Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-28 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/27/2011 04:05 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: I think the right approach here is to prep a patch for the spec and make the dir official given that a) it probably makes sense to have a standardized dir like this,

Re: Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH

2011-07-28 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/27/2011 10:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.07.2011 21:59, schrieb Marc-André Lureau: I don't understand the security risks. If something is allowed to write to ~/.local/bin (or ~/bin etc..), then surely it's able to read elsewhere or do something else nasty. Could someone detail it?

Re: Fwd: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [old_testing_critpath] mdadm-3.1.3-0.git20100804.3.fc14

2011-08-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 08/10/2011 03:02 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age? I'm getting the same mail for some time now for my critpath security update. I'm just wondering how long

Re: UsrMove feature (was Re: FESCo meeting minutes for 2011-10-24)

2011-10-25 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 10/25/2011 09:30 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: On 10/25/2011 09:15 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: It's not only an aesthetic issue. This enables possibilities, which were not doable before. ... - mount rootfs encrypted - mount /usr not encrypted (no secrets here) this is already possible, I use this

Re: UsrMove feature

2011-10-27 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 10/27/2011 10:34 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: On 10/26/2011 06:21 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:18:42PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: On 10/26/2011 03:07 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.comsaid: Having said that, the split

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-23 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Monday, August 23, 2010 08:19:13 Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'm not sure a notification applet by itself is going to be the best answer here... as people may be busy or not see the notice and a few seconds later it goes away and they miss it. That's why the notification

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 21:11:56 Kevin Kofler wrote: Michal Hlavinka wrote: disagree, have you seen your notifications after leaving your computer alone for several hours with IM client connected (with whatever status)? You'll get tons of User XY has changed status to: blah blah

Re: Fedora Notifications System.

2010-08-25 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 11:13:29 Kevin Kofler wrote: Michal Hlavinka wrote: Well, IMHO Kopete shouldn't spam notifications for this type of non- exceptional event at all. Is this enabled by default? If so, maybe we should disable it by default in kde-settings? afaik it's enabled

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday 26 of August 2010 21:21:53 Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: We probably need to attack this trend more aggressively, like putting expiration dates into the installer after which it'll just refuse to install, stuffing fedora-release-n+1 into the Fedora n updates

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Friday 27 of August 2010 07:03:06 Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 8/26/2010 11:53 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: On Thursday 26 of August 2010 21:21:53 Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: We probably need to attack this trend more aggressively, like putting expiration dates

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-31 Thread Michal Hlavinka
... So in other words, dependency 1.6 to 1.6.1 is okay as it is likely a bug fix, but 1.6 to 1.8 is not okay because it is a new release. there's no reason why 1.8 won't be ok after 2-3 weeks in updates-testing So, web developers want latest httpd/PHP/Rails/MySQL; GNOME developers want

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-31 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 16:14:39 Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote: So in other words, dependency 1.6 to 1.6.1 is okay as it is likely a bug fix, but 1.6 to 1.8 is not okay because it is a new release. there's no reason why 1.8

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-31 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 17:36:39 Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:31:43PM +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote: So in other words, dependency 1.6 to 1.6.1 is okay as it is likely a bug fix, but 1.6 to 1.8 is not okay because it is a new release. there's no reason

Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)

2010-08-31 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 17:39:11 Jesse Keating wrote: On 8/31/10 6:57 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: there's no reason why 1.8 won't be ok after 2-3 weeks in updates-testing An update that changes behavior for the end user would never be acceptable as an update to a stable release. Only

Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux blocks all nondefault ports for ssh I have ssh confugured to use different port than 22 for security reasons and I think there is a lot of people doing

Re: Selinux: SSH broken after F-13 -- F-14 upgrade

2010-10-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
- Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2010 01:49 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi all, I've recently upgraded my system, but after that I was not able to connect through ssh. More things are wrong (from my POV): 1)SELinux

Re: rawhide report: 20101019 changes

2010-10-19 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 15:56:54 Matthew Garrett wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:43:33PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: This despite the FHS says (right at the top of Chapter 3, the Root Filesystem): /usr, /opt, and /var are designed such that they may be located on other

What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

2010-11-08 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to %check section of ksh spec file. These tests never fails when executed in user's environment, but some of them always fail when executed as part

Re: What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

2010-11-09 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Monday, November 08, 2010 16:26:22 Rex Dieter wrote: Michal Hlavinka wrote: I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm build and usual user's environment. You mean the difference between rpmbuild and... a manual ./configure; make? something like

Re: What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

2010-11-09 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Monday, November 08, 2010 19:34:14 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:49:28PM +0100, Michal Hlavinka wrote: I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to %check section

Re: What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

2010-11-09 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi, I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm build and usual user's environment. I've added regression tests to %check section of ksh spec file. These tests never fails when executed in user's

Re: What are differences between real and rpmbuild's environment?

2010-11-09 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:30:17 Panu Matilainen wrote: On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Michal Hlavinka wrote: On Monday, November 08, 2010 15:49:28 Michal Hlavinka wrote: Hi, I'm trying to find out what are differences between environment for local rpm build and usual user's environment

Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?

2010-01-27 Thread Michal Hlavinka
not break anything, only problem can be with separate /usr partition but because of library in /usr it would be already broken and I've not seen any complain about it ever. If there are no complains, I'll move it next week (in rawhide only). Cheers, Michal Hlavinka -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?

2010-01-27 Thread Michal Hlavinka
to participate in this discussion a bit, if that's ok :-) Regards, Maxim Burgerhout ma...@wzzrd.com GPG Fingerprint EB11 5E56 E648 9D99 E8EF 05FB C513 6FD4 1302 B48A On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 14:17, Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, in Fedora we

Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?

2010-02-01 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Friday 29 January 2010 06:35:21 Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/28/2010 04:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de said: On 01/27/2010 02:17 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Do you think moving this is a bad idea? Yes. The pciutils are valuable

Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-15 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, So you're running an X server? Well, my lad or lass, sit down and let me tell you about the neverending story of X server input configuration changes that has hopefully ended now. I'm just pushing the latest X server goodness into rawhide and enabling udev, completing (from the X

Re: F13 -EGPUDRIVERNOWORKIE

2010-03-10 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 17:14:41 Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I tried to install this new Goddard thing on my laptop and it seems to be b0rken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572243 Any chance to get graphical installer with vesa driver? Regards, Michal afaik you have

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-31 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:50:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: which will make fixing bugs in current even more important. Not at all. Either the bug is important to fix in the current

Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

2010-11-22 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 23:35:43 Kevin Fenzi wrote: ok, I dug through the devel list for the last month or two and wrote down all the various ideas folks have come up with to change/improve things. Here (in no particular order) are the ideas and some notes from me on how we could

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Adding my whishlist 1) /etc/abrt/conf.d/ directory - like httpd ones. So I can drop there configuration for my packages. For example when dovecot crashes, I'd like to see doveconf -n output 2) better notification for crashes. I have one application that crashes when I'm ending desktop

Re: [HEADS-UP] util-linux[-ng] and mtab

2011-01-20 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 18:35:52 Karel Zak wrote: I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux. koji did not hadle this change well, because it was not required to specify util-linux-ng as buildrequire, but util-linux

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

2011-03-28 Thread Michal Hlavinka
(soname bump in libmysqlclient) * Wed Mar 23 2011 Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com - 1:2.0.11-2 - rebuild because of updated dependencies Time between first and second rebuild is 5 hours. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-14 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, I have similar question (sorry for stealing this thread). I have package that has 3 services (they somehow depend on each other). Based on configuration in /etc/sysconfig/.. file it starts 2 or 3 services. This is handled by init script, but I don't know how to do it in systemd service

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-14 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote: On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: d) split it to more service files and make dependency there this would be incompatible change in configuration and hard to do, Hard maybe, but solvable. Incompatibility happens from

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-14 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 15:48:09 Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 14.04.11 14:51, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote: On Thursday, April 14, 2011 13:26:02 Michal Schmidt wrote: On 04/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: d) split it to more service files and make

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-14 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 14:46:01 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 04/14/2011 12:51 PM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Can you elaborate on this? a) ups driver - runs when you have ups attached to that host b) upsd - runs when you have ups attached to that host c) upsmon (master/slave mode

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-14 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 19:54:36 Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 14.04.11 16:15, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: On 04/14/2011 03:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: In man systemd.unit BindTo= Configures requirement dependencies,

Re: Systemd unit file implementation questions (ypbind)

2011-04-18 Thread Michal Hlavinka
now, if you shut down A with systemctl stop A, this will also stop B, and it will do so in the inverse starting order. i.e. stop B first, stop A second. BindTo= would do exactly the same here. The difference now comes if for some reason A dies independently of anybody running

systemd questions

2011-05-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, I'm working with nut upstream to test sysv-systemd changes, but I found some problems and they've came up with a few questions too. 1) does systemd support alternative to service sthd configtest or other special actions? 2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It

Re: systemd questions

2011-05-16 Thread Michal Hlavinka
2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It seem it's not supported right now. Is there any plan for this? I am not entirely sure what you understand by condition, for example condition based on string/variable in file, so: a) EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/something;

Re: systemd questions

2011-05-17 Thread Michal Hlavinka
5) in old initscripts, there was /etc/init.d/halt with section for ups shutdown. With that script gone, was that functionality ported to systemd somehow? Well, any such code is just inherently broken. It *cannot* work. A number of kernel subsystems hook into the shutdown code of the

Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks

2011-06-20 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/17/2011 04:02 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 6/17/11 6:28 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:45:01 +0200, MP wrote: W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:43 użytkownik Eric Sandeen napisał: On 6/16/11 2:37 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting

Re: The behaviour of systemctl.

2011-06-20 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/17/2011 10:16 PM, Aaron Sowry wrote: Hello, I'd like to discuss the behaviour of systemctl. See RH bug 713567 for context. To summarise: - 'systemctl --all' pages by default when the output is to tty. This consumes 50-60+ lines of potentially bug-prone code, and irks the crap out of

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2011-06-16 x86_64

2011-06-24 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday 22 of June 2011 19:17:45 Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2011-06-16 Good hunting! Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ ... Total packages: 10614 Number failed to build: 603 Number

Re: Heads-up: net-snmp soname bump in rawhide

2011-07-08 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday 07 of July 2011 15:23:19 Jan Safranek wrote: net-snmp-5.7 is heading to rawhide, please rebuild your packages if you depend on it. $ repoquery --whatrequires net-snmp-libs net-snmp net-snmp-devel net-snmp-perl net-snmp-python --alldeps -s | sort | uniq ... apcupsd done ... and

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks))

2011-07-11 Thread Michal Hlavinka
) or is it an eCryptfs problem? W dniu 8 lipca 2011 20:08 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com napisał: Hi, please check if this package changes anything for you: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mhlavink/task_3187528/ unfortunately there is no difference I'm

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks))

2011-07-11 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com napisał: ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to reproduce

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks))

2011-07-11 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/11/2011 06:05 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:57 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.com napisał: On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka mhlav...@redhat.comnapisał: ok, complain

Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error on different disks))

2011-07-12 Thread Michal Hlavinka
ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to reproduce original problem nor valgrind complaint, so please test if following package produces memcpy complain in valgrind output or not:

Re: Systemd transition prevents updating older release branches??

2011-07-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 07/25/2011 09:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote: In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd I read that conversion of a package using a SysV initscript to systemd units requires a trigger with a NEVR condition, and that # Note: the NEVR in trigger scripts should all be

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)

2012-06-18 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/17/2012 06:06 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 17 June 2012 10:53, Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote: So this is a problem that needs to be solved, but does it require a reboot? Not really ... it's possible to list all processes using zlib, convert that back into a list of packages,

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)

2012-06-18 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/18/2012 01:09 AM, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Benny Amorsenbenny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com writes: It takes me 4 seconds to POST, boot the kernel, get into system-update.service, and then reboot. Using a new rpm version, applying

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)

2012-06-18 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/18/2012 01:22 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 18 June 2012 12:03, Benny Amorsenbenny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Why testing the daemons? Any daemon which cannot be restarted by systemctl restart foo.daemon is broken already. Try booting a few VMs and then doing systemctl restart

(re)starting of a daemon after package update

2012-06-19 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, I'm trying to find out what is the best place to restart service after update. Dovecot have runs several binaries, has some plugins,... in short, it does not like when it's running during update. I was asked by upstream to modify rpm package to stop it before update and start it

Re: (re)starting of a daemon after package update

2012-06-21 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/20/2012 02:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson: Michal Hlavinka wrote: Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new version starts and start dovecot (if flag is set) after old version is removed - that would mean %postun script

Re: (re)starting of a daemon after package update

2012-06-22 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/21/2012 11:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 21.06.2012 22:52, schrieb Michal Hlavinka: On 06/20/2012 02:37 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 20.06.2012 14:32, schrieb Björn Persson: Michal Hlavinka wrote: Correct approach would be to save state before installation of new version starts

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2012-06-18)

2012-06-22 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 06/22/2012 01:16 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: Hi. On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:28:14 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: And instead of making the system adapt to system problems (inhibit reboot during updates) we're making the user adapt to system problems (add forced reboots were they were none

Re: Bad coding practices in Fedora packages

2012-01-04 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 01/03/2012 05:21 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 11:15 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote: On 01/03/2012 09:16 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: # cat /proc/meminfo/tmp/1; killall tracker-store; sleep 1; cat /proc/meminfo/tmp/2; cat /tmp/1 /tmp/2 | grep MemFree MemFree: 1940372 kB

Re: does /etc/sysctl.d/ really obeyed and does really override /etc/sysctl.conf

2012-03-16 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 03/16/2012 02:28 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 16.03.12 14:54, Muayyad AlSadi (als...@gmail.com) wrote: but this does not make sense the idea behind all .d is to allow packages to provide default (either kernel defaults or distro defaults) because the other choice is to use %post

Re: Thunderbird bz 579023 still not fixed even though there is an upstream fix available

2010-04-23 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Friday 23 of April 2010 09:03:37 Martin Stransky wrote: Hi, we're patching mozilla packages only for really critical issues because of mozilla trademarks. We can't put any patch we want to the mozilla package and ship it as 'Firefox' or 'Thunderbird'. just curious: is it possible to ship

Re: Fedora 13 continuing the tradition of being an update monster

2010-05-11 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are: yeah, over 750 MB where 584 MB belongs to wesnoth and openarena. So without these two games it's

Re: F13: nouveau driver seems to swap video streams on NVIDIA NVS-290.

2010-06-10 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Thursday, June 10, 2010 00:31:20 Charles Butterfield wrote: I suspect the nouveau driver is swapping or mislabeling the two video streams that the NVS-290 card generates. Here are my clues: Setup - Fedora-13 and nouveau driver (latest yum updates as of midnight) - NVIDIA NVS-290 video

Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile

2010-07-07 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Tuesday, July 06, 2010 01:05:57 Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Hi all, I'm initiating a fast track procedure for libsndfile -- a security bug has been reported for over a year, and there has been no response from maintainer I've

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-09 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday 07 of July 2010 22:29:01 Tom spot Callaway wrote: Okay. Here's the list of packages that I think might be affected by this. Reminder: You need to check these packages and fix any which need fixing, then email me and let me know which ones you checked/fixed. Thanks! ~spot

Re: Question regarding dist-git aesthetics with branches

2010-07-21 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:19:54 Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 10:55 +0200, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: On 07/20/2010 08:55 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Using names like f13, el5, and so forth would also

Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-26 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Saturday, July 24, 2010 08:54:53 Jesse Keating wrote: Hey all! It's that time again, we're gearing up to branch for Fedora 14 this coming Tuesday! There is a major twist this time around, we're going to attempt a roll out of dist-git! What we will find in git? Only rawhide? F-14? All not

Re: The move to git!

2010-07-30 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On Friday 30 of July 2010 05:55:09 Jesse Keating wrote: ... Wiki pages will get filled out as knowledge of how to interact with dist-git starts to spread ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Fedora_GIT is a good start ). Thanks for your hard work! Could you describe this in more details:

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-13 Thread Michal Hlavinka
On 02/12/2013 06:46 PM, Honza Horak wrote: Hi folks, I'd like to share an idea related to MySQL-MariaDB move, that may be a bit controversial. Speaking about default case in Fedora, MySQL has used only one file at /etc/my.cnf to configure server, libraries, command-line utilities, etc. MariaDB

Orphaning apcupsd

2016-06-22 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Hi, my APC UPS died and as I won't be buying new APC UPS, I can no longer test and investigate bugs. So apcupsd is free for taking if anyone wants it. Cheers, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org