Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. It's that time again for Fedora 16. New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have failed to build since before Fedora 14. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25. Orphan gnusim8085 comaintained by: chitlesh Orphan gwave comaintained by: tnorth Hello there, I wish to take ownership of gnusim8085 and gwave. Can you please grant me the Take Ownership for the respective devel branch ? thank you, Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)
Hello there, It seems that guile-gnome-platform should be unblocked as well. thank you Chitlesh On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. It's that time again for Fedora 16. New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have failed to build since before Fedora 14. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25. Orphan gnusim8085 comaintained by: chitlesh Orphan gwave comaintained by: tnorth Hello there, I wish to take ownership of gnusim8085 and gwave. Can you please grant me the Take Ownership for the respective devel branch ? thank you, Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: 1) When you added this to F14/F15/EL6, you added a typo; this broke the F-14 branched compose and the EPEL updates push. *Please* verify your changes before pushing. Sorry I missed it 2) Aside from that... how does this merit a separate group? - We already have the electronic lab group - If we add a group each for developing for any embedded/custom board, we're going to run into group explosion really quickly Well it does merit a separate group and we differ in terms of goals. Fedora/Free Electronic Lab focuses primarily on ASIC design. We were pretty bad in terms of knowhow in the embedded environment, until Shakthi joined us. Hence our solutions for embedded tool are improving. But our FEL goal is not only provide to but also to foster a community around it. Milkymist community builds and enhance their own toolchain (currently not fully supported by Fedora). They have contributors who contribute for tools such as gcc, qemu, other libraries (too software for FEL goals). They have many patches that need to push to upstream. Milkymist founder and I believe that we can collaborate as the milkmist community is situated between FEL and Fedora, in terms of tools and upstream patch-push. It is a win-win situation for everyone. Having a separate group will prevent flooding ASIC engineers (existing FEL users) with non-useful tools. Having a separate group will strengthen RedHat/Fedora focus on patch submission for important tools such as gcc, qemu,. In short, that was it. It's sad though you can differ FEL goals from the rest. Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: 'milkymist' group in comps?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: OK, that's clear. But I am worried that if we go down this road, we'll eventually have 20 or 30 groups for different SoCs for embedded use, and that seems like it will eventually be problematic. Is there some generic moniker that could be used for this usage? To be honest that would be a great idea. But I don't know any other active and vibrant community like milkymist and openmoko alike. I suggest that, let it be like this. If it gets momentum and other HW communities pop in, we can rename it, I won't object. From a strategy perspective, let's bring forces together and show that this model works. It does, then good for us and our efforts brought several communities into our wagon. What do you think, let it be its roadmap ? regards, Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Lookaside failure. Check your cert.
Hello there, I'm having the following error with some of my packages (iverilog and perl-Verilog-Perl) since last week, even after updating my certs. $ fedpkg import /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/iverilog-0.9.20100928-1.el6.src.rpm Uploading: d004408ea595b13780c4c036f8188b66 verilog-0.9.3.tar.gz Could not import srpm: Lookaside failure. Check your cert. However, I managed to build verilator on koji somehow. Can you please tell me what it may cause this ? Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:21 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: try to be excellent, please. -sv Be excellent would be that guy to drop me a mail stating my package is being updated to a new version. This is respect ! Similarly my package perl-perlilog is now part of RHEL-6, I haven't got any email from its RH maintainer whether he cares to co-maintain it with me on fedora as well. Where is that sense of friendship Fedora once had ? This is disgusting ! I FULLY support Ralf Corsepius's comments. Chitlesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?
Hello there, I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me. Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages. It's simply disgusting !! Chitlesh ! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
