2.6.40 ecryptfs oops (Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks)))

2011-08-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 12 lipca 2011 22:45 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: I tested it, but it still corrupts data. On Thursday I'll do more tests. Sorry for the nearly month delay :) Today I tried to copy a file over samba to my encrypted dir and operation still fails. When I tried

Re: 2.6.40 ecryptfs oops (Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks)))

2011-08-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 sierpnia 2011 14:41 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: W dniu 12 lipca 2011 22:45 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: I tested it, but it still corrupts data. On Thursday I'll do more tests. Sorry for the nearly month delay :) Today I tried

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

2011-08-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer? It's maintained - serious bugs are fixed. F15 is SEVEN versions behind! sometimes it seems nobody cares about GA-Releases to

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

2011-08-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/8/20 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net: Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer? F15 is SEVEN

Re: gimp

2011-08-23 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/8/23 Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com:  Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x - 2.8 into F16 ? Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that the whole 2.7.x series should be considered unstable. Alright, would then the 2.8.x series be in F16? I'm afraid that it is not the

Re: Will we finally get firefox 6.0.1???

2011-09-01 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/9/1 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com: Can someone finally rebuild firefox 6.0.1 for fedora? The browser is a critical part of everyone's system today and I really don't understand why such software isn't updated when needed to. I'm sure it will be updated soon - it was released

Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/9/6 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/06/2011 02:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) said: the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean

howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm getting an error DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee ## DEBUG util.py:250: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/01-drop-privileges.patch;4e664eb5: cpio:

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/6 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz: Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 19:02 +0200: Hi, I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm getting an error DEBUG util.py:250:  cherokee ## DEBUG util.py:250:  error

Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br: 2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm getting an error DEBUG util.py:250:  cherokee ## DEBUG util.py:250

Re: Transmission and Deluge sysv to systemd

2011-09-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/9/7 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com: Hi These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and need to be converted to systemd.  I have been meaning to convert but could use some help.  If someone can take a look a look and file a patch,  I will be happy to role

Re: Transmission and Deluge sysv to systemd

2011-09-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/07/2011 01:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and need to be converted to systemd.  I have been meaning to convert but could use some help.  If someone can take a look a

Re: Transmission and Deluge sysv to systemd

2011-09-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most appropriate solution. Here is a service file for transmission https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/systemd-services/blob/master

Re: Transmission and Deluge sysv to systemd

2011-09-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 7 września 2011 16:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: 2011/9/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most appropriate solution. Here is a service

Re: cherokee-1.2.x for EL5 [WAS]: Re: howto build for EL5 on F15 in mock?

2011-09-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/9/7 Pavel Lisy pavel.l...@gmail.com: Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 20:27 +0200: 2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br: 2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm getting

Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011-09-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/7/2 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011. If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16.  I would put the

Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011-09-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/11 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,   Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to upgrade PostgreSQL for this release. The beta freeze starts

Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011-09-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/11 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/9/11 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Yeah.  I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much ready to go on my end.  I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on Monday if there

what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi 2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: (This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0 for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd files.) I used this service file on F15 and it starts slower 4214ms postgresql.service if we compare with an old SysVinit

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: (This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0 for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd files.) I used this service

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Certainly postgresql.init was never exactly lean-and-mean, so it seems like it ought to have been doing more work than the unit file requires.  Are you sure

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 20:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Certainly postgresql.init was never exactly lean-and-mean, so it seems like it ought to have

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: On 09/14/2011 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is systemd boot actually any faster?  There seems to be no noticable difference in boot times for me over whatever we were using in F14.  ie. both methods still takes ages, far longer than

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Ok, I made four series of tests: - start/stop an old init script - start/stop an old init script with dropping caches - should simulate system booting - start/stop service file - start/stop service file with dropping caches

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: Ok, I made four series of tests: - start/stop an old init script - start/stop an old init script with dropping caches - should simulate system booting - start/stop service file - start/stop

Re: what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

2011-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/9/14 Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com: 2011/9/14 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com Exactly. F15, PostgreSQL 9.0 and just service file from PostgreSQL 9.1. Root filesystem and database are on SSD and Ext4. Okay... brace yourself. I just ran this test on my non-SSD ext4 based F15

F15 - F16 upgrade

2011-09-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Just to let you know - I had to downgrade bind-libs-lite after the update, because my network was broken. There is a problem with loading lib that is required by dhclient. I also have an old kernel uname -a Linux ozzy.pl 2.6.40.4-5.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 30 14:38:32 UTC 2011 x86_64

Re: F15 - F16 upgrade

2011-09-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
After the update I had also enabled iptables -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011-09-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 11 września 2011 22:47 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: 2011/9/11 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/9/11 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: Yeah.  I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty

F16 /usr/sbin/smbd: undefined symbol: wbcSidsToUnixIds

2011-09-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I did a samba test update on my F16 from 3.5 to 3.6 and I get this error [2011/09/27 18:14:31, 0] smbd/server.c:1045(main) smbd version 3.6.0-72.fc16 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2011 /usr/sbin/smbd: symbol lookup error: /usr/sbin/smbd: undefined symbol:

Re: Samba on rawhide

2011-10-16 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/10/16 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk: Hi, For some unknown reason, all of my Samba share drives are no longer visible. I've done the updates from rawhide and am running the 3.1.0-0.rc8.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 kernel. I've not altered anything on the firewall or with

how to block grub2 update?

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone knows some other effective way to block this update? -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to block grub2 update?

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/24 Heiko Adams fedora-upda...@heiko-adams.de: Am 24.10.2011 18:56, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone knows some other effective way to block

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/10/24 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-10-24) ===   * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove     (t8m, 17:26:45) Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using /bin

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/24 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz: 2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Hi, 2011/10/24 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net:   * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove     (t8m, 17:26:45) Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using /bin /sbin /lib

Re: how to block grub2 update?

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/24 James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org: On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone knows some other effective way to block

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/24 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said: In any case #!/usr/bin/env sh seems to be more portable solution. Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise short shell scripts). Yeah, this solution has its

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-24 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/24 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: 2011/10/24 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Using env has always been a hack (and overhead, especially on otherwise short shell scripts). Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 25 października 2011 08:32 użytkownik Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com napisał: Dne 24.10.2011 22:27, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): Yeah, this solution has its drawbacks, but it also has undoubted advantages. I am probably dumb, but could you tell me some *undoubted* advantage of using

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com: Dne 24.10.2011 22:48, Michał Piotrowski napsal(a): For example - you can switch to different version of language interpreter with different configuration without modification of the script and without the hassle for server admin. So, because you

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com napisał: On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: In any case #!/usr/bin/env sh seems to be more portable solution. please :) you can propose this as a separate feature for F18 :) Let's see, if it gets

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com napisał: On 10/24/2011 10:12 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: In any case #!/usr/bin/env sh seems to be more portable solution

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said: I created feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18MorePortableInterpreters I strongly object to this feature.  /bin/sh is a Unix standard back to IIRC around 7th Edition

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said: I created feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said: 2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said: I created feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features

Re: UsrMove feature

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Frank Ch. Eigler f...@redhat.com: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes: [...] What is wrong with #!/usr/bin/env interpreter from technical POV? It's more wordy. Yes. It makes it impossible to pass an interpreter argument. This actually may be a

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/10/25 Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net: Once upon a time

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/10/25 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2011 03:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 20:39 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2011/10/25 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200

F16 my network doesn't work after an update and I don't know how to fix it...

2011-10-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on this box doesn't work anymore. I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update NetworkManager and NetworkManager-glib was updated from

Re: F16 my network doesn't work after an update and I don't know how to fix it...

2011-10-26 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 26 października 2011 18:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com napisał: Hi, Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on this box doesn't work anymore. Sorry for the noise

why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql, mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord was installed because of dependencies. But I would like to know why I need this package? My system worked

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com: 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Hi, Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? My system is ordinary web developer box with php, python, postgresql, mysql, memcached, cherokee, httpd etc. Colord

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-07 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? Try yum remove colord and see what it wants to remove (and probably say no if it's anything important to you), then you'll know what drags

Re: why do I need colord?

2011-11-08 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/11/8 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system? Checkout http://www.freedesktop.org/software/colord/ for details about the project. I know what colord is intended for and I think

F16 possible glibc 2.14.90-19 problems

2011-11-29 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I've got 15 daemons writen in python that run php tasks. When I start all daemons I see a lot of segfaults in logs. [137969.485410] php[23201]: segfault at 50018 ip 005910d9 sp 7fff4160bd90 error 4 in php[40+2ca000] [138037.623654] php[23469]: segfault at bc072fa35 ip

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

2010-08-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/8/11 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org: Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1].  Please refer to the following pages for download links and testing instructions. I downloaded http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso - it

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

2010-08-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/8/11 Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: Michał Piotrowski on 08/11/2010 09:28 AM wrote: I downloadedhttp://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20100810.15.iso - it is too

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 Available Now!

2010-08-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 11 sierpnia 2010 17:37 użytkownik Brandon Lozza bran...@pwnage.ca napisał: Political discussion is EXTREMELY off topic and will cause flame wars. Environmental talk is politics, especially the stuff you're bringing up with video links. Sorry, I did not know that the music here evokes

Re: Kernel 2.6.34 for F13?

2010-08-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/8/20 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de: On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote: Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable? My question is because there were also some  2.6.30 builds for F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things in combination with VMware /

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-01 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/2 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com: [..] Well, the version of Mozilla Firefox in Fedora 14 should support WebM, so try this: http://www.youtube.com/html5 Unfortunately does not work here http://i54.tinypic.com/11ayg6d.png Any ideas why Adobe Flash does not work on F14? Once

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/2 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com: It could be an SELinux problem.  Look for AVC messages. No AVC's releated to flash-plugin. I disabled SELinux and it still doesn't work - so it's not a security issue ;) Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/2 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com: On 2010-09-01, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any possibility to use Youtube in Fedora 14? First I tried to install Adobe Flash 10.1. I tried to copy flashlib to various dirs /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins, /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-02 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 2 września 2010 18:00 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to napisał: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:26:28 +0200,  Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/9/2 Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com: It could be an SELinux problem.  Look for AVC messages. No AVC's releated to flash

Re: Koji crashes Google Chromium [was Rawhide Koji borked??]

2010-09-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/5 Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu: On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:28:47PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Randall Berry wrote, at 09/05/2010 05:06 PM +9:00: 1) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2447749 2) https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2447750name=root.log

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/2 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 17:47 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: I istalled all the good, the bad and the ugly plugins from rpmfusion repo and it's not workie :) Ok, nevermind, I give up. Flash support on this system is nice to have not must have

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/5 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org: Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4 at gmail.com writes: Thanks! It almost woks now (nspluginwrapper.i686 was missing I had only x86_64 version) - video works well, but I don't hear any audio. I can play music through Amarok and I can control sound

Re: F14 youtube support?

2010-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/6 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org: Check the page again, I made several edits to the instructions to simplify them. In particular, I broke the yum install into two separate commands, which avoids the libstdc++ dependency problem that previously lead to the need to use

Re: Meeting summary/minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-09-14)

2010-09-14 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: Should gnome-shell (..) becoming the default I hope that there will be the option to disable this default and return to classical gnome desktop. Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with 2.6.35.4-12.fc14.x86_64

2010-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/15 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com: On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:44:47 +0200 Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: Does anyone know something about this issue? [...] === [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]

Re: Problem with 2.6.35.4-12.fc14.x86_64

2010-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/15 Morten P.D. Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com: -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject:

Re: Problem with 2.6.35.4-12.fc14.x86_64

2010-09-15 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/15 Dave Jones da...@redhat.com: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:   One problem fixed, introduced another     ===   [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage

Re: FYI: rawhide now requires systemd to boot by default

2010-09-17 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, What are the current plans for SystemD in F14? Systemd is still listed as F14 feature. Will it be developed in F14 or in external repo as Rahul Sundaram suggested? Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FYI: rawhide now requires systemd to boot by default

2010-09-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 18 września 2010 19:10 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to napisał: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 23:56:54 +0200,  Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What are the current plans for SystemD in F14? Systemd is still listed as F14 feature. Will it be developed in F14

Re: FYI: rawhide now requires systemd to boot by default

2010-09-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/18 Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net: Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: upstart = 0.6.5-8.fc14 is needed by (installed) upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-8.fc14.x86_64 The same problem here. Here is a workaround sudo rpm -e --nodeps

Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/20 Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com: On 09/20/2010 01:37 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:56:56 +0200 Michał Piotrowski wrote: You can blacklist the firewall modules - it can be critical :) Actually, I think you can run any arbitrary command to load a module, Or pass any

Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 20 września 2010 15:02 użytkownik drago01 drag...@gmail.com napisał: Well depends on the cirumstances. I fully agree. As the file is supposed to be obsolete anyway ... we should just make modprobe ignore it ;) This is not a solution to the problem. Now the file will be ignored, but

PostgreSQL 9 for F14?

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, PostgreSQL 9 was released http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235 Are there any chances to get this for F14? The new version supports basic replication scenarios, so I would not have to use PgPool :) Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/20 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk: 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: PostgreSQL 9 was released http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235 Are there any chances to get this for F14? The new version supports basic replication scenarios, so I would not have to use

Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 20 września 2010 20:03 użytkownik drago01 drag...@gmail.com napisał: Why? The file is obsolete for a while now, apps that rely on it if any should crash and burn and use the proper interface (/etc/modprobe.d) I can't think of a reason why someone will change this again. In the same way

Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 20 września 2010 20:47 użytkownik drago01 drag...@gmail.com napisał: 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: W dniu 20 września 2010 20:03 użytkownik drago01 drag...@gmail.com napisał: Why? The file is obsolete for a while now, apps that rely on it if any should crash and burn

Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/20 Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:53:41 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2010/9/20 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk: 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: PostgreSQL 9 was released http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235

Re: Grrr... modprobe.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/20 Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org: Right. I get what you're trying to say. Yes, indeed, whatever is creating the legacy file should stop doing that. Are we sure it's not anaconda doing it during installation? I don't have this file my rawhide system - it was installed from F14

Fedora backports repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com: As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as users) grows, this interdependence will grow. Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora backports repo for these that wants new and shiny Firefox 4, PostgreSQL 9 or whatever

Re: Fedora backports repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/21 Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com: 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: Setting up official backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation. Another repository/branch inside Fedora infrastructure does not automatically avoid the any of the potential problems that you would

Re: Fedora backports repo?

2010-09-20 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/21 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora backports repo for these that wants new and shiny Firefox 4, PostgreSQL 9 or whatever with big number. I'm not a huge fan of huge updates in stable Firefox3-Firefox4, Kde4.5

Re: Fedora backports repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/21 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:49 +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Sounds like the only way to package Firefox under such a backport scheme would be to bundle Gecko etc. Yup. In MDV, Firefox isn't/wasn't allowed under the backports guidelines. I

Re: Fedora backports repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

2010-09-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/22 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: Maybe we should turn this around and ask why more people don't use Rawhide. Maybe because when I installed rawhide I lost my desktop icons? :) IMHO rawhide isn't the right answer for most users who wants just one new app. Rich. Regards, Michal

Re: x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform

2010-09-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/27 Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com: On 09/27/2010 06:53 PM, seth vidal wrote: i686 will run on x86_64 and i686 machines and on the overwhelming majority of hw someone will happen to have. x86_64 will not. until i686 is uncommon (which is still not yet) I think we should keep

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/10/6 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and Fedora 15.  Items built with this could have undefined

e4defrag support?

2010-10-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I'm curious why e4defrag isn't enabled in e2fsprogs. Are there any problems with this tool? Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: e4defrag support?

2010-10-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I'm curious why e4defrag isn't enabled in e2fsprogs. Are there any problems with this tool? It's had really limited testing, and the kernel interface has had some problems in the past (though I guess that's irrelevant

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

2010-10-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/6 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/5/10 3:43 PM, Micha? Piotrowski wrote: Is there somewhere a list of packages potentially broken on F14? http://fpaste.org/7dvk/ is a list of broken F14 builds.  The syntax is: Thanks. I hope

Re: e4defrag support?

2010-10-05 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I'm curious why e4defrag isn't enabled in e2fsprogs. Are there any problems with this tool? It's had really

Re: e4defrag support?

2010-10-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 października 2010 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: ... cool!  I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just build your own e2fsprogs

e4defrag repetable segfault (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-10 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/6 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: Frank Murphy wrote: On 06/10/10 16:31, Eric Sandeen wrote: Maybe I'm being a bit too paranoid but it is your data after all :) I just use Rawhide for testing, so a little reinstall keeps you in practice :D OK gang, it's in

Re: e4defrag repetable segfault (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-10 Thread Michał Piotrowski
e4defrag[23597]: segfault at 20 ip 0040232c sp 7fff5bb0cd20 error 4 in e4defrag[40+5000] This is caused by the race between rm and e4defrag repeatable with attached canto_della_terra2.sh /mnt/tmp/test/ /mnt/tmp/reply.sh 50 Regards, Michal canto_della_terra2.sh Description:

Re: e4defrag repetable segfault (Re: e4defrag support?)

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/11 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com: Michał Piotrowski wrote: e4defrag[23597]: segfault at 20 ip 0040232c sp 7fff5bb0cd20 error 4 in e4defrag[40+5000] This is caused by the race between rm and e4defrag repeatable with attached canto_della_terra2.sh /mnt/tmp/test

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/11 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com: I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM), and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed.  It's starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky. Some of the things it does which are IMHO better:  -

Re: e4defrag support?

2010-10-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 6 października 2010 15:42 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 6 października 2010 05:01 użytkownik Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com napisał: ... cool!  I suppose I could turn it on in rawhide, or you could just build your own e2fsprogs

Re: experimental systemd + initscripts repo

2010-10-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2010/10/21 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:  http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/notting/initscripts-systemd/ This repo includes updated initscripts and associated packages that test the conversion of various boot-time actions to systemd services.

  1   2   3   4   5   >