Re: Default services enabled

On 08/19/2011 10:08 AM, Ola Thoresen wrote: On 19. aug. 2011 16:00, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 08/19/2011 12:35 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: On Friday, August 19, 2011 03:41:33 AM Tim Waugh wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 16:52 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: It's not so much cups start up being

Re: Why EDID is not trustworthy for DPI

On 10/04/2011 01:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: I am clearly going to have to explain this one more time, forever. Let's see if I can't write it authoritatively once and simply answer with a URL from here out. (As always, use of the second person you herein is plural, not singular.)

Re: Why EDID is not trustworthy for DPI

On 10/06/2011 09:45 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:57:38PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: But maybe a quick 'I know I have a 13.3 widescreen laptop, you know the resolution, just make things work' should work for the single-screen case (esp if we stick to certain

NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping bug?

Hi, I need some help clarifying this issue in order to know if this is a bug or limits of the NFSv4 / POSIX ACL mapping before reporting it Creating a directory on the server with the following POSIX ACLs, rwx for the group sharedgroup and same defaults:

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote: 26.07.2011, 18:34, Andrew Haleya...@redhat.com: On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote: Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are supposed to run user scripts will work

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

On 07/26/2011 09:04 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] : Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this? You can. That is the case. a clean F15 install has PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin, not the same /etc/skel/.bash_profile but still has ~/bin Emmanuel --

Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH

Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to supersede system ones. Although there is probably only a small number of security vulnerabilities of user applications that would allow just creating

Re: Canonical Will Remove Java From Ubuntu

On 12/22/2011 08:50 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote: At $WORKPLACE I use a Java app (via javaws) - EMC NetWorker Management Console - that won't work with OpenJDK (it pops up a username/password window as expected but doesn't then pop up the main app window once the username+password have been entered),

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/16/2013 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: ... Additionally the following symlinks will be provided: * /usr/share/javascript - /usr/share/assets/javascript * /usr/share/fonts - /usr/share/assets/fonts (so any Fedora font package can be used as a web font) Not all fonts installed had

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/19/2013 01:13 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: Not all fonts installed had the same licensing requirement, people install fonts from other places that are not as careful as Fedora with the licenses

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/22/2013 11:11 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit : Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the copyright displayed, some fonts has the copyright added to their metadata, I don't find for example that gnu-free-serif

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/23/2013 12:56 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit : Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the copyright displayed, some fonts

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 07/26/2013 12:30 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 21:58, Robert Marcano a écrit : The real problem with publishing things is that if I distribute binaries of many things I must follow the license, some say I need to distribute sources, some say that I need to distribute

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On Aug 3, 2013 8:55 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: On 07/26/2013 12:30 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 21:58, Robert Marcano a écrit : The real problem

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: You make the decision by installing a js-foo package, just like you make the decision to provide a web application by installing a package for it. You make a decision

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 02:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 22:57 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those libraries that can be used on desktop and web

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 05:10 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those libraries that can

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/09/2013 06:53 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: The directory is not called /usr/share/web-javascript, it is called /usr/share/javascript, and the packaging guidelines draft explicitly says that the intention

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/12/2013 03:23 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: This is a better explanation of why the use /usr/share/javascript: We want to be compatible with others distribution that have the legacy idea that JavaScript is a browser only thing, so in this directory we will only store JavaScript that run

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/14/2013 07:34 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: On 08/12/2013 03:23 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: This is a better explanation of why the use /usr/share/javascript: We want to be compatible with others distribution

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 11:28 AM, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. +1 Actually, unless it tracks users, i don't think that our guidelines forbids it, though it may influence our choice for the packages set installed by default. I

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On 02/12/2014 11:55 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a non-profit one?

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 04/30/2014 01:17 AM, P J P wrote: On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 3:18 AM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On my home LAN, I run my own DNSSEC-enabled server using F20 bind 9. This local server also is my DHCP and Samba server. As usual, dynamic clients receive the LAN local domain ID and DNS

Cron jobs output are sent to the network by default

I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug, the security tag was removed and it was recommend to make it public, something I can't do. I will resume the problem here, because there are comments that

Re: Cron jobs output are sent to the network by default

On 10/29/2014 04:08 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Oct 29, 2014 11:33 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com mailto:m...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it

Re: Cron jobs output are sent to the network by default

On 10/29/2014 05:06 PM, Moez Roy wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote: I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug, the security tag was removed

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/08/2014 04:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 07:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Hi, I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not amused when I noticed this: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 08:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.12.2014 um 14:16 schrieb Bastien Nocera: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 12:54:59PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: Why we can't have something like this? And if you don't want a popup asking, have something in the NetworkManager applet menu, where

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 09:20 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:08 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: Adding to that, this decision bring me memories to the awful old case when someone decided that the install anything from the repositories was permitted to any user on the system by default

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 09:27 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: What I see frequently are applications that are installed from outside the Fedora repositories, that can be forced to behave like Fedora packaging rules, with secure defaults before sharing, being installed and the user that don't know much about

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 11:01 AM, Christian Schaller wrote: - Original Message - From: Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 10:22:01 AM Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 02:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.12.2014 um 19:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera: Richard Hughes wrote: So do I! I'm a developer, which spin do I use so that the firewall doesn't get in my way? We can't develop a *product* based around what you specifically want, not me, nor anyone

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/09/2014 04:04 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:25:47PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote: On Dec 9, 2014 12:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 09.12.2014 um 20:51 schrieb Pete Travis: Hmm... a whitelist of things that are allowed to ask for firewall

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/10/2014 12:38 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:46:32 +0100 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Pete Travis wrote: Lets say I do have an understanding of network basics, just for the sake of argument. I share my application with you. The application is intended to

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On 12/10/2014 12:01 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: In the end, this is a tempest in a teapot. The release is out and it is done. The release is out, but there are an expected 13 months of security updates, of which this ought to be the first. and there is a precedent of

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On Dec 14, 2014 10:12 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Sudhir Khanger wrote: Most decision are being made on two assumptions 1. people have fast and unlimited internet connections and 2. people have high RAM and multiple core CPU powerful computers. Both of these assumptions

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On 12/15/2014 09:38 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote: Am 15.12.2014 um 14:29 schrieb Richard Hughes: At the moment the PK front-ends only download when on wifi or wired. Do you have an actual use-case for per-network configuration? Well I think the whole idea of wifi === unmetered is flawed. For

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On 12/15/2014 10:02 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 14:08, Felix Schwarz fschw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Well I think the whole idea of wifi === unmetered is flawed. It's as good a metric as we've got. When you set up a personal bridge between UMTS/wifi, or even GPRS/wired

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On 12/15/2014 10:15 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: On 15 December 2014 at 14:38, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: ...grown up user expects grown up users (whatever that means) can do gsettings set org.gnome.software download-updates false Devices designed for not grown up users has

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

On Dec 17, 2014 4:44 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 December 2014 at 00:00, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: This particular setting is frequently-requested and extremely important for users in the developing world and users who tether, so I think it would

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 06/01/2016 04:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:51:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: So there's tmux, screen, curl, wget, and probably quite a few others that don't necessarily get daemonized that are probably affected. I would really like to see a solution whereby tmux

Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

On 06/14/2016 09:08 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Certainly we're not going to come along and try to delete packages over the maintainers' objections. In general, I expect package maintainers would be deciding whether or not to make the switch, but yeah: if the upstream developers request that

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Anaconda LVM RAID

On 01/31/2017 03:44 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Also: does this apply to /boot partition RAID 1? IIRC that didn't work with LVM RAID at one time. This is important, that mdraid is still available in anaconda and not entirely replaced by LVM RAID. Not only /boot partition but UEFI boot

Re: Plan to orphan cups-pdf

t; devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Robert Marcano ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else seeing this? I just noticed it after reading

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

On 08/24/2016 10:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Robert Marcano wrote: ... I wonder if the default setting for network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris=https:// is or isn't a leak. No, it is not, at least not to the remote server you are trying to visit. Kerberos flow

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

On 08/23/2016 05:06 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/23/2016 04:44 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

On 08/24/2016 08:41 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any

Re: Broken: Firefox 48 + Private Tab + Kerberos SSO

On 08/24/2016 12:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Dusty Mabe wrote: I can't seem to get firefox-48.0-5.fc24.x86_64 to work with kerberos single sign on in a private window. It works fine when using a non-private window. Any ideas on why this would have broken? Anyone else

Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

On 12/14/2016 11:17 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: You're right, it's better :) By technology involved, true. But until there is a Fedora (or another distribution) flatpack build service, there is no replacement for a Fedora built RPM package. It doesn't matter you trust the developer, you must

Re: SELinux policy contibutions

On 03/23/2017 08:53 AM, Lukas Vrabec wrote: On 03/23/2017 01:12 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: Greetings. Is https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib the right place to contribute to the Fedora SELinux policy? I added a pull request for a small update needed for a new release

SELinux policy contibutions

Greetings. Is https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib the right place to contribute to the Fedora SELinux policy? I added a pull request for a small update needed for a new release of cups-pdf, but I am not sure someone is monitoring that. There is another one from rhatdan

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

I am late to the discussion, and a lot of them are related to the security implications. I am more worried about users overriding dependencies of other programs. Let me explain with a hypothetical case: 1- There is a system installed application that manipulates PDFs and has a requirement to

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

On 05/31/2018 06:52 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: ... This will basically get us back the F28 behavior of showing the menu but only after a failed boot, I think that is a good solution, do you agree? What is the definition of a successful boot? I ask because a machine could boot perfectly, and

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should be Recommends and not Requires You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence to support that. Example below. why do I need all these dependencies

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/12/2018 10:50 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:01 PM Robert Marcano mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote: Greetings. Hello, Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I thin

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

, only needs gtk3-devel to be built, the others devel packages are only needed if my code links to them directly. On 08/12/2018 11:07 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/12/2018 12:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:39 AM Robert Marcano <mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter mailto:rdie...@math.unl.edu>> wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: > Fo

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/12/2018 03:57 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM Robert Marcano <mailto:rob...@marcanoonline.com>> wrote: On 08/12/2018 02:07 PM, JD wrote: > What about dependencies of dependencies? Have you thought of that? Sorry, I don't get

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/13/2018 10:20 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On ma, 13 elo 2018, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you think they’re not needed, or are you sure

Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

Greetings. Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client, probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/13/2018 09:12 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/12/2018 12:46 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: And thinking about it, a lot *-devel packages interdependencies should be Recommends and not Requires You keep saying this, I'd like to see some evidence

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On 08/13/2018 08:34 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 08/13/2018 06:17 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 11 Aug 2018, at 20:58, Robert Marcano wrote: Current *-devel packages tend to pull a lot of dependencies, probably to make developers life easier, but I think some of them are not needed. Do you

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Robert Marcano wrote: > > > For example, someone developing against krb5-devel for a GSSAPI client, > > probably doesn't need openssl-devel installed, that they are linking > > against Kerberos doesn't means they use

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

On 10/31/18 8:13 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user wide. Simple reason is refresh the look of terminal while also providing useful information especially for git branch. Since powerline does not impact the performance, it will be

Re: Enabling powerline theme system wide by default

On 11/2/18 10:12 AM, John Florian wrote: On 11/2/18 9:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:10 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 01 November 2018 at 01:13, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: It will be nice to enable powerline theme by default system and user

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/29/18 7:46 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: On 11/28/18 4:37 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276). We're down a rabbit hole where it seems that in Fedora 29 /etc/nssswitch.conf ought

Re: /etc/nssswitch.conf is supposed to be a symlink now?

On 11/28/18 11:37 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 11/28/18 11:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 11/28/18 3:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: Trying to track down a bug in IPP printing (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653276). We're down a rabbit hole where it seems

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: * The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking measures. We don't want to track; just count. Uh, so what's the story there? i mean, if you pass over the uuid you

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

On 1/9/19 4:45 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 2019-01-08 18:13, Robert Marcano a écrit : On 1/7/19 2:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:14PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: * The Fedora community cares about privacy and is adverse to tracking measures. We don't want

Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects

On 3/29/19 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: On 29/03/2019 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote: I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files like when I execute strip directly on those binaries. The first thing I

Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects

On 3/29/19 1:44 PM, Josh Stone wrote: On 3/29/19 9:17 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program Side note on this -- if you do package Rust shared libraries, not just executables, and you want them to be available for further linking, then rustc

RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects

I have been working on a private RPM for a Rust based program and noticed that the RPM strip scripts are not reducing the binaries files like when I execute strip directly on those binaries. The first thing I checked is the brp-strip script. This one is filtering executables where "file"

Re: How to install a mountpoint directory from an rpm?

On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote: Hi, I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a systemd service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon. What's the best way to encode this in the specfile? I did have: %files /afs but that doesn't

Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

On 4/17/19 4:38 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 16.04.19 09:06, Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a nice highlevel goal to shoot for. Another one I might add: "No stuck stop jobs" - it annoys me every

Re: Where can I remove myself from bug emails for packages I am not a maintainer anymore

On 8/14/19 4:08 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-08-13, Robert Marcano wrote: I am not maintaining eclipse-subclipse from a long time ago, I am not listed as a member at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-subclipse but I still get FTBFS bugzilla emails. That's because synchronization

Where can I remove myself from bug emails for packages I am not a maintainer anymore

Greetings. Where can I remove myself from bug emails for packages I am not a maintainer anymore? I am not maintaining eclipse-subclipse from a long time ago, I am not listed as a member at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-subclipse but I still get FTBFS bugzilla emails. Any help

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: There's no need to write "a new style of firewall". It would be as easy as asking the user once whether a new connection is trusted or not. That's it. But, well, how do you do that? What do

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 8:06 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:23 AM, John Harris wrote: At least in KDE, possibly not in GNOME as it lacks many of the features available in KDE, you can specify the zone of the connection in your NetworkManager configuration GUI. We used to have

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 9:10 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: On 8/27/19 8:57 AM, Björn Persson wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: Maybe, now that NetworkManager implements now its own DHCP client, if the IP received is not an private address (RFC 1918 for IPv4, some other consideration should be done for IPv6), Notify

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 8:57 AM, Björn Persson wrote: Robert Marcano wrote: Maybe, now that NetworkManager implements now its own DHCP client, if the IP received is not an private address (RFC 1918 for IPv4, some other consideration should be done for IPv6), Notify the user the connection is in a secure

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 4:52 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't really accomplish anything: either your app or service needs network access and you have whitelisted

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/26/19 9:27 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:15 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: This is a reasonable point of view, until you notice Linux desktops evironments don't provide applications with a method to detect if they are running on a private network or not (See

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:14 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: In Fedora Server there is a suit of package named samba and samba-dc* These package, with some other, are useful to make Fedora an Active Directory Domain Controller. I have decide tu use it into a little lan and convert old samba NT 4 Style into AD-DC

Re: Fedora Samba DC for what purpose it is released in Fedora ?

On 9/2/19 11:58 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 11.26 -0400, Robert Marcano ha scritto: I switched to run Samba DCs on a container with non Fedora / RHEL / CentOS provided RPMs. Thank Robert for reply. Then why don't release samba compiled with Heimdal kerberos? I

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/26/19 11:35 AM, Dan Williams wrote: On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that want to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also doesn't

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On 8/27/19 10:03 AM, John Harris wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 5:35:08 AM MST Robert Marcano wrote: On 8/27/19 8:18 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 2:37 PM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: There's no need to write "a new style of firewall". It would be as easy

[perl-Time-Period] Rebuilt in order to fix broken dependencies

commit 2152b33fb685cc6abac19c4776d906a4907add87 Author: Robert Marcano ro...@promca.com Date: Mon Feb 7 09:01:56 2011 -0430 Rebuilt in order to fix broken dependencies perl-Time-Period.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Time

Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

On 9/26/19 12:57 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit : Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss: ○ Every

Re: Remove all non UK/USA English spell checker variants from default Fedora installation

On 7/18/20 8:44 AM, Germano Massullo wrote: All desktop oriented Fedora installers install on the system packages: hunspell hunspell-en hunspell-en-GB hunspell-en-US When a user opens the language list of the spell checker, is has ~24 different English options, like English (Antigua and

Re: Driverless scanning for WSD and ESCL supported scanners is coming

On 8/6/20 3:48 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 8/5/20 2:30 PM, Jiří Eischmann wrote: Will it be possible to use a Fedora machine as a server, so that I can have an old scanner connected to it via USB and then shared with other devices on the local network via those protocols? That would be neat.

Re: Driverless scanning for WSD and ESCL supported scanners is coming

On 8/5/20 8:30 AM, Jiří Eischmann wrote: Zdenek Dohnal píše v St 05. 08. 2020 v 07:44 +0200: Hi all, I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2]. sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually

Re: User experience issue on btrfs

On 6/29/20 2:26 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Sunday, June 28, 2020 5:37:08 PM MST Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, John M. Harris Jr said: XFS proved to be troublesome, and still is up to the latest of RHEL7. It's not uncommon to have to run xfs_repair on smaller XFS partitions,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

On 6/5/20 12:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:23 +, devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:15:39 -0500 From: Steven Munroe Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Delay service startup but only on boot

On 12/3/20 9:44 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:41 AM Gargoyle > wrote: On 02/12/2020 16:09, Richard Shaw wrote: Nope, it's an external networked device. They always "boot up" at the same time, but the computer which runs the service boots

Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, 8:19 PM Davide Cavalca via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 12:54 -0400, Robert Marcano via devel wrote: > > On 12/21/20 12:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > === New process =

  1   2   >