Re: Review(s) swap - sugar activities

On November 5, 2011 12:00:09 PM Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda wrote: Hello, Folloing are few sugar activities that I have packaged. They need to be reviewed. Anyone interested in reviewing them all, some or one? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741494

Re: Review(s) swap - sugar activities

Hello, On November 8, 2011 11:22:24 AM Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: [...] well, I'm kinda busy with exams at the uni and I'll be free again after the first week of December. I'm ok with your suggestion, but the only problem is it is only after the first week of December that I can proceed

Re: Review(s) swap - sugar activities

On November 8, 2011 05:44:46 PM Brendan Jones wrote: On 11/08/2011 09:29 PM, Thibault North wrote: Hello, On November 8, 2011 11:22:24 AM Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: [...] well, I'm kinda busy with exams at the uni and I'll be free again after the first week of December. I'm ok

Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

On Friday 15 January 2010 15:36:42 Sebastian Dziallas wrote: [...] I had attempted to package it, since it would be probably of interest for the Design Suite, but building currently fails due to [1]. I'm not sure whether I'll be able to look into it over the next days, but if somebody else

Review swap

Hi packagers, I have an easy package to review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664298 autojump - A fast way to navigate your filesystem from the command line. Anyone interested in a review swap ? Thanks, Thibault -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

On December 19, 2010 02:56:05 pm Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: Hello, Thibault. I ready swap and took it. Thanks Pavel. Let me know which one I can review for you. Thibault 19.12.2010 20:59, Thibault North wrote: Hi packagers, I have an easy package to review: https

Re: msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

Hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Rob Spanton rspan...@zepler.net wrote: Hi, [...] So I'd like to submit a new msp430mcu package for review.  This package would almost entirely consist of headers and linker scripts. Since this package would be essential for cross-compiling *anything* for

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

I took GREYCstoration. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Due to the orphaning of packages due to inactive maintainers, this list is a little longer than normal. When we're in danger of losing so many packages, it's a sign that

Re: avr-gcc refusing to link against avr-libc in Fedora 23

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:07 AM, spike wrote: > [snap] > Could it be that the current avr-gcc that's in Fedora 23 (and it seems also > in 24 and rawhide) is just not playing nicely with the (apparently pretty > ancient) avr-libc version? Something was mentioned here: >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check: tnorth (for autojump branch request)

Hi there, I apologize for the lack of response. I've been unable to contribute lately for personal reasons. I'll attempt to pass or orphan packages I can't support any more. @Michel Alexandre Salim: I gave you the requested rights. Please get in touch with me per e-mail directly if need anything

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check: tnorth (for autojump branch request)

Hi Michel, On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:22 PM Michel Alexandre Salim < mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote: [...] > Thanks for getting in touch! I have one additional request (please also > orphan autojump so we can find a new primary maintainer), and hope > everything is fine personally. > I just