Regarding these two questions:
Are there any concerns about such change?
>> I believe that >90% users wouldn't notice anything as it's related to the
>> history database only.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:01 AM Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Since we've changed
hank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Technical Product Manager - RHEL Systems Mgmt
Red Hat, Inc.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 11 April 2018
Re-adding epel-devel as I was previously not a member and received a
rejection notice.
Thank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Technical Product Manager - RHEL Systems Mgmt
Red Hat, Inc.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Terry Bowling <tbowl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hopefully I can help pro
a developer working in Fedora Rawhide.
Thank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Technical Product Manager - RHEL Systems Mgmt
Red Hat, Inc.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:04 PM Terry Bowling wrote:
> Regarding to a few of the questions about why modularity was created in
> the first place (paraphrased), I can
appy to consult with, but not
dictate to, Fedora members on defining their own policy guidelines if
desired.
Thank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Technical Product Manager - RHEL Systems Mgmt
Red Hat, Inc.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:52 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:29 PM Colin Walters wrot
Hello Fedora friends!
I would like to follow up and collect your input on Application Streams and
modularity after all of the discussions over the past month. We have been
listening and brainstorming on how to proceed with both the tooling, user
experience, and communicating better upstream for
eams without breaking
a user's choice or need for a different AppStream in the dependency chain.
b. What feature or tooling gaps still exist for creating
community or commercial products for RHEL & Fedora?
c. Anything I did not think to ask?
Thank you for your feedback!
---
essed well enough that we are
listening to all of our developers and working to resolve that.
Hope that helps provide more clarity.
Thank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Product Manager - RHEL Automation & Management
Red Hat, Inc.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:33 PM clime wrote:
>
> So I don't really get even after almost five years where modularity is
> going or what it wants to achieve. I don't understand its use-case for
> any of Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS because disabling
> parallel-installability to allow parallel
Hello Fedora Community!
I would like to start a dedicated thread to focus on the “why” and use case
contexts to help clarify past and future decision making related to
Application Streams and Modularity. As I follow some of the Fedora mailing
list threads and Pagure issues, I have noticed a
the pain for these customers in the RHEL 10
timeframe, as well as a container image (maybe built from the rpms pulled
from EPEL?).
Hope this is helpful. And again, THANK YOU!
Terry Bowling
Sr. Product Manager - RHEL Installation & Build Services Experience
Red Hat, Inc.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023
Re-adding epel-devel as I was previously not a member and received a
rejection notice.
Thank you,
Terry Bowling
Sr. Technical Product Manager - RHEL Systems Mgmt
Red Hat, Inc.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Terry Bowling <tbowl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hopefully I can help pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
