https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/161
ds patches -
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/161/0001-Ticket-161-Review-and-address-latest-Coverity-issues.patch
admin server -
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.a8. 1.2.10 has some new features and fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.10 testing and bugs from earlier releases. There is also a
389-admin package in testing
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/22
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/22/0001-Ticket-22-RFE-Support-sendmail-LDAP-routing-schema.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
0001-fix-a-couple-of-minor-coverity-issues.patch
Description: application/mbox
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/87
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/87/0001-Ticket-87-Manpages-fixes.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/01/2012 02:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 02/01/2012 04:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/01/2012 02:16 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There is an issue with the PAM plugin, that when it performs a
successful bind we actually return error 1 to plugins_call_func(),
which
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/279
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/279/0001-Ticket-279-filter-normalization-does-not-use-matchin.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/280
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/280/0001-Ticket-280-extensible-binary-filters-do-not-work.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/281
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/281/0001-Ticket-281-TLS-not-working-with-latest-openldap.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.rc1. No new features were added between alpha 8 and
rc1, just many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and
389-dsgw packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base
On 02/07/2012 02:42 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
I had a typo in part of the fix, but...
After looking at ticket #111, I think maybe we should add this flag to
memberOf, referint, and maybe some other plugins.
Any thoughts on this?
If the concern is the audit trail, then when memberof, referint,
From 31ecec728ada7c50e57c969342bb5a400a9b0c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:14:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] coverity uninit var and resource leak
12550 Uninitialized pointer read
In dna_update_config_event(): Reads an uninitialized
0001-coverity-12559-Uninitialized-pointer-read-In-ldbm_ba.patch
Description: application/mbox
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.2. No new features were added after alpha 8, just
many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw
packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/301
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/301/0001-Ticket-301-implement-transaction-support-using-threa.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
0001-init-txn-thread-private-data-for-all-database-modes.patch
Description: application/mbox
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.3. No new features were added after alpha 8, just
many bug fixes. There are also 389-adminutil, 389-admin, and 389-dsgw
packages in Testing.
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base package is
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.4. This release contains a fix for a bug that causes
the directory server to hang when using compare operations with virtual
attributes. No new features were added after alpha 8, just many bug
fixes. There are also
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/331
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/331/0001-fix-transaction-errors-with-db-4.3-and-db-4.2.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.4. This release contains a fix for a bug that causes
the directory server to hang when using compare operations with virtual
attributes. No new features were added after alpha 8, just many bug
fixes. There are also
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/336
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/336/0001-Ticket-336-abrt-389-ds-base-1.2.10.4-2.fc16-index_ra.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
389 Directory Server 1.2.6.a3 (alpha 3) is now in the Fedora and EPEL-5
testing repos. We would appreciate any feedback/karma.
http://port389.org/wiki/Release_Notes
Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
There were a few more problems with my previous patches. The console
was not able to handle some cases where we using a DN value as the value
in an RDN, in both the base console and in the ds-console packages.
Also, I moved a lot of DN handling code from the ds-console package
DSUtil into the
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Alpha 4 of
version 1.2.6. This release contains a new replication session API,
auto DN index upgrade, and several bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is an
Alpha release, so it may have a few
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 2 of version 1.2.6. This release contains a couple of bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a
Release Candidate release, so it may have a few glitches, but it has
been tested for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609590 - main bug - 10
different patches attached
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602530 - split off from main bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602531 - split off from main bug
--
389-devel mailing list
The 389 team is pleased to announce the availability of Release
Candidate 3 of version 1.2.6. This release contains a couple of bug fixes.
***We need your help! Please help us test this software.*** It is a
Release Candidate release, so it may have a few glitches, but it has
been tested for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611850
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=429926action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=429926action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Vcelak jvce...@redhat.com writes:
There were some changes in recent openldap package in rawhide, adding
Mozilla
NSS crypto support and enabling LDIF reading/writing API. This change was
introduced in openldap-2.4.22-3.fc14.
Please, make sure that this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547503
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nathan Kinder wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=433803action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=433803action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
change the overhead from 50% to 10%
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/574/0005-Ticket-574-problems-with-dbcachesize-disk-space-calc.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47312/0004-Ticket-47312-replace-PR_GetFileInfo-with-PR_GetFileI.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
The new 389-ds-base-1.3.1 branch has been created. Commits for 1.3.1
will have to be checked into master first, then cherry-picked to 1.3.1
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47465/0003-Ticket-47465-problem-with-389-adminutil-detection-in.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47465/0001-Ticket-47465-problem-with-389-adminutil-detection-in.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47403/0001-Ticket-47403-DSGW-authentication-issue.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.2.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47486/0002-fix-compiler-warnings.3.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47675/0001-Ticket-47675-logconv-errors-when-search-has-invalid-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 01/24/2014 04:13 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
Hi @all,
iirc /bin/sh scripts should use . instead of source (see
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#dot
)
To use source you should change the interpreter to be /bin/bash
On 02/25/2014 07:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/24/2014 10:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
IPA team filled this ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47553.
It requires an ACI improvement so
On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 07:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/24/2014 10:47 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/24/2014 09:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
Hello,
IPA team filled this ticket
On 03/07/2014 07:15 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
Hi Nathan,
is there special reason why you use /strcasestr/ in ACL plugin instead
of /PL_strcasestr/.
It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10.
On 01/08/2015 06:56 AM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of
On 11/03/2015 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You see that 'Clone' button in Bugzilla? You, yes you, with your cursor
hovering over it?
Don't do it! It's a trap.
Cloning a bug is almost never actually what you want to do. When you
clone a bug, all of the following are transferred to the new
On 05/31/2016 11:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400
On 05/31/2016 11:31 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week
On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote:
On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
They usually have a 60 hour a week job
I hope this isn't accurate...?
I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering
On 02/15/2017 11:31 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com> wrote:
Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog
(already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do
custom tr
On 02/15/2017 07:23 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for
something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in
system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit,
journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora.
On 10/25/2017 09:49 AM, William Moreno wrote:
2017-10-25 9:38 GMT-06:00 Sandro Bonazzola >:
2017-10-25 16:54 GMT+02:00 Jason Brooks >:
Hi all --
As part of a
On 10/25/2017 01:43 PM, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi Jason,
Packaging deps is a virtuous circle: it makes the work of the next person who
needs them for other software easier, which increases the chance other software
is packaged, which increases the value of the distro as a whole,
On 9/29/20 8:55 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Upstream is slowly dying out, since the official Github CLI[1] was
announced. The latest upstream release doesn't pass the test suite on
Golang 1.15[2] and I don't have the time to spare these days, so I'm
going to orphan it and let someone else take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516611
There are three separate patches for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396463action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396463action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396465action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551198
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397221action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397221action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 2ab747aeeb1ea0c049cf6eaf6b15ea38f8088cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:53:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for additional schema/matching rules included with 389
1) The 60qmail.ldif schema we ship used integerMatch and IA5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572677
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399548action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399548action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 03/30/2010 03:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Nathan Kinder wrote:
New patch attached.
Nice!
Thanks for the review!
mep.c:491 - value is not freed if it is not a valid filter - also would
be nice to have the error message
From d8234c6633eb1e371fd0590180cd247e87bb0784 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:27:51 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Repl Session API needs to check for NULL api before init
The new repl sesssion API will crash when adding a replication
I've tagged 389-ds-base-1.2.6.rc3 - this will hopefully be the actual
1.2.6 release - if not, then I can always create a branch at the
389-ds-base-1.2.6.rc3 tag. The tree is now open
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610177
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428568action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428568action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610276
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428569action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428569action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434078action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434078action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=436371action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=436371action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624485
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474704action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474704action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479564action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479564action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680284
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480912action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480912action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676655
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481466action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481466action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481957action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481957action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
None of these are serious.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690584
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Systemd_Revised_Draft
These are the patches for ds-base:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=494777action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=494779action=edit
These are the patches for admin:
a couple more patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703990
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 331d60e55e68632a7403adfac1f37bd3202f839d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:24:37 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] skip rebranding current brand
if the current brand is the same as the new brand,
skip rebranding
the branding information is now
From 7950cbb484f6b517cd00fec4cdde93fc305ca01c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:50:00 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] add support for ldif files with changetype: add
IPA config files use changetype: add to add new files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725953
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515610action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515610action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723126
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517325action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517325action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723937
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517662action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517662action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729369
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517678action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517678action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633803
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519337action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519337action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/07/2011 05:06 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
The problem comes from the method we use to check if the changelog does
not match the database in replica_check_for_data_reload(). The RUV in
the database contains obsolete elements from replicas that are no longer
in use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522361action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736712
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522382action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522385action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741744
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525605action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741744
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525654action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740942
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525854action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
0cc8c050795e575617fcb1f88ce9890a2358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:12:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] set the ENTRY_POST_OP for modrdn betxnpostoperation plugins
The ENTRY_POST_OP needs to be set before calling the betxnpostoperation plugins
for the modrdn operation (e.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740959
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=530746action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 17837f58fcf4f09c3df531f274bf8786b65e983a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:50:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] uniqueid formatting - use slapi_u8_to_hex instead of sprintf
Use slapi_u8_to_hex for each part of the uuid to convert to string
From d5312b2bd400695875c1fe68a6a54c612f09eec9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:26:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] reduce calls to csn_as_string and slapi_log_error
csn_as_string is an expensive operation - we should reduce calls to it
many
From ce59c808793ff858bb0771830e000eb54982035c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:34:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] csn_init_as_string should not use sscanf
Added new slapi functions to convert decimal/hex strings to their integral
values. Use
From 1a0660f4fa2da22a6918078442afffba51c8c225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] use slapi_hexchar2int and slapi_str_to_u8 everywhere
uniqueid code was using local str2Byte - use slapi_str_to_u8 instead
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/4
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/162
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/256
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/256/0001-Ticket-256-debug-build-assertion-in-ACL_EvalDestroy.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From c17fc9b454c9757ab9f8b0fe3004ec1d1e75c0d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:46:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix mep sdn compiler warnings
---
ldap/servers/plugins/mep/mep.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/257
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/257/0001-Ticket-257-repl-monitor-doesn-t-work-if-leftmost-hos.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 8d4fa6d412b0bf911c063b371ad23d9257df312f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:23:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix recent compiler warnings
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
../ds.git
From 01dd56d3e51180afef8158855ae0e747b43ba89a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:48:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix compiler warnings
---
ldap/servers/plugins/linkedattrs/linked_attrs.h |1 +
ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c
101 - 200 of 349 matches
Mail list logo