2022-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > I see 20-30% of steal time in the VM building webkit, which should mean > the hypervisor's capacity is at/over limit :-( It would benefit from > having more physical CPUs. In the past, steal time has been caused by other lpars

Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1

2022-08-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:55:15 +0200 > Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:46:44 +0900 > > Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > > > Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: > > > > Hmm, > > > > > > > > I am really sorry for this,

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

2022-08-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Could you please share a link to the existing script? > > https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/mass_rebuild_file_bugs.py I wonder if it's hitting a limit from bugzilla now, or perhaps a paging issue? It definitely

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

2022-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:43:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed > > > build

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

2022-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 03:04:50PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 07. 22 17:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 21713 builds have been tagged into f37, there is currently 1144 failed > > builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs > >

Re: Upstream Release Monitoring - bug report

2022-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote: > Ah, It's a bit more tangled than I thought: > > I've somehow got an impression that the upstream release monitoring is > not related to Fedora, but I expected the BZ bot should be. > So I've looked for a place to report issues other

Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

2022-07-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to f37. Failures can be seen

Fedora 37 mass rebuild complete

2022-07-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved over to f37. Failures can be seen

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
As a quick and dirty thing I took the f37-needs-rebuild list and the f37-failed to build list and found things that were only on the needs-rebuild list. I then filtered out the ones we don't try and mass rebuild (shim, kernel, grub2, etc) and the silly ones we have like Fedora-Live-Xfce

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 02:49:53PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37. > > > > Also, the signing queue is all caught up. > > Can you take a look at gap-4.11.1-

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:43:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Can confirm, looks all good now, thanks! > > BTW, I'd like to know whatever magic you did to fedora notifications. > Because it apparently kept chugging on right through the mass rebuild, > and is now caught up again. :) Yeah,

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:09:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: ...snip... > > So, as long as that sidetag update goes out all should be fine. The packages were signed and the sidetag is through to f37. Also, the sign

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:37:39AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > We have had several issues in the last few days sadly. > > I think your build ran into systemd-oomd running on some builders after > > I ha

Re: Orphaned package dnstracer takeover

2022-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 04:26:28PM -, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to take over the orphaned package dnstracer. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnstracer > > I submitted a ticket with releng for this as there was no "take" button > present. > >

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 02:24:21PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On 22/07/22 09:08AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > notmuch failed to build from source because of a strange test suite failure > > on ppc64le: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89837091 > > > > The

Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild for the changes listed in: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged when

Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

2022-07-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Hi all, Per the Fedora f37 schedule[1] we have started a mass rebuild on 2022-07-20 for Fedora f37. We are running this mass rebuild for the changes listed in: https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and merged when

Re: F37 proposal: Public release of the Anaconda Web UI preview image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-07-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:30:14PM +0200, Jiri Konecny wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Dne 16. 07. 22 v 21:35 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > ...snip... > > > For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a > > > built-in tar-payload (so that the im

Re: Koji ppc64le build failure

2022-07-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:59:49AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:50:01PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko

Re: Koji ppc64le build failure

2022-07-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 08:34:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=89618509 > > On ppc64le: > FAIL: test-checkwrite.sh > > There should be a core dump associated with this failure. Is it > possible someone with Koji access could look to

Re: F37 proposal: Public release of the Anaconda Web UI preview image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-07-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
...snip... > > For this we will create a self-contained boot.iso style image with a > built-in tar-payload (so that the image can work even without network > access) based on the latest Anaconda upstream code. What packages will be in this tar-payload? And can you use the boot.iso to do

Re: pre-change: lower printk setting after switching to real root

2022-07-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > We recently did https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1840 for > Fedora CoreOS (more background: > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1244 ) and I'd like to > consider applying this to all Fedora

Re: [External] Re: F36 official respin iso for lenovo Z13 and Z16

2022-07-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > On 7/13/22 15:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > >> Hi Fedora Devs, > >> > >> Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done

Re: F36 official respin iso for lenovo Z13 and Z16

2022-07-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:34:12PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > Hi Fedora Devs, > > Would someone be able to help getting an official-respin done from F36 > latest please? Similar to what was done for the Carbons etc. > > We need one for the Z13 & Z16 preload. We're waiting on one FW fix but >

Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

2022-07-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline) to work with these large updates if at all possible. Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additionally, it's more work to releng folks and more

Re: Once again, more than 8 days delayed notifications

2022-07-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
crossposting to infra list to keep folks there in the loop... On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:53:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 15:06, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > That said, IRC is actually one of the fastest ones we can push to. > > Is

