On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/20/2012 01:49 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm
which needs rebuilding due to to the soname bump before
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
due to the soname bump:
jdieter deltarpm
Did I see that you took care of this one for me?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:48 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/26/2012 02:30 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:24 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
As a reminder, at least the following packages will now need a rebuild
due to the soname bump:
jdieter deltarpm
:12:52)
Does this have any implications for polyinstantiated tmp directories?
As far as I can see, it should cause no problems as pam_namespace has
an option for tmpfs tmp directories. But I thought it worth asking.
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
and I haven't had time over the last year or so to get it done.
So volunteers are welcome.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
headers for multiple
architectures. In this case, the problem was a conflict in the size of
a long:
#define XERCES_SIZEOF_LONG 4
vs.
#define XERCES_SIZEOF_LONG 8
Are there other requirements for -devel packages that I should be aware
of? Is there something I should read?
Jonathan
--
devel
On 26 May 2010 14:06, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
...
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.6-1.2.fc11.x86_64
my version is currently at:
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.i686
on a
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
ATM, I am observing this:
# repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
It seems that deltarpms aren't being kept from one push to another for
Fedora 13 (and, also it seems, Fedora 11). For example, there's an
openoffice update, but though there were deltarpms when it first came
out, they've gone now. Where should I report the bug?
Jonathan
signature.asc
deltarpms were only available for a day or two before
being deleted. Yes, this is a bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598584
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
and new rpms into block
and delta each block separately, but it would involve some very creative
reworking on how deltarpm uses pseudo-files for all of it's work (see
cfile.[ch] for the pseudo-file structure).
I don't know if that's clear enough, feel free to ask if it's not.
Jonathan
signature.asc
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:26 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:48:44PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I would like to allow deltarpm to split both old and new rpms into block
and delta each block separately, but it would involve some very creative
reworking on how
really look forward to others being involved with this. Count me in
for the SIG.[2]
- Jonathan Steffan
[1] http://plone.org/documentation/faq/plone-versions
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Zope
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
hello, i try create 2 package: ldc and tango.
I have a big question where i put *.d file ?
for C/C++ it's in /usr/include but D they are nothing
thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC a compiler for the D programming language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
bad link for tango = https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
Le vendredi 25 juin 2010 à 17:15 +0200, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC
hello,
I would like to add a feature for F-14: D programming
For this the needs are
- D compiler
- standard runtime library
Fedora will take some benefit to increase its community of developers
with the inclusion of this feature. And an easy way for people who want
to try this language.
Feature
I said the same thing to irc chan #ldc #d #d.tango
And unfortunately all said this: because D likes static, it is actually
a bit complicated to have shared lib
Le dimanche 27 juin 2010 à 09:25 -0400, Neal Becker a écrit :
jonathan MERCIER wrote:
hello,
I would like to add a feature for F
you are welcome
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Peopke who want help this feature can edit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/D_Programming#Owner and add
name.information ...
Thanks for all
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
i will try do something for shared library but is in development for
linux, is very unstable. shared libray works only for osX. And we did'nt
use dmd compilateur but ldc. here ticket:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/tango/ticket/857
shared library is for 1.0 (i hope)
kind regards
--
devel
feature release request is submit here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
'
option that limits the memory usage.
The downside is that now the deltarpm must be held in memory,
but it should be small in most cases.
Built for Rawhide and available at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=182465 until it
gets pushed.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description
hi everybody
ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and
increase his karma thanks
link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-1.2.20100706hg1653.fc13
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ?
me i add in bashrc:
for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done
instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do not
exist!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 7 July 2010 21:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[jgu] emacs-auctex: tex-preview-11.86-2.fc14.noarch
emacs-auctex-doc-11.86-2.fc14.noarch
Fixed in rawhide (emacs-auctex-11.86-3)
[jgu] shorewall: shorewall6-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch
shorewall-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch
Both
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:42 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ?
me i add in bashrc:
for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done
instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do
Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 14:32 -0600, Orion Poplawski a écrit :
On 07/15/2010 07:41 AM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
hi everybody
ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and
increase his karma thanks
link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2
Le mardi 20 juillet 2010 à 16:16 +0100, Matthew Booth a écrit :
When I booted my machine this morning and started Empathy everything was
fine. I did a rather big yum update this morning (including
updates-testing), and I had reason to reboot my machine this afternoon.
Empathy no longer has
Le mardi 20 juillet 2010 à 16:28 +0100, Matthew Booth a écrit :
On 20/07/10 16:19, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
Le mardi 20 juillet 2010 à 16:16 +0100, Matthew Booth a écrit :
When I booted my machine this morning and started Empathy everything was
fine. I did a rather big yum update
different unison versions, multiple unison versions are needed
to be packaged, alas.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What's devend? Oh, you mean de-vendorize. Aren't hyphens great? ;)
On Feb 10, 2013 10:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I along with Jon Ciesla and Parag Nemade are working through this list
slowly but there are over 600 packages. So we could use more hands
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the build
logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong.
What does this mean?
GenericError: upload path
exists: /mnt/koji/work/tasks/9923/423/naev-data-0.5.3-7.fc19.noarch.rpm
Jonathan
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 07:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:18 +0200
Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com wrote:
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the
build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong.
What does this mean
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 08:03 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora?
Sorry, I just scanned through the guidelines and didn't see this
anywhere. Do you mind citing a reference, please?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
it.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Indeed. This was a concern I raised when we first began the bootstrap. Blindly
rerunning autoreconf in every case is a really bad idea. But doing it in a
discretionary way, allowing the package maintainer to influence what happens
(they in theory know whether this will work for their package
Excellent proposal. I of course think this would be just awesome!
--
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 9, 2013, at 15:37, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
Change owner(s):
Matthew,
We'll be looking into LLVM in due course. There are a few of us capable of
fixing the issue (that you were noted as being extremely concerned about on IRC
at the time - we will be happy to send you updates on this) but we balance this
with other priorities (as well as a desire not to
That option simply preserves the global stack canary value between tasks during
context switch. It's not really core to this. The core piece is userspace
compiler tooling. I know the option exists and I thought/was lead to believe it
works. But if Jakub has concerns I will add that to the
Thanks Brendan. My Fedora doesn't even use a GNOME desktop. I've happily used
XFCE for years. And I make no secret that I care about servers more than
desktops (you know, that part of the market where general purpose Linux has a
huge footprint and stands a chance). I would hate to look back in
And following the legitimate concerns about stack-protector this was raised by
ARM into core Linaro as an urgent action for which engineering resource is
being assigned to correct this deficiency ASAP. Thus within a day an issue has
been noted that we were unaware of and is being worked through
Note that there are teams within Linaro doing benchmarking and driving such.
And once the specific stack protector issue was raised, I poked Marcus in
person and he escalated it such that it will be looked at this next engineering
cycle. In general we can plan ahead if we know there are issues.
On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:32, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:58:08PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:50:24PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Or does it mean x86 as PA is out of line? There are a lot more people
with ARM devices than
my iPad
On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:36, Jonathan Masters j...@redhat.com wrote:
Note that there are teams within Linaro doing benchmarking and driving such.
And once the specific stack protector issue was raised, I poked Marcus in
person and he escalated it such that it will be looked at this next
On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:11, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Syslog =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering net, Matthew
Hi folks,
I've just orphaned the emacs-vm and emacs-bbdb packages. Hopefully the
other maintainer (goeran) of these packages will take ownership.
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ldc
derelict
gl3n
dustmite
tango
gtkd
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Le lundi 12 août 2013 à 09:13 +0800, Christopher Meng a écrit :
D lang many...
gtkd
dustmite
ldc
tango
taken.
I go in holliday, so i have no time to maintain rpm. When i come back i
will see if i have enough time to be a co-maintener
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
as this feature seems to make most sense in a cloud setting,
wouldn't it make sense to ship a package (bash-prompt-full-fqdn or
something like that) that contains the necessary PS1 adjustments and
make it default for the Cloud group?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
group, you get long hostnames by default), but leave the default for
most spins as short hostnames.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Jan 19, 2014 8:57 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 20:32:26 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
If scriptlet failures weren't fatal, we wouldn't have the problem we
have now with duplicate packages. We could have just pushed the selinux
update,
After
at DevConf.cz. Thanks so much for getting
deltarpm support into dnf. It's been the last major blocker for me
personally.
Thanks again,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
, changing the version to 0.999 and the release to 1 is probably
your best bet.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Dear,
I just added a group for D development into comps. I would like to know
if that is 'ok' and if i should to do something ?
thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 19 March 2014 19:23, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.03.2014 20:21, schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
On 19 March 2014 19:16, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but with not take care of it you would end in having firewalld as mandatory
dependency which is the main
On 19 March 2014 19:16, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.03.2014 20:14, schrieb Jonathan Underwood:
On 19 March 2014 15:10, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046816
You are going to need fail2ban-0.9-2 - f20 build
not to install)
firewalld and installing fail2ban should know enough to configure
things appropriately.
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 20 March 2014 13:04, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
On 03/19/2014 09:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Ok using Jonathan's suggestion for the settings from a clean install I'm
getting an error whether I use
On 20 March 2014 16:17, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
I am concerned that this looks like configuring the fail2ban package by
installing more packages. If we started doing it everywhere multiple
packages interact, it would combinatorially explode the number of packages
that
upstream has moved to a squeak VM image, and I haven't been able to find
the source for it, so we're still on drgeo 1.x.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
I too am now seeing exactly this problem I'll email Kevin my IP address
too... unless there's a more generic infra email address I should send to?
On 7 June 2014 19:31, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:24:42 -0600
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't
On 11 June 2014 16:50, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:02:08 +0100
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
I too am now seeing exactly this problem I'll email Kevin my IP
address too... unless there's a more generic infra email address I
push a build, as I am happy to let it be retired before
F21 branching if noone picks it up.
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
? Does DNF/yum already
have the necessary code? Or is this available as a plugin? Has the
deltarepo generator been packaged for Fedora? Can createrepo be
extended to call it at the same time that it generates deltarpms?
I am volunteering to review whatever needs to be reviewed.
Jonathan
an uncompressed RPM.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 06/29/2014 04:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/29/2014 12:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jonathan Dieter jdie...@lesbg.com
wrote:
2. RPM would also need to support signatures across the uncompressed
payload
as well as the compressed payload.
Well Florian said
This has already happened once before a few years back. IIRC, we
updated xz on the builder to match the one in Fedora, but our users had
broken deltarpms until they got the updated xz.
Jonathan
On 07/02/2014 07:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Doesn't the current process assume that xz
very much,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 6 August 2014 23:02, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:15:17PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
So, I went to orphan the Fedora branches of cmake28 (not sure why these
branches were created in the first place - I had meant only to create an
What did you
On 7 August 2014 13:27, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
This is done now.
Thank you!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
, and
this includes the prohibition on bundling, so we'd really like to get
this fixed.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 10/01/2014 03:33 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:52:03AM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled
in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in
a popular external repository, require
that getting deltarpm
support is as easy as dnf install deltarpm.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
(Florian, you're one of them, right?). If I recall correctly, when we
first looked at deltarpms, one of the selling points was that rpm didn't
have to change at all.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:53:09 +0100
valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Issue was with missing TPM modules! One solution would be to disable
TPM in EFI/BIOS and other to install missing kernel-modules-extra
package.
Jackpot, that was my problem too. The interesting
Hi,
A perhaps naive question, but is it really necessary to have both the
audio and jackuser groups? Could these not be consolidated moving
forward?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 18 December 2014 at 17:57, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com:
I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that
might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an
x11alpha driver.
On 14 January 2015 at 14:31, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Again, how is that different from F9, F11, F13, F15, F17, F19?
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change (as you know) compared to the GCC upgrades for those releases
is moving from C89 to C11 as
On 14 January 2015 at 14:47, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:44:03PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 14:37, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Only a partial answer to your question, but one fairly significant
change
and into the proper kernel,
so it's been removed from RPM Fusion. The latest F21 and Rawhide
kernels do have the modules enabled and available in
kernel-modules-extra (thanks Josh!), so all that's left is this review.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
. Is anyone willing to do a package review swap
for this package?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
the author of one package included in Fedora, pstreams-devel,
so would be happy to help with the packaging for that.
I'm looking forward to contributing to Fedora, after getting so much
enjoyment and benefit from it for so long.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
http://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article46/json-license ) and
thus cannot be shipped in Fedora.
Minifiers available in Fedora include uglify-js and python-slimit.
Thanks Kevin - I'll ask the FPC to consider adding that info to the
packaging guidelines for js packages.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing
On 28 March 2015 at 19:28, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:05:11PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
rjonesemacs-common-tuareg
Update in Rawhide:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/emacs-common-tuareg.git/commit/?id
On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
---%---
$ cat test.cc
#include string
std::string test(int i)
{
be interested in joining such a SIG and effort.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-pkgowners | sort | column
-t]
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199189
?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 23 March 2015 at 12:40, Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote:
Jonathan Underwood píše v Po 23. 03. 2015 v 11:39 +:
On 23 March 2015 at 11:19, Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote:
Is anyone up for a review swap? I need wiredtiger, which is a
new storage engine of mongodb 3.0
On 01/04/15 15:16 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Do you mind clarifying? I thought string should provide that
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operator+/ or is that
what fno-implicit-templates is turning off?
Of course string provides it, but it's a template, so it needs to be
Hi Jeff,
On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton jlay...@poochiereds.net wrote:
I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
the code is public domain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've
Hi,
Now that F22 has branched and reached the bodhi branch point, should
there not also be a Fedora 22 chroot in copr?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
On 5 March 2015 at 17:09, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
yum install -y closure-compiler
if you have fedora 20
should work
Thanks - I had hoped to push packages for F20 too, but this is a start
at least :).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mar 5, 2015 9:19 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/04/2015 11:49 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
Now that F22 has branched and reached the bodhi branch point, should
there not also be a Fedora 22 chroot in copr?
I just added it there.
Thanks very much.
Jonathan
of the RPM build process. I am not at
all familiar with java script - what is the recommended tool for
minifying .js files?
Thanks,
Jonathan
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160
It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1)
undefined behaviour and (2) not going to work now that std
On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160
It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1)
undefined behaviour and (2) not going to work now that std::string is
really defined as
On 18/05/15 13:42 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/05/15 13:39 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/05/15 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
lyx: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651160
It looks like LyX forward-declares std::basic_string, which is (1)
undefined
101 - 200 of 1128 matches
Mail list logo
