I've been running nightly with this enabled for quite a while on Intel
and it's been fine.
Note that OMTC is required for e10s.
The layer acceleration pref is a totally different thing and will stay
off for the near future. It's affected by a bug in libxcb which has been
patched but not made it
*if* you use binary tarballs they *should not* be extracted in a user
writeable location as *no binary* whenever possible should have
permissions allowing a ordinary user to change them
This is simply not the way how end users install original Mozilla
Firefox binaries.
In addition, if
I currently use Mumble quite a bit, but it has been orphaned in F22+. I
have emailed the previous maintainer but didn't get a response.
I would be interested in maintaining the package, but this would be the
first that I have done for Fedora.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mumble/
On 11/15/2015 10:34 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> My understand is that Opus excels at lower bitrates; above 100 Vorbis is
> better.
Opus is always better - but at high bitrates, artifacts become so
imperceptible that it doesn't matter too much which codec you pick, so
you might still pick Vorbis
I also absolutely hate flat-volumes. Often I have trouble getting an
application loud enough, and discover that it's too low in the mixer.
The idea of flat volumes is to avoid a global volume, but the way it
interacts is super confusing and unlike any other system people use
(except maybe Android,
On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>
> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
> the providers can be installed
> Sep 25 23:14:39
Um, that bug looks totally unrelated to the problems reported here.
On 09/21/2015 06:51 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Germano Massullo wrote:
>>
>>> Il 21/09/2015 21:45, Thomas Daede ha scritto:
>>>> Is there currently a bug open for this?
In the case of Youtube, you shouldn't be having any issues because
Mozilla switched to using a soft mixer internal to Firefox:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1046814
If you still have issues, you should report them upstream.
(note that this means all website volume sliders are
OK, here's a couple of counterexamples, still using default apps:
- I start chatting on Firefox with WebRTC and I can't hear the person
talking over my music. So I open the GNOME control center and make
Firefox louder. Pulseaudio is awesome. But now, the volume of all of my
other applications is
Is there currently a bug open for this? I'd rather it not get lost.
On 09/17/2015 11:59 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
> ===
> Definition of flat-volumes from [1] : it scales the device-volume with
> the volume of the "loudest" application. For example, raising the VoIP
> call volume will raise
That's all x86 assembly, not ARM.
It looks like all that program is doing is trying to select a bundled
software mesa implementation. None of those are probably included in the
Fedora build anyway, I'd suggest patching to not build that executable
at all.
On 01/05/2016 06:12 PM, Orion Poplawski
On 09/14/2016 12:50 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Although, perhaps given upstream has not had a release since 2006 and
> we've acquired 14 out-of-tree security patches (and countless others
> for various fixes) perhaps we should drop dep this from applications
> completely?
OpenJPEG has long
For Fedora Workstation, the current limit on mlock()ed memory per user
is 64kiB, which less than what some applications need.
In particular, Bitcoin Core uses mlock() to prevent private keys from
being swapped to disk. The total size of the wallet keys can exceed 300kB.
Audio is another use case
In Firefox, the about:config setting:
layout.css.devPixelsPerPx
can be set to an arbitrary non-integer scalefactor, such as 1.25 or 1.5.
Unfortunately, GTK applications are limited to scalefactors of 1 or 2 so
you're stuck with Large Text, gnome-tweak-tool's font scaling factor, or
setting font
On 10/21/2016 03:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, do you know if that's hidpi-style 'scale everything'
> scaling, or is it just font size scaling?
It's hidpi-style 'scale everything'. Apps can either natively draw at
1.5x or 1.25x, or be scaled by the compositor (with what looks
On 10/21/2016 03:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 13" 1080p laptops are the biggest exception to this that I can think
> of. I dunno what you do with them on Windows; I think Windows has a
> slider somewhere which more or less works like the 'scaling factor'
> setting.
Yes, Windows also has a
On 10/21/2016 03:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> There was a lot of kerfuffle around the GTK (and Wayland) decision to
>> only support integer scales, searching for it will give you some background.
>
> I don't recall that...do you have any specific references? At the time
> hidpi was first
Thinkpad W540, with two finger right click on (which I think is off by
default):
https://people.xiph.org/~tdaede/w540.evemu.xz
On 11/13/2016 07:20 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> [Disclaimer: sorry if you've seen this one before, I posted it to desktop@
> but I only got one recording. That's not
On 12/14/2016 03:29 AM, Martin Ueding wrote:
> How could I diagnose this regressions? There are no issues in
> `journalctl -f` whenever there is a short lag. Any log that might help?
Could it be something to do with dbus? Do all of these actions make
messages appear in dbus-monitor? I've noticed
On 12/11/2016 07:33 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> I would expect if they are provided by upstream, they should be fine.
> However, if they are generated during build from some other source, that
> won't be acceptable, as MP3 encoding is still not allowed in Fedora.
Note also that if you are generating
I have such a piece of hardware and could run a benchmark in ~1 week, if
you're curious. That said, Fedora Workstation is borderline unusable on
that hardware anyway - due to the integrated graphics, not the CPU. I
doubt most users would notice a slowdown from different CFLAGS when
gnome-shell
On 04/09/2017 02:39 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
> I had bad experience with enabling powertop' service - USB mice and
> headphones don't work very well with that. But I am using tuned (tuned-gtk)
> for few years and I didn't notice any issues (top-battery) profile. I see
> that my Haswell
There's also tuned, another way to set lots of kernel bits. I think it
was an accepted feature for a previous Fedora release, but it's off by
default, and it is only mentioned in the Fedora 20 power saving guide,
which seems to have disappeared entirely for Fedora 21+:
On 04/07/2017 05:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Powertop, maybe it ought to be a feature request for F27, and see if a
> bunch of bug reports happen during the beta *shrug*. I've used it on
> an ancient and new laptop, of different manufacture, and haven't had a
> problem. But of course if it puts
On 10/16/2017 01:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main
> problem.
>
> I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work
> out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess FF
> maintainers may have
On 10/12/2017 02:54 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Yes, but that wasn't branded as all-new, better-than-ever Firefox (which
> it is), that intentionally breaks stuff which is directly visible by the
> end-user. An update that breaks the majority of extensions is very hard
> to sell for a stable
On 10/12/2017 10:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think that may not realistically be possible, though, as 56 is not
> being made an ESR, AFAICT, and it sounds like downgrading from 56 to 52
> (the most recent ESR), aside from the epoch bump it'd require on our
> side, is not straightforward (it
On 12/18/2017 03:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Does anyone read this as Mozilla admitting that they messed up?
This was published today:
https://blog.mozilla.org/firefox/update-looking-glass-add/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This now landed in Firefox Nightly, and it's working great! The only bug
I hit was with the dark theme:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1416673
On 09/15/2017 12:26 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Guys,
>
> there's available [1] new Firefox package with emulated CSD rendering [2].
>
>
On 07/03/2018 05:15 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Move to uEFI as the default boot mechanism for ARMv7 devices.
Will this work with virt-manager too? Currently, while aarch64 boots via
uEFI there, it seems that armv7 is only supported by manually specifying
a kernel and initrd.
On 07/16/2018 11:27 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> There is a /usr/libexec/tracker-extract process that searches my directories
> about every 11 seconds. I can imagine on a laptop that would be a lot of disk
> activity. Sometimes I use root in my home directory and accidentally create
> files owned
On 07/18/2018 02:26 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == User Experience ==
> Currently the Fedora support for FPGAs is basically non existent.
> There's currently a few open tools for specific FPGAs. This is the
> beginning of improving this with the intention of having a uniform as
> possible user
On 7/23/19 7:52 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> In the interest of a productive discussion, could we maybe focus on what
> the benefits are, both of changing the baseline in general and of
> enabling any particular features?
As someone whose software heavily depends on SSE and AVX2 assembly
On 4/12/21 09:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
P.S. I opened an upstream pull request to add support for the Lulzbot
TAZ Pro and the Mini 2 in the main Cura codebase (still actively
maintained). I would highly recommend that anyone considering reviving
these packages devote their efforts in that
34 matches
Mail list logo
