Re: Tagging commit hashes of Koji builds in dist-git

2019-06-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:37:57 -, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging it into git might be convenient for offline purposes.

Re: Stale packages in Fedora 30

2019-06-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 12:47:53 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: I once maintained this, it seems that Bruno, who took it over, no longer has time to maintain this. Yeah, but leave me as a co-maintainer as things might get better. I did some CI work for squashfs-tools a couple of weeks ago, so

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 22:00:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: Since there is no personal information attached, I don't see how on the face of it this is a privacy violation. I want to take this concern seriously, but I need more to go on than "this is inherent". Can you elaborate? From the

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 00:44:26 -0500, John Harris wrote: On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 12:32:45 AM EST Bruno Wolff III wrote: The cost for pretending to be lots of machines is also reduced a lot in this scheme over having to connect from lots of different IP addresses. Though at some point

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 21:43:46 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:27:39PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Is this going to happen on install or upgrade before there is a chance to turn it off? Maybe? Keep in mind that you are _already_ contacting the mirror systems

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 17:44:59 -0500, John Harris wrote: We don't need to be thinking of more things to track about the user, but ways to prevent tracking and still get the counts the Council wants. There are two mutually opposed sides here. The users need to consider how they might be

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 22:54:46 +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: You could move the rotation to the client by hashing the UUID with a timestamp of sufficiently coarse granularity (a week?) before submitting it. Then you make sure that all UUIDs submitted by a given machine during a given time

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 17:04:11 -0500, John Harris wrote: On Monday, January 7, 2019 5:00:48 PM EST Stephen Gallagher wrote: I think the only useful data we could get from unknown variants would be "the number of times we see an unknown variant". So I think throwing it away and just

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 16:41:46 -0500, John Harris wrote: On Monday, January 7, 2019 4:31:29 PM EST Bruno Wolff III wrote: If the strings aren't checked when they are received, they could be anything. The system varient also has the same issue. You shouldn't trust the clients supplying

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 16:00:46 -0500, John Harris wrote: On Monday, January 7, 2019 3:27:39 PM EST Bruno Wolff III wrote: Are the UUIDs going to be sanity checked so that NSFW UUIDs don't show up in reports? I don't see how a UUID could possibly be NSFW, or why UUIDs would ever

Re: F30: System-Wide Change proposal: DNF UUID

2019-01-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Is this data only going to be sent to the metalink or do the mirrors actually used, get the data? Is the data going to be sent along with requests to non-Fedora repos (e.g. rpmfusion)? This will make it much easier to spoof being lots of systems. Is there some plan to mitigate this risk?

Re: Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed to gpg1?

2018-12-19 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:28:16 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Seems that I missed writing announcement, but there is a package called `gnupg1` which provides `gpg1` binary. So you should be fine with that I hope. And sorry for this trouble. Thanks for the help. I'm not sure why I didn't

Wasn't gpg supposed to be renamed to gpg1?

2018-12-19 Thread Bruno Wolff III
gnupg2 is now obsoleting gnupg and the previous gpg command is not available. The change page said gpg would be renamed gpg1, but this was not done. Unfortunately gpg2 will not read my existing secret keys. (They are pretty old and probably should be replaced.) For now using rpm --nodeps

Re: fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug is not getting updates

2018-12-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:37:24 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 14:29:15 +, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: Anyway it seems like Rawhide isn't getting new nodebug kernels. - Latest nodebug kernel: kernel-4.20.0-0.rc1.git4.2.fc30.x86_64.

Re: fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug is not getting updates

2018-12-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 14:29:15 +, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: Anyway it seems like Rawhide isn't getting new nodebug kernels. - Latest nodebug kernel: kernel-4.20.0-0.rc1.git4.2.fc30.x86_64.rpm (https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/rawhide-kernel-nodebug/x86_64/) - Latest Rawhide

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

2018-11-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 15:57:25 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: 4) not able to start gdm (because dbus was not running) blocks any local login. Simple after such crash it is not possible to open or switch to any local consoles!!! I was able to login to a shell, so this one might be

Re: Last dbus upgrade issues

2018-11-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:57:34 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: 4) Nevertheless my system ended up with *not enabled* dbus-broker. If it was caused by upgrade over rpm it clear sign that dnf is not fully compliant with upgrade semantics implemented in rpm. This will cause more issues in the

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

2018-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 19:38:20 +, "Anderson, Charles R" wrote: I use a perl script with these modules and some regexps to clean up the result: use HTML::Strip; use HTML::LinkExtor; use HTML::Entities qw/decode_entities/; use URI::Escape qw/uri_unescape/; Thanks, I'll take a look at

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

2018-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 14:48:52 -0400, "tonynel...@georgeanelson.com" wrote: ... For html only messages you would either need to reject them or rewrite them, both of which have issues. I've used elinks to do that in an email forum I wrote. It worked better than doing it with, say,

Re: Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML mail

2018-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 15:40:19 +0200, Stop sending e-mail to public mailing lists using Gmail, then? Or are you going to pay for affected people's bandwith? Mailing lists have push delivery model, so it's not possible to filter-out only HTML e-mail before it's already downloaded. It is, but

Re: Fedora should replace mailing lists with Discourse

2018-10-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:20:49 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Email responses end up with hard line breaks in the web interface, which may not look as nice as web-submitted contributions. Did you test this for format=flowed? I would expect hard line breaks if that wasn't used.

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180409.n.0 changes

2018-04-10 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 15:06:50 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/share/licenses/kernel-core/COPYING from install of kernel-core-4.17.0-0.rc0.git4.1.fc29.x86_64 conflicts with file from package

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-03-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:19:48 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: Note that there was a completed compose for March 1st, so you don't need this today. I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like the compose only got copied over to the secondary architecure. So i3

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-03-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:31:21 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Actually yes, it would be super useful if I knew where the repos are. I use the following to get the rawhide i386 compose repo. I need to change the date and sequence number to match the one I want. I use it to

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:35:11 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log it probably was, but it is not obvious from the

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

2018-02-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 09:49:11 +0100, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: It's all too easy right now for everyone to be busy with something else just when things break, and sometimes the authority to tell people "fix your builds you're blocking everyone" is needed (or even the authority to

Re: gnome crashes after today upgrade

2018-02-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 20:35:25 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Hi, Looks like today updates are trashing gnome almost completely. gdm-x-session cannot setup XKB mapping. gnome-shell is core dumping .. "journalctl -xe" output is in attachment. If this is rawhide,

Re: No i686 build of grub2?

2017-08-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 08:57:30 -0400, Mauricio Tavares wrote: I think I read here (or in other mailing list) about an interest in dropping 32bit altogether. But this might be just my imagination. Certainly there was a discussion, but I hadn't heard this was definitive,

No i686 build of grub2?

2017-08-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Currently grub2 isn't being built for i686 since somewhere between 2.02-8 and 2.02-10. I looked through the change log (but not the git log yet) and didn't see anything mentioning this, which I would have expected if it was an intentional change. So is this a new permanent feature going

I'm still here

2017-05-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I haven't had much time for Fedora develoment the last 9 months or so, but I may be able to start doing more again around August. I continue to use Fedora on my work desktop and multiple machines at home (currently rawhide). ___ devel mailing list --

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

2016-10-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 16:26:54 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 14:19 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: I propose we create a parallel "Critical Issues"  list, using basically the same procedures. Issues eligible for this status would be those which do

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

2016-10-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 13:29:41 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 10/05/2016 01:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: In any case, what do you all think? What happened to the Nice-To-Have (NTH) tag? It was renamed to freeze exception. But it covers a different set of fixes.

Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

2016-10-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 14:19:12 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: In any case, what do you all think? I don't think the tracking side would be hard to do. What I'd like to hear about is how the list will work for getting bugs better fixed than bugzilla entries will?

Re: PSA: Do not run 'dnf update' inside GNOME, KDE or any other graphical desktop on Fedora 24

2016-10-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 20:42:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: I'd say broadly speaking both, but the most disruptive and potentially catastrophic effect is when the update process itself crashes or is killed. Because of how RPM transactions work, this generally

Intending to retire and/or orphan festival

2016-09-23 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I plan to retire festival before f25 beta unless someone else wants to take it over. It really needs a lot of work to update it to a current version. Also recently outside changes have resulted in it segfaulting (even after a rebuild) and it is currently unusable.

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

2016-08-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 16:19:08 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Re: recent rawhide/branched compose issues

2016-08-19 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:37:39 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * The failing composes still always send the broken deps emails, which means when we run several composes a day to try and fix things people will get a bunch of duplicate emails. There's a proposed fix for this,

Re: kernel 4.7 on stable ?

2016-08-03 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:02:56 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, From list of koji builds [1] rawhide and F25 uses pre 4.8. My question is kernel-4.7.0-2 doesn't land on F24 and F23 ? , since kernel 4.6 already have a short live and 4.7 fix my cpu-freq kernel ooops , I vote

Re: Fixing /.autorelabel

2016-07-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:25:36 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Do we actually *need* the second patch if we have the first? I mean, my suggestion was just to do the first patch; if we do that, do we actually need to worry about making the relabel happen any earlier

Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-07-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 00:48:14 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: So that's rather fast to explain. Libero.it use this SPF record: Isn't SPF tied to the envelope sender address and not the From: header? The messages do have an envelope sender address for the list, so I don't

Re: multi-CPU optimization inside a distribution

2016-07-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 00:34:02 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: To get developers they need to get a CPU/motherboard combination out for under $1000, likely closer to $500, as these will be purchases as a secondary system to "play with" because there is no direct way to

Re: Maintainer preferred method of blocker bug notification?

2016-06-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 16:20:32 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: - Would it help to have a nagbot (or enhance zodbot) to ping maintainers on IRC? Is the nagbot more or less likely to be ignored, or would it be about the same? Of course there are lower level questions about

Re: new page in wiki: livemedia-creator

2016-06-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:53:10 -0700, That depends on how you use lmc. In --no-virt mode it's calling anaconda directly so kickstart processing of the %include may work, depending on the location of the files. But if you're using it in virt mode only the top level ks gets passed into the vm

Re: new page in wiki: livemedia-creator

2016-06-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:53:15 -0700, "Brian C. Lane" wrote: 4. ksflatten is not part of lorax, it is part of pykickstart. I don't think it is required either. I was able to create live images from ks files that included others without having to use it. -- devel mailing

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160623.n.0 compose check report

2016-06-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Let me know if anyone one sees their bios clock stomped on by a rawhide live image. I think I have fixed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018162 but if not, it should get reopened. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

2016-06-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:50:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Sure and there's encryption as sgallagh mentioned. There is probably a way to handle the encryption as (at least if there isn't a kernel update), as this is done already when switching from initramfs to your

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

2016-06-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:49:18 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Well, it's different historical behavior/tradeoffs. dnf assumes you will reboot as you need to / restart apps that need restarting. And there is an extension that will tell you what needs to be restarted. -- devel

Re: having trouble with bodhi

2016-06-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 15:32:44 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: [nbecker@nbecker2 Cython]$ bodhi -n -r F23 -t bugfix -b 1343331 Cython-0.23.4-3.fc23 No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi" Creating a new update for Cython-0.23.4-3.fc23 Traceback (most recent

gstreamermm 0.10 -> 1.4 change

2016-06-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Maybe I missed something, but I didn't see any announcement about gstreamermm changing from 0.10 to 1.4. Is there any documentation on what packages that need gstreamermm are supposed to do to cope with the change? In my case, I'm trying to get lordsawar working again and upstream isn't to

Re: ping spin-kickstarts maintainer (bz1176483)

2016-06-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 16:11:33 +0800, Dave Young wrote: It is for adding kexec-tools-anaconda-addon package to kickstarts, exactly like Brian said in comment #5. I added the following questions to the bug, but since there is a discussion here, I also mention them here.

Re: ping spin-kickstarts maintainer (bz1176483)

2016-06-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:39:11 +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote: What is the plan for the 22 active tickets at https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/report/1 ? Are reporters expected to recreate them in bugzilla or will they by migrated en masse? The task

Re: ping spin-kickstarts maintainer (bz1176483)

2016-06-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 16:56:50 +0800, Dave Young wrote: Hi, We have a bug report for adding kdump anaconda addon to livecd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176483 The bug was created in 2014, seems I can not reach the maintainer. What else can I do? Do we

Re: Bugzilla email address sync

2016-06-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:05:55 +1000, Jeff Fearn wrote: Hi, we expect to have SAML authentication working in Bugzilla 5, I'm implimenting it for Red Hat customer accounts ATM and also testing with FAS in the hopes we can get it "for free" :) What IdPs are you going to

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

2016-05-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:43:30 -, John Dulaney wrote: Here's an idea. How about Gnome fix their broken crap, and let's not enable this missfeature in systemd? All these problems (including the true, root problem!) go away. Alas, this seems to be too difficult a

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 17:44:43 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update. There is more extensive testing performed

