How attached are we to branch ACLs? -- Should we kill pkgdb?

Hi everyone, As I am working on bringing pagure as a front-end to our dist-git, a question is troubling me. Currently ACLs are stored in pkgdb, it allows having a per-branch ACL model, which in itself is quite cool, but I wonder: is it that useful? I know pkgdb brings us other things too and I

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: 2017-03-13 @ ** 1600 ** UTC - Fedora 26 Blocker Review

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Silvia Sanchez wrote: >Now I'm confused... Is it 17:00 UTC or 16:00 UTC? >I'm in Germany so at what time should I join? Since Europe hasn't changed time, the meeting is at 16:00 UTC for you, ie: one hour earlier. In three weeks when Europe

Re: fedorahosted.org retired today (2017-03-01)

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:10:21AM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ke, 01 maalis 2017, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Today we have retired fedorahosted.org. > > > > Please see the following wiki page for up to date information: > > > >

Re: F27 System Wide Change: No More Alphas

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:26:00PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 07:43 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, February 20, 2017 6:44:50 PM CET Jan Kurik wrote: > > > Fedora will no longer produce Alpha releases. > > > > As a side-effect of making rawhide "alpha". That

Re: ceph / boost broken in koji Rawhide

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:27:53AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:30:51AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 10.2.2017 v 10:06 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:02:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > >> Yesterday around 4pm UTC +-

Re: post-receive-alternativearch git hook bug?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:08:53PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > Just did a git push to polymake and got this: > > > $ git push > Counting objects: 3, done. > Delta compression using up to 8 threads. > Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. > Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 454 bytes | 0 bytes/s,

Re: Two questions about koji

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:21:43AM +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 24/12/2016 03:59, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > > > Second question: I've uploaded new sources by using the new kinit > > > method, but I see that the sources are actually double uploaded > > > (upload reaches 100% and then

Re: Two questions about koji

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 07:59:20PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:16:36 +0100 > Mattia Verga wrote: > > > It's the first time I'm trying to use 'fedpkg chain-build' feature, > > but I'm receiving an error that I don't understand. > > I want to

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 05:07:46PM +0100, gil wrote: > >If you do not need ~/.koji/config I would advice dropping them entirely. > this mean remove entirely folder or only config* files? Seeing what is in that folder, I think the entire folder could go (I do not have it on any of my machines) >

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 04:19:35PM +0100, gil wrote: > > > Il 23/12/2016 16:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:00:03PM +0100, gil wrote: > > > > > > Il 23/12/2016 14:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > > > On Fri

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:00:03PM +0100, gil wrote: > > > Il 23/12/2016 14:38, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:53:25PM +0100, gil wrote: > > > > > > Il 23/12/2016 12:04, Patrick Uiterwijk ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > &g

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:53:25PM +0100, gil wrote: > > > Il 23/12/2016 12:04, Patrick Uiterwijk ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > > > > $ koji build --scratch --arch-override x86_64 rawhide > > > > > /home/gil/springframework/springframework-3.2.18-1.fc26.src.rpm > > > > > SSLError: [SSL:

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:18:50AM +0100, gil wrote: > Hi > > i get : > > $ KRB5_TRACE=/dev/stdout kinit g...@fedoraproject.org [...] > $ koji build --scratch --arch-override x86_64 rawhide > /home/gil/springframework/springframework-3.2.18-1.fc26.src.rpm > SSLError: [SSL:

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:08:21AM -, Iiro Laiho wrote: > I am sorry if I ended up insulting any Bodhi volunteers. That was not my > intention. My intention was point out the risks of trusting the word of > people on the Web without proper screening. We are a community of world-wide

Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 12:54:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 21:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Of course, the developers of bodhi would need to be convinced of such a > > feature, too, and it could be that there is no big kahuna to do exactly > > that. Oh well. >

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-09)

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:56:55PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Chris Adams wrote: > > I read email in mutt, a terminal-based mail client. I have it > > configured so I can open up URLs in lynx easily. Recently though, I > > can't open the agenda or logs from meetings in lynx. I don't know when

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-12-09)

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:19:13PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Josh Boyer said: > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Adam Miller said: > > >> Meeting started

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:04:14PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 8 December 2016 at 20:00, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > > wrote: > >> On 8 December 2016 at 19:30, Peter Robinson

Re: urw-fonts: Versioning Mess

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 01:37:18AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 16:07, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann'

Re: remote: sh: ./hooks/post-receive-chained.d/post-receive-alternativearch: No such file or directory

On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:41:55AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:34 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > when I was pushing new commit to ghostscript, I received the line in > $SUBJ during the push, for all the

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: aledvink

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:42:53PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' > ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in > the > Fedora A

Re: pkgdb2 devel

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:32:04PM +, Christopher wrote: >Where does pkgdb2 development occur? Searching online, and >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ itself points to >https://fedorahosted.org/pkgdb2/ >That page says there's a clone at >

Re: RFC: Storing Automated Tasks/Tests In Dist-Git (git-submodules)

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:37:45AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 11:40:44 AM CEST Tim Flink wrote: > > I didn't notice that my reply went only to Pavel, resending to devel@ > > > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:25:46 +0200 > > Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >

Re: [ANITYA] easy way to strip suffix from version

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote: > Am 14.10.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote: > > > Hello together, > > > > > > is t

Re: [ANITYA] easy way to strip suffix from version

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:41:15AM +0200, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote: > Hello together, > > is there an easy solution, maybe by regex, to strip a suffix, e.g. '.orig', > from the version-string found by Anitya / release-monitoring? The easiest is likely to just edit the regex to account for

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:35:52AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:20:55PM +0200, spike wrote: > > On 05.10.2016 12:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > It has been a month, more than I expected, so I asked FESCo to consider > > > the

Re: A new tool for backward compatibility analysis of API/ABI interfaces in RPM packages

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:58:10PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > > > 06.10.2016, 08:23, "Pierre-Yves Chibon": > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:36:16PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > >>  The tool is based on different software stack for analysis of back

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:20:55PM +0200, spike wrote: > On 05.10.2016 12:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It has been a month, more than I expected, so I asked FESCo to consider the > > user > > spike MIA: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1632 > > Sorry, must

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:20:55PM +0200, spike wrote: > On 05.10.2016 12:44, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It has been a month, more than I expected, so I asked FESCo to consider the > > user > > spike MIA: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1632 > > Sorry, must

Re: A new tool for backward compatibility analysis of API/ABI interfaces in RPM packages

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 06:36:16PM +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > The tool is based on different software stack for analysis of backward > compatibility developed since 2009: https://github.com/lvc (ABI Compliance > Checker, ABI Dumper, etc.) > > RedHat created an alternative libabigail tool

Re: Call for help contacting contributor: spike

On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 12:45:44PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Dear all, > > Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' > ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in > the > Fedora A

Call for help contacting contributor: aledvink

Dear all, Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in the Fedora Account System (FAS). This is mandatory to allow ACLs to be propagated from pkgdb to bugzilla, allowing the right person

Re: Please unpush FEDORA-2016-7776983633 on all releases or drop support for libjasper

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 01:52:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 18/09/16 13:48 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 17/09/16 08:46 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:30:34 +0100 > > > Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > > On 16/09/16 12:55

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:20:06PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > If ABRT is a firehose of bugs flying to RH's bugzilla, would the > > situation be > > really better if the reports were sent to gnome's BZ? >

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing bugs > > > :-( > > > We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their > > > bug reports

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:32:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing bugs :-( > > We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their > > bug reports are going to be ignored

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:24:33PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:30:07AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > I'm seeing 24 bugs at: > > > >

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:30:07AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > I'm seeing 24 bugs at: > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fprintd/bugs/all > > including a potential security one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1333882 > > Fedora's bugzilla is a

Re: F24, small backward steps

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 07:05:32AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > Dne 9.9.2016 v 21:53 Roger Wells napsal(a): > > > Just a couple of smallish things after upgrading (via dnf) from F23 to > > > F24 a couple of months ago: > > > > > > > > > 2.

Re: F26 System Wide Change: DNF 2.0

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:00:21PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But > it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just > bugfixing releng tools. > > So I'm not sure. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:38 PM,

Call for help contacting contributor: spike

Dear all, Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in the Fedora Account System (FAS). This is mandatory to allow ACLs to be propagated from pkgdb to bugzilla, allowing the right person

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:45:57AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote: > > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > > requestor

Re: Pending ACLs

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This morning, during the automation

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 06:16:16PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:55:55PM +0200, gil wrote: > >Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote: > > >

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:55:55PM +0200, gil wrote: >Il 26/07/2016 16:34, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:32 AM, gil wrote: > >hi > >someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? > >

Re: Missing F25 branch

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 04:32:00PM +0200, gil wrote: > hi > > someone can give me the access right also for F25 for these packages? > > ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis > ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-support > > when i selected

Re: Self Introduction: Oliver Haessler

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:45:36AM -0400, Oliver Haessler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > my name is Oliver and I am working for Red Hat in the internal IT department. > I am responsible for the internal RHEL desktop build we use for our employees. > I maintain extra config packages that we add to the

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:37:26PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:30:14 + > Christopher wrote: > > > Thanks. I opened: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5333 to address > > the issue more broadly (I figure this would be

Re: graph database options

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:33:38PM -0400, Michael Hrivnak wrote: >Graph databases are becoming very popular, as data science is getting a >lot of attention. I have at least one problem at work right now where a >graph DB could be a great fit, so I set out this weekend to do some >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-04-09)

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24:41AM +0200, Didier FABERT wrote: > I want to take tsung and verbiste packages but I have not idea how to do it > except contact cicku (package admin) directly. Is it the correct way ? Simply visit pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/verbiste/

Re: Can't request commit access after requesting an EPEL 7 branch

On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 03:23:36PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: >On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:59:08 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > >

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the different one > in

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:20:34PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > (Also, going forward I'd love to see us build comps in a more sane manner than > by editing an XML file; this simply *screams* for having a decent web UI to > manage it, tied into pkgdb so when a package is retired it also

Call for help contacting contributors

Dear all, Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in the Fedora Account System (FAS). This is mandatory to allow ACLs to be propagated from pkgdb to bugzilla, allowing the right person

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in > >f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by > >some other gnome packages. > > I

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:23:09PM +0300, Pete Walter wrote: >20.03.2016, 10:49, "Igor Gnatenko" : > > I'm updating libgit2 stack to 0.24.0 in rawhide. > >* >Can you do it in F24 as well, please? Based on how much libgit2/pygit2 break their API, I

Re: Very late Koji certificate expiration warnings

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/29/2016 10:16 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > >You do know that such report would be much better suited on the > >infrastructure

Re: Very late Koji certificate expiration warnings

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > Today (2016-02-29) I received a mail, seemingly having been sent last night > (2016-02-29 01:18 CET), entitled "Your Koji certificate expires within a > week" > > --- snip --- > This is an automated email sent to inform

Re: librsvg2 breakage in rawhide

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:59:17AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/26/2016 01:50 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >>On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2

Re: librsvg2 breakage in rawhide

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:06:58AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2016-02-25 at 10:56 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:46:55 -0500 > > Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > > > > > > Hoping to raise the profile of BZ#1311814 ; seems to break anything

Re: librsvg2 breakage in rawhide

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 03:38:59PM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We are working on a fix for pkgdb now. > > Thank you! Note that it will take some time, before fixing pkgdb itself I'm trying to assess the size of the

Re: Access denied [Was: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 08:50:25AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/20/2016 08:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 02/20/2016 05:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> > >>>>rpms/free

Re: Access denied [Was: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/20/2016 05:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > >>rpms/freefem++ -- PDE solving tool ( master f23 f22 el6 ) > > I am trying to push an update for freefem++, using my provenpackager > privileges, but I am denied access: > >

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:43:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:34:03PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 > >epel7 ) > > > >whats wrong with this package? I

Re: Large number of packages to be orphaned on Feb 26

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:34:03PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >rpms/python-pygit2 -- Python 2.x bindings for libgit2 ( master f23 f22 >epel7 ) > >whats wrong with this package? I think it is well-maintained by me. It needs an upgrade to 0.23.3 on F23 as otherwise it just failed upon

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:31:12PM -, Raphael Groner wrote: > You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any more". > Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security patches? To > retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. That's quite the opposite,

Re: Upstream release monitoring issue

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:11:46PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >I was notified by a user that a newer version of trustedqsl was available >so I looked into why I wasn't notified. >For some reason it still thinks 1.13 is the current version when it is >2.2: >

Re: qt (4) no longer injects $RPM_OPT_FLAGS by default (on f24+)

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:00:43AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Well, in the first place it would be nice not to push FTBFS commits to > packages you don't own without contacting maintainers before: Well, one thing about this is that no-one owns packages anymore. We are a community and there

Re: Upstream release monitoring issue

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:45:04PM -, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related > .spec files in git repos? Looks like one is using a tarball named

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:32:50AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2016 01:22 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >>>Hi, Ral

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2016 11:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > >Hi, Ralf. > > > >On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>On 01/25/2016 11:34 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> > >>>fakeroot (athimm,

Re: dnf still is unuseable

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch back to yum? > > > > ongoing problems in the core-task solve dependencies is not > > production  > > ready AND

Re: How to fix a package name with wrong capitalization?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:43:19PM +0100, Haïkel wrote: > 2016-01-16 16:10 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > > Hi, > > > > in the following review: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042 > > a package was reviewed and approved under the name "kpmcore", which

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > > On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >>> Hiya! > >>> > >>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb? >

Re: un-block bookkeeper

On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 10:48:06AM +0100, gil wrote: > > > Il 02/01/2016 10:45, gil ha scritto: > >hi > >bookkeeper [1] was orphaned but has now under review for inclusion in > >Fedora [2] > >Please un-block it in rawhide. > >Thanks in advance > >regards > >.g > > > >[1]

Re: security of the lookaside cache (was: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf)

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:38:35PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Tim Lauridsen wrote: > > How do i handle a situation where someone, without my knowledge > > uploads new sources to one of my projects. It could be a security > > problem ? > > While I trust that Francesco had only good intentions,

Re: frafra uploaded yumex-dnf-4.1.6.tar.gz for yumex-dnf

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 09:38:25AM +, Tim Lauridsen wrote: >Looks like a false alarm, just a scatch build  >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294377 Why uploading sources to dist-git for a scratch build? Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mod_rewrite rule please? admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/packagename/ ?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:19:15PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Hi, > > I really miss the simple URL lookup to find links to the last few > package builds of a certain package. Eg for libreswan, I could use: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreswan/ > > Now I have to go search

Re: Dead entries in pkgdb?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:40:01PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:13:31 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > pkgdb-cli list |cut -d" " -f4 |sort >$HTMP/fedoralist > > > After testing a few of them in pkgdb, they seem to be mar

Re: Dead entries in pkgdb?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:34:01PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Hi > > As part of my work as AArch64 secondary architecture developer > I keep git trees of all Fedora packages on my development machine. > Tend to update it ~weekly. > > Script for it is easy: >

Namespacing in pkgdb

Hello everyone, The Fedora infrastructure and the release-engineering teams have worked together to begin to add namespacing to our infrastructure. The idea is that in a near future Fedora will distribute more than just rpms, such as docker containers but also other technologies that might arise

Namespacing in pkgdb

Hello everyone, The Fedora infrastructure and the release-engineering teams have worked together to begin to add namespacing to our infrastructure. The idea is that in a near future Fedora will distribute more than just rpms, such as docker containers but also other technologies that might arise

Namespacing in pkgdb

Hello everyone, The Fedora infrastructure and the release-engineering teams have worked together to begin to add namespacing to our infrastructure. The idea is that in a near future Fedora will distribute more than just rpms, such as docker containers but also other technologies that might arise

Re: Between a rock and a hard place

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 01:44:30PM +, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > Hi! > > libunwind package is now part of RHEL 7.2. It got retired from EPEL7 > three days ago (and incidentally the Release went backwards so upgrade > path is broken): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288313 > >

Re: Direct messages

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:30:34PM +0600, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:29:32AM +0600, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > >>I just want to know what happened to direct messages about issues with > >>packages. > >> > >>When builds fail i.e. during mass rebuilds I have a

Re: Direct messages

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:29:32AM +0600, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > I just want to know what happened to direct messages about issues with > packages. > > When builds fail i.e. during mass rebuilds I have a message about it. > If for some reasons dependencies tree was broken (in rawhide,

Re: Automate nag emails for pending ACL/pkgdb requests?

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:50:59AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >This is not about any particular instance, but browsing around pkgdb for >various reasons I've run across ACL/pkgdb request that haven't gotten >approved (or rejected). I know we all get busy but it's not right to >

Contact info for FAS user: linuxdonald

Hi everyone, Fedora infrastructure is trying to reach the FAS user linuxdonald. The email address listed in FAS for this user does not correspond to a bugzilla account, while this user is a packager. We have been trying to contact him via the hotmail address set in FAS, but unsuccessfully. Does

Re: Contact info for FAS user: linuxdonald

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:27:05PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Fedora infrastructure is trying to reach the FAS user linuxdonald. The email > address > listed in FAS for this user does not correspond to a bugzilla account, while > this user is a packag

fedora-packages rebuild/upgrade

Hello, In the coming hours we will be both upgrading fedora-packages [1] to a new version (relying on mdapi [2]) and rebuilding its index. This should take a couple of hours during which fedora-packages will not be available. It will impact the package name completion in the new update form of

Re: apitrace-libs.i686 missing in x86_64 repos

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:48:25AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:44:55 +0100 > Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 25.09.2015 23:46, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200,

Re: Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:43:26AM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm spending a bit of time getting distro upgrades using GNOME > Software working on rawhide. I've put in a lot of the lower levels of > making this work, but I'm stuck for a data source. Who is responsible > for

Re: Recommended way of proposing changes in someone else Fedora packages configuration

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:18:15AM -0400, Jeff Peeler wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'd think a pagure.io like frontend would but at somewhat of a > > different level than this. You would: > > > > * Go to the interface and create a fork of the

Re: Announce: Group projects in Copr

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:59:56AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > It is my pleasure to announce new version of Copr. > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/ > > Seems that the new version broke sorting by date in the Builds listing. > > For example, I don't

Re: how set InitialCC in pkgdb2 for new package

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:51:26PM +0200, gil wrote: > > > Il 08/10/2015 18:11, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > >On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a): > >>>hi > >>>i missing someth

Re: how set InitialCC in pkgdb2 for new package

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:50:51AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 10/08/2015 06:11 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a): > >>> hi > >>> i missing

Re: Howto remove project from release-monitoring.org (Anitya) ?

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:15:07AM +0200, Jiri Popelka wrote: > I can't find a way how to remove > https://release-monitoring.org/project/5554/ > > What am I missing ? Regular users cannot, but you can flag the project asking an admin to delete a version found or the entire project :) Pierre --

Re: what it takes to unbundle, in triangle form

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:44:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > An unbundling triangle: > > > inclination > > /\ > / \ >/\ > / all \ > A / three→ \ B > / ideal \ >/

Re: how set InitialCC in pkgdb2 for new package

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:07:20PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2015-10-08 at 16:57 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a): > > > hi > > > i missing somethings... > > > how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package? > > > regards > > > thanks

Re: how set InitialCC in pkgdb2 for new package

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a): > > hi > > i missing somethings... > > how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package? > > regards > > thanks in advance > > gil > >

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >