Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

2014-07-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 03:37:15PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sáb, 2014-07-19 at 12:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a > > .src.rpm file is built from the git repo. > > > > Currently

Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

2014-07-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 07:10:40AM +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > lör 2014-07-19 klockan 12:30 +0100 skrev Richard W.M. Jones: > > The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a > > .src.rpm file is built from the git repo. > > > > Currently this inv

Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

2014-07-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 04:38:22PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Well something like (made up example): > > Source0: %{lang_download_url}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > where %lang_download_url is an RPM macro defined in some > lang-specific package that's not part

Re: Does Rawhide inherit from F-21?

2014-07-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:12:34PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Does Rawhide inherit packages from F-21 nowadays? No. The branching note says "anything you do for f21 you also have to do in the master" [ie. rawhide] "branch and do a build there": https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-a

Re: Make buildSRPMFromSCM faster?

2014-07-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:58:49PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:30:38 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > The first step of most Koji builds is buildSRPMFromSCM, where a > > .src.rpm file is built from the git repo. > &

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

2014-07-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 09:30:07AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:03:00 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, > > Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > > > This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the > > rawhide r

Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide (was: Re: rawhide report: 20140717 changes)

2014-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I've done all the easy rebuilds. The remaining packages either depend on ocaml-labltk, for which there is an open review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122073 or have actual build problems: ocaml-bitstring - tests fail indicating the package is broken on OCaml 4.02

Brokenness in newly created dist-git repositories

2014-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Two new packages/repositories have been created for me recently. Both appear to be broken in a subtle, non-fatal way: $ fedpkg clone ocaml-camlp4 $ cd ocaml-camlp4/ $ fedpkg verrel Exception AttributeError: '_read_only' in > ignored [ the command hangs for a few minutes before printing .

Re: Brokenness in newly created dist-git repositories

2014-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
OK I see in the final comment there is a hang reported. I would still be interested in whether anyone else can reproduce the bug on the specific two repos: ocaml-camlp4 & ocaml-labltk. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming an

Re: Brokenness in newly created dist-git repositories

2014-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:30:48PM -0700, Josh Stone wrote: > On 07/22/2014 12:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Two new packages/repositories have been created for me recently. > > Both appear to be broken in a subtle, non-fatal way: > > > > $ fedpkg cl

Re: Brokenness in newly created dist-git repositories

2014-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:26:38PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:11:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Two new packages/repositories have been created for me recently. > > Both appear to be broken in a subtle, non-fatal way: > >

Re: Brokenness in newly created dist-git repositories

2014-07-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:01:40PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:31:50PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > OK I see in the final comment there is a hang reported. I would still > > be interested in whether anyone else can reproduce the bu

Re: HEADSUP: json-c SONAME BUMP

2014-07-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json > 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from > now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname > manually: > > libjson-c.

Re: The GNU C Library will be rebased in F21 to match glibc 2.20.

2014-07-31 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 09:03:45AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > > > The problem with that approach is that lots of bugs go unnoticed until > > very late in rawhide, resulting in those bugs being caught and fixed > > on

Re: packages seeking new owner

2014-07-31 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > unison240 -- Multi-master File synchronization tool ( master f21 f20 f19 ) I tried to take this one, but the new pkgdb UI is incredibly non-intuitive and it seemed to fail. Can you orphan the package, and I will try again. Rich.

Re: The GNU C Library will be rebased in F21 to match glibc 2.20.

2014-07-31 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:41:25PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar > > There is however one change that the s/390 > > folks will find painful - s/390 broke ABI in 2.19 without a proper > > justification and that is now going to be reverted in 2.20 (an

OCaml in Rawhide update (was: Re: rawhide report: 20140801 changes)

2014-08-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 11:16:58AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > [coq] > coq-8.4pl4-2.fc21.i686 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:4.01.0 > [ocaml-camlp5] > ocaml-camlp5-6.11-4.fc21.i686 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:4.01.0 Both of these are now rebuilt. They were blocking about 10 oth

Re: rawhide report: 20140802 changes

2014-08-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
The OCaml (second) beta rebuild is almost done, so this email won't be quite so giant tomorrow :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from sc

Re: packages seeking new owner

2014-08-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 06:03:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > > > unison240 -- Multi-master File synchronization tool ( master f21 f2

Re: Need help with converting growroot to a systemd service

2014-08-11 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:24:59PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 11.08.14 12:59, Juerg Haefliger (jue...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > All, > > > > I want to convert the growroot functionality to a proper systemd service > > Not sure what "growroot" is... Lennart, the one I'm familiar wi

Re: are compiler flags being honored?

