Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:24 AM Remi Collet wrote: > > Le 26/09/2023 à 19:32, Carlos O'Donell a écrit : > > >> In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition > >> in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use > >> as the fallback value. > > > > I'm curious; what does this patch look

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: > > >

Re: Intention to tighten RPM crypto-policy back

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > Hello, > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960 > Long story short: > RPM has moved to sequoia, > sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies, > Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit

Re: Broken Discrete/Dedicated GPU support

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:16 AM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 14 2023 at 07:19:05 PM +0200, Jan Drögehoff > > > > > Unfortunately yes. There is more info here: > > > > https://www.hadess.net/2023/08/new-responsibilities.html > > > > Red Hat has instructed us to stop work on several core

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:35 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 19:26, Marcus Müller wrote: > > I fully agree with that assessment. "Here's a knob you turn that has the > > potential to make > > your firmware update 2s faster and is generally good for the ecosystem, but > >

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:43 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and > default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create > lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's > described in

Re: Replacing DNF with DNF5: changes reverted and helping steps

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf > > > > Updating and loading

Re: SELinux problems with Fedora 36?

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:34 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I don't remember seeing any change proposals around SELinux for the Fedora 36 > release but there seems to be several issues reported one way or another... > >

Re: NVIDIA Open-Source GPU Kernel Modules: How does that affect Fedora Linux?

> Hello Fedorans. I suppose this changes things, right? But how? > > https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-releases-open-source-gpu-kernel-modules/ In the short term this changes little, the should be build-able similar to how the other proprietary NV kernel modules are now though. In time

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:05 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Systemd-Creator-Microsoft > > https://linuxactionnews.com/248 > > Time to remove systemd from the distribution? Why? There's other maintainers, and he's not

Re: F37 proposal: Linux Firmware Minimization (late System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:36 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 02/07/2022 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote: > > This proposal has been withdrawn by the owners. > > Why? Very useful feature. Because they didn't coordinate with the maintainers, it wasn't ready and overall has flaws that need to be

Re: Fix aarch64 build on embree

> > Hello team, > > > > What is the way to disable `-mss2 for aarch64 build in embree? > > I think you mean msse2, the build should be using the distro default C > flags for builds so it shouldn't be an issue, if you fix the build to > use the proper distro flags the problem should go away.

Re: Fix aarch64 build on embree

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:15 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Hello team, > > What is the way to disable `-mss2 for aarch64 build in embree? I think you mean msse2, the build should be using the distro default C flags for builds so it shouldn't be an issue, if you fix the build to use the proper

Re: Fix aarch64 build on embree

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:06 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:08:31PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga napsal(a): > > Hello team, > > > > What is the way to disable `-mss2 for aarch64 build in embree? > > > > Spec file: > >

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 7:49 AM Peter Boy wrote:> > I very much appreciate the work to support the various SBC devices like > Raspberry Pi and workalikes. But I'm a little lost with this proposal. > > > Am 05.07.2022 um 23:16 schrieb Ben Cotton : > > The work around Raspberry Pi 4 has been on

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:37 PM Ron Olson wrote: > > I have a Pi 4 that runs Fedora just fine; I use it to build Swift (takes > almost 24 hours, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) so what doesn’t work? What podcast was this > mentioned on? Core things have worked for some time, I know, I did the work, but we've

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:23 PM Sally A. Haj via devel wrote: > > Fist of all, thank you for the big amazing news for Fedora. > I have some questions about the new support of V3D in Fedora, is that support > goes to upstream mainline Linux kernel? If yes, which release of Kernel has > that

Re: F37 proposal: Officially Support Raspberry Pi 4 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:05 PM Alec Leamas wrote: > > Hi, > > On 07/07/2022 17:36, Onuralp SEZER wrote: > > > > For example can you run wayland, or usage of fully supported GPU usage, > > Rs-pi's Camera usage, SPI , I2C , GPIO usages (PWM,Analog and others) > > > Indeed. Also, the installation

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:14 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer > > [...] > > === Unwinding === > > [...] > > * Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10% > > regressions in some benchmarks > >

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

Hi, > Today I encountered another LLVM-specific bug that affects at least > one Rust package and causes non-working code to be produced, which > prompted this question: > > Why are stable releases not getting bugfix releases of LLVM? > > Fedora 35 is stuck at LLVM 13.0.0, while 13.0.1 has been

Re: dnf makecache memory usage increase

> Looks like dnf makecache is uses a lot more memory, causing issues on > smaller systems/containers. > > F34: > > Metadata cache created. > 1.51user 0.15system 0:12.01elapsed 13%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 162440maxresident)k > 144inputs+56outputs (0major+46906minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > > F35: > >

Re: Fix aarch64 build on embree

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:39 AM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > On 2022-06-29 01:24, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:15 AM Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > Hello team, > > What is the way to disable `-mss2 for aarch64 build in embree? > > I think

Re: Why install rsyslog by default?

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:07 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25 2022 at 02:45:31 PM -0400, Neal Gompa > wrote: > > We should remove rsyslog from @standard. > > Packages in @standard but not in @workstation-product: > > at > crontabs > dbus > ed (no, really) > fprintd-pam > irqbalance

Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 8:11 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, David Airlie said: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:02 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > > wrote: > > > since this mesa change ( > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa/c/94ef544b3f2125912dfbff4c6ef373fe49806b52?branch=rawhide

Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 9:33 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:01 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > > > On 19/10/2022 09:48, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Sure but as mentioned it's public data, and the modification, and I > > > cover

Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:47 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 19/10/2022 14:14, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > IOW, the impact of AES on server peformance will vary depending > > on CPU models, NIC models / network switches and whether other > > workloads are competing for CPU time.

Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:17 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 13/10/2022 15:46, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Also, a ton of Fedora mirrors still don't use HTTPS for various reasons. > > I think such insecure mirrors should be removed from metalink. Why are they insecure? This is public open

Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 8:40 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 19/10/2022 09:33, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Why are they insecure? This is public open data, not banking data, > > where the data being downloaded is verifiable by the rpm signatures > > and signing

Re: Fedora support for new aarch64 chip

Hi Hua, > I need to install Fedora IoT to our chip but I realize that the > Fedora-IoT-ostree-aarch64-36-20220618.0.iso does not support our GPU driver > so we can't install it. > > + Document about our chip: >

Re: small aarch64 home server

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:51 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > I'd like to piggy-back - is there a Fedora well-supported board that can > use the Pi-targeted hats? I stayed away from the Pi for a long while, > because of the support problems, but it just seems like there's so much > that's just made for

Re: Intel MIPI IPU6 cameras support

On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:43 AM Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > > Hello, > I got a new Dell XPS laptop with the "amazing" [1] Intel MIPI IPU6 > webcam. There are upstream repos with drivers [2] and user-space stuff > and Ubuntu [3] and Arch [4] have user repositories with everything > required

Re: small aarch64 home server

> My rpi based home base server died rpi NAS keep running:). > I would very like to replace it with little bit better thing - in work, I > have https://softiron.com/blog/news_20160624/ , unluckily, It seems that > similar machines - I can call it aarch64 desktop, somehow died off. > > Does

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 37 Beta Release Announcement

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Fedora Linux 37 Beta Released > -- > > The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability > of Fedora Linux 37 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora Linux 37 > release > at

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

> > However, last this was discussed, the Fedora AAA system(s) > > did not (yet?) support the full fido2/webauthn/passkey > > functionality, so at this time such full integration is just a > > dream(*). > > You don't have to be a provenpackager to be able to do serious damage; > you just need to

Re: Grub menu with 3 kernels by default

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 6:16 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 11:43 AM, Geraldo Simião Kutz wrote: > > On my acer Aspire laptop it's the "esc" key. Works everytime I want to see > the grub menu. > > > The gotcha with ESC is that it brings up firmware settings on qemu-kvm

Re: [rawhide]Failure for aarch64 on embree

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 8:28 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 23:25:57 -0700 > Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > Hello team, > > > > The scratch build specifically failed on aarch64 architecture [1] with > > the following line when updating to embree 3.13.4 (not yet committed): > > > >

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 5:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden writes: > > > >> Right now you can't test them since they haven't been migrated to > >> testing yet. > > > > You can download the packages directly from

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

Hi Dmitry, > I've just pushed the updates for OpenSSL fixing 2 CVEs evaluated as HIGH. > Could you please check the freshly pushed builds to get necessary karma ASAP? Is there a reason we're note rebasing to 3.0.7 or generally updating in Fedora with 3.x? It looks like 3.0.6 had CVE-2022-3358

Re: Karma for OpenSSL needed

On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:17 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 11/1/22 13:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:53 PM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > >> > >> On 11/1/22 13:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden > writes: > >>> >

Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > -1 for this change. > > I will ignore it if it's accepted. > > That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in. So if the change is opt-in how is this an actual

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

Hi Folks, > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:12:22PM +0800, 孙海勇 wrote: > > I want to add LoongArch to the official Fedora support architecture, > > This is really cool -- welcome, and I'd love to help make sure you succeed! > > > I'm currently a newbie in the Fedora community, so I need help from > >

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

cess is good to better notify both developers and users of the change. > ~spot > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 10:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> Hi Spot, >> >> > TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in >> > rawhide today.

Re: Fedoras GnuPG default option is deprecated

On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:37 PM Christopher Klooz wrote: > > A fresh installation of Fedora 37 has by default the "--supervised" > option active in its gpg-agent systemd file > (/usr/lib/systemd/user/gpg-agent.service). > > According to GnuPG Docs [1], this option is deprecated. Once gpg-agent >

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Hi Spot, > TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in > rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure > it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that > there are probably still some bugs introduced by

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! Today I woke up and found > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 , which diverted me > down a bit of an "installer environment size" rabbit hole. > > As of today, with that new dep in webkitgtk, Rawhide's network

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 3:54 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 08. 12. 22 v 13:58 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > Ideas on how to solve that problem welcome. > > Do we need - at install time - firmware for: > > * v4l > > * dvb > > * cameras No, and we're looking

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 4:56 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 12:58 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream > > that are no longer supported in any stable kernel release, also a > >

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:06 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 16:51 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > I've done a few passes, dropping a bunch of older firmware upstream > > >

Re: Small rant: installer environment size

> > > We *could* do something about repo metadata: only install the "main" > > > metadata, > > > and not the "filepath" metadata. This would reduce the metadata size by > > > ~80%. > > > It'd also have huge benefits for speed: on small dnf operations a > > > significant > > > portion of time is

Re: Policy on supporting old and external software packages and compat RPMS

On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:01 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 05/12/2022 12:39, Terry Barnaby wrote: > > I am wondering what Fedora's policy is on depreciated old shared > > libraries and particularly compat RPM's ? > > Fedora is a bleeding edge distribution. If you need old versions,

Re: F38 prospoal: Enable bootupd for Fedora Silverblue & Kinoite (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 7:02 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, at 11:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022, at 6:08 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> Ben Cotton writes: > >> > >>> By design, ostree does not manage bootloader updates as they can not > >>> (yet)

Re: Ask Fedora: user reporting trouble with R-pi 4. Could someone please take a look?

Hi, > We've had a post this morning from a user having trouble with R-pi 4 > using the F37 ARM 64 images. Could someone with some experience in this > area please take a look and maybe help them out? > > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-arm-64-does-not-work-on-raspberry-pi-4/29111 I

Re: moby-engine (also known as Docker) maintenance in Fedora

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:09 AM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Hi Timothée, > > On November 14, 2022 7:18:45 PM UTC, "Timothée Ravier" > wrote: > >Hi everyone, > > > >The moby-engine package [1] (also known as Docker) has been orphaned in > >Fedora and is looking for a new maintainer. The waiting

Re: musings on rust packaging [was Re: F38 proposal: RPM Sequoia (System-Wide Change proposal)]

Hi Fabio, Been meaning to reply to this, but it got lost in the mail pile. > > I _very much_ appreciate all the work you and the other Rust SIG folks > > (Igor and Zbyszek in particular but I'm sure others as well!) have put into > > packaging rust apps and crates and all of the systems around

Re: F38 proposal: IoT Simplified Installer (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:20 AM Dan Čermák wrote: > > Ben Cotton writes: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTSimplifiedInstaller > > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > > community

Re: TSS maintainer volunteer

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:04 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:07PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a): > > I think I followed all those steps - identifying the package, announcing > > that > > I want to be the packager, making an account, etc. > > > > What's next? > > Submit

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

> > There is no problem technically; the Copr repo[2] is building > > Firecracker RPMs with musl. Maintainers of both Rust and musl seemed > > to be against it in Fedora. From this thread: > Why does Fedora not want to ship Firecracker statically linked to musl? > That is the supported and

Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 5:15 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BiggerESP > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be

Re: How to check if a package is retired?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:19 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Peter Robinson: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:58 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> * Peter Robinson: > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer > >>

Re: How to check if a package is retired?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see > ). How can I > check if this is actually the case? It's not, if you look at the tags at the bottom there should be

Re: How to check if a package is retired?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 9:58 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Peter Robinson: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:56 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > >> The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see > >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu

Re: linux-firmware RPM package

On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 11:48 AM Matthias Weckbecker wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 12:16:02PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 12:00:30 +0200 > > Matthias Weckbecker wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the linux-firmware package has recently added a requires in its

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using > > containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away before the > > F-36 EOL

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:43 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > Hi, > > We (podman upstream and fedora maintainers) are hoping to disable i686 > and 32-bit arm builds for Podman and some related tools under > https://github.com/containers org. We would like to do this also for > released Fedora

Re: Fedora Linux 38 branched

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:27 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 09:44, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > > > Hello Tomas, > > thank you for the announcement. > > > > We also branched Fedora 38 in Copr so that everybody can submit builds > > for it by now. Also, all projects with the "Follow

Re: TSS maintainer volunteer

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote: > I have a fedora account. > > > > How do I get packager status? How do I work with a packager - is that a > person or a program? > A quick google gave me this link:

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 2:25 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > We're not getting rid of Firefox. > > At least that is an answer, unlike the complete radio silence on: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920298 > > Still does not explain why Firefox has to be

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 5:52 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 08:47 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > Accepted blockers > > - > > > > 1–3. distribution — {Workstation,Everything,Server} boot x86_64 image > > exceeds maximum size — ASSIGNED > > ACTION: Relevant

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 10:27 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > Assuming those "binary compatible distributions" choose to add > > LibreOffice back in and support it, given what they actually do in > > terms of actual development it'

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek > wrote: > > > > Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where > > microdnf worked [1]. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520 > > Correct

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:38 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:11 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek > > > >

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Hello Pavel, > > May I ask you to be more specific what is the problem with including > references for issues? I am not sure whether your issues are related to > issues referenced by Fabio or whether you have in mind something else. It

Re: DNF5-5.0.1 has a stable API

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote: > > Hi all, > Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This update > makes DNF5's API stable. This means that changes to the API won't happen in > stable Fedora releases. How compatible is this API with the old dnf4

Re: DNF5-5.0.1 has a stable API

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 11:35 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > 2023-07-19T13:39:57Z Peter Robinson : > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:20 PM Nicola Sella wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> Yesterday, DNF5 5.1.0 was released upstream[1] and in rawhide[2]. This &g

Re: DNF5-5.0.1 has a stable API

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's > >> not at all compatible. > > It may be worth to add the link to the API: > &g

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:21 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek > wrote: > > > > Does that mean the issues with dnf [2] we able to be solved all the > > time but just weren't investigated? > > The issue was investigated also with DNF, but the issue

Re: Plans for dhclient / ISC dhcp?

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:10 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/issues/121 > > We use dhclient to get a DHCP address inside a minimal appliance. > To get this out of the way: NetworkManager or systemd are not options. > > It seems as if the ISC dhcp package

Re: Are we ready for ipv6-mostly networks?

Hi, > I have attended recently csnog.eu conference [1], where some interesting > presentations took place. They were usually in Czech, so it is not > something I am going to share more. But what took my interest were ipv6 > readiness with some exceptions. Fedora is ready to be run on dual-stack >

Re: Plans for dhclient / ISC dhcp?

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 5:14 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:11:21AM -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:09:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/issues/121 > > > > > > We use dhclient to get a DHCP

Re: LibreOffice packages

Terry, > I appreciate and am empathetic to all of those carrying the burden of this > and the thousands of other RPM packages. As a users of Fedora + RPM Fusion + > Cinnamon Desktop as my daily laptop driver since 2011, I love Fedora and am a > heavy user of Flatpacks. So thank you all. > >

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 2:28 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 07:20, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> Lets not make this a drama. >> >> Package maintenance changes have never gone through change proposals. >> > > I am sorry, but this was made into a drama by the way this was

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:39 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 05/06/2023 13:54, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I'm not sure what led you to the conclusion that IBM has anything to > > do with this or that "they fired a lot of good engineers". I don't > > see evidence of either being the case. > >

Re: Using AI/Machine Learning with rpmautospec?

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:36 PM Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > Automatically complete/update the spec file with AI/ML. Have you looked at Packit? https://packit.dev/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or > > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I > > just encountered while preparing an update for the package: > > > > $ git push > >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:44 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Josh Boyer: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > * Miro Hrončok: > >> > > >> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, > >>

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Enable fwupd-refresh.timer by default on IoT, CoreOS & Server Editions (Self-Contained)

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 3:37 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > > Am 26.07.23 um 15:55 schrieb Solomon Peachy via devel: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:45:13AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > >> It could be "my bubble", but for me, in all these fwupd is around, it has > >> never, ever worked on any

Re: Disabling rawhide builds during branching - happening in 2hrs

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:13 AM Luna Jernberg wrote: > > I think so as there is Branched composes here atleast: > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/ Builds of packages and composed are completely disconnnected. A compose will just consume what ever packages are available in a

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 5:35 AM Daniel Alley wrote: > > >In my test zlib-ng is about 40% faster. > > I did some testing with zlib-ng and createrepo-c a few months ago [0], and I > also found that the compression portion of the workload was about 40% faster. > So this matches my experience, too.

Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:47 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 27. 07. 23 v 22:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Samantha Bueno writes: > >>> We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora > >>> 39 and, perhaps

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 4:41 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice > > packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, > > multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: > > A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" > > > don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and > > spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort,

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > on things that are imp

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:30 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > > iDevice pieces is &quo

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 11:01 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 02/07/2023 10:51, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > > The suppliers for these enterprise distributions and the support they > > offer also abide by political lines. > > Indeed. That's why having RHEL repacks (Alma, Rocky, Oracle

Re: F39 Change Proposal: LibuserDeprecation (System Wide)

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:15 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibuserDeprecation > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 7:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello Patsy, > > On 26. 06. 23 17:54, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AllowRemovalOfTzdata > > > > == Summary == > > Allow the removal of tzdata especially on containers in order to minimize > > size. > > ...

Re: How to get a rawhide i686 VM?

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > What is the simplest way to get a rawhide i686 VM? I came across a > nasty architecture-specific bug, and the code investigation isn't of > much help. There is no obvious way to access a core dump via mock > (could

Re: How to get a rawhide i686 VM?

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 12:45 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 1:06 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear colleagues, > > >

Re: F39 Proposal: Make Toolbx a release-blocking deliverable and have release-blocking test criteria (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:11 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:57:30PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > I think we need some clarity wrt. to the dependency order here. > > Let's say we: > > > In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building

Re: Can't update from fedora 39 to rawhide

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Guinevere Larsen wrote: > > Hi Fedora list! > > I'm trying to upgrade a VM from fedora 39 to rawhide but running dnf > system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide fails. the offending > package seems to be "grubby-8.40-73.fc39", which conflicts with >

<    10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   >