Re: filesystems and year 2038

2022-04-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:47 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > Hi, creating a thread on this from: > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1650 > > Basically I'd propose that not just our default images have y2038-compatible > filesystem setups, we ensure that if e.g. XFS is explicitly

Re: Fedora 36 NoIfcfgFiles change

2022-04-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 4:28 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > Part of the aforementioned change is a migration tool and a documentation for > said tool. Now that the beta is officially released, I tried to find both. > Unfortunately unsuccessfully. > > Please, could someone help me with a pointer where

Re: Looking for provenpackager to update rapid-photo-downloader package

2022-04-01 Thread Neal Gompa
ed a bug report last year but the maintainer has been unable to work > > on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031866 > > Meanwhile, two months ago Neal Gompa made this pull request to update it: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapid-photo-downloader/pull-req

RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

2022-03-31 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, Earlier this week, the Fedora Workstation WG discussed a ticket brought to us asking for a GUI-based rescue/recovery environment[1]. While we all agreed in principle that such a thing would be a very good thing to have, we don't really know how to achieve such a thing. Additionally,

Re: Dropping wine from ARM

2022-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:44 AM NightStrike wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, 08:34 Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Fedora currently ships Wine 7.3 released February 25th, 2022. >> >> Wine 7.4, released March 11th, started to require a 'llvm-mingw' compiler >> for ARM64 >>

Re: Dropping wine from ARM

2022-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:37 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 3/30/22 8:26 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > The main llvm package should be capable of this already, as it's a > > retargetable compiler. The clang package provides a clang program > > that's capable of this

Re: Is mingw-llvm useful? (was Re: Dropping wine from ARM)

2022-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:35 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 30.03.22 15:31, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 30.03.22 15:26, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth > >> wrote: > >>> On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro

Re: Dropping wine from ARM

2022-03-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 3/30/22 7:38 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > > > What does llvm-mingw mean exactly? FWIW, there is a mingw-llvm package. > > > > Thanks > > Sandro > > > It is a complete, cross-compiling, Windows PE building toolchain[1][2] that

Re: F37 Change: Support FIDO Device Onboarding (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:38 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed? > > > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing post ... > > > > > > > > Yes, that was an oversight, for reference: > > > >

Re: F37 Change: Support FIDO Device Onboarding (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:29 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:25 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > Can we get a link to the actual software stack being proposed? > > > The link in this proposal is a marketing

Announcement: livesys-scripts v0.1.0

2022-03-28 Thread Neal Gompa
Hello all, Over the past few months, I've been working on building new image build descriptions for the CentOS Hyperscale SIG and Fedora Cloud WG so we can migrate away from Oz/ImageFactory[0]. One detour that I took as part of doing this is an attempt to simplify the creation of live media. The

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > You don't have to. You can point

[EPEL-devel] Re: Modules for EPEL9

2022-03-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > It was talked about December 2021, and pushed off to the new year. > > https://pagure.io/epel/issue/135 > > It's the new year, and you are the first this year to ask for it.

Re: Collecting ideas for “Feature Spotlight” articles

2022-03-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've started working on something that we talked about a while ago: A > "Feature spotlight" for new features in Fedora that are not getting > visibility because they're too small for the "Change" process, or > because they are

Re: Splitting alternative Python packages into subpackages, e.g. python3.11{,libs,devel,...}

2022-03-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 03. 22 17:12, Tomáš Orsava wrote: > > Hi Python-devel, > > we are considering splitting the alternative Python versions from a > > single-package format (e.g. python3.11) to multiple subpackages (e.g. > >

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

2022-03-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:54 AM David Cantrell wrote: > > Hi, > > Our most recent FESCo meeting involved discussing the proposal to drop i686 > builds of jdk8,11,17 from Fedora 37 onward. The topic quickly changed to the > larger question of "what do people use i686 packages for?" > > Rather

Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

2022-03-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:10:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > >> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end. > > > > > > And

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-03-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 7:50 AM Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 10:01:10 AM CET Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 12:00:06 -0500 > > Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CurlMinimal_as_Default > > > > > > == Summary == > > >

Re: Problem with cmake 3.23.0

2022-03-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:33 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > If you mean the Fedora 33 change page, it only describes the change > > from Fedora 33+ perspective. It does not take compatibility with EPEL > > buildroots into

Re: QEMU-kvm installation a dependency hell?

2022-03-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 4:45 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > I just checked installation of qemu-kvm & libvirt & virt-install on a Fedora > Server Edition, that is a headless server. It installed 338 packages / 158 > mb including poppler, mesa, wayland, libX11, gtk3, cairo and a lot of > additional

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 7:09 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 10/03/2022 11:51, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > >> Everyone has their own conflicting idea of what is 'minimal'. There's > >> no nice w

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-03-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:26:54PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 10/03/2022 11:55, Alex wrote: > > > May I suggest to leave at least the telnet protocol in curl-minimal for > > > debugging purposes. > > > > Telnet is an

Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:45:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:25 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > So, I'll go ahead and be a bad guy here: > > > > > > Perhaps it's time to just retire i686 completely? > > > > > >

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

2022-03-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:34 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 3/8/22 15:23, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 20:51 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>> On Tue, Mar 08, 20

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

2022-03-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:11 PM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 20:51 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > > the only realistic way to weed out its reliance on SHA-1 signatures > > > from all of its

Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:46 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:25 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, I'll go ahead and be a bad guy here: > > > > Perhaps it's time to just retire i686 completely? > > > > Steam is available as a flatpak > > Do we know how the flatpak is built

Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 3:05 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Fabio Valentini writes: > > > For example, as far as I know, you need the 32-bit host libraries for > > running 32-bit Windows applications in Wine. Dropping that would make > > our Wine packages almost useless, since a large fraction of

Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-03-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 07. 03. 22 19:30, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 7:22 PM Chris Adams wrote: > >> > >> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said: > >>> == Summary == > >>> > >>> Package maintainers are encouraged to actively stop building

HEADS UP: ABI-breaking rebuild for ffmpeg in F36+ incoming (drop non-upstream patch)

2022-03-07 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, I'm going to do an ABI-breaking update of FFmpeg in F36+ to drop a non-upstream patch that was intended to make it work with Chromium. However, the patch never made it upstream and other FFmpeg builds don't have it anymore, so now we have an ABI incompatibility that needs to be fixed. I

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 9:22 AM nick black wrote: > > Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader: > > Reduced configuration to offer what we can ship. But it does have > > H.264 support through OpenH264 and AAC support through fdk-aac-free. > > outstanding; it ought sup

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 5:21 PM nick black wrote: > > Andreas Schneider left as an exercise for the reader: > > Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora. > > oh hey great! i'm currently using OpenImageIO in Notcurses on > Fedora because ffmpeg wasn't available,

Re: Is missing python3-docs in EL9 a problem?

2022-03-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 1:35 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I've been poking at some packages that BR python3-docs, like > python-zope-event. This apparently comes from a sphinx inventory: > > # Use local objects.inv for intersphinx > sed -i "s|\('https://docs\.python\.org/': >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing RHEL 9 buildroot packages in EPEL 9 buildroot

2022-03-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the > > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem. > > This gets odder. I see

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-8 Packages needing care and feeding

2022-03-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 10:36 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > OK with some help from Miro on the python team, I was able to use the scripts > they use regularly to list what dependency problems they have with soon to be > orphaned packages. I have included the entire report as an attachment

Re: Chromium security bugs remain unfixed for > 1 month

2022-03-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:19 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:08:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Those features provide tangible benefits to the community at large > > that we would lose by "sloppy packaging". Instead of kvetch

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing RHEL 9 buildroot packages in EPEL 9 buildroot

2022-03-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > To keep this a bit more specific, we're trying to build coccinelle for > EPEL 9. This requires ocaml [compiler] and a bunch of ocaml packages. > They are mainly in RHEL buildroot. > > The problem we're going to have (which to be fair

Re: Chromium security bugs remain unfixed for > 1 month

2022-03-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:44 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 3/2/22 04:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 02/03/2022 01:21, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> What are the differences between the RPMFusion SRPM and the > >> Fedora SRPM? > > > > RPM Fusion version includes all available

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2022-03-01)

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-03-01) === Meeting started by Eighth_Doctor at 18:03:35 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-03-01/fesco.2022-03-01-18.03.log.html . Meeting

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-03-01)

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-03-01 18:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:44 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Christoph Erhardt: > > > Hi Florian, > > > >> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in > >> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them > >> together completely from scratch, without

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing RHEL 9 buildroot packages in EPEL 9 buildroot

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:20 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 04:21:56AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

[EPEL-devel] Re: Missing RHEL 9 buildroot packages in EPEL 9 buildroot

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:07 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058274 > > fails to build with: > > DEBUG util.py:444: No matching package to install: 'ocaml-dune >= 1.0' > > This package is in RHEL 9 buildroot (ocaml-dune-2.8.5-5.el9.x86_64). > >

Re: Blender failed to build with ffmpeg enabled

2022-03-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > On 2022-02-28 22:23, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/03/01 15:11: > > Hello team, > > Blender failed to build with enabled FFMPEG support using ffmpeg-free-devel > at the following line: > > ''' > >

Re: Questions about new free-only FFMPEG in Fedora repos

2022-02-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:39 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 28/02/2022 13:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Fortunately, that's where we can bring value to the ecosystem, as > > we're supposed to be capable enough to work with upstreams to fix > > broken cod

Re: Questions about new free-only FFMPEG in Fedora repos

2022-02-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:11 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 28/02/2022 03:45, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > How are these removed codecs handled in the library? > > ffmpeg is a monolithic library. > ffmpeg is a set of libraries. The libavcodec library is a monolithic library of

Re: Questions about new free-only FFMPEG in Fedora repos

2022-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:05 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:00 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > We do also have OpenH264 support enabled via dlopening the library, so > > if the openh264 package is present on the system, it'll "just work"

Re: Questions about new free-only FFMPEG in Fedora repos

2022-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:46 PM Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > I noticed in the electron thread that we now have FFMPEG 5.0 in the official > Fedora repos, but this will of course mean that certain codecs are removed > due to legal concerns. This prompts a few questions though: > > 1) How

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:04 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 27/02/2022 19:03, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > Unless H.266 (VVC) takes off, and we get to > > start the cycle all over again until 2040 or > > so (rough estimate on patent expiration). > > H.266 is not popular. Most video

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > Hello! > > Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on > Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora > Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-02-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > On Thursday, February 24, 2022 1:35:38 PM CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Did you discuss modularising curl itself upstream? > > > > It was added to their wish list

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-22) is CANCELLED

2022-02-22 Thread Neal Gompa
-resolved not being used as expected) as a FESCo blocker https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2760 APPROVED (+6, 0, -0) Modularity guidelines change: All packages in default stream should be part of module API https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2761 APPROVED (+4, 0, -0) -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa

[EPEL-devel] Re: Does EPEL 9 maintain upgrade path from EPEL 8?

2022-02-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 3:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a Fedora package that I've recently also branched for EPEL 9. > > The (so called) binary package used to be called "python3-tox", but has been > renamed to "tox" in Fedora 34. All supported Fedora versions and EPEL 9 have >

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

2022-02-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:59 AM Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel wrote: > > Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. > > php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by > upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. >

Re: F37 Change: Make pkexec and pkla-compat optional (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:38 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 16.02.22 12:12, Ben Cotton (bcot...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > `pkexec` and `pkla-compat` > > ([https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/polkit-pkla-compat package]) are > > legacy tools that are no longer needed on a desktop and

Re: More declarative RPMs

2022-02-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:54 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 16. 02. 22 v 9:43 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): > > doesn't say anything about scriptlets being discouraged: > > because we are far from using a word "discouraged". But yes, filetriggers and > other similar methods should be

Re: New package review

2022-02-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:49 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Hi, > > I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708 reviewed please. > > This is a pre-req dependency needed for new features in the next major > release of Ceph, i.e. Quincy. Grabbed it and left initial feedback. --

Re: Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-15) is CANCELLED

2022-02-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:12 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:56 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > We have no new business to discuss, so this meeting is CANCELLED. > > What about the bug I suggested FESCo consider as a rele

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-15) is CANCELLED

2022-02-15 Thread Neal Gompa
) Change proposal: Podman 4.0 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2749 APPROVED (+4, 0, -0) -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: ZFS

2022-02-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:57 PM Germano Massullo wrote: > > After having dealt for the n-th time with libvirt dependencies messing > up [1] with zfs packages installed from ZFS On Linux repository, I > wondered if we could just include them in Fedora repository. > They are not in the Fedora

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

2022-02-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I used to be motivated to write such a bot, but after the rpmautospec > > thing, I'm not going to bother. I wanted rpmautospec to handle &g

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

2022-02-13 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:47 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 09:43:38AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13 2022 at 02:26:46 PM +0100, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > Considering most of the dependent packages failed to rebuild in this > > > case,

Moving everything to ImageBuilder in F37? (was Re: [fedora-arm] Re: Fedora on Pinephone Pro & path to upstreaming)

2022-02-12 Thread Neal Gompa
Bringing this subthread to devel@ since apparently this has a wide impact... On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > This is great new for Fedora because I think it means we can use the normal > > Fedora tools for building ARM images to create UEFI bootable images without >

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2022-02-11 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:15 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2022-02-11 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > > > The meeting

Re: libcurl-minimal

2022-02-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 6:56 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 2/10/22 18:49, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 2/10/22 13:39, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 18:58 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:33:59AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: >

Re: libcurl-minimal

2022-02-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022, 3:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:51 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > That's a good idea. I'll file a late Change page for F36. > > We're deep enough into the cycle that sending a proposal through the > process, even superficially, seems

Re: libcurl-minimal

2022-02-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:59 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:33:59AM +0200, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > For example dracut, dnf, and rpm seem to use FTP: > > > > > >

Re: F36 Change: Wayland by Default for SDDM (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM allan2016--- via devel wrote: > > På Wed, 9 Feb 2022 05:59:03 -0500 > Neal Gompa skrev: > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 5:24 AM Jonathan Wakely > > wrote: > > > Last time I tried, I couldn't use Synergy and Wayland together, so I > &g

Re: F36 Change: Wayland by Default for SDDM (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
Change the default display server mode for SDDM to use a Wayland-based > > greeter rather than an X11-based one. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa]], [[User:Rdieter|Rex Dieter]], > > [[User:Jgrulich|Jan Grulich]] > > * Email: ngomp..

Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-08) is CANCELLED

2022-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, We have no new business to discuss, so the announced meeting is CANCELLED. I'll chair next week if we have a meeting. -- Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-08)

2022-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 08. 02. 22 17:31, Neal Gompa wrote: > > = Followups = > > > > #2711 F37 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2711 > > > > #2721 F37 Change: DIGLIM > > https://p

Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-08)

2022-02-08 Thread Neal Gompa
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2022-02-08 18:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2022-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:12 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > gstreamer1 orphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks > > ago > > gstreamer1-plugins-baseorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks > > ago > > gstreamer1-plugins-goodorphan,

Re: F37 Change: RetireARMv7 (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:27 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:55 AM David Bold wrote: > > > > On 11/15/21 20:15, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireARMv7 > > > > > ... > > > == Scope == > > > > > > * Proposal owners: Work with rel-eng to

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:20 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Release build should be tested on Windows. It is easy to build and test > > natively with msys2 nowadays, or build for other targets. Why not use > > that? > > Because I do not have a computer running

Re: How to make fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild use crb?

2022-02-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:15 PM Roman Inflianskas wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. > > I get this this error: > mockbuild.exception.ConfigError: Could not find included config file: > /tmp/epel-9-x86_64.j_mo4dzgmockconfig/templates/centos-stream-9.tpl > > Copying this

Re: How to make fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild use crb?

2022-02-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 10:33 AM Roman Inflianskas via devel wrote: > > I'm trying to build python-executing for epel9 > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049855) using this command > (from Fedora 35): > fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild > > The build fails with these lines: >

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 5:54 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 10:47:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > I have honest doubts about projects doing releases for Windows without > > > ever running it. > > > > WINE can be helpful for

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

2022-02-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 9:07 AM Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 22:02 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On 03. 02. 22 16:36, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > > I've just tried to build python-gssapi with notes enabled after > > > krb5 was fixed > > > and it builds fine. > > > > > > See

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-02-04 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 8:21 AM Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> For the record: >> >> https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/#msvcrt-vs-ucrt states: >> > MSVCRT […] Works out of the box on every Microsoft Windows

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

2022-01-31 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 8:19 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > > Hello Mirek, > > This is the most constructive reply I've seen in this thread. > > On Monday, January 31, 2022 1:12:50 PM EST Miloslav Trmac wrote: > > > But doesn't satisfy our security requirements. If the kernel dbus project > > > had been

Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-29 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:32 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT > > > == Summary == > > This proposal is to add the UCRT target & support from Fedora to the > MinGW cross-toolchains. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:elmarco| Marc-André Lureau]] > *

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

2022-01-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 3:04 PM Robbie Harwood wrote: > > Adam Williamson writes: > > > ...and yet despite being so easy to review it somehow had a major > > security vulnerability ever since it was written. > > This is not a good metric. easy to review != was sufficiently reviewed, > and

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

2022-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 1:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:21:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > My best recollection is that pkexec was kinda a kludge to allow us to > > get rid of consolehelper: some apps weren't getting rewritten to the > > Right Way of doing

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

2022-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:57 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 27/01/2022 15:50, Neal Gompa wrote: > > pkcs11-helper doesn't exist in RHEL/CentOS itself, and it's probably > > being filtered out in ELN to mimic RHEL. It's shipped in EPEL, so you > > need an EPEL reposit

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

2022-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:45 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 27/01/2022 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:33 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figu

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

2022-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:33 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figure out properly. I'm > putting together a Fedora Copr repo which should cover most the various > distros supported via Copr- CentOS Stream, EPEL, Fedora and Fedora ELN. > > The

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 9: Interested in fails to install reports?

2022-01-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello EPEL, > > would you be interested in automated bugzilla reports for EPEL 9 packages that > fail to install in the buildroot? Or is it too soon? > > When testing upcoming changes in c9s we have found out some packages (e.g. >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bodhi failure for EPEL9 Build

2022-01-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 9:28 PM Frank Crawford wrote: > > Folks, > > Any idea what is going on here? I'm trying to push an update for a > package (s3cmd) to EPEL9. The original package worked fine a few weeks > ago, but this fix is being failed after a day or so sitting testing > state with the

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-01-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:47 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > It breaks ALL packages using gold to link, and the "fix" is to explicitly > > add a macro to generate gold-compatible output or to stop using gold. Also > > affects qt5-qtwebengine: > >

Re: F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:14 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 1/20/22 01:13, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 1/20/22 06:16, Chris Murphy wrote: > >>> Deleting /var/lib/net-snmp/snmpd.conf means making the agent look like a > >>> new system, with new IDs, a renumbered interface table, and loss of

Re: F36 Change: Wayland by Default for SDDM (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-20 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 2:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 18. 01. 22 v 15:28 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > > ** Upgrade {{package|sddm}} to the latest snapshot and introduce > > mutually exclusive sddm-wayland-generic and > > sddm-x11 greeter configuration packages. > > ** Modify

Re: F36 Change: Authselect: Move State Files to /etc (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:19 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Authselect_Move_State_Files_To_Etc > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > Authselect will move several files that are currently stored at > >

Re: F36 Change: Silverblue and Kinoite will have /var on its own Btrfs subvolume (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 6:05 AM Casey Jao via devel wrote: > > Doesn't rpm-ostree already provide transactional, image-based updates without > the use of filesystem snapshots? In addition, roofs snapshots are only really > useful if they are coordinated with bootloader management, which is

Re: Remmina orphaned and I would like to take it.

2022-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:39 PM Philip Wyett wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376 > > > > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions > > changed: > > > >What|Removed

Re: F36 Change: Silverblue and Kinoite will have /var on its own Btrfs subvolume (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-01-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VarSubvol4SilverblueKinoite > > == Summary == > Silverblue and Kinoite: For new clean automatic (guided) > installations, create a "var" subvolume to be mounted at /var. > > > == Owner == > * Name:

Re: New top-level dir: /state [WAS: Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change] proposal)

2022-01-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 6:47 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa said: > > It benefits LVM-based OS snapshotting equally well. However, the > > tooling for LVM snapshots are under-developed, so it's not used so > > much for this. > > How? S

Re: New top-level dir: /state [WAS: Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change] proposal)

2022-01-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 5:59 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 14.01.2022 um 23:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini : > > > > > > Wait, I thought this change was about making the path consistent > > within Fedora variants? > > The question still is whether this is actually useful and beneficial. > > All

Re: New top-level dir: /state [WAS: Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change] proposal)

2022-01-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:16 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > The path "/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm" does look very out-of-place in > > > non-image-based systems, so

Re: Workflow and other problems with the Fedora container infrastructure

2022-01-16 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 8:43 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2022, 6:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:14:19PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> > >> > One of the things that has recently happened in the Koji space is the &

[EPEL-devel] Re: The incredibly shrinking RHEL

2022-01-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 7:27 AM Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote: > > Am 14.01.22 um 13:02 schrieb Josh Boyer: > > A fairly accurate list of packages removed in RHEL 9 can be found in > > our RHEL 9 Adoption documentation: > > > >

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >