--- On Sat, 2012/3/31, Daniel E. Wilson d...@bureau-13.org wrote:
Hi, my name is Dan and I have submitted the version 5.2.1 of the racket
scheme interpreter for review.
I use Lisp type languages for my own projects and needed a more recent
version than the plt-scheme package for my Fedora
On 12/08/2011 05:12 AM, seth vidal wrote:
Bandwidth is the big concern for the end user here and then the other
issue is - is all of this worth it for building pkgs? I don't think it
is, personally, pkg building is not that huge of a hit, afaict to
getting things done.
I mean the sum total
An idea just struck me that may work.
If the system is made light enough that it is utterly painless for
anyone to contribute processing time then cross-checking of hashes could
be made statistically secure, save for a widespread compromise of the
entire Fedora userbase.
For example, if I
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:48 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
First, the TPM (nor the CPU) really can't tell the difference between
the owner of the computer and an author of a virus.
A jumper on the motherboard, or some other kind of physical circuit breaker,
can do
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:11 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know
how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated
from an (insecure) software simulation
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:41 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2011/6/24 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com:
Yes, I completely agree. What Gregory tries to emphasis here - as I
understand it, of course he might have a different intention - is purely
politics and I do not think, that Fedora should
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 15:50 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 06/17/2011 03:50 PM, Henrik Wejdmark wrote:
On my desktop it's not on one page, it's a mile long listing so you get no
overview at all. In Gnome2 at least all the apps are categorized. If the
graphical user interface _requires_ you
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 10:04 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:33:18 +0900
夜神 岩男 supergiantpot...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
Considering the frequent calls of Gnome 3 has failed at its task or
the GUI has failed if the user must makes me wonder: Where is
the task definition
Perhaps the Gnome3 way of thinking is that calling up an additional
application constitutes starting a new task in the work flow, so that
the big interruption happens anyway. I don't think that is a good
assumption for the design of a DE.
This is the sort of criticism that grants a clear
