> Should be cleared up now... can you check again?
Thanks, here's take 2:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/2121
Cheers,
Alan
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
python-jsonpointer is going into base with 7.2, so it needs to be
retired from EPEL7[*]
Before doing that, I wanted to check when will be 7.2 imported to
Koji, so we don't end up with broken builldroots?
Cheers,
Alan
[*] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249138
Hi,
I'd like to unretire novnc in EPEL6, it was retired on 2014-12-20
because of broken deps:
unresolved dependencies for openstack-nova-novncproxy-0.4-2.el6.noarch:
openstack-nova
This will be fixed by importing latest Fedora build which removed
openstack-nova dependency in 0.4-7
I also
In addition to the standard RHEL base repositories please ensure the
following repositories are also enabled.
[rhel-7-server-extras-rpms]
name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Extras (RPMs)
[rhel-7-server-optional-rpms]
name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Optional (RPMs)
Those
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Augeas:
7f16635afdea754ca0642f714f8dd3a8 Config-Augeas-1.000.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ef6d919908eb930a5b55903cc65253bf2aa3ee49
Author: Alan Pevec alan.pe...@redhat.com
Date: Sun Sep 28 22:05:23 2014 +0200
Update to 1.000
* Added methods text_store, text_retrieve and rename
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Config-Augeas.spec |8 ++--
sources
2014-07-04 18:35 GMT+02:00 Anssi Johansson e...@miuku.net:
16.4.2014 23.20, Matthias Runge kirjoitti:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:33:50AM +0300, Anssi Johansson wrote:
I'm still of the opinion that if a package in EPEL is no longer
maintained and it has known security issues, it should be
Package collectd
comaintained by: apevec fab
ok, that's epel branches, I'll take them.
Alan (fas: apevec)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Thursday is OpenStack Test Day[2].
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day
You can also join Openstack testing today on your current trusty
Fedora 16 installation by using fresh
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com wrote:
2) [mutterings about maintainer non-responsiveness for collectd
removed as I've just seen him update BZ #797773 ]
Feel free to apply as a co-maintainer :)
3) Given that this is a major version bump (even if there's
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Kévin Raymond
shai...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects
Semi-related question: what's the procedure to get new language team
approved on transifex?
I see few teams hanging in requested state at
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Renaming current Virtualization to Virtualization Client makes sense.
Oops, just found there's already Virtualization Client in
comps-el6.xml - but it's
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
That's precisely what the new stack or scl concept that Marcela wrote
about needs. We don't have a complete documentation out yet, but we will,
soon (hopefully).
Random idea after looking at
56d295c07996349c2b1e28847ec6bd4edebf674d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:04:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2] add Virtualization Hypervisor group
Smallest possible virtualization host installation
for headless nodes, without any graphical interface
suggestions for the name of the group, maybe
Virtualization Minimal, Minimal Hypervisor, Virtualization Node
?
Thanks,
Alan
From 0d381fd2feab8fd7899ffec0e2984c9f7cbf0cca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:04:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] add Virtualization
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which
is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization
host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too.
Right, I forgot
16 matches
Mail list logo
