On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:44:41 +0300
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I tried using
%global gccver %(gcc -dumpversion)
%if %{gccver} = 4.6.0
foo here
%endif
to conditionalize usage of quadruple precision support in a spec file
that ships on multiple distros, but the comparison gives the
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 21:39:24 +0100
Niels de Vos wrote:
Watch out, this is very dangerous! You are comparing strings, not
versions:
print '4.6.2' = '4.6.12'
True
Thanks... I was testing with to low numbers... :(
The better way would be to use distutils.version:
from distutils.version
Hi list,
I just build ipython-0.11 in rawhide, which changed pretty much
anything internally, so *ALL* dependant packages will be possible
broken.
repoquery just reports 2 packages, but it should be more...:
python-networkx
python-polybori
Missing packages (maybe more):
python-matplotlib
scipy
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't test it. I waited for today's Rawhide update
so I could get the new version of ipython. About 2 seconds after
the yum transaction finished,
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 08:58:27 -0400
Ric Wheeler wrote:
I have a shiny new laptop (HP Pavilion dm4) with the Sandy Bridge
video (HD 3000). Installing F15 or the nightly F16 build causes a
blank screen during the install. Installing/running basic video works
but is annoying.
I have spent a
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 14:22:35 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, I can test now, and it looks like python-polybori is broken by
the new ipython. When I try to run ipbori, I get an ipython help
message, followed by this:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:10:03 +0300
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hi all,
Due to the brown paperbag bug of rpm-4.9.1 causing unwanted trailing
slashes on directories (with various nasty side-effects), the
following packages in rawhide require rebuilding, the sooner the
better to stop spreading
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:04:48 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will
be possible in F16?
Hi Joachim,
It won't be possible in the near future, because it's orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pdfedit
Unless
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:34:22 -0300
Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi
Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a -devel subpackage?
I'd say, it depends on the use case...
Why do you want to do that?
* Only to have some piece of software installed, which can handle the
(C++?) source code? Then no:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu writes:
The I can 100%... is not the first sentence of the comment
but it's all in there.
I'm taking about the redhat bug. How do I get to know about all this
if nobody tells me?
Yep...
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:11:54 +0200
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0200
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu writes:
The I can 100%... is not the first sentence of the comment
but it's all in there.
I'm taking about the redhat bug
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 +
Rawhide Report wrote:
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
extensions are still compatible?
The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for
updates,
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:07:17 -0600
Peter Gueckel wrote:
Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
Yeah sometimes is okay of course. Happening every two or three weeks
it isn't.
So, why are you using devel?
This happened on F-15.
-Tom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 03:41:43 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/10/2011 03:33 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 11:10:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/09/2011 10:59 PM, Vinzenz Vietzke wrote:
I'd prefer a bit less bleeding edge over breaking crucial
packages.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:30:19 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:43:58 +0200
Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all
extensions are still compatible?
Anyone with a FAS account can pull updates from
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:18:10 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) said:
On 10/10/2011 08:52 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
So there doesn't need to be more co-maintainers (which is welcomed
anyway), but it would help to get such updates pushed to stable
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:36:01 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Thomas Spura (toms...@fedoraproject.org) said:
If the required updates are due to version checks in the
extensions, it might be possible to have RPM have a dependency
generator that checks these and outputs the appropriate
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:45:17 -0500
Nathan O. wrote:
If I remember correctly I did update it in rawhide.
The master repo says it is updated to the latest version, by looking
at the SPEC
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=worker.git;a=blob_plain;f=worker.spec;hb=master
Apparently, you
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:01:00 -0400
David Michael wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The automatic requires proposed in bug #745038, does this:
Requires: firefox = 3.0
Requires: firefox = 10.0a1
and seems
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:57:35 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:40 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:16:52 +0200
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It would be great, when bodhi would allow me to add an updated
mozilla-noscript
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:58:15 +0200
Henrik Nordström wrote:
mån 2011-10-10 klockan 20:44 +0200 skrev Thomas Spura:
Forcing only critpath packages being in updates-testing and the rest
being allowed to push to stable directly would help to fix issues
much faster.
You could set stable
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:02:36 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:11:39PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
As far as I know if you burn the key you will lose the ability to
use the yubikey's servers and I'm guessing
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:58:05 +0200
Martin Stransky wrote:
Firefox desktop file name has been changed in rawhide, from
mozilla-firefox.desktop to firefox.desktop. See bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736558.
Ok. Could you also please comment to packaging the firefox/mozilla
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:18:55 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
The first two should be dead easy. From Fedora's point of view,
they're just data packages; no libraries or binaries are involved.
The third one is a bit complex. I had to tweak a lot of pathnames to
match existing Fedora practice, as
2011/11/20 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
Is the bump for real this time? I remember that some time ago the
soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds.
--
Unless there are too much problems with this yes:
2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr:
- koji ➙ last build...
This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
And the script says it was Nov 2...
Otherwise a great start :)
Thanks,
Tom
--
devel mailing
Am Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:37:19 -0500
schrieb Mark Rader msra...@gmail.com:
Hello
I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS
a couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors.
[ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
Cloning
Am Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:20:35 -0700
schrieb John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com:
F-14 Alpha TC1 has been posted for testing:
* http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620274
pyconfig-32.h and [respectively] pyconfig-64.h are
Am Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:44:02 +0200
schrieb Karel Zak k...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:56:37PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/03/2010 12:53 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
correct, git will share objects between branches, so by storing
in different directories you'll loose that
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:03:46 +0300
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 06:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
Yaah -- so if it's useful documentation, then I'd be against
creating a rule that bans it. The next
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should remain
assigned to the actual application, unless an actual investigation
has been done and there's a reasonable certainty the flaw is in the
library code in which it
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:49:29 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:01:36 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose a general rule that ABRT crash logs should
remain assigned
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:20:18 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Without a clear way how to reproduce it, they can't help here
One advantage of automated collection (or semi-automated like ABRT) is
that given enough
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing
something like:
foo/__pycache__
to capture the directory and the bytecode files within.
Unfortunately there is sometimes also a __pycache__ directory in
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:29:38 +0800
Chen Lei wrote:
2010/8/22 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages,
listing something like:
foo/__pycache__
to capture
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:37:19 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/5/10 2:30 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Well, how about creating dist-f14-for-chainbuild build target and
allow people to tag or untag build as/from that tag freely?
For example
Hi list,
I'm orphaning pychess, because I don't use it that often anymore and I
don't have time to take care properly for all the bugs (and it needs
some love...):
23 open bugs:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:50:24 +0200
Chris Spike wrote:
Hi,
Mohamed unfortunately doesn't answer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578957 or private mail, so
does anybody know how to get in touch with him?
I'd try pikachu_2014 [at] jabber.fr (obviously via XMPP ;-)), but I
didn't
the original maintainer accept that change to the package.
If upstream released an extra python3 package, I sometimes package that
and get it in fedora.
I don't think we need a python3 SIG for that. Isn't the python SIG
enought? ;-)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python
--
Thomas Spura
--
dreampie-python3-1.1-5.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.1
Should be fixed now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=201221
--
Thomas Spura
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:22:14 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for
fpconst. I have not so far been able to contact upstream.
Maybe we should start a SIG
.
--
Thomas Spura
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:15:03 +0200
Dan Horák wrote:
Jesse Keating píše v Út 26. 10. 2010 v 12:01 -0700:
On 10/26/10 11:46 AM, Branched Report wrote:
Updated Packages:
tryton-1.6.1-1.fc14
---
* Tue Jul 27 2010 Dan Horák dan[at]danny.cz 1.6.1-1
- update to
Hi,
the package gpointing-device-settings is searching for a new
maintainer in all branches.
I just orphaned it as I don't use it any more and it doesn't preserve
the settings from one reboot to another and don't know how to fix this
properly [1]. A partial solution might be at [2]
Furthermore
Am Freitag, den 15.01.2010, 23:22 -0500 schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
I had attempted to package it, since it would be probably of interest
for the Design Suite, but building currently fails due to [1]. I'm not
sure whether
Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 22:00 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
Is there any provenpackager that can help me to sync F-11 and F-12
branches with devel's, since the original ower of qtiplot doesn't
maintain any packages for more than one year.
See
Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2010, 00:15 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
* pychess -- Chess game for GNOME
I've taken this.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 20:18 +0100 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
Am Samstag, den 06.02.2010, 19:27 +0100 schrieb drago01:
What needs to be fixed here is bugzilla not ABRT, we need a report
upstream button.
Ok, and where is the submit downstream button in upstream's bug
tracker? The
Hi list,
I never saw this anywhere before, so I'd like to ask here first, before
doing so ;)
Is it allowed to create a file ~/.mpd.conf, when building in koji and
deleting afterwards?
I need to write down a password into that file, for running a testsuite.
If that file does not exist, I can't
Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Thomas Spura:
Is it allowed to create a file ~/.mpd.conf, when building in koji and
deleting afterwards?
There also is a safer way...
echo MPD_SECRETWORD=$(pwgen -s 50 1) mpd.conf
chmod 600 mpd.conf
export MPD_CONF_FILE=mpd.conf
run tests
Am Freitag, den 26.02.2010, 11:14 +0100 schrieb Ralf Ertzinger:
Hi.
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:29:21 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
Here is the snipped, I intend to use:
%{_mpich2_load}
# create ~/.mpd.conf, if it does not yet exist
if [ -e ~/.mpd.conf ]; then
# working locally
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 22:40 +0100 schrieb Hans Ulrich Niedermann:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:29:21 +0100
Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de wrote:
Is it allowed to create a file ~/.mpd.conf, when building in koji and
deleting afterwards?
I need to write down a password
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 19:03 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
Following the previous thread on opencv:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-February/131584.html
Almost all packages have been rebuilt against opencv-2.0.0-7 (thank you,
guys !) except mrpt.
We didn't get any
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:50 -0500 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On 03/06/2010 05:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
Given the obvious utility of this script, can we get it added to the
fedora-packager package? It doesn't make a lot of sense to
Am Sonntag, den 14.03.2010, 15:26 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:41:26 -0400, Neal wrote:
Kalev Lember wrote:
An alternative, and in my opinion better approach is to group those two
builds into one update in Bodhi. This way you can keep karma automatism,
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 19:05 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
* Automatically add latest %changelog entry to each Bodhi update as
Notes or as something else (new field, perhaps).
The changelog information is already provided in the update detail metadata,
Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 11:33 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 18:07, Thomas Spura
spur...@students.uni-mainz.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 19:05 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
* Automatically add latest %changelog entry to each Bodhi
Am Donnerstag, den 18.03.2010, 23:30 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
On 18 March 2010 00:19, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Wed Mar 17 09:15:24 UTC 2010
linphone-2.1.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libortp.so.7
Thanks Quentin for looking into this and Jesse for importing. I have
Am Samstag, den 20.03.2010, 07:20 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Thomas Spura wrote:
KPackageKit != Bodhi:
When you use fedora-easy-karma or the updates site to provide testing
feedback, it would be nice to have such a %changelog field, *expecially*
if there are no updates notes shipped
Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Mike Chambers:
On a brand new F13 install using yesterday's images/packages, and using
evolution and imap, I noticed that when deleting emails, they aren't
going to the trash folder. I understand that they technically they are
still there and
Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk:
Yeah. Kick out KDE! Use XFCE! Flamewar! *g*
+1 :D
Just jokin'...
I also agree with Fine. Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And
of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug...
I also agree with
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 30.11.2013 22:26, Ionuț Arțăriși napsal(a):
python-tornado -- Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
I need that one so I can take it.
Hmm, sorry for being faster ;)
I didn't see this mail, but only the
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote:
What do you need it for? Is your dependency still working with 3.1.1?
pronteserve from printrun
httpretty
octoprint
None of those is in Fedora right now.
Feel free to take the package, I'll investigate if 3.1.1 is ok
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:32:04 -0800
Jesse Keating wrote:
On 11/22/10 12:47 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:31:05PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
So they stay in updates-testing until someone does actually test
them.
We all know that the longer that updates wait in
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:23:31 -0300
João Neto wrote:
2010/11/24 João Neto joao.gsn...@gmail.com
I Running Fedora 14 x64 on HP G42 250Br ( Intel 5 Series/3400Series
Chipset Family ) on Core i3 330M;
After boot, the CPU temp is 58º C, after 1 or 2 minutes, without any
operation, the CPU
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:05:57 +0100
Petr Machata wrote:
04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
[snip]
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:42:08 +0200
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
I wonder why I'm still getting nag mails about
pokerth has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.44.0()(64bit)
pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:55:42 +0200
Pablo Martin-Gomez wrote:
Hi,
Since the 28th of March, Rawhide get no more updates as the rawhide
report show up (or better said, don't show up) by its disappearance.
The last update I got was a broken NetworkManager and
Empathy/Gnome-Shell ('cos of
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Some packagers have been observed circumventing the system by
configuring a karma threshold of 1, so their own +1 vote or the
first one from an arbitrary tester make it
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:40:22 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:37:25 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Some packagers have been observed circumventing
Hi list,
I'm orphaning gbirthday and linbox, because I either don't use them
anymore or it's too much work to integrate it into fedora...
* gbirthday:
I don't use it anymore, and it has some SQL bugs open (I
don't use SQL either, so I can't debug it etc.)
*
On Sat, 14 May 2011 21:14:20 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Thomas Spura
toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
* linbox:
Required for SAGE [1], but FTBFS since a while and the new
version now requires another package, not yet in fedora
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan gpointing-device-settings
This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
I definitely want to keep this.
Peter: Do you continue as primary maintainer and I'll co-maintain it, or
do you want to stay co-maintainer?
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:55:30 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:28:59 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan gpointing-device-settings
This is co-maintained by whot (not shown in this list).
I
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
* If a git commit is tagged in a specific way, omit from rpm changelog.
What I mean by tagged is a git tag, in form of let's say
silentXXX. Where XXX has to be unique, but that can be figured out by
Hi,
I just orphaned blazeblogger [1] in rawhide as I just switched to hyde [2].
If there are perl enthusiasts, who like to take it, feel free to do so
and just let me know, if you also want other (non-rawhide) branches.
Greetings,
Tom
[1] http://blaze.blackened.cz/
[2]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
Ri == Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de writes:
Ri For your information. I stoped working for the Mate-Desktop project
Ri for f18 because for me it is imposssible to to work together with
Ri Dan Mashal. One of the
2011/12/6 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:26:00 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
in the Fedora accounts system, and proactively identify any users
whom have not done anything in Fedora
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
mtas...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
Hi,
Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:53 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:12:30PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 14:06 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:22:06PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
To some extent I agree
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Now I have problem building two packages and pushes into stable branches -
to build gxneur I need waiting until xneur go through testing and will be
pushed to stable. Sometimes, when karma can't be
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Ofer Schreiber oschr...@redhat.com wrote:
As I'm not used to this kind of self-intro posts, I'll try to make this
one quick :)
I'm Ofer Schreiber, and I've been working with several Linux distributions
for the past few years or so.
Currently, I'm working for
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Greg aptge...@gmail.com wrote:
will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's
likely to be a fsck next month?
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTA0Njk
Looks like these bugs needs to be resolved first:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
It doesn't look like Bohdi isn't set up for branched yet.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-February/000889.html
On Feb 14 will be the use bodhi and do updates switch.
Greetings,
Tom
--
devel
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why?
We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
(Right now we have a symlink from python2 - python and not the other
way around like in the pep, but the
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why?
We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
(Right
2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
account.
How do you do this check?
Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail
address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4].
When it's not
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
account.
How do you do this check?
Show all useres in the cla_signed group
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 12:52 + schrieb
build...@fedoraproject.org:
parcellite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On i386:
parcellite-1.0.2-0.1.rc5.fc17.i686 requires
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hence my reply.
*Sigh*
Then better look here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html :)
Greetings,
Tom
--
devel
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got two reviews I need completed which are dependencies for
another package I'd like to submit.
Pivy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458975
Please open a new review request so $reporter == ${submitter
Am Samstag, den 24.04.2010, 13:27 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 04/24/2010 01:15 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
* because without forwarding them the whole ABRT approach is
useless. We are gathering data but the reports are going to be
closed WONTFIX by the
Am Samstag, den 24.04.2010, 22:14 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 04/24/2010 09:49 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Samstag, den 24.04.2010, 13:27 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
There is a alternative. For some of my packages, I have asked upstream
to sign up for a Fedora account and apply
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 11:52 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, 2 May 2010 17:25:10 +0200
yersinia yersinia.spi...@gmail.com wrote:
Would be interesting to have in Fedora something like this
http://popcon.debian.org/
?
Look interesting from a QA point of view.
It's been
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 23:30 +0200 schrieb Björn Persson:
Thomas Janssen wrote:
Good question about on or off by default. To make sense it should be
on by default.
NO! Popcon may have its uses, and I actually have it enabled on my Debian
boxes, but it *must* be strictly opt-in. If it
Am Montag, den 03.05.2010, 22:37 -0400 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Orcan Ogetbil said:
The statistic talks. It doesn't only talk. It yells. Ignoring this
test statistic in favor of the large pool of imaginary users, who
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
