On 21:59:40 Tuesday 25 October 2011 Josh Stone wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 11:24 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > W dniu 25 października 2011 09:26 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> >
> > napisał:
> >> W dniu 25 października 2011 09:20 użytkownik Harald Hoyer
> >>
> >> napisał:
> >>> On 10/24/2011 10:1
.depmap.file/maven.local.depmap.file/ . The rest is just things
that
are not needed anymore but should not break things like defining
MAVEN_REPO_LOCAL and passing it to mvn-jpp.
P.S. Ville is just the last one I've seen doing that which made me writing
this mail.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
d
dist-$version-noppc (you get the idea) target to koji to allow
requesting noppc builders for exactly this problem.
But until(if) this is done I see no other way than submiting builds until they
hit noppc builders. At least I do that often.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
> regards.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
inging it'. As far as I was concerned, MySQL was just an arbitrary
> example chosen by the OP.
I want to add one more POV - not every database is constantly-used. Example
usage is Amarok using mysql database and I really want mysql to not be started
until I start Amarok. Not that this i
On 13:24:10 Tuesday 23 August 2011 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Lun 22 août 2011 13:42, Alexander Kurtakov a écrit :
> > Nicolas, while this was true things have changed dramatically last year
> > and Fedora is now what JPackage was in the past ...
> >
> > Fedora migh
ny EE
platform, Fedora is trying to unify the stack by spending a huge amount of
time helping upstream move away from ancient libs, build practices and etc.
I can continue listing examples but these 2 alone should be enough for
everyone to see that the projects are departing more and more and th
in Fedora 16.
The less duplicating packages we have - the better :). I'm all for reducing
the number of jvms we ship (assuming that OpenJDK 7 doesn't break many
things).
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> If the reason for asking was w.r.t re-builds, it is unlikely that most
> applicati
d tomcat with Eclipse
(assuming WTP usage), I personally never managed to make it work so if this
was the reason for the complexity it's not smth that ever worked for me.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
is just laying around in bugzilla as so many of them but
> if the maintainers actually need that stuff they would probably throw it
> in /usr/sbin/tomcat6 which is where the actual start magic is happening...
FWIW, tomcat package (note the missing 6) is at version 7.x.y and ships with
the s
On 10:51:05 Thursday 14 July 2011 Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> > Orphan link-grammar
>
> I am taking this one.
>
> - fabiand
Can we get a v3 of the packages to be retired? There seem to be enough
changes in the list already.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel
On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
> 2.9.x for F16 - the lates
On 07:38:37 PM Thursday, June 23, 2011 David Timms wrote:
> On 23/06/11 22:53, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > maintainers of most of the stack are slightly moving it to maven 3 only.
> > We
>
> Hey Alex, is that supposed to be slowly ?
Not really. We do it as fast as we
Hi everyone,
Fedora is transitioning to using Maven 3 by default. Up until now it was
working because a lot of things were bringing maven2 into the build system.
Maven2 was part of Fedora for more ~5 years - long enough time to get a lot of
crap accumulated. We are slowly fixing issues as they
On 08:17:24 AM Tuesday, June 21, 2011 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 21.06.2011 01:44, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> so where was the QA before the release which forbids fix the release?
> >
> > Well, a few things:
> >
> > There's no planned testing of mysql prior to release. QA does not have
> > the
without our
managers even know - because it's smth we do on our own. Speaking personally
everyone can accuse me of not fullfilling some user's wishes (which I'm not
oblided to do) but someone saying that I(we) look at Fedora as a toy is really
hurting a lot of feelings.
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
army of contributors
just sitting and waiting for what to do. Until this happens people should
remember that the one that do the works has freedom too and if they don't like
smth they are free to come with better implementation and offer it.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10:33:31 AM Wednesday, March 23, 2011 Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > fedora is known for offering the "latest and greates software" and
> > > "being on the edg
of maven-pmd-plugin which I maintain.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01:59:44 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote:
> On 8 February 2011 11:47, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
> >> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages w
On 01:56:00 pm Tuesday, February 08, 2011 Mat Booth wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 20:59, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
> > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where
> > necessary. It's that time again for Fedor
On 09:38:08 pm Thursday, December 16, 2010 Mat Booth wrote:
> On 16 December 2010 17:09, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> >> I have been using eclipse-fedorapackager for a while now and it works
> >> quite well, thanks for the effort th
On 02:18:47 pm Thursday, December 09, 2010 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> > Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
> > ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
> > (or some other threshold
t set this to something really big because people can
use eclipse for things that even require less than the current settings.
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 4 2010-11-20 15:47:18.005
> !MESSAGE An internal error has occurred.
> !STACK 0
> java.lang.OutO
On 07:33:18 pm Friday, November 19, 2010 Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> >
> > wrote:
> > > The Java Packaging Guidelines have been revised:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packa
stuff, that should
> be dropped according to the updated guidelines.
I think that it should be fine if you do the changes when you have other
reasons too.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ct files from pom.xml [1]
> >
> > There must be other package you are looking for, but I'll let someone
> > else answer that part of you inquiry (since I have no idea :-) ).
>
> Ah, I was looking for http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/ , guess this isn't
> packaged
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
> > > > How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs
> > > > and not expect the user to verify his/her bug
> > On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
> > > How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
> > > not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
> >
> > Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
> > a sudden? They may
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:23:00 +0200, Alexander wrote:
> > How can you expect a maintainer to fix/respond to hundreds of bugs and
> > not expect the user to verify his/her bug still applies?
>
> Have you noticed how many ticket EOL warnings some users receive all of
> a sudden? They may be able to
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 04:17:59 +, Jóhann wrote:
> > On 11/06/2010 02:11 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > On 11/05/2010 10:06 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:58:21 +, Jóhann wrote:
> > >>> On behalf of all reporters that have never received a response from a
> > >>>
> On 11/06/2010 01:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 11/05/2010 09:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:56:51 +0100, Ralf wrote:
> >>> ABRT
> >>> It doesn't tell the user that core dumps without reproducer are
> >>> worthless in most cases but blindly sends out reports
> >>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:58:21PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > > 2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
> > > outstanding "needinfo?" flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
> > > shouldn't be able to send
s are overtaken by events. "
> This is the best we can do no matter what we want to do!
>
> P.S. Believe me having open bugs that both the packager and the submitter
DON'T care for (sorry for the typo)
> care for are useless and these are the kind of bugs t
submitter care
for are useless and these are the kind of bugs that get auto closed. If one of
them cares he will change the version flag. Oh and looking at a list of
hundreds bugs makes things close to impossible to put priorities, fix and
improve the situation.
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has
> > > not managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging
> > > can not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there
> > > to say? (and on thi
> On 11/3/10 2:14 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > And it's unreasonable to expect those ISVs to change when Fedora has not
> > managed to package a working JBoss. If the Red Hat Java packaging can
> > not even be used with the top Red Hat Java product, what is there to
> > say? (and on this subject,
> Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:28 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 21:32 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :
> > > > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > > > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 201
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > FYI the versionless jar/javadocs files are now in the draft (thanks for
> > the suggestion, somehow none of us thought of that)
>
> Thanks for considering it.
>
> > But keep t
> On 10/21/2010 08:10 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi Fedora Packagers,
> >
> >
> > I would like to bring a new Eclipse plug-in to your
> > attention: Eclipse Fedora Packager[1]
> >
> >
> > Feedback, testing, bug reports, contributions are very much
> > appreciated. Our Trac instance is here
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > * AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff
> > running from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff
> > run from our packages)
> > * Name it :)
>
> At my wo
> I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
> (somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
> interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
> join up.
>
Please everyone that is interested add yourself to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
> On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
>
> Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
> of packaging work, we've "borrowed" a lot of that work, an
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
(needs work)
* Tomcat - phase out tomcat5 , package tomcat 7
* AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff running
from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff run from our
packages)
* Name it :)
I'm pretty sure there are a number of o
t;
> > That way packages with AWOL maintainers could grow co-maintainers
> > without going through the complicated AWOL-process.
> >
> > --
> > sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
> > --
>
> Sounds reasonable enough to me.
>
> Regards
Big +1 from m
> On Monday 15 March 2010, Mat Booth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't find the Java bindings for libnotify -- I thought they would
> be in libgnome-java, but I guess not.
>
> So a couple of questions for the Gnome Desktop team:
>
> And are there plans to package java-gnome?
Hi Mat,
I'm not in the G
savy users only and change for this type of users means you
have to take care of "This update broke my homework formatting" or "Where is
that blue icon for usb devices now?" and etc.
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
even more
aggressive maintainers who never put newer versions in older releases.
Is this idea worth discussing at all?
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >Scilab?is,?in?fact,?in?advanced?packaging?stage,?waiting?for?JOGL.
>
> A lot of java packages need package from scratch or patch(this may be
> difficult if you are not provenpackager, since some package maintainers
> are non-responsive for a long while) for scliab5.2.1.
>
Please give us the f
How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the devel branch because it is
possible to take F-12 branch.
Regards,
Alex
> It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> we get to feature freeze.
51 matches
Mail list logo
