On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:28:55PM -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618349
The bug is blocking my ability, or at least my willingness to upgrade
to F14. I would
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Michel Alexandre Salim fed...@michelsylvain.info writes:
Note: I don't think Mark was proposing to do the packaging work himself.
But it'd be great if whoever picks this up (Michał, are you a packager?)
could reply to this
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
fed...@michelsylvain.info wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so
far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time.
A Fedora
2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com:
As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as
users) grows, this interdependence will grow.
Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora backports repo for these that
wants new
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:58:53 -0400, you wrote:
2010/9/20 Micha? Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora backports repo for these that
wants new and shiny Firefox 4, PostgreSQL 9 or
I apologize for interrupting this tread. I shall take my leave.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:01 AM, FlorianFesti ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:05 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
(I don't have a strong opinion on whether the data format is RPM or
repodata myself; maybe just a slight preference for the latter; the
most important thing in my mind is to
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Ubuntu recently got high praise from LWN for Software Center in 10.10
betas. It doesn't use PackageKit at all AFAICS (no PackageKit packages
are installed in my VM). It integrates tightly with apt (you know, like
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 14:17 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
Sure, I understand where you're coming from. As you see from
app-install schema version 1 it really was least common denominator.
But version 2, which is in
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 15:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 7 September 2010 15:23, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Are you having any discussions about applications like postfix, or is
version 2 going
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:58 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 08/30/2010 10:50 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
The attention to freedom is not unique. The attention to upstream is
invisible to users.
But it is why I
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:26:27PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Maybe I was too long winded, or failed to communicate my point: a
stable (bug fix only updates, slow feature release), strongly FOSS,
strongly upstream
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:56 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:26:27PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Maybe I was too long winded, or failed to communicate my point: a
stable (bug fix only
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
The cynic in me would expect that the people who want something different
than the fire hose we have now
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
The cynic in me would
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
Thomas Janssen thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2010 09:25 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es said:
Also - and this is a question that I have asked myself and others a
couple of times - if you could implement Fedora the way you want: What
unique selling points are left for
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 23:56 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:11:06 +0200, you wrote:
A typical developer wants
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/10 8:56 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Henriksen ghenr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:11:06 +0200, you
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/10 1:33 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Is this still unique?
I believe it is, particularly with our attention to freedom and upstream
relationships, and our
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/10 9:50 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Jesse Keating
jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com wrote:
AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN... http://start.fedoraproject.org/ is using a
Google Search Box... YOU DON'T HAVE THE CODE TO PLAY WITH IT OR ANYTHING...
With Fedora's engine I'm giving you the chance of having something more
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:04 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:09 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
What more do you want an MTA to do at install? It was decided a long
time ago that the MTA shouldn't listen for remote SMTP connections by
default. Pretty much
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
sendmail has always worked out of the box for some things, including
sending mail from local programs to remote email addresses
I thought this was a speed trip to spamhaus' lists (the
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Static configuration should be something you can do from the dynamic
configuration tool. gnome-display-properties should have a set as
default
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 01:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/27/2010 12:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That wasn't the question. The question was what is the benefit of not
having one. Is it simply that it saves
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:00 -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
I think that makes sense if we're talking about adding a default, but
taking one out - especially something that's been default in all Unix-y
OSes for ever
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:59:06PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:59 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
1. Not everyone uses GNOME
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
We're going in circles. I already said that I think the best fix for
this is to replace sendmail with an MTA which works 'out of the box'.
For what
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:31:58PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Useful information is being generated and then lost. That shouldn't happen.
This is not a sudden realization, there are bugs open about this for
multiple
30 matches
Mail list logo