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

2022-07-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> > > >> > That said, until then I can try and run things on

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

2022-07-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends. > > Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom? Yes. Basically

signing vault down (2022-07-04)

2022-07-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. We were having some issues with the management interface on our primary signing vault. The server was power cycled, but the management is still not functioning, and now the server isn't processing signing requests further. Due to the US holidays there's no one on site right now, but

signing vault down (2022-07-04)

2022-07-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. We were having some issues with the management interface on our primary signing vault. The server was power cycled, but the management is still not functioning, and now the server isn't processing signing requests further. Due to the US holidays there's no one on site right now, but

Re: Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

2022-07-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 11:36 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > > Am 03.07.22 um 10:46 schrieb Benson Muite: > > > Maybe there are contributors where the working week is Sunday-Thursday? > > > > I feel, Fedora's leadership has

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

2022-07-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 11:52:26AM +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Am 03.07.22 um 04:02 schrieb Neal Gompa: > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:52 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > > wrote: > > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > > > The e-mail address reaches nowhere > > > or actually, does it still work?

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

2022-07-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 05:31:13PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 3:11:44 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:54:17AM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 10:01:18 AM CDT Micha

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

2022-07-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 11:54:17AM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 10:01:18 AM CDT Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > This is an extremely common problem in Fedora: the de facto maintainer > > is not the main admin, and so the bugs are assigned to the wrong > > person.

Re: side-tag including other side-tag ?

2022-06-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 08:53:03PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 08:52 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:47:33PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > > On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > >

Re: nfs4-acl-tools

2022-06-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:53:40AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I just took over the maintership of nfs4-acl-tools > and it appears the command has not been part > of Fedora since f32. How do you mean 'part of fedora'? The package isn't retired or blocked, it's available in the repos

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
h things here? quay is open source... althought quay.io is a Red Hat run instance of that. kevin -- > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

2022-06-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 12:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > ... > > I think doing this could really help us keep Rawhide solid and avoid > > introducing major compose-breaking bugs, at minimal cost. But it's a > >

Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB

2022-06-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:09:13AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > > I also think that every package change (including rebuild) must be > > tracked in changelog. > > I think that convolution is at the very heart of the problem: > > As it is, dist-git tracks "packaging sources", i.e. spec

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container > > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to > > move our containers to

Re: side-tag including other side-tag ?

2022-06-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 01:47:33PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > On Monday, June 20, 2022 10:02:00 AM CDT Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Is is possible include builds of one side-tag into other side-tag ? > > It is also possible to `koji tag-build [dest side tag] [NEVR(s) from other > side tag]`,

Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-06-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
I'm definitely in favor, but a couple of questions... What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something else? I assume this will not be release blocking at least at first? Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

2022-06-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:21:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 11:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > > > Kevin, Adam, do could you please do some kind of compose validation? > > I can validate a compose if Kevin can build one. I'm not sure I have any easy way

Re: Request: Airspy HF+

2022-06-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:28:10PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 18/06/2022 12:57, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > Devel List: If no response from Emiliano, what's the process here for > > taking over a package in this case (and also renaming the repo to drop > > the version from it)? > >

Re: fedpkg request-side-tag: I don't understand "allowed_suffixes"

2022-06-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 02:00:03PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 18/06/2022 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > So it sounds like the suffix is used for the purpose I guessed. Why > > not let any packager use a descriptive suffix (without pre-approval)? > > +1. I like this idea.

Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817

2022-06-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:15:35PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17 2022 at 02:00:14 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry. > > Hi, can you explain why? Since we do not maintain upgrade paths from one > release to the next

Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817

2022-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:38:19AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime > > dependency. What's the most accurate way? > > > > Bug ticket:

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

2022-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Big +1 from me... I think this would be great to enable. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Who checks the exception at fedora-scm-requests?

2022-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:09:30PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently seen a package that was imported into Fedora without a package > review. I've noticed this because the packages doesn't even install and I > wanted to check if this could have been caught in the package

Re: Combine two Bodhi requests?

2022-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:47:53PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 11:38 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Pairs of Bodhi updates which probably should be combined so the > > packages go out together: > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8f775872c9

Re: Planned Outage - Bodhi upgrade - 2022-06-09 09:00 UTC

2022-06-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 07:32:21PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey Mark, > > will rawhide builds in Koji automatically create Bodhi updates after the > outage is over, or is there some manual action that will be required? I'm not Mark, but there shouldn't be any manual action needed. When

Re: Copr login not working

2022-06-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 08:34:51PM -0400, Chris wrote: > Hi, > > Can't seem to log into COPR; I can log into everything else, but after > providing my correct user/pass combo and logging in, the screen just > returns back as though I never even attempted (the log in). > > I tried resetting my

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:59:28AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams > > wrote: > > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > Cryptographic policies

Re: Ceph, virt packages (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

2022-05-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:05:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 05. 22 10:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:31:21AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone

Re: PSA: I am not getting all email from Fedora, reach me directly if you need me

2022-05-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 07:08:00PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello Fedorans, > > this is a just a heads up: If I ignored your question in a Pagure issue, or > your pull request, possibly haven't replied to your bugzilla report or a > devel thread... it's because my email is broken and I don't

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 04:57:54PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > We are testing also upstream. note that RH is maintainer of ojdk 11 and 8, > so we have to. But that is much easier, as the usptream is static within > intree libraries. And we have to run also for 17 and 18/19 as we need this >

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
So, just replying here since this is a nice monster of a thread. ;( First, just to clear up some previous coments, shim does build against the oldest stable Fedora in koji and then is manually tagged into newer ones. This is not at all a good process. It only gets a bodhi update for the one

Re: [CentOS-devel] [EPEL-devel] RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com only long term

2022-05-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL > > under Projects at issues.redhat.com. > > What is the correct project

[EPEL-devel] Re: [CentOS-devel] RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com only long term

2022-05-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:37:46AM +0200, Branislav Náter wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL > > under Projects at issues.redhat.com. > > What is the correct project

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:21:53PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 1:13 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: > > > > Hi all, >

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

2022-05-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:45:55PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: > > Hi all, > > > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source > > files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore > > downloading

Re: The future of FMN (Fedora Messaging Notifications)

2022-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:49 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Replying to a reply because I can't find the original mail, sorry. > > > > I want to be easily able to *NOT* be notified of things I just did. In > > fact this should

Re: Allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without fedpkg

2022-04-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 04:14:03PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:44:01PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If I understand correctly, SSH access is a security/legal/whatever > > no-go for nonpackagers, but can we offer some kind of standard git > > mechanism to

Re: Allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without fedpkg

2022-04-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:01:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:54 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > what would it take to allow non-packagers to push to dist-git forks without > > fedpkg? > > > > The instructions at > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Does EPEL 9 Koji have older c9s packages than local mock?

2022-04-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:53:10PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9 > Koji, but not in mock. > > At the end, I compared the list of packages with: ...snip... > > This seems like my local mock has newer c9s

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE retirement of ansible-2.9.x

2022-04-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
o updates... not even security updates. :( kevin -- > > Kind regards, > > Michael Trip > > On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 13:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Just a reminder that ansible-core (The split out ansible 'engine') > > will &

[EPEL-devel] retirement of ansible-2.9.x

2022-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. Just a reminder that ansible-core (The split out ansible 'engine') will be landing in RHEL8.6 (and other el builds thereafter). Also, the ansible 2.9.x ('ansible classic') package is going to going end of life and no longer supported in that same timeframe. So, at that time I will be

Re: VERY late notification emails

2022-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 07:48:56PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I think this is broken again. Last notification I have received was at > 03:50:49 UTC. Yep. Restarted it. In other news, we now have the upstream python3 version deployed in staging and are testing it/fixing issues. After f36 is out

Re: F37 Change: Drop i686 builds of jdk8,11,17 and latest (18) rpms from f37 onwards (System-Wide Change)

2022-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
This change has been reworked... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs If folks could take a fresh look and see if this addresses their concerns, that would be great. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing

Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users

2022-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just to revive this thread, there's a proposed policy discussed at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2759 and codified in https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/61 If all interested parties could take a look and comment back here with any changes or concerns, FESCo can move it forward.

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-04-19) Canceled

2022-04-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Because there's no new business and ongoing business/voting is taking place in tickets, todays FESCo meeting is canceled. Announcements of decided tickets: = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = Title of issue https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/### DECISION (+X, Y, -Z) Change proposal: Support FIDO

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL conflicts with Satellite 6 packages

2022-04-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 12:39:56PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 09:54, Amos wrote: > > > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600 Erinn Looney-Triggs > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provid... > >

Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

2022-04-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
...snip bios sig plan... Thanks for that Hans! If that proves acceptable for change owners here that would perhaps take care of the short term problem. What about longer term though? Would the thought be that the BIOS sig would remain around for the forseeable future maintaining BIOS boot? Or

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36

2022-04-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 08:21:11PM -, Tom Seewald wrote: > It's been ~1 month and I am still unable to upgrade to F36 due to the same > issue with lilv: > > Error: > Problem: lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.i686 has inferior architecture > - lilv-0.24.10-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-04-12) - Canceled

2022-04-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-04-12 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:54:02PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 08/04/2022 19:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We actually had IMA signing all up and running last year from jan 15th > > to jan 22nd. As luck would have it, there was a chromium build in that > &g

Re: F37 Change: Signed RPM Contents (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-04-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:20:00AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:51 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > There are plenty of things in an RPM build that already inherently take > > > > O(N) time in the number of files or the total size of the files, even > > > >

Re: newRepo is slow today

2022-04-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:16:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:10:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:07:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >

Re: Today's rawhide compose is taking a long time to fully sync

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:27:30PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:06:35 -0700, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Short version: > > We updated to koji 1.28.0 yesterday. It has a bug in it where it writes > > out signed rpms as mode 0600, w

Re: newRepo is slow today

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:10:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:07:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 05:54:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > Been waiting a couple of hours I think. > >

Re: newRepo is slow today

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 05:54:52PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Been waiting a couple of hours I think. There's nothing in the queue waiting: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojira/queue What repo were you waiting for and what package? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Today's rawhide compose is taking a long time to fully sync

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 11:22:34AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Today's rawhide compose is taking a long time to sync on the primary > mirrors. It has been a mix of the update from the 28th and the one for today > for at least a couple hours. That is much longer than normal. > Did something

Re: dist-git force push

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:22:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, ...snip... I don't think we should ever allow force pushes in dist git repos. Even aside detecting if something has been built, you basically screw up the repo for everyone else who has work in progress against it. > 2. Or if

Re: Koji down?

2022-04-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 06:19:06AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > I submitted some builds yesterday and didn’t get any emails, > and at least as of 6:18 CDT every link I click on the main webpage replies > with “server is offline”. This was likely during our scheduled outage.

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

2022-03-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 08:12:47PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > "You know these lights in the theaters that go out gradually? > When the guy ve-ery slo-o-owly pulls the plug out?" > - a joke from my childhood. > > > Hello, it's been quiet for a while, and I've been busy > but kept

Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC

2022-03-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-03-31 21:00

Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC

2022-03-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage - Updates / Reboots - 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2022-03-31 21:00 UTC which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-03-31 21:00

[EPEL-devel] Re: Modules for EPEL9

2022-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:09:33PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > It was talked about December 2021, and pushed off to the new year. > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Handling packages with missing dependencies provided by HA-RS repos?

2022-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:18:08PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 2:54 PM Carl George wrote: > > > > Typically EPEL inherits policy from Fedora, diverging when necessary. > > Here is the corresponding section of Fedora policy. > > > > "All package dependencies (build-time or

[EPEL-devel] Re: Modules for EPEL9

2022-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > It was talked about December 2021, and pushed off to the new year. > https://pagure.io/epel/issue/135 > It's the new year, and you are the first this year to ask for it. So, time > to get it back in the discussions. > Could you please

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-03-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:27:31AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > Package (co)maintainers Status > Change > > atomic-reactorcverna,

Re: Please use side tags for backwards-incompatible bumps of major packages, not buildroot overrides

2022-03-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
I wonder... should we stop allowing buildroot overrides? Or at the very least add a admon to adding a new one in bodhi, explaining that you should probibly use a side tag, etc? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

2022-03-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:07:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:03 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at >

Re: Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

2022-03-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:58:59PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at > src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user. > But those group memberships are only synced if the user logs in, AFAIK? > So ... do these packagers retain provenpackager capabilities in >

Re: Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

2022-03-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will > > be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds > > submitted in the last six

Re: VERY late notification emails

2022-03-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:29:37AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 07. 03. 22 v 19:12 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > I watched it over the weekend, and now it's only 3 days behind. ;( > > Hopefully it will finish catching up... I'm continuing to watch it. > > > It even

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

2022-03-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > >> I believe it is failing on the line: > >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py",

Re: [fedora-arm] Re: F36 buildroot broken on armv7hl

2022-03-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 11:39, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello! > > Has anyone else seen this? > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=84213778 > > failed on armv7hl: > > > >

Re: undefined symbol `__libc_stack_end' in F36/Rawhide

2022-03-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:21:09AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:36 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Ron Olson: > > > > > Building swiftlang on F36/Rawhide results in a a failure that, > > > boiled down to its essence, appears to be: > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >