Re: rb_libtorrent has broken deps in Rawhide

Thank you for bumping and rebuilding it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=151914 On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 18:55 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Leigh Scott wrote: At the moment I am unable to build qbittorrent and torium (springlobby as well

Re: F12 to Rawhide upgrade

I had the same issue, it's due to the F12 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau version being higher than the rawhide version. On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:24 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: Over the weekend I tried this via yum and the upgrade/install part went fine. But once I rebooted, the gui wouldn't work.

Re: F12 to Rawhide upgrade

I suppose you could install it just before upgrading ( you might need --nodeps ) , doing so would break X so avoid rebooting before the upgrade. On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 22:50 +, Leigh Scott wrote: You need to manually fetch the f13

Re: F12 to Rawhide upgrade

Better still, if using yum to upgrade, install it after it's completed (before reboot) On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:55 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 22:50 +, Leigh Scott wrote: You need to manually fetch the f13 package from koji and install it using 'rpm -Uvh

Re: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free

I'm getting this error when trying to update Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmpegdemux.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-3.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-flumpegdemux-0.10.15-8.fc13.x86_64 On Mon, 2010-02-01

Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?

I would refuse to allow two accounts. On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 09:05 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: According to yesterday's reply, the person really wants to create a second account. Whatever the full plan may be, so far it only creates confusion. -- Michael Schwendt Fedora release 12

Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners

I will take avant-window-navigator but I haven't got the time to go through all the bugs reported against it. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/avant-window-navigator? Is there any chance a bug zapper could help ? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ABRT unusable again

On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 13:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: And, IIRC, Jiri has already agreed and said this will be implemented, so why bring it up again? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net

Re: ABRT unusable again

On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 15:48 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: but then user might well enter description consisting of I dont care (or worse). -- vda That would ease my conscience when I closed the bug report :-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Call for F13 release slogan suggestions

* short (1-3 words) Have about The dog's bollocks http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Dog%27s%20Bollocks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: howto group push?

On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 08:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: The maintainers should coordinate, and one of them should bundle both packages into a single bodhi update. It's the only way to guarantee they get pushed at the same time. josh They would need commit rights for both packages. --

Re: Update question: some user data

Last time I looked at the admin logs for Fedoraforum i.e who's voted , there was at least 15 votes from Fedora project members. On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 18:12 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Adam, if you can't realise that the users most likely to haunt a support forum are the people most likely

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:34 AM, jack smith wrote: > And MPV is a GTK+ based application, That isn't true or are you actually referring to gnome-mpv (separate project)? [leigh@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa --requires mpv\* |grep gtk [leigh@localhost ~]$

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: Björn Esser (besser82)

Besser82 hasn't answered any of my emails for months. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List

My orphaned list

Today I cleared out the packages I no longer wish to maintain. I have set orphan as 'main admin' for all of them, xplayer*, xviewer and pix still have besser82(MIA) listed as admin. icon-naming-utils xplayer xplayer-plparser xviewer pix ___ devel

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

> On 7.9.2018 14:48, Leigh Scott wrote: > > They are not retired. They are now, I thought besser82 had done it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fe

Re: Packages that need new maintainers

mint-themes-gtk3 mint-y-theme are dead packages, they are now sub-packages of mint-themes. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

orphaned blueberry and bluez-tools

I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have orphaned them. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: orphaned blueberry and bluez-tools

> On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome. > > kevin Thanks, Clem intends to port blueberry in the near future. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: orphaned blueberry and bluez-tools

> Thanks, Clem intends to port blueberry in the near future. to python3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Call for testing of xserver 1.20 release candidates

> On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:03 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Much as I would like to, the change process does exist, and says it's > far too late for that for F28 gold. > > - ajax Can't new Xorg wait till F29?, isn't this change to big and prone to breakage to be pushed after F28 release?

Intention to orphan vulkan stack

I haven't got the time or energy to maintain these packages any more, any takers? glslang spirv-headers spirv-tools vulkan-headers vulkan-loader vulkan-tools vulkan-validation-layers ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Intention to orphan vulkan stack

Thanks, transfer of main-admin rights should be complete. > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:13 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Hi Leigh, > > Please give them all to me. > > Thanks, > Dave. > > > > glslang > > spirv-headers > > spirv-tools > > vulkan

Intention to orphan vulkan stack

I haven't got the time or energy to maintain these packages any more, any takers? glslang spirv-headers spirv-tools vulkan-headers vulkan-loader vulkan-tools vulkan-validation-layers ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

> out. How would we structure repositories? How would we make sure we're > not overworked? How would we balance this with getting people new stuff > fast as well? I'm already overworked supporting old releases for the current 13 months, most of my time is spent on fedora next.

Re: Intent to retire or orphan keybinder - python2 version

The rpath/libtool issue is fixed https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4ddd5fcd1f ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

I'm hoping the Fedora LTS idea will die as quickly as it started. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

+1 to anything to rid me of deltarpms, I currently have to disable this lame default. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Upgraded from F28 x96_64 XFCE Spin to F29 => rough audio

Try https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_PulseAudio_problems#Playback_problems.2C_crackling_or_skipping ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Miller > > "Canonical Extends Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Linux Support to 10 Years" > > https://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/canonical-extends-ubuntu-18.04-lt... > > I just don't see how we're going to be able to compete with that, not > unless our Fedora

Why is bugzilla spamming me?

I'm currently getting up to 9 emails per new issue, each attachment generates a separate email! This needs fixing now/yesterday, if it continues I will pipe all bugzilla mail to spam. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Why is bugzilla spamming me?

> On 12/14/18 8:50 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: > So, if this was abrt email related, you could file an issue or PR at > https://github.com/abrt/abrt/ and add the affected package(s) to the > abrt blacklist... > > kevin So your cool with me adding all my packages to the abrt blacklist?

Re: What does delaying F31 mean for packagers/users?

Damn!, I thought this was a done deal and booked my six month holiday :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

> On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 > > Is there a definitive reason why those are necessary to go in RPM fusion? Was > Tom Hughes right? > > Dusty This sums up the situation ht

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

> On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 The packages should be in the repo by the weekend. https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=581 https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?pack

Re: svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL

Try adding this to %prep rm -rf .svn ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

Reviewers welcome. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5089 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Automating package maintainers responsivity check

> Maybe a tool that checks a packager activity in the last 6 months and if > What do you think? Better make it a year as people are entitled to a break! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

> > You should adapt cinnamon away from lzma. > I will retire lzma, you need to take it or deal with that. Cinnamon never required lzma, it was it's 'Requires: openbox' that generated the deps issue. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

@mhroncok Can you rerun the broken deps generator again as kio-extras is fixed, the list will be a lot shorter :-) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1177618 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected > packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package > or > retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your > package will be retired when the affected package

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

I added a comment to the bug review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153#c16 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, it demonstrates that your rpm packaging skills are lacking . Did you even take the time to read the Fedora packaging guidelines? Currently I wouldn't consider sponsoring you and I doubt anyone else will till it improves.

Re: koji download-build fails with [ERROR] koji: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied

Works fine here with $ rpm -q koji koji-1.16.1-2.fc29.noarch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Package bear got mixed with bear-factory, erlang-bear and bear-devel

> Hi list, > > I have discovered a very weird problem with the package bear on > apps.fedoraproject.org: it got somehow mixed with the (completely > unrelated) packages erlang-bear, bear-devel and bear-factory. > My actual question: what is going on? How do I get out of this mess? > > > Thanks

Re: f30 buildroot

I have added an override at rpmfusion so you can build mythtv. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Re: Ditch RPM in favor of DPKG

> Greetings packagers, > > I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaks > everything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should > have from day one. > > I'm calling this initiative fedpkg: Fedora Embraces DPKG. > > A bit of background here: I build both RPMs

Re: Reminder: Beta freeze and code complete deadline in one week

Can someone wake me once beta is released, the time between branching and beta isn't enough to do anything! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4

> Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30. > So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29? I don't care enough to apply the Debian fix, perhaps the maintainer does. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675363#c4

Re: Self Introduction: Dragos Iorga

Welcome. Feel free to CC me to your first package review, maybe I can assist. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: compilation of mellowplayer fails on Fedora 30 with gcc-9.0.1 - error: redundant move in return statement [-Werror=redundant-move]

> Thanks for your reply. > > I will pass this information on to the developer of mellowplayer because I > can not make > these changes myself. Maybe suppress the error warnings for now https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/0UcXKIQa-Nsqha~eV1scKA/raw

Re: build failure using boost-python3 on ppc64le

I have fixed the issue https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libpst/c/b1874bd9f8ba64d3801e1097c031cd75f964dcce?branch=master and also cleaned up the spec file https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libpst/c/34fa7877c3c30b291712914b9834c79154a020cd?branch=master

Re: I found 2 problems on remove python2-foo packages

The python2-foo removed packages be added to the fedora-obsoletes package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: F30 FTBFS Packages - Help Please?

Your fix for libtommath was incomplete. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1277908 It was also having issues with parallel build for docs. I haven't got time to do the other packages. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

I will take exaile. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8459 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Duplicate speedtest-cli packages in the repo.

speedtest-cli and python3-speedtest-cli appear to be the same package. Downloading Packages: python3-speedtest-cli-1.0.2-7.fc30.noarch.rpm 364 kB/s | 44 kB 00:00 Total

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

There is no f31 repo yet https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/ so perhaps mirror-manager is redirecting f31 to rawhide. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

> There is no f31 repo yet > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/ so > perhaps mirror-manager is redirecting f31 to rawhide. It is mirror manager doing the redirection to rawhide. https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever=$basearch

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

> On 8/19/19 3:31 PM, David Jeremias Vásquez Sicay wrote: > Please stand by. Is the beta freeze going to be delayed because of this? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

RE: getting below error in fedpkg clone

> Hi Jacob, > Iam the packager of the given package(fctxpd). > > And in pkgs.fedoraproject.org I don't find an option to add ssh key as we > have in pagure.io . You have to add the ssh key to your FAS account. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

> We need to drop 32-bit packages, except needed to run Steam and Wine32. Why should I bother helping to keep steam alive?, perhaps the gamers should allocate some of their gaming time to keeping i686 alive. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

> On 9/9/19 12:47 PM, vvs vvs wrote: > > > Having read the thread, you seem to miss the point that's been > repeatedly made: the packages occasionally fail to build, and someone > has to fix them.  That act, fixing packages when they don't build is the > "support" that someone has to provide.

Re: Offering do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune sponsoring

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 > > so long > MUFTI I

Re: Does anybody care about gettext?

Maybe package the newer version 0.20.1 http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: x86-64 micro-architecture update

> == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > Fedora installations on systems with CPUs which are not able to > execute AVX2 instructions will not be able to upgrade. > Time for me to switch to LinuxMint as I'm not going to be forced into hardware updates I can't afford.

Re: Audio packages depending on python2

Shouldn't you be using system waf instead of the ancient bundled version?, try the waf-python3 package instead. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307

> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 8:33 PM Ty Young Fedora and other distributions have been working on rootless Xorg > since 2013. We've had it in place since at least 2015. This change was > made way back in Fedora 24. > Do you mean 'Support non-root X'? if so some DM's still don't support it.

Re: RPM Fusion Bugzilla Bug 5307

> I'll just cut to the chase. > Rawhide with Nvidia drivers because of debug kernel. There is a lack of > software compared to other Linux distros like Ubuntu or Arch(no > Vivaldi!?!?). Fedora developers tend to be hostile towards proprietary > software. etc. I guess debugging symbols are an

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

rpmfusion dropped support for gstreamer when it was retired, Banshee is not going to be a nice experience for users if there are no codecs to play stuff. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

> On 11/10/19 7:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > > Everyone answering so far has missed the important point. He explicitly > disabled that repo, but using the "--source" option re-enabled it. I > would suggest that you file a bug report for that. I noticed that but only care about the rpmfusion

Re: Review request: selenium-geckodriver

I wouldn't review this as it isn't correct to use prebuilt code, you will need to build from source. Source0: https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver/releases/download/v0.26.0/geckodriver-v0.26.0-linux64.tar.gz ___ devel mailing list --

Re: recent mesa + libglvnd rawhide updates broke ... something?

See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/870 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: recent mesa + libglvnd rawhide updates broke ... something?

So a few package need to adapt, they should have listed all the required #includes in their source files already IMO > So you mean to say that this has to be "fixed" in each individual > package, from fedora f32 forward? ___ devel mailing list --

Re: dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

Why report it here? I think rpmfusion mirrormanager is missing the source repos. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

> For linked-list, > And you see the temp_dir rubygem dep is used for only > spec/archive_spec.rb context "::load" and "#write!". > > ``` > $ grep -r temp_dir spec/ > ``` > > spec/archive_spec.rb > > ``` Thanks that fixes the %check > context "::load" do > ... > end > > context

Koji issue, rubygem-linked-list isn't listed on koji

Can someone from releng please fix this issue please? https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/20219 koji isn't aware BuildError: package rubygem-linked-list not in list for tag f32-updates-candidate https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39430986

Re: Koji issue, rubygem-linked-list isn't listed on koji

Ticket also filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9081 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Help with rubygem packaging

Hi, Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please? I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes. https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-linked-list.spec Best regards Leigh

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm. Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Thank you for the examples and hints > 2. Adding %check section, as Jaroslav said. > Note that we do not use "bundler" ("bundle" command) and > "rake" > command in RPM *.spec file. > I have removed bundler and rake from linked-list, the test doesn't seem to run anything + pushd

Re: Next F31 push?

> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 07:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I mean, in the end it would be self-defeating, because the high chance > that it would introduce more problems would just mean we'd need to > freeze again for longer. > So you get a working ISO for release then break it by releasing

Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora

> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:01:31PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > Yes; Leigh, let's please refrain from name calling. I often disagree with > John, but I don't think he's acting in bad faith here (or in Fedora in > general). Did I manage to earn another misconduct badge for that? ;-)

Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora

> On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:59:18 PM MST Leigh Scott wrote: > > I am not a troll, and I definitely am listening. I read the third party > software guidelines very carefully, on both the FESCo page, and the > Workstation Group's page. Sorry for mislabeling you :-) Fedor

Re: Recommending proprietary software in Fedora

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr > > As previously mentioned in this thread, we already approved Steam for > F28. > > > This was also previously addressed earlier in this thread, where I > quoted the relevant portion of the policy in full. Please consider > previous

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:45:03AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > mokutil.c:1977:16: error: comparison of integer expressions of different > signedness: > 'unsigned int' and 'int' [-Werror=sign-compare] > 1977 | if (salt_size > setting

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:38:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > We're in final freeze now. Any progress? > > Zbyszek I poked mokutil with a couple of upstream fixes, now it fails only on i686. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38515227

List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

On 29/10/2019 15:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: leigh123linux   xed     (BuildRequires: python2-gobject-base → PY2) Check your script as it returned a bogus result, xed has BuildRequires:    python3-gobject-base ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned camlp4 dependencies (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

I have taken sassc but will welcome anyone else willing to help co-maintain this train wreck. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Bodhi issue with buildroot overrides

I used bodhi cli to expire and reactivate, at least something still works unlike the new interface :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Bodhi issue with buildroot overrides

It seems none of my overrides are in the buildroot despite bodhi showing them as active. The new interface doesn't work properly, I can't expire them and reactivate. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Blender for Fedora 31 does not support multimedia?

Rpmfusion can't ship blender due to our non-replacement policy, fedora should consider dropping their crippled package. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: gstreamer-plugins-base revival

> Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries > for use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora Old gstreamer is used by a couple of ancient apps in fedora (banshee) and isn't installed by default so I fail to see how you class it as

Re: Temporarily using `best=False' for EPEL-8 builds in Copr

Shame on Redhat for using an untested feature https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671683 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: libdav1d SONAME bump

> Hello, > > Dav1d 0.5.0 was published today and brings a SONAME bump from libdav1d.so. > 2.0.0 to libdav1d.so.3.0.0. > I will be updating it next week on F31/32, consumers of these libraries > (ffmpeg, xine-lib, vlc) will need to rebuild their packages. > > Best regards, > > Robert-André I'm

Re: calibre and hedgewars missed in qt5 5.12.5 update

> On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Except sadly, it doesn't build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022 > > ... > * Running build > * > Fatal Python error: PyQt5.QtCore: Unable to embed qt.conf > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vEjk0u: line 31:

Re: calibre and hedgewars missed in qt5 5.12.5 update

Seems the f30 build wasn't tagged https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1390409 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: calibre and hedgewars missed in qt5 5.12.5 update

> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:38:57AM -0000, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Thanks! I tagged it into f30-updates-candidate and submitted a bodhi update: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a4aa28b798. > Please give it karma so it can go to stable quickly. > > Z

Re: Orphaned hstr

I will take it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 11/02/2020 22:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. I am trying to figure out who maintains dbus-python in Fedora. The main admin is Ray Strode but I haven't seen any activity from Ray on that package (git log and %changelog). The default Bugzilla assignee in Fedora is "Alternative GTK desktop

Re: error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:

Try https://askbot.fedoraproject.org/en/question/71293/how-do-i-overcome-these-dnf-and-rpm-errors/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

  1   2   3   >