Hello all,
I've been using Fedora for many years and recently became interesting
in QA testing. My interest developed when I wanted to test programs
before they reached stable so that I could ensure that I wouldn't be
surprised by an update. But I find the QA process to be kind of find
and
On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 18:18 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 17:00, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > mobile device
>
> Requires proprietary Google services.
>
> > computer
>
> Requires proprietary TPM 2.0 chip.
Hi,
Neither of this is true. For example, I use Raivo on my iOS
On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 14:26 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > So I am going to say I am in agreement with Vitaly that FIDO2 is
> > not a
> > solution we could support at this time. At most we could support
> > HOTP via
> > yubikey but we would need to be able to make sure
> > 1. That we have some sort
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 22:45 -0400, Daniel Micay via devel wrote:
> The comparison is being done incorrectly. Since hardened_malloc
> builds
> both a lightweight and heavyweight library by default, and since I
> already explained this and that the lightweight library still has
> optional security
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 15:11 +0800, yanqiy...@gmail.com wrote:
> I would be very SAD if this change lands on my computer. While
> instead
> of arguing with some legal puzzles, I think those parts can be
> provided
> by seperate package (and maybe packaged in rpmfusion?) like intel-
>
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:40 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:38 AM Tommy Nguyen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:24 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > As one of the ffmpeg maintainers, I'm actively working on
> > > workarounds
&g
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 08:12 +, James bond wrote:
> (This is a sad noob user rant, please bear me. And sorry in advance
> for 'whataboutism'.)
>
> IANAL but this is a horrible idea.
>
> It's like parents turning off the internet entirely WiFi because the
> kid can't be able to watch 'bad'
On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 02:53 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Tommy Nguyen wrote:
> > DNF5 is ridiculously fast.
>
> It is faster, but "ridiculously"? In the metric that matters (elapsed
> wallclock time), your benchmark shows the update taking 30%
On Tue, 2022-09-06 at 16:14 -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and
> > >
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 02:46 -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Because FIDO2 is not phishable. TOTP and HOTP are. The only other
> non-phishable authentication method is TLS client certificates and
> I would be fine with those.
I'm not entirely convinced. See this paper:
In a F36 toolbox:
Transaction Summary
Install 21 Packages
Upgrade588 Packages
Downgrade1 Package
Total download size: 438 M
Operation aborted.
Wants to downgrade grubby. So no issues.
I cannot run this on my actual system because the mirrors I use (which
I hard-coded for bandwidth)
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The hardcore way is to say "welp, too bad, your account's gone,
> create
> a new one and start over, including going through the maintainer
> process again", but that might be a bit *too* hardcore.
>
> This is a perennial issue, though,
On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 10:13 +0200, Marius Schwarz wrote:
> If it's still written in python, it will still be slow on devices
> like
> Pinephones. I was under the impression, that microdnf + libdnf was
> developed to counter this slowness?
>
> best regards,
> Marius Schwarz
Though I don't know
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 17:16 +, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On September 16, 2022 5:03:03 PM UTC, Kevin Fenzi
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:03:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Isn't peer review much better and easier solution over all? We
> > > could also
> > > require signed
On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 10:40 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Leigh Scott kirjoitti 17.9.2022 klo 10.27:
> > > On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> > >
> > > I found this:
> > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
> > >
> > > Again, not a very friendly
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
> installed
> as Fedora 24, now running 36. For some rpm and dnf operations, I get
> the
> following kind of errors:
>
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 740
>
> On Sep 15, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Otto Liljalaakso
> wrote:
>
> Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 16.28:
>>> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
>>> To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
>>> installed
>
I'm unable to figure out why, but running the command:
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37
on my main system (with RPMFusion and some copr repos enabled)
consistently causes dnf to segfault. The crashing function appears to
be solver_addbestrules. In either case, I'm submitting a
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 17.40:
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Otto Liljalaakso
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > So maybe it is just that, for Fedora 36 at least, RPM Fusio
On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 17:47 +, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> I think this is a bad idea. It's quite hostile to packagers. It will
> break rawhide for months and make it very difficult to stabilize the
> distro before the beta freeze or do any type of rebuild. It very well
> may
> affect
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> RPM Fusion Fedora 37 repository seems to be all SHA256 already.
Thanks for doing the research. I plan on upgrading to the F37 beta
soon. Have you done so already and what are your results?
___
For those who are still not convinced, here is a comparison:
$ toolbox create -d fedora -r 37 && toolbox enter
$ sudo time dnf upgrade -y
26.79user 3.46system 0:49.09elapsed 61%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
489304maxresident)k
47400inputs+1243320outputs (266major+377843minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ toolbox
On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 22:10 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Wed Oct 5, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > Hi Fedorians,
> >
> > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria
> > that
> > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
> >
> > The DNF
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 13:53 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:20:47PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > Hi Fedorians,
> >
> > I think we should define a more through list of blockers/criteria
> > that
> > dnf5 needs to meet before it can replace the current dnf.
On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 10:25 +, Daniel Rusek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in
> packaging full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure
> that the package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is
> showing in GNOME Software /
> On Sep 29, 2022, at 7:36 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Unfortunately, we have to be very careful to not provide a complete
>> codepath to these codecs to avoid legal risks.
>
> Considering that we have been shipping these hardware codec interfaces for
>
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:24 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> As one of the ffmpeg maintainers, I'm actively working on workarounds
> for the problem. And I've talked to my counterparts in RPM Fusion
> about the issue as well. We're all trying to figure this out.
That seems to contradict this quote from
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 10:13 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Wait, what? Which countries are 2FA token illegal in?
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
I cannot think of any reason why 2FA would be illegal in any country
when TOTP is based on HMAC and by default uses SHA-1.
Further if I may
28 matches
Mail list logo