2014-08-14 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Dhiru Kholia wrote: > Initial scan results are available on the following URL, > > https://halfie.fedorapeople.org/flags-scanner/ > > Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-) You should be excluding native OCaml objects. The

Re: Maximum length of command line arguments

2014-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > This is of little practical consequence unless someone really wants to > pass a 2 MB command line to a program... but as a curiosity, I ran a > diff of a Koji build log from last year against a build from this year, > and I notice

Orphaning: ocaml-pa-do

2014-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
ocaml-pa-do is a complex syntax extension that adds operator overloading (in the C++ sense) to the language. Currently FTBFS because of a parse error with the latest camlp4. Upstream is unmaintained since 2012, but I think they are working on a replacement using the new `ppx' syntax extension mec

Re: Orphaning: ocaml-pa-do

2014-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:39:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > ocaml-pa-do is a complex syntax extension that adds operator > overloading (in the C++ sense) to the language. Currently FTBFS > because of a parse error with the latest camlp4. > > Upstream is unmaintained si

Re: /media -> /run/media???

2014-08-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:21:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 15.08.14 22:21, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > I just reverted the "two weeks in rawhide" symlink change > > > already. /media is no longer symlink in Rawhide. Removeable media mount > > > point is n

Review swap

2014-08-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423 http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/ menhir - an LR(1) parser generator It's a simple package, so will swap for something not over-complex. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my pr

Re: Review swap

2014-08-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:18:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423 > http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/ > menhir - an LR(1) parser generator It turns out this package already exists in Fedora :-) Rich. -- R

How quickly should we retire orphaned packages?

2014-08-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
As requested on this ticket, I'm opening this up for discussion. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1332 There's a proposal to retire packages quite quickly (I think) after they are orphaned. At the moment packages are retired once per release. A notice is posted on devel list, see for exampl

Re: How quickly should we retire orphaned packages?

2014-08-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > (a) The reason for wanting packages to be retired so quickly has not > > been made clear by rel-eng. > > Miloslav explained this nicely

Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers

2014-08-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:11:50 +0200 > Florian Weimer wrote: > > > What is the recommended way to contact the Ocaml maintainers? > > > > There is a systematic packaging bug which introduces unusable i686 > > packages into the x86_64 comp

Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers

2014-08-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:12:52PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:01:16 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:17:16PM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 21:11:50 +0200 > > > Floria

OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers)

2014-08-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
And would this be a good place to say that the OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild is now under way? Well, it is. I'm expecting that all packages should rebuild without any problems. It may take a couple of days to rebuild them all. This rebuild only affects Rawhide. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualiza

Re: OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers)

2014-08-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:18:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > And would this be a good place to say that the OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 > rebuild is now under way? > > Well, it is. I'm expecting that all packages should rebuild without > any problems. > > It

Re: OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers)

2014-08-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:22:04PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This is complete now. There were four or five packages which didn't > > rebuild which I'll look at after the UK public holiday. > > You

Re: OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers)

2014-08-26 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:12:34AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > The script should build them in BuildRequires order automatically. > > However in this case I have blocked frama-c and gappalib-coq because > > the

Re: OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers)

2014-08-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:41:55PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Go for it if you have time. If not then I'll ask in a few days. > > Asked here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.caml/C6_VauENVgo Than

OCaml 4.02.0 final (was: Re: OCaml 4.02.0+rc1 rebuild (was: Re: Contacting the Ocaml maintainers))

2014-08-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:26:35PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'll add this patch to the compiler header files in the next > > iteration, ie. 4.02.0-rc2. > > It looks like the ocaml team has elected to

Is rpm 4.12.0-0.rc1.1.fc22 totally broken or is it just me?