Re: Policy change on emulators

2016-05-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might attract a lawsuit if someone did. This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understand that situation before giving openmw the all-clear. Unless

Re: Policy change on emulators

2016-05-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
What about things like openmw that in theory can be run with free assests, but for which there really isn't anything beyond a demo for other than the assests from a proprietary game? There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some platforms in place, that isn't reflected

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the current nightly, but we'll at least need to do sanity testing

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

2016-02-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Upgrading to this version of glibc also breaks postgres if you have a database that uses something other than the C locale. Installing appropriate language packs and restarting fix the issue. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160212 compose check report

2016-02-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 21:25:56 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 19:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:   Failed openQA tests: 16 of 63 32-bit tests are still failing to boot, still kernel issue there. I suspect the real issue is with

What's up with boost in rawhide?

2016-01-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Rawhide has boost 1.6 now but a number of packages haven't been rebuilt for it yet. I haven't seen bugs filed against my packages asking me to fix things, so I am wondering if the boost guys were planning to do rebuilds or if there was some other plan I should be aware of. The change page seems

Re: What's up with boost in rawhide?

2016-01-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 14:57:27 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: If you packages are broken then by all means take a look at them and see if you can see how to get it to build. Otherwise you'll be getting bug reports as soon as I have time (I'm also trying to get GCC

Re: PostgreSQL 9.5 in rawhide

2016-01-18 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:40:39 -0500, Pavel Kajaba wrote: we are going to change version of PostgreSQL from 9.4 to 9.5. Thanks, I have moved one machine to rawhide to test it and will me moving another machine where I use it, right after branch. -- devel mailing list

Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux

2016-01-09 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 10:33:01 +0100, Jiří Konečný wrote: On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 10:44 +0100, Jiří Konečný wrote: Hello all, it was some time but I finally made it to the Fedora review  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513 This is my first package so I

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

2015-09-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything 'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

2015-09-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem. It won't boot from flash

Using a patch with DOS line endings

2015-08-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
I have a patch for a source file that has DOS line endings and %patch strips the \r characters causing the patch to fail while suggesting the use of the --binary option. However the %patch macro will not accept the binary option. Is there an easy way to use a patch with DOS line endings or am

Re: Rawhide plans

2015-08-19 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:18:04 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: 2. Upgrading from a stable release is also often hard due to broken deps, resulting in having to remove packages just to get upgraded. dnf works much better than yum for this. You can use distro-sync with the

Re: dnf distro-sync oddities

2015-08-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:22:09 +0200, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote: Correct me, if I am doing s.th. wrong, but # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing This command doesn't remove my kernels that are in enabled repos. Note this is a useful command as dnf update --best --allowerasing

Re: Validity of i686 as a release blocker

2015-08-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:40:28 -0400, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: Ambivalent is probably understated here. It's hard to imagine people securing i686 hardware these days to run a Workstation experience, after all. I still use i686 for my primary server, primary desktop and

Re: OCaml 4.02.3 is in Rawhide

2015-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:43:42 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: I rebuilt all packages, except: - js-of-ocaml - waiting on package review of a new dependency - ocaml-camlimages - FTBFS http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10514721 but may be a

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)

2015-07-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Updates not getting pushed?

2015-07-26 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 15:49:35 +0100, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: I have updates for both F21 and F22 that were requested for testing on the 22nd and still haven't been pushed, but I also can't change them because trying to do so says: Unable to add or remove builds from an update

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

2015-07-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:54:41 -0400, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 08:51:09AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: openwrt builds on Fedora with very little work. The first part of that is building the cross tool chain it uses to build images. Okay

Re: building an embedded Linux distro into a RPM package

2015-07-25 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 23:05:07 -0400, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: Is there an existing Fedora cross toolchain for targeting a tiny i586/i686 Linux userspace with uClibc? Maybe I could use that to build linuxpba and the PBA image itself. I'd still need a custom kernel, because the

Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

2015-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote: blobby needs this patch to build: http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream Could you attach a copy of that patch to

Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

2015-07-24 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 19:26:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote: blobby blobby needs this patch to build: http://git.engineering.redhat.com/git/users/jwakely/fedora/blobby/commit/?h=ostream (I've sent the patch to one of the upstream project maintainers). But it still

Re: DNF 1.0.2 Released

2015-07-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 04:49:34 -0400, Honza Šilhan jsil...@redhat.com wrote: Finally there’s the new release of DNF which fixes the bugs which were highly demanded from Fedora community (former yum users). When a transaction is not successfully finished DNF preserves downloaded packages

Re: Orphaning Tremulous

2015-07-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:49:13 +0200, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote: I'm orphaning tremulous and tremulous-data packages. The upstream is dead and it fails to compile against new speex in rawhide. I think the package is more or less ready for retirement, but maybe someone else would

Should generic-release issues block releases?

2015-07-14 Thread Bruno Wolff III
This is being post to remixes, test and devel since people on test and devel may not ordinarily be involved with remixes, but might want to comment. Replies have been pointed back to the remixes list (hopefully won't be munged) and you probably should join remixes temporarily if you want to

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago nethack-vultures is now rebuilt in rawhide, f22 and f21. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Improving our processes for new contributors.

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 22:38:38 +0100, Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote: 2) We now have the possibility of obtaining sponsorship through co-maintaining packages, but that's somewhat low profile and less used as a route to sponsorship (just an impression-I have no data on

Re: Sponsor shortage

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:04:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: Nowadays, I would likely shift the prerequisites to highlight the importance of - the fedora-review tool - Mock, as needed by fedora-review and used by koji - koji, the Fedora Build System I started out as

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago This one is mainly due to string format warnings, most of which are false positives. I got about half way through in about 4 hours. Most likely I'll

lordsawar changing from GPLv2+ and GFDL to GPLv3+ and GFDL

2015-07-04 Thread Bruno Wolff III
While working on the 0.3.0 for lordsofwar update I noticed that it is now GPLv3+ and GFDL instead of GPLv2+ and GFDL. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: FESCO Elections - June 2015 - Results

2015-06-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:47:22 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote: In the past the following things are usually done during elections: 1) Various blog posts by candidates and various people that an election is occurring. Interviews with all of the candidates were posted to

Re: InsightToolkit fails to build on rawhide due to missing SSE instructions

2015-05-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 13:21:19 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl s...@k-d-w.org wrote: I'm currently struggling to get InsightToolkit to build again for rawhide. Currently, the problem is that it cannot detect SSE instructions when using koji [1]. It worked for a previous build [2] and still works

Re: convert program from ImageMagick broken in rawhide?

2015-04-30 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 21:34:45 -0500, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: I was doing a test build of zipios++ for rawhide in mock and when the build for the documentation was attempted I got an interesting (if unhelpful) error. It looks like the make doc target uses convert for part of

Re: dnf interactive config file updates

2015-04-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 17:49:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Anyway, here is the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211344 I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208626 previously. You can disable it on the command line for scripting. --

Re: dnf interactive config file updates

2015-04-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 21:20:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:17:14PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 17:49:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: Anyway, here is the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: (I was wrong) dnf and removing the running kernel

2015-04-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 14:41:37 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It looks like I got burned by dnf removing the running kernel during update. Due to dracut / grubby issues only my oldest kernel was bootable. I didn't notice that the old kernel had been removed until after

Re: dnf and removing the running kernel

2015-04-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 00:35:01 +, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to writes: It looks like I got burned by dnf removing the running kernel during update. Due to dracut / grubby issues only my oldest kernel was bootable. I didn't notice

dnf and removing the running kernel

2015-04-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
It looks like I got burned by dnf removing the running kernel during update. Due to dracut / grubby issues only my oldest kernel was bootable. I didn't notice that the old kernel had been removed until after the machine crashed (I suspect because the kernel had removed, since that kernel had

Re: An everyday tale of dnf

2015-04-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 16:47:17 +0100, Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 April 2015 at 16:21, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It sounds like you might be happier setting clean_requirements_on_remove to false in dnf.conf . I often find myself wanting to do

Re: appdata validation and li too long

2015-04-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 09:16:12 +0100, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: A style warning is just that; it's going to look a little different to most other apps but with no real harm. If you use: appstream-util validate-relax usr/share/appdata/hedgewars.appdata.xml ...then the style

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400, Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote: AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things: 1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most suitable cannot be installed 2) it skips the requested package if none of its versions can be installed

Re: An everyday tale of dnf

2015-04-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:14:17 +0100, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: fedora22 [~] % sudo dnf upgrade Failed to synchronize cache for repo '_local' from 'file:///var/lib/dnf/plugins/local': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried, disabling.

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken, and in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is broken, and if not something vital, use

Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

2015-04-07 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we *really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to make such options the default I think it's much more likely there is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >