[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 End Of Life

after the release of Fedora 25. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0] https

Fedora 22 End Of Life

after the release of Fedora 25. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0] https

Fedora 25 Alpha Freeze

. Finally, today is the 'completion deadline' Change Checkpoint[8], meaning that Fedora 25 Changes must now be 'feature complete or close enough to completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested'. Regards Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule [2] https

Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild Update

to be done before branching Fedora 26 from rawhide[1] that is on 2017-02-28. You can contact releng if you have any issues in #fedora-releng on freenode, by dropping an email to our list[2] or filing an issue in pagure[3] Regards, Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule [2

Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild

if you see any bugs in the reporting. You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode, by dropping an email to our list[2] or filing an issue in pagure[3] Regards, Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/rel

Fedora 26 Mass Branching

in the Fedora 26 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora_25_Alpha_1.1_Download

Hi Philip, Please find the candidate composes for testing at http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 Beta Freeze

, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is finished. The level of code completeness is reflected as tracker bug state ON_QA. The change does not have to be fully tested by this deadline'. Regards Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule [2] https

Announcing the release of Fedora 25 Beta

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora 25 Beta, the next big step on our journey to the exciting Fedora 25 release in November. Fedora's journey is not simply about updating one operating system with the latest and greatest packages. It's also about

Fedora 23 End Of Life

one month after the release of Fedora 26. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https

Announcing the release of Fedora 26 Alpha

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the Fedora 26 Alpha, an important milestone on the road to our Fedora 26 release in June. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: - Get Fedora 26 Alpha Workstation - Get Fedora 26 Alpha Server Or, check out

[Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Alpha Freeze

. Finally, today is the 'completion deadline' Change Checkpoint[8], meaning that Fedora 26 Changes must now be 'feature complete or close enough to completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested'. Regards Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule [2] https

Cleaning packages with broken deps

Hi, We have a ticket on how to clean up packages with broken deps: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6877 We had a discussion about this issue in our releng meeting on Jul 10th 2017. The problem is that there is no good way of solving this issue, but we came up two options: 1. Blocking the pkgs

Fedora 24 End Of Life

month after the release of Fedora 27. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [1]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [2] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https

Fedora 26 Beta Freeze

, meaning all the code required to enable to the new change is finished. The level of code completeness is reflected as tracker bug state ON_QA. The change does not have to be fully tested by this deadline'. Regards Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule [2] https

Fedora 26 Final Freeze

/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/26/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu

Announcing the release of Fedora 26 Beta

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Fedora 26 Beta, the next big step on our journey to the exciting Fedora 26 release in July. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: * Get Fedora 26 Beta Workstation https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Final Freeze

/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/27/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 27 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 27 Beta. A short list of changes: The Workstation edition of Fedora 27 Beta features GNOME 3.26. LibreOffice is updated to LibreOffice 5.4. Fedora Atomic 27 now defaults to a more simple container

Fedora 27 Bodhi Activation Point

that Fedora 27 Changes must now be ‘feature complete or close enough to completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested’. Regards Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/27/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https

Re: Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle - request for review

I dont want to reduce the time between branching and bodhi enablement. The gap is for any short comings from branching, but if you guys think it is absolutely necessary then I am okay with reducing it to a week. Also, I want to point out that traditionally Alpha freeze and Bodhi enablement

[Test-Announce] Fedora 25 End Of Life

. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: Fedora 28 Final status is GO

Wow, that is some serious digging, and good to know that we are on time :) Hope we continue it for future releases. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:03 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 20:41 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > The Fedora_28_RC_1.1 compose [1] is

Re: Fedora Media Writer for macOS, is not signed?

We know about the issue and hoping to fix it soon. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:50 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Chris Murphy píše v Pá 11. 05. 2018 v 16:42 -0600: > > Hi, > > > > The Fedora Media Writer for macOS at getfedora.org is not signed. I > > filed this bug a couple

Fedora 26 End Of Life

schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Fedora 28 Mass Branching

in the Fedora 28 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 29 Mass Branching

nabled in couple of weeks time when we hit Beta change freeze point in the Fedora 29 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscrib

Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 29. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html. Thanks Mohan Boddu. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:19 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 3:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 6.7.2018 15:29, Mohan Boddu wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be st

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 29 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > Fedora 29 very shortly. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 29 for all > the changes listed in > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7480 > > we will start the

Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html Things still needing rebuilt https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f29-need-rebuild.html Regards Mohan Boddu ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Rebuild

. Thanks, Fedora Release Engineering. On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:55 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > We are delaying the mass rebuild as people are still working on > binutils 2.31 change (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS231). > > At this point, we want to re-eval

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

> Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate > packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place > for the Fedora 29 timeframe. > > As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could > use Bodhi

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, April 17th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Bodhi Activation Point

Hi all, Today’s an important day on the Fedora 28 schedule[1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 28 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they will be

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > With today's Beta release, the release announcement post for Fedora > Magazine was not ready. As a result, the announcement went out a > little late and then only due to a drop-everything effort (thanks, > stickster!). We have a proposal to add

Re: 3 days vs 7 days

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22.9.2018 22:47, Jerry James wrote: > > Koji seems to be requiring 7 days in -testing for F29. Shouldn't it > > be requiring 3 days at this point? > > > I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7741 ~3 weeks ago, but I've > got no

Bodhi update pushes are now automated

on #fedora-releng on Freenode. Thanks, Mohan Boddu. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code

Re: Fedora's OpenH264 repo issue

I am working with Cisco on fixing this. We got an email from Cisco that the rpms are available on their CDN. So, we pushed the repodata on our end. But it seems they are still not available on their CDN. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 6:03 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7590

Giving same acls to new modular repos as that of their respective rpms repos

m repo. I want to get some thoughts on it before adding this feature. Thanks, Mohan Boddu. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedor

Re: fedora-packager purpose and future

Hi, There was some communication gap and I didn't pay much attention to that package. I am very much interested in maintaining the package going forward. Sorry for the confusion that I have caused. Please create the PR's if anything is needed, and I will take care of it. I will also go ahead

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Final Freeze

Hi all, Today, October 09th 2018, is an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Beta Release Announcement

or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering. ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou

Re: Giving same acls to new modular repos as that of their respective rpms repos

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 9:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 11. 18 15:15, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We got a suggestion about giving same acls of rpm when creating new > > module dist-git which matches the rpm. > > > > The plan is to give &

Fedora 27 End Of Life

of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

+1 to the change proposal. Someone still need to submit updates in bodhi and rel-eng would be happy to own that task and it is much simpler than what we have today. On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

+1 to the reducing compose time, although there are many other things that we have to do to make it even faster. There are many good points that people are bringing up here, but I hope it wont have any bottlenecks as that of xz compression. Also since its a very young technology we should spend

Re: prevent accidentally creating branches in dist-git

This is good to know. I should enable it on some of the packages that I maintain. On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:25 AM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > I've certainly made the mistake of accidentally creating branches > in dist-git and now being stuck with them because we can't delete > them. Now that

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

I am still updating the EOL's in pdc, but some of them should be updated. I will send another email once all of them are updated. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:10 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:30:32AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > The policy on the wiki[1] says "one month",

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

Okay, all of the eol entries for f27 in pdc should be updated now. Please create a ticket at https://pagure.io/releng if you find any issues. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:03 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > I am still updating the EOL's in pdc, but some of them should be updated. > > I

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

The 27 EOL should be tomorrow. The n release gets EOL'ed 4 weeks after n+2 release. But I am not sure why fedpkg is rejecting the push. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:06 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 9:48 AM John Florian > wrote: > > > > At the very least, I don't recall seeing

Re: Is Fedora 27 EOL?

I am working on fixing it. It should be fixed soon, I will send an update once its fixed. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ben Cotton: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:20 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > >> > >> The 27 EOL should be tomorrow

Re: Proposal: Move to an annual platform release starting at F30

I totally agree with Paul and Kevin. I want to see a faster release cycle (probably rolling release) and shorter processes to get a release out. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I agree with the folks in this subthread, but I think we are going to > have to look at

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:05 PM Matthew Miller < >

Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:42 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 11:30 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 11/26/18 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:53 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 18:44 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >

Fedora 30 Beta Release Announcement

/ Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering

Re: Stepping back from FESCo

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:00 PM Till Maas wrote: > Hi friends, > > Brian[0] made me think about my commitments and I realized that it is > time to step back from my FESCo seat. > > Thank you for your confidence in electing me last year! > > Kind regards > Till > > [0]

Fedora 30 Mass Branching

in the Fedora 30 schedule[1]. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Branching Starting Today

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:26 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hello All, > > Fedora 30 will be branched from rawhide today as per the Fedora 30 > schedule[1]. The process takes about a day and everything should be ready > by tomorrow. You can still be able to build packages

Fedora 30 Mass Branching Starting Today

Hello All, Fedora 30 will be branched from rawhide today as per the Fedora 30 schedule[1]. The process takes about a day and everything should be ready by tomorrow. You can still be able to build packages normally until then, but after the mass branching rawhide and F31 will be separated. We

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 30. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

Hi all, Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we are supposed to start the mass rebuild on Jan 30th 2019, but due to known bug with gcc it got pushed by a day and will start on Jan 31st 2019[2]. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 for all the changes listed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8086

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

Hi all, Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild will start in few minutes. We are preparing for the final steps and will run mass rebuild once everything is in place. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:02 AM Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we are supposed to start the mas

Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly. Please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on freenode, by dropping an email to our list[2] or filing an issue in pagure[3] Regards, Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora 30 Final Freeze

/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/30/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu Release

Fedora 28 End Of Life

schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Regards, Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle

Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

I retagged them, that should fix this. On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 6:35 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Two more are stuck again. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3b8418 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-399f5bd105 > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:08 PM Kevin

Re: ceph packages submitted to testing four days ago still haven't been pushed

They got stuck while getting signed, I retagged them and that should fix this. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:47 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > ceph-12.2.12 for f28 and f29. > > Happens every time. > > Someone please give them a kick. > > Thanks. > > -- > > Kaleb > >

Fedora Module Mass Rebuild

as part of mass rebuild and sorry for the delay. Regards, Mohan Boddu. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Fedora 31 Mass Branching Starting Today

Hello All, Fedora 31 will be branched from rawhide today as per the Fedora 31 schedule[1]. The process takes about a day and everything should be ready by tomorrow. You can still be able to build packages normally until then, but after the mass branching rawhide and F31 will be separated. We

Re: Fedora 31 Mass Branching Starting Today

in the Fedora 31 schedule[1]. Two things to remember: 1. The modules are still building for the new platform:f32. 2. Since the signing of rpms is not done yet for the new f32 builds, you might expect failed composes for the next couple of days. Thanks for understanding. Mohan Boddu. [1] https

Modules in rawhide (that shouldn't be there)

rawhide and will not be branched. Thanks, Mohan Boddu. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 31. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5

Fedora 31 Beta Release Announcement

encountered during testing, contact the Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode. Regards, Mohan Boddu Fedora Release Engineering. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Retiring FTBFS packages from Fedora 30

Hello all, As per the FTBFS policy [1], we started the retirement of the packages that have been FTBFS since F30 mass rebuild. Please follow the unretirement process [2] if you are planning to re-add the package to Fedora. [1]

Fedora 31 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html Things still needing rebuilt https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f31-need-rebuild.html [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule Regards, Mohan Boddu ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou

Re: Add a rule to have a compose when Fedora branched

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 17. 09. 19 17:00, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > >> If that is not doable what about taking last Rawhide compose and mark > >> that as first compose of newly branched Fedora? The only thing I'm >

Re: [Mindshare] Re: [Ambassadors] Re: FOSDEM

Since there are lot of people who are showing interest, may be someone should submit the request for a booth (probably who has done it before) before the deadline. We can figure out who can be the booth coordinator and stuff later on. On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:47 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd

Re: Do F31 updates not obsolete each other during freeze?

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:34 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hey, I've just noticed something that I find a bit odd: > > This python38 update is on it's way to f31 stable: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c26f535d3c > > This newer python38 update was submitted yesterday: > >

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 EOL

. The maintenance schedule of Fedora releases is documented on the Fedora Project wiki [0]. The Fedora Project wiki also contains instructions [1] on how to upgrade from a previous release of Fedora to a version receiving updates. Mohan Boddu. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora 31 Final Freeze

/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/31/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu Release

Re: Can not build new package: not in list for tag f33-updates-candidate

This should be fixed now, can you give it a try? On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:54 AM Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am trying to build sourcextractor++, which was accepted yesterday, and > every time I try I get the following error: > > BuildError: package sourcextractor++

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Beta Freeze

should not now be changed for Fedora 32. Mohan Boddu [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: New Release Freeze Times

We didn't pick the time at random, 14:00 UTC is the time when Fedora release gets out. We thought if we are changing the time, we should align it with the only other time constrained task, that is, Fedora release. 00:00 UTC is definitely confusing for some people as they complained about it, but

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

Dan and Artur, The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild. If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild later. CC'ing Ben. Thanks. On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki wrote: > > Here's a koji

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

gt; > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > > > > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebui

Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

-failures.html Things still needing rebuilt https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-need-rebuild.html Regards Mohan Boddu ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le

Re: Mass rebuild reminders

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020, 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 01. 20 3:32, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Just a few reminders for folks: > > > > * If your package failed to build in the mass rebuild > > ( https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f32-failures.html ) > > and you want to fix it,

New Release Freeze Times

updated to reflect the changed time. [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html Thanks, Mohan Boddu. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le

Fedora 32 Mass Branching

branching rawhide and F32 will be separated. We will send another email once the branching is done. Thanks, Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Branching

immediately. Thanks for understanding. Mohan Boddu. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/31/Schedule On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 02. 20 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:05 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: &g

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

I guess it should be a fixed in bodhi. But for now you can remove the builds that it's complaining about in the update. https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3991 On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 2:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5

Re: Replace buildroot overrides with user side tags?

This is a great idea, but I wouldn't recommend removing buildroot overrides totally for one more reason than the others that are already mentioned here. Side tags are resource intensive compared to buildroot override as each side tag needs its own buildroot. On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 5:02 PM Richard

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:57 AM Rex Dieter wrote: > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > > > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday > > morning which has been in pending for 2 days. (As it's Rawhide

Re: Rawhide update from side tag pending for 2 days

On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d120de33c5 > > > > This one is a Rawhide update from a side tag, submitted on Sunday > > morning which has been in

Re: koji wait-repo (newRepo) is really taking a long time

Things should be getting better now https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2119#comment-640757 On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 5:13 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 12:42:29AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 03. 04. 20 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > >I've been waiting on: > >

Re: Fedora 32 Final Freeze

g/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process > [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/31/final/buglist Correcting the url: [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/32/final/buglist > > Regards, > Mohan Boddu > Release Engineering _

  1   2   3   >