2014-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
The 'rpm -U' command just exits when run, no error messages. strace output is attached. rpm-4.12.0-0.rc1.1.fc22.x86_64 Rich. -- execve("/bin/rpm", ["rpm", "-Uvh", "./e2fsprogs-1.42.11-3.fc22.x86_6"..., "./supermin-5.1.9-3.fc

Re: Is rpm 4.12.0-0.rc1.1.fc22 totally broken or is it just me?

2014-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 02:51:36PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The 'rpm -U' command just exits when run, no error messages. > > strace output is attached. > > rpm-4.12.0-0.rc1.1.fc22.x86_64 I don't know what went wrong there, but it's not recovera

Old virt-v2v may be half-retired

2014-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I tried to retire the old virt-v2v package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/virt-v2v However I likely only "half-retired" it because although I'm a package administrator, I'm not the owner, or something like that. In any case I'm coordinating with the package owner and we will have

systemd-readahead

2014-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of "systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process. Did we agree to this when we adopted systemd as an init replacement? I don't remember init including all thi

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > /tmp has nothing to do with systemd The tmp-on-tmp misfeature is to do with systemd. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
The systemd sysvinit replacement talked about in Fedora 14/15 was not the init system + other bogus features that is talked about today. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com v

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100, > Sérgio Basto wrote: > >Hi, > >[1] > >since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group > >have some valid reasons , systemd should be the replacement of > >sysvinit ,

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core > > package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push >

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:18:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 18:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > &

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I think FESCO underestimates the problem in that case. FESCO should ask that these packages are separate (exist as different components) and communicate with the rest of the system / systemd through fully specified interfaces. Linux improves because of a brutal Darwinian selection process where

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:26:44AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > so *what* is your problem by a unit knowing "i must not run now" What open-vm-tools needs is a system feature known as the "VMware backdoor". This is provided by other hypervisors too (notably qemu). If you look at Hyper-V, it prov

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:37:45PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 09.09.2014 um 12:33 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > Il 07/09/2014 20:04, Reindl Harald ha scritto: > >> on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/199113 > >> *you* complain about systemd-readahead - guess what - if

Re: Old virt-v2v may be half-retired

2014-09-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 08:06:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I tried to retire the old virt-v2v package: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/virt-v2v > > However I likely only "half-retired" it because although I'm a package > administrator

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:01:09PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> >> on http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/199113 > >> >> *you* complain about systemd-readahead - guess what - if a virtual > >> >> machine is detected it is skipped > >> > > >> > And why is it a good idea to

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-12 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:33:13AM -0600, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: > I am curious though. Everyone says the only way to do it securely and > safely is with nothing running. Why can't updates be applied with stuff > running prior to a reboot? There's no reason, apart from the kernel. You're doi

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:50:36AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 09/12/2014 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > >never worked relieable here on multiple machines > > > >it often showed nothing where i knew the thing > >which should be restarted without looking and > >"lsof" proved it > > I am one

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Every of the script is based on assumption that you already read some > library/unit whatever. But that is not enough. I wonder how you want to > detect that you need restart in case that I have something like this: > > $ ls > foo.rb

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> 1) I run some application, which loads my foo.rb file. > >> 2) I later up

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 15.09.2014 um 14:44 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:40:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >> Am 15.09.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > >>

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:07:39PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 15.9.2014 14:28, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:57:13AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Every of the script is based on assumption that you already read some > >> library/uni

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140924 changes

2014-09-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:12:14AM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote: > [cduce] > cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = > 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90 > [ocaml-bisect] > ocaml-bisect-1.3-3.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = > 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140924 changes

2014-09-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 09:45:01AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > And the e-mail-address for ocamlmaint is not working: > fedora-ocaml-list at redhat.com I've been trying to kill off this virtual FAS account. If it is still watching any packages, feel free to unwatch it (if some FAS administrator coul

Re: F-21 Branched report: 20140924 changes

2014-09-28 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Thanks for rebuilding those. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html -- devel mailing list

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we > shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382 While we should be working on packaging guidelines, it has been ver

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > @Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could > be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited > set of packages. Well the specific case was that libguestfs has golang bindings, and we wanted to

Re: Dash as default shell

2014-10-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:39:04PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Is it worth considering using Dash as the default (non-interactive) shell > in Fedora? Other distributions including Ubuntu and Debian ( > https://lwn.net/Articles/343924/) have been using dash as the default shell > and And

Re: No more deltarpms by default

2014-10-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:41:07AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is > support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled this and I think this > change deserves a broader discussion > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: Orphan packages in rawhide

2014-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:39:54PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > ocaml-pa-do orphan, rjones I've intentionally orphaned this one since it has been superseded upstream. See my announcement: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/20

Re: Orphan packages in rawhide

2014-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:53:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:39:54PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > ocaml-pa-do orphan, rjones > > I've intentionally orphaned this one since it

Re: bugzilla usage trends

2014-10-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did > this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks > here who either work on the infrastructure or are curious about > long-term collaboration trend

Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?

2014-10-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two that broke stuff. Anyone seen this? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualiza

Re: Broken dependencies in F21 (was: Re: F-21 Branched report: 20141015 changes)

2014-10-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > >> [cduce] > >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = > >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90 > > This fails to rebuild: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7881630 This was waiting for an upst

Re: fedora 21 lets me install packages without root

2014-10-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I don't agree with it, but link to the FESCo discussion: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1115 (BTW can someone delete the spam from that ticket?) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rw

top in Rawhide

2014-10-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in Rawhide? The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace with a useless display of per-CPU stats, and [not shown] is completely static until you press 'P'. Rich. top - 14:20:04 up 3:46, 3 users, load average: 1.65, 1.18, 1

Re: top in Rawhide

2014-10-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:42:30AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:33:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Anyone worked out how to get top to give a normal (ie. old) display in > > Rawhide? > > The default consumes huge amounts of whitespace w

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-01 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:59:30PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > - Original Message - > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > > > Thoughts? > My intuition is that if an application needs _everything_ in /usr to > be readable then it is likely broken. Somet

Re: Requiring all files in /usr to be world-readable?

2014-11-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:58:21AM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > - Original Message - > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 01:59:30PM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467 > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > >

koji rawhide broken: ImportError: cannot import name ProtocolError

2014-11-05 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7943/8047943/mock_output.log Something is broken. fedpkg maybe? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for vi

Re: Virtual network interface

2014-11-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Is there way how to setup some virtual network inteface, which would > always work, no matter if I use ethernet, wireles, VPN or whatever else > network connection on background? > > * It is pretty annoying that ever

LLVM OCaml bindings disabled

2015-03-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
LLVM, the C compiler, has OCaml bindings to its internals[1]. In the latest version they are generated using an OCaml library called 'ctypes'[2] (instead of however they were generated before -- maybe written by hand or something). Since we don't yet package ocaml-ctypes for Fedora, we've decide

Lots of emails about `pkgdb created branch 'f21' ...'

2015-03-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Like the ones attached (and not just for libguestfs, but for other packages too). AFAIK no one is creating branches .. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists dis

Re: Lots of emails about `pkgdb created branch 'f21' ...'

2015-03-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:31:10AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:22:43 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > > > Like the ones attached (and not just for libguestfs, but for other > > packages too). AFAIK no one is creating b

Re: Lots of emails about `pkgdb created branch 'f21' ...'

2015-03-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:08:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:48:26 + > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > The other one was: > > > > Subject: pkgdb created branch 'el6' for the 'mingw-zlib' package >

Re: ocaml expert for review?

2015-03-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, > I've tried to package two ocaml-based packages. I have no idea about > the language and tried to follow the guidelines in [0]. If there any > experts in packaging in that language I'd appreciate a review (in > exchang

Complicated RPM dependency generator question

2015-03-12 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
libguestfs.spec overrides the RPM internal dependency generator in order to add a very specific and rather narrow set of automated dependencies to a single sub-package. The spec file has: Source1: libguestfs-find-requires.sh %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %global __find_

Re: Complicated RPM dependency generator question

2015-03-12 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
What I've done here is to write a custom internal dependency generator, using the documentation here: http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: htt

Re: ocaml cairo

2015-03-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:42:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Richard - > >Apparently plplot is shifting to using > https://github.com/Chris00/ocaml-cairo for it ocaml cairo bindings. > It is known by "cairo2" on opam. plplot appears to be the only user > of ocaml-cairo. Do you have any

Re: ocaml cairo

2015-03-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:50:49AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > So I believe in this case, unless anyone objects, we should simply > replace the upstream of the ocaml-cairo package with > https://github.com/Chris00/ocaml-cairo > > I _don't_ think we need to rename the

Re: ocaml cairo

2015-03-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Orion, I realize there was not anything actionable in my last emails. Could you take a look at this scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9273794 and check that it's suitable for what you want. If plplot is using ocamlfind, then we may need to change the META file

Re: ocaml cairo

2015-03-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:19:49AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/19/2015 08:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Orion, I realize there was not anything actionable in my last > > emails. > > > > Could you take a look at this scratch build: > &g

Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm not even sure what component I would file this bug against, but since a few days ago, something in Rawhide is causing every ssh terminal, console etc to get spammed with SELinux audit messages. Simply ssh-ing to the box gives you: $ ssh trick Message from syslogd@trick at Mar 20 14:13:46 ..

Re: ad: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 03:35:37PM +0100, Tomas Heinrich wrote: > Spamming shells was traditionally the domain of syslogd. In > /etc/rsyslog.conf, there's this line: > > *.emerg :omusrmsg:* Yup, that exists. Note I've not changed /etc/rsyslog.conf from the default configuration. > You can try co

Re: ad: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
My original aim with the message to devel@ was to find out what component to file the BZ against. I've filed it now, against rsyslog for the moment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204217 and I will follow up in there with the additional information you requested. Thanks, Rich. --

Re: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:29:21PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:14:38PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Message from syslogd@trick at Mar 20 14:13:46 ... > > journal: pid=2038 uid=0 auid=1000 ses=2 > > subj=system_u:system_r:

[ppc] Default stack size on ppc64

2015-03-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
For the OCaml packages on ppc64/ppc64le, we keep having bugs like this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204876 The OCaml compiler is quite recursive, and so it can easily overflow the default stack. For reasons that are not entirely clear this happens only on ppc64/ppc64le (not

Re: Self Introduction: Török Edwin

2015-03-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:02:08AM +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi all, > > I am introducing myself according to [1]. > As the co-founder of Skylable [2] I am working on building Open Source cloud > storage software: Skylable SX and LibreS3. > > As an Open Source enthusiast I have contributed to

Re: ocaml cairo

2015-03-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Hi Orion, What was the upshot of this thread? Do you want me to commit what was in the last test build? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtua

Could we disable "AutoQA" until it can produce usable results?

2015-03-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
Witness (a): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libguestfs-1.29.31-1.fc22 The log file in this case is 3452 lines long. Witness (b): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.9.git87c6a6b0.fc22 The log file in this case is 3452 lines long (not coincidentally - it is exa

Re: [ppc] Default stack size on ppc64

2015-03-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:35:30AM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 12:19 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > For the OCaml packages on ppc64/ppc64le, we keep having bugs like this > > one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204876 > > > >

Re: [ppc] Default stack size on ppc64

2015-03-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 05:54:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > OCaml uses its own code generator. However the description of > -fsplit-stack from GCC sounds interesting. Are there any more details > of how exactly it works? Does it catch the segfault from hitting the > guard

Re: [ppc] Default stack size on ppc64

2015-03-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:30:25PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 11:35 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > > I am not sure how ocaml is generating code for PPC64, you could look in > > to split stack support, but at this time GCC does not implement split > > stack. > ...

Re: [ppc] Default stack size on ppc64

2015-03-25 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:30:25PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > If the compiler is single-threaded, and increasing the stack ulimit > fixes the problem, that implies that the default stack ulimit is less > than the 8MiB-64KiB that it takes to reach the guard page... Just so I'm clear, is the

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >