Package rubygem-mercenary has not been updated to 0.4.0, released over a
year ago. Package rubygem-jekyll depends on it and suffers from a bug in
older versions. The maintainer, besser82 has not responded to Bugzilla
comments, nor email to any address I can find on Fedora sites. Thus, I
am
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 4.5.2021 klo 19.38:
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:09:09AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Could you comment on the status of repository
package-maintainer-docs at pagure.io [1]? It looks like it is
intended to be that migration, I wanted to contribute and started
with a tiny
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 3.5.2021 klo 17.36:
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 04:29:54PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Right, but this sub- thread it about
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
Ah, sorry. I got lost. :)
But now that you mention it, I'd like to see that
Jan Grulich kirjoitti 1.5.2021 klo 22.15:
Octave is suffering from similar problems. I have reported this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954181
and also saw another issue where menus opened in strange places on the
screen, or even partially off-screen. I did not report that
Bryce Carson kirjoitti 1.5.2021 klo 3.21:
For what it's worth, I'm trying to join and have a package included and
there are definitely some areas I would like to improve. Should we make a
thread on their mailing list?
On Fri., Apr. 30, 2021, 5:50 p.m. Bryce Carson,
wrote:
Perhaps we could
Germano Massullo kirjoitti 30.4.2021 klo 13.23:
KeepassXC comaintainer here.
There are many Fedora GNOME Wayland users experiencing quirks in using
KeepassXC. Textboxes not showing text that is being written, other
quirks with GNOME, etc.
Upstream developers said many times that this only
Mamoru TASAKA kirjoitti 29.4.2021 klo 8.55:
Greg Hellings wrote on 2021/04/29 14:46:
So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11)
It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g.
Honggang LI kirjoitti 6.4.2021 klo 16.03:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:54:42PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:27:52AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 22:26, Honggang LI wrote:
Hi,
After input my FAS accout and password, I got this
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki kirjoitti 28.3.2021 klo 19.16:
I'm looking to package some GTK themes. Those themes come in several colour
variants. The author decided on a workflow where, instead of keeping variants
alongside each other in the tree, each variant has its own git branch.
When working with
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 26.3.2021 klo 18.07:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:25:28AM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones kirjoitti 25.3.2021 klo 20.56:
Thanks - it is working now.
I have similar but different problem which still happens:
1. Open pagure.io or src.fedoraproject.org
2
g.nickname%2Csreg.timezone=oturpe%40iki.fi=Otto+Urpelainen=oturpe%40iki.fi=Europe%2FHelsinki
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
Eduard Lucena kirjoitti 19.3.2021 klo 16.57:
I'm not a proven packager, but I'm interested in clipit.
Is possible for me to take it?
You do not need to be a proven packager to adopt a package, being a
"normal" packager is enough. In that case you just click a button at
package's src.fp.o
Sandro Mani kirjoitti 17.3.2021 klo 11.17:
Hi
I need litehtml to update to qt-creator-4.15, review request is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939875
Happy to review in exchange.
I have never done a package review before, but looking at the spec file,
I think this could
Tim Landscheidt kirjoitti 23.2.2021 klo 18.16:
Hi,
using "%forgemeta" with the "-i" option causes debug infor-
mation to be output which leads to %changelog entries being
garbled:
(snip)
Therefore, the templates at
Otto Urpelainen kirjoitti 14.2.2021 klo 10.25:
Hi,
While Jekyll and its dependencies make a bit complex setup for the first
package to maintain, I am willing to start as a Fedora packager by
adopting these packages. I already did some work for the Jekyll 4.2.0 on
Ruby 3.0, so the problem
Hi,
While Jekyll and its dependencies make a bit complex setup for the first
package to maintain, I am willing to start as a Fedora packager by
adopting these packages. I already did some work for the Jekyll 4.2.0 on
Ruby 3.0, so the problem is not completely new to me. I also actually
use
Fabio Valentini kirjoitti 30.1.2021 klo 12.37:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:19 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22:
On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
So if fedpkg clone just added things to .git/info
Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22:
On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
So if fedpkg clone just added things to .git/info/exclude there would
be no need to modify every .gitignore file in every repo on every
active branch.
That
Gwyn Ciesla via devel kirjoitti 28.1.2021 klo 0.09:
If the user doesn't 'git add .', or has a correct .gitignore, this should be a
non issue.
Me being the quoted person with a workflow issue, I still think there is
a workflow issue.
Setting .gitignore is possible of course, but rather
Gwyn Ciesla via devel kirjoitti 27.1.2021 klo 19.40:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 11:33 AM, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 27. 01. 21 v 18:21 Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a):
Question; What problem would be solved by removing fedpkg local that isn't
addressed
Ian McInerney kirjoitti 16.1.2021 klo 22.06:
I noticed due to an upstream bug report for a project I am on that the Fedora
packaging guidelines still say that GUI applications should install their files
as appdata.xml files and not metainfo.xml files
a whole new package is no the first thing I
can do for Fedora, requiring a sponsor and so on, so I suppose I should
start by contributing version updates for my applications' dependencies
or such easier tasks.
Regards,
Otto Urpelainen
___
devel
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